User talk:PaestumPaestum

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PaestumPaestum!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Paestum) - Facade W maggio 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Paestum) - Facade W giugno 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade East.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Espandero 20:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amphitheatre (Paestum) - interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Paestum) - Facade E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 09:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum), North-East view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Paestum) - Facade South - East.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum), Northern view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Paestum) - Facade W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum), Western view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Paestum) - Facade East.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum), South-East view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum), East view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum) - South view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 18:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)✓ Done XRay,sorry--PaestumPaestum 18:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum) - Interior from west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum) - Interior from east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempio di Poseidone - South view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Great shot, IMO it's a QI if you correct both verticals... --Terragio67 16:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you --PaestumPaestum 17:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better now, THX. Good quality. --Terragio67 22:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum) - North east view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capitolium (Paestum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Personally I had tried a more appealing composition. --Tuxyso 16:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Poseidon (Paestum) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempio della Pace - Paestum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capitolium 4 (Paestum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Temple of Poseidon (Paestum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 21:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Paestum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Hera (Paestum) - Northern view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems to be tilted CCW --MB-one 11:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneBetter? --PaestumPaestum 22:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The tilt seems gone now, but you need to crop from the right a bit now. --MB-one 22:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ups...✓ Done Sorry --PaestumPaestum 23:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capitolium 3 (Paestum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade N W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade S W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade s W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 20:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capitolium 2 (Paestum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of the diver in Paestum - east wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of the diver in Paestum - North wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of the diver in Paestum - South wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of the diver in Paestum - Cover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Athena (Paestum) - Facade S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe a bit underexposed. But overall good quality. --Milseburg 13:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel dell' Ovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Some surfaces of some of the white rocks are blown, but that's trivial and not the subject of the photo, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontana del Gigante (Naples).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 15:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vesuvio visto dal lungomare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 21:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel dell' ovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laquearius 10:07, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facoltà di economia e commercio - Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave Fidelis di lato a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 22:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave Puritan a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vesuvio e nave a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think some denoising would improve the image --FlocciNivis 13:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done thank you --PaestumPaestum 17:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave Fidelis a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --ArildV 13:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Mercadante a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maschio Angioino vista laterale destro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but please, fix the title, it isn't the Castell dell'Ovo. --Poco a poco 15:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I made the request. I cannot. Thank you--PaestumPaestum 16:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel dell'ovo laterale sinistro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but please, fix the title, it isn't the Castell dell'Ovo. --Poco a poco 15:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maschio Angioino frontale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel dell'Ovo vista laterale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. On first impression looks tilted, but it seems that the picture is ok and the castle is crooked. --Plozessor 17:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento ai Martiri napoletani 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento ai Martiri napoletani 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mare di Napoli e rocce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
✓ DoneThank you--PaestumPaestum 13:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC) Thanks. --Imehling 16:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Partanna - Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good sharpness, geocoding woud be fine. --Palauenc05 15:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cancello a napoli con svastiche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capitello dorico a Pompei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cannoni a Castel dell'Ovo a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facade of the Palazzo Calabritto - Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonna ionica a Pompei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
For me it's QI, but a bit too dark. Can you brighten it? --Jakubhal 05:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now? Thank you --PaestumPaestum 09:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonna ionica a Pompei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
For me it's QI, but a bit too dark. Can you brighten it? --Jakubhal 05:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now? Thank you --PaestumPaestum 09:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempio di Vespasiano (Pompei).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Any chance to brighten the shadows a bit in raw conversion? Otherwise beautiful picture. --Plozessor 11:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now? Thank you --~~~~
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonne ioniche a Pompei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonna Ionica a Pompei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonne Ioniche a Pompei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statua usata come fontana a Pompei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

Traditional German advent wreath in Lonsee, my home village

Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2024!
Joyeux Noël et une bonne année 2024 !
Frohe Weihnachten und alles Gute für 2024!

AFBorchert (talk) 08:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you infinitely AFBorchert ,sorry for my terrible delay but I am very busy at the university. Thank you again.--PaestumPaestum (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for uploading Fontana del Gigante (Naples).jpg that was selected as Picture of the month on the Neapolitan Wikisource. --Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you, very kindly,it is nice to represent my city. Sorry for the delay but I am very busy with the university. Thank you again. PaestumPaestum (talk) 18:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piccolo viaggio nelle categorie e nei template con le rendono standard[edit]

Ciao, la creazione di una categoria è semplice come crearla in una qualsiasi wiki, come Wikipedia, il problema semmai è "standardizzarla". Mi sono permesso di precederti e creare la Category:March 2024 in Apulia e se la apri con modifica wikitesto vedrai che ora contiene {{Apuliamonthyear|2024|March}}. Quello è un template, "un artificio", per approfondire it:Aiuto:Template, "per far fare delle cose in automatico" (perdona, non so quale sia il tuo livello di conoscenza di linguaggio quindi lo spiego in maniera veramente basica), che inserendola (e ovviamente salvando la pagina) crea in automatico delle nuove categorie. Quel template lo possiamo scindere in tre parti; tra le parentesi graffe ci si mette il nome della regione italiana (in lingua inglese che è la lingua franca di Commons) seguita da month (mese) e year (anno) tuttoattaccato, quindi nella seconda si mette l'anno, nel terzo il nome del mese (sempre in inglese) Threecharlie (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ti ringrazio,molto gentile PaestumPaestum (talk) 22:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Opps, mi sono accorto ora che ti serviva Category:March 2024 in Abruzzo, vuoi provare tu a crearla?--Threecharlie (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ci provo,se ho problemi ti romperò di nuovo :) PaestumPaestum (talk) 22:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Grazie PaestumPaestum (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corinthian capital at Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remains of Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman road in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There's a dust spot or editing error around the left lamp. Otherwise it would be good. --Plozessor 04:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now? thank you --PaestumPaestum 09:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)(UTC[reply]
 Support Ok now! --Plozessor 09:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient Roman aqueduct (Alba Fucens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There's a dust spot on the left side of the upper cloud ... --Plozessor 04:50, 13 March 2024
Ok now? thank you --PaestumPaestum 09:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Velino marzo 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sky is a bit noisy --Nikride 19:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,ok now? Thank you --PaestumPaestum 22:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General view of Alba Fucens as seen from the south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remains of a column in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remains of a column on the ground at Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remains of capital with Latin inscription in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remains of a columns at Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General view of Alba Fucens as seen from the east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Way in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Apollo at Alba Fucens - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via dei Pilastri in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via dei Pilastri 02 in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street 3 in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Apollo at Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orsini Castle in Massa d'Albe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Amphitheatre (Alba Fucens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Main subject a bit too dark. Otherwise good --MB-one 08:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now? Thank you --PaestumPaestum 13:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. --MB-one 14:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Zeus at Alba Fucens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]