User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 11

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Musée Rigaud Tombstone 1300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of Virgin and Child in Campo Santo de Perpignan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eugenio Lucas Velázquez: "Hommes et femmes espagnoles à une tribune" in Musée Hyacinthe Rigaud.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image; obviously the only one in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 22:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
• Too bad for the frame, it is advisable not to make them appear on the pictures of paintings --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Musée Rigaud l'été 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tombstone of a horseman (1300) in Hyacinthe Rigaud Museum, Perpignan..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Musée Rigaud l'été 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:19, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Campo Santo sarcophagus 1553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'Été sans bras by Aristide Maillol (Musée Rigaud), Perpignan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragmentary sarcophagus (1553) in Campo Santo de Perpignan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope is too wide IMO. It would be better if you create a scope more specific for your image --P. Branquart (alias PJDespa) talk 18:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Nevertheless it is a good and useful image. -- Spurzem (talk) 18:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The scope is very narrow: I am sure there is no other sarcophagus dated 1553 in Campo Santo and I doubt if there is any other in Perpignan or in Pyrénées-Orientales, at least as far as my research with Ministère de la Culuture goes. If you have better information, please let me know. --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caladroy wine barrel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 4cv engine 1961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good image -- Spurzem 21:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caladroy Chapelle du Sacré-Cœur de Jésus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 17:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caladroy château from Northeast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Musée Rigaud Virgin with child, (14th century).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan two saints MHR91 20086604951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle du Sacré-Cœur de Jésus du château de Caladroy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I have modified the geocoding. The photo should be dilated in width because the upper part of the stained glass windows is actually round. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing, after comparing it to the raw file I've corrected it. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of a 1961 Renault 4CV.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Musée Rigaud sarcophagus Perpenya Blan 1344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Caladroy, view NE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marble relief of two saints, Campo Santo de Perpignan (Base Mémoire: MHR91_20086604951).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marble relief of two saints (faces destroyed), Campo Santo de Perpignan (Base Mémoire: MHR91_20086604953).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Virgin with child, wooden sculpture in: Hyacinthe Rigaud Museum, Perpignan..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragmentary sarcophagus of Perpenya Blan († 1344) in Hyacinthe Rigaud Museum, Perpignan..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 17:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medieval marble relief of an owl, Campo Santo de Perpignan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Berchtesgaden 50 Pfg 1920.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Campo Santo marble fragment AP066 20096601276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medieval marble inscription, Campo Santo de Perpignan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (pupa)-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Musée Rigaud l'été 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Musée Rigaud Faraill Primavera 1870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpnes is a bit on the low side but fine for me. --Tobias ToMar Maier 21:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Palauenc05,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medieaval stone relief with two coats of arms and inscription in Campo Santo de Perpignan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image, best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 09:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Scope should surely define the coats of arms to be valuable? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't have any better information than the "Ministère de la Culture" (see file description). The criterion for me is that the object is at least mentioned in the "Base Mémoire". But if you wish, I'll withdraw the nomination. No problem for me, just let me know. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schedelsche Weltchronik Trier 1497.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schedelsche Weltchronik Trier 1497.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reuth Nischenkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunschweig 50 Pfg 1921 Franz Abt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Fritz Quant Römerbrücke.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helgoland 1 Mark 1920 new year's flood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality: sharp, detailed, well-framed, well illustrating the subject --Stimoroll 12:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sörup 2 Mark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hildesheim 25 Pfg Kriegsnotgeld 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 20:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lippe-Detmold 50 Pfg 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magdeburg 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenach 50 Pfg 1921 Stadtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenach 50 Pfg 1921 Luthers Gefangennahme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A very high-quality scan. --Bobulous 13:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunschweig 10 Pfennig 1921 townscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Seychelles Ten Rupees.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 20:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt 1000 Millionen 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juan Montalvo Portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esch Bildstock 1623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenach 50 Pfg 1921 Wartburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenach 50 Pfg 1921 Luther übersetzt das neue Testament.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esch Wegekreuz 1653 Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esch Bildstock 1623 Detail(1)jpg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenach 50 Pfg 1921 RV Luther bei Frau Cotta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen (Thür) 50 Pfennig 1921 RV Luther.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Beaulieu 1680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aken 50 Pfennig 1921 2 Tore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aken 75 Pfennig 1921 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Dominikanerinnenkloster Sankt Katharina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen (Thür) 50 Pfennig 1921 RV Tilly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunschweig 25 Pfg 1921 Dom Sankt Blasii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen (Thür) 50 Pfennig 1921 RV Karl V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen (Thür) 50 Pfennig 1921 RV Wallenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Supermarket in recife, pernambuco, Brazil.jpg

Dear Palauenc05,

I have uploaded a new improved version in this nomination, please, take another look and tell me what you think. Thank you very much --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Wilfredor, thanks for your message. Of course, I realized that you have improved your image. Thank you for your effort, but as there are still quite a few unreadable cans, I wouldn't support it. But I can cross out my oppose vote, because I don't want to spoil your nomination. The majority have supported it anyway.

Greetings --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Please change your vote to  Oppose because I don't want to win the nomination, I just want good suggestions like yours. I really tried to improve this image, if you do not agree, I would appreciate if you would not change your vote, I love negative votes because they allow me to improve --Wilfredor (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

No, that's OK, because there is a real improvement. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aken 50 Pfennig 1921 Elbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen (Thür) 50 Pfennig 1921 RV Bach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butzweiler Wegekreuz 1819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would you please add a category about the waycross? --Poco a poco 17:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Good quality -- Spurzem 20:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biesdorf Kruchten 1888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin Reichsschuldenverwaltung 2 Mark 1914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butzweiler Wegekreuz 1635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aach Wegekreuz Krein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aken 25 Pfennig 1921 Stadtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quedlinburg 50 Pfennig RS Klopstock Denkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier 50 Pfg Notgeld 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldenburg 50 Pfennig 1921 seascape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kernscheid Bildstock Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the angle is not placed perfectly at 90 degree frontal. --Augustgeyler 11:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC) *  Support Für mich ist das Bild einwandfrei -- Spurzem 21:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC) You may want to fix the tilt, Palauenc05 --Poco a poco 20:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC) I have corrected the horizontal line at the bottom. --Palauenc05 09:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Quedlinburg, RV: Klopstock-Monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Trier, RV: Roman Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fritz Quant Steipe Lithografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good reproduction! (And a nice litograph, of course.) --Aristeas 06:36, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Oldenburg (Oldb) (1921), RV: seascape..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lithography by Fritz Quant, "Steipenbering" in Trier (Germany).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)