User talk:PS-2507

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PS-2507!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Stehlik 2009.10.15 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Jovianeye 22:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009.09.23 038b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Pudelek 11:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)  Comment Needs a proper file name. --High Contrast 06:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Stehlik 2010.04.24 021.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and informative. --Cayambe 13:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Stehlik 2009.10.09 004a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments beautiful composition, and beautiful color, a small part is overexposed but with the dynamique range it can be excused --Croucrou 23:40, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Dateibenennungen

Hallo PS-2507!

Zunächst einmal danke für die schönen Fotos. Ich habe vorhin Deinen Umbenennungswunsch erledigt (File:2009.09.23 038b.jpg → File:Peter Stehlik 2009.09.23 038b.jpg), wobei ich den von Dir vorgeschlagenen Namen nicht für sehr gelungen halte (ich hatte mir schon eine kleine “Ansage” eingehandelt). Das Problem dabei ist, dass aus dem Dateinamen nicht das Motif hervorgeht. Nur mal so am Rande für künftige Dateien und Umbenennungswünsche → Commons:Erste_Schritte/Hochlade-Formular#4._Einen_passenden_Dateinamen_setzen. Alles Gute, --Mattes (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Stehlik 2009.05.09 008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok -- Smial 10:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Getreidefeld mit Mohnblumen bei Habitzheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a bit better description. 'Grain' is not sufficient. Lycaon 11:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC) seems to be Barley --Mbdortmund 21:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Yes, Barley field. Very nice colors and composition.  Support --George Chernilevsky 18:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 101 138-6 Peter Stehlik 2010.06.13 058a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (de:) Schärfe liegt genau richtig, schön unscharf im Hintergrund, formatfüllend, selbst Fahrleitungen gut erkennbar --Ralf Roletschek 15:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Google-Translation: Sharpness is just right, nice blur in the background, full frame, even overhead lines clearly visible

File:CSAD logo.jpg

File:CSAD logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Motopark (talk) 14:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 20:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011.08.13 509a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK but can you upload smallers pictures next time so it won't take that much time to load? --Someone35 17:13, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Bitte keine Dateien überschreiben

Hallo PS-2507,

bei de:Wikipedia:Fragen zur Wikipedia kam heute eine Beschwerde, dass du diverse Bilder einfach mit neuen Dateien überschrieben hast, indem du neue Versionen hochgeladen hast, die evtl. das gleiche Motiv zeigen mögen, aber dennoch definitiv andere Bilder sind. Tu so etwas bitte nicht, und zwar ganz egal, ob die ursprünglichen, von dir überschriebenen Bilder von dir sind oder von anderen Benutzern. Ein solches Verhalten anderen Benutzern gegenüber ist sehr rüde und unhöflich, und auch bei deinen eigenen Bildern ist ein solches Überschreiben explizit unerwünscht. Bitte lade also Bilder jeweils unter neuen, individuellen Dateinamen hoch. Bei gleichen Motiven kannst du unterschiedliche Dateinamen bspw. durch Einbeziehen des Aufnahmedatum erzielen. Die betroffenen Dateien werde ich jeweils auf ihre alten Versionen zurücksetzen. Bitte lade die neuen Versionen unter anderen Namen nochmals hoch. Evtl. kann dir dabei jemand helfen, frag am besten im Commons:Forum nach. Viele Grüße --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Stehlik 2011.07.29 A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 13:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012.03.24 162a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 12:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

File:FDNY EMS Mobile Data Terminals.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Wasserzeichen in Versailes

Ich verstehe den Drang von Photographen ihr geistiges Eigentum zu kennzeichnen und so vermeintlich besser vor Diebstahl zu schützen. Allerdings lenken ins Bild integrierte Wasserzeichen nicht nur vom Bildinhalt ab und sehen in der Thumbnailansicht unansehnlich aus, sondern erschweren/verhindern eine adäquate Verwendung in der Wikipedia, weil kaum eine Artikelauthor dauerhaft solch offensichtliche Werbung in seinem Artikel zulässt.

Ich habe deshalb gerade in Übereinstimmung mit Commons:Exif und Deiner Lizenz das Wasserzeichen und die Letterbox aus Deinem Bild File:Peter_Stehlik_2013.04.22_Panorama_1A.jpg entfernt. Ich möchte Dich aus den obengenannten Gründen bitten in Zukunft auf solche Auszeichnungen zu verzichten. Sie werden hier eh früher oder später entfernt und machen Dir und uns nur Arbeit. Danke! --Martin Kraft (talk) 19:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC) P.S.: Schönes Photo!

Ja, schönes Foto. Martin Kraft: Davon gibt es jetzt zwei im Grunde identische Fassungen. File:Peter Stehlik 2013.04.22 Panorama 1A.jpg und File:Versailles banner.jpg. Eine Datei könnte eigentlich als Duplikat gelöscht werden. Wobei die zweite in mehrere Wikipedien eingebunden ist, aber nur die erste die FP-Auszeichnung trägt. Ich würde die von Peter im Juni eingetragene FP-Auszeichnung in die abgeleitete Datei einbinden, aber ich finde die Kandidatur und Nominierung weder in der en-Wikipedia noch hier auf Commons. Peter, kannst du mir dazu mal bitte den Link geben? --Martina talk 21:55, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Ich finde, dass bei der beschnittenen Version zu viel verloren geht. Und auch die Höhe des Bildes ist dann nicht gerade wikifreundlich. Ich halte es daher für sinnvoll die Ursprungsversion bestehenzulassen. --Martin Kraft (talk) 01:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)