User talk:OwenBlacker

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1
Soft redirect page
#REDIRECTUser talk:OwenBlacker on the English Wikipedia

File:Wappen Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel.svg[edit]

Is there any source for this coat of arms as the coat of arms of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel? Brunswick coats of arms generally have two gold lions in a red shield, not red lions in a gold shield. As far as I know, the rulers of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel did not use a single shield on its own, but used the usual Brunswick shield together with a number of other coat of arms as it was usual in this time. --FA2010 (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Francis Drake arms.svg[edit]

It has a pseudo-reflective gradient of the type which is demanded on French Wikipedia, but may not be so suitable for English Wikipedia... AnonMoos (talk) 01:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done — OwenBlacker | Discussion 08:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear OwenBlacker,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Dexheim.svg[edit]

File:Wappen Dexheim.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Amitie 10g (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thanks! — OwenBlacker | talk 10:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 22:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thanks! — OwenBlacker | talk 22:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HRE[edit]

Hello, you did map Holy Roman Empire 1000 map-en.svg? Why in 1000? Duchy of Bohemia was part of HRE only after 1004. Even Moravia belonged to Poland that time, it became part of Bohemia in 1019/1029 (uncertain dating). This should be reworked or deleted. Thak you for your answer. Jirka.h23 (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jirka.h23: I merely translated the French-language map Holy Roman Empire 1000 map-fr.svg, itself based on the German-language map HRR 10Jh.jpg. You are right — the original German map has borders that are more accurate and clearer. I don't know if I have a chance (or the expertise) to correct that but, if you make comments on the Talk: pages (and Holy Roman Empire 1000 map-de.png, which is also derived from the incorrect French borders) plus on Commons talk:WikiProject Atlas, then someone should be able to help you correct those. I note that Hexagon1 is also from the Czech Republic, so might be able to help you more easily :o) — OwenBlacker | talk 17:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Another way could be to change date to for example 1030. Jirka.h23 (talk) 15:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed; the original map was HRR 10Jh.jpg, so File:Holy Roman Empire 1000s map-en.svg or File:Holy Roman Empire 11th century map-en.svg would be better names, for example. — OwenBlacker | talk 20:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@OwenBlacker: one year has passed and image is still not renamed? Thank you for your answer. Jirka.h23 (talk) 06:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jirka.h23: Feel free to propose a rename. — OwenBlacker (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hansa map[edit]

Hi, Kraków isn't included or badly located on this map: Extent_of_the_Hansa.png Please add it :) Thank you, --Winnetou14 (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Code issues in User:OwenBlacker/common.css[edit]

Hi OwenBlacker, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:OwenBlacker/common.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: ident-after-colon: line 8 char number 1 - Evidence: :
  2. ERROR: block-expected: line 15 char number 1 - Evidence: :
  3. ERROR: block-expected: line 171 char number 20 - Evidence: [
  4. ERROR: ident-after-colon: line 190 char number 17 - Evidence: :
  5. ERROR: block-expected: line 192 char number 1 - Evidence: table
  6. ERROR: block-expected: line 290 char number 1 - Evidence: /* , div#simpleSearch! > input:focus */
  7. WARNING: invalid-value: line 24 char number 22 - Evidence: -webkit-gradient
  8. WARNING: invalid-value: line 37 char number 22 - Evidence: -moz-linear-gradient
  9. WARNING: unknown-property:-webkit-background-size: line 50 char number 4 - Evidence: -webkit-background-size
  10. WARNING: unknown-property:-moz-background-size: line 51 char number 7 - Evidence: -moz-background-size
  11. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 52 char number 29 - Evidence: 50px
  12. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 52 char number 34 - Evidence: 50px
  13. WARNING: browser-only:ie: line 104 char number 4 - Evidence: zoom
  14. WARNING: browser-only:ie: line 110 char number 4 - Evidence: zoom
  15. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 124 char number 30 - Evidence: 14px
  16. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 148 char number 16 - Evidence: 1px
  17. WARNING: unknown-property:-webkit-column-count: line 166 char number 5 - Evidence: -webkit-column-count
  18. WARNING: unknown-property:-moz-column-count: line 167 char number 5 - Evidence: -moz-column-count
  19. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 186 char number 36 - Evidence: 1px
  20. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 187 char number 39 - Evidence: 1px
  21. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 188 char number 71 - Evidence: 1px
  22. WARNING: autocorrect-swap: line 207 char number 137 - Evidence: right
  23. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 208 char number 15 - Evidence: 18px
  24. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 223 char number 4 - Evidence: -webkit-border-radius
  25. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 223 char number 27 - Evidence: 15px
  26. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 224 char number 4 - Evidence: -moz-border-radius
  27. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 224 char number 24 - Evidence: 15px
  28. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 225 char number 19 - Evidence: 15px
  29. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 240 char number 25 - Evidence: 4px
  30. WARNING: font-family-one-generic: line 260 char number 4 - Evidence: font-family
  31. WARNING: browser-unsupported:ie7: line 275 char number 22 - Evidence: inherit
  32. WARNING: browser-quirk:ie8: line 275 char number 22 - Evidence: inherit
  33. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 280 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
  34. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 304 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
  35. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 304 char number 17 - Evidence: 4px
  36. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 307 char number 19 - Evidence: -1px
  37. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 310 char number 4 - Evidence: -webkit-border-radius
  38. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 310 char number 27 - Evidence: 3px
  39. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 311 char number 7 - Evidence: -moz-border-radius
  40. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 311 char number 27 - Evidence: 3px
  41. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 312 char number 27 - Evidence: 3px
  42. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 318 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
  43. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 318 char number 17 - Evidence: 4px
  44. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 337 char number 50 - Evidence: 2px
  45. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 337 char number 54 - Evidence: 3px
  46. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 343 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
  47. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 343 char number 17 - Evidence: 4px
  48. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 344 char number 4 - Evidence: -webkit-border-radius
  49. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 344 char number 27 - Evidence: 9px
  50. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 345 char number 7 - Evidence: -moz-border-radius
  51. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 345 char number 27 - Evidence: 9px
  52. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 346 char number 27 - Evidence: 9px
  53. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 353 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
  54. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 353 char number 17 - Evidence: 12px
  55. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 354 char number 15 - Evidence: 13px
  56. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 355 char number 17 - Evidence: 20px
  57. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 356 char number 12 - Evidence: 30px
  58. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 359 char number 19 - Evidence: 1px
  59. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 359 char number 23 - Evidence: 1px
  60. WARNING: invalid-value: line 362 char number 29 - Evidence: -webkit-gradient
  61. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 366 char number 12 - Evidence: 1px
  62. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 370 char number 4 - Evidence: -webkit-border-radius
  63. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 370 char number 27 - Evidence: 4px
  64. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 371 char number 7 - Evidence: -moz-border-radius
  65. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 371 char number 27 - Evidence: 4px
  66. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 372 char number 27 - Evidence: 4px
  67. WARNING: invalid-value: line 373 char number 12 - Evidence: progid
  68. WARNING: invalid-value: line 374 char number 12 - Evidence: progid
  69. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 375 char number 32 - Evidence: 1px
  70. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 375 char number 66 - Evidence: 1px
  71. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 375 char number 70 - Evidence: 2px
  72. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 376 char number 32 - Evidence: 1px
  73. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 376 char number 66 - Evidence: 1px
  74. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 376 char number 70 - Evidence: 2px
  75. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 377 char number 32 - Evidence: 1px
  76. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 377 char number 66 - Evidence: 1px
  77. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 377 char number 70 - Evidence: 2px
  78. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 384 char number 13 - Evidence: 5px
  79. WARNING: extra-tokens-after-value: line 384 char number 22 - Evidence: -webkit-focus-ring-color
  80. WARNING: unknown-property:outline-offset: line 385 char number 4 - Evidence: outline-offset
  81. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 393 char number 32 - Evidence: 2px
  82. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 393 char number 36 - Evidence: 4px
  83. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 393 char number 63 - Evidence: 1px
  84. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 393 char number 67 - Evidence: 2px
  85. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 394 char number 32 - Evidence: 2px
  86. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 394 char number 36 - Evidence: 4px
  87. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 394 char number 63 - Evidence: 1px
  88. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 394 char number 67 - Evidence: 2px
  89. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 395 char number 32 - Evidence: 2px
  90. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 395 char number 36 - Evidence: 4px
  91. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 395 char number 63 - Evidence: 1px
  92. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 395 char number 67 - Evidence: 2px
  93. WARNING: invalid-value: line 404 char number 29 - Evidence: -webkit-gradient
  94. WARNING: invalid-value: line 410 char number 12 - Evidence: progid
  95. WARNING: invalid-value: line 411 char number 12 - Evidence: progid
  96. WARNING: invalid-value: line 426 char number 29 - Evidence: -webkit-gradient
  97. WARNING: invalid-value: line 432 char number 12 - Evidence: progid
  98. WARNING: invalid-value: line 433 char number 12 - Evidence: progid

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 08:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear OwenBlacker,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Coa St. Gallen.png[edit]

File:Coa St. Gallen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

↔ User: Perhelion 01:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shapefile used for Provinces_of_France.png[edit]

Dear OwenBlacker,

I was wondering if you had used a shapefile to create the image Provinces_of_France.png. If so, would you mind sharing the shapefile? Any help on this front would be much appreciated.

All the best,

Carlos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosrv (talk • contribs) 15:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Swung dash in Chrome 65 on Windows 7.png[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:34, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kije.jpg[edit]

File:Kije.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Стальной Детройт (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear OwenBlacker,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Ottoman calendar – caption[edit]

In your helpful caption to c:File:1911_Ottoman_Calendar.jpg, also copied in w:en:Rumi calendar, the interpretation of the Bulgarian line has a problem. Bulgaria in 1911 was on the Julian calendar, same numbers as in Greek; only the month and day names needed translation. The number 30 must therefore be something else. The only relevant explanation for it that I can think of is that it is the total number of days in the month. To be certain, we would need context – more pages of this calendar. However it should not be stated that the Bulgarian date was 30 April, as this is certainly not the case. — Justinbb (talk) 17:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Justinbb: Ah, thank you; I'll take a look now! (And feel free to correct errors in my captions ever.) — OwenBlacker (talk; please ping me in replies) 20:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sütterlin letter W.png[edit]

Hello, could you please tell me what font this is? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: I'm sorry, I don't remember; it's 15 years since I created those images and I don't seem to have any Sütterlin fonts installed on this laptop, so I must have lost them somewhere since. — OwenBlacker (talk; please ping me in replies) 17:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¡Una Wkiestrella para ti![edit]

Wikiestrella del diseñador gráfico
Por tus magníficos trabajos en el campo de la heráldica. ¡Felicitaciones!. Atentamente: David C. S. 19:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC), Puyo - Ecuador.[reply]

File:Mandatory face coverings sign at Waterloo station, 2021-02-25.jpg[edit]

File:Mandatory face coverings sign at Waterloo station, 2021-02-25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 10:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waterloo concourse, mid-morning 2021-02-25, part 2.jpg[edit]

File:Waterloo concourse, mid-morning 2021-02-25, part 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 10:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Oberharmersbach.png[edit]

File:Wappen Oberharmersbach.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 21:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Stolberg (Harz).png[edit]

File:Wappen Stolberg (Harz).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ollemarkeagle (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Multilingual Countries Map.svg[edit]

File:Multilingual Countries Map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Oort kuipert (talk) 12:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in/contribute to a photo contest[edit]

English[edit]

Dear OwenBlacker,

We’re excited to share with you our first-ever art and photo contest for this year’s #VisibleWikiWomen, on Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports!

We’re inviting submissions of photos, illustrations, and other forms of art depicting womxn and non-binary people in sports — as athletes, fans, cheerleaders, referees, journalists, and much more. Our #VisibleWikiWomxn contest celebrates the bodies of womxn in sports by centering their voices, images, stories, and experiences in all their diversity, plurality, and glory.

You can find all the information on our landing page: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports

Spanish[edit]

Hola OwenBlacker,

Queremos invitarte a participar de nuestro primer concurso de arte y fotografía "Cuerpos plurales en el deporte" en el marco de la campaña #VisibleWikiWomen de este año.

Estamos convocando a presentar fotos, ilustraciones y otras formas de arte que representen a mujeres y personas no binarias en el deporte - atletas, personas aficionadas, animadoras, árbitras, periodistas y personas ligadas al deporte en todos los aspectos. Nuestro concurso #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra los cuerpos de las mujeres en el deporte centrándose en sus voces, imágenes, historias y experiencias en toda su diversidad, pluralidad y gloria.

Puedes encontrar toda la información en la página del concurso.

Portuguese[edit]

Olá OwenBlacker,

Ficamos felizes em convidar você a participar de nossa primeira Wiki-competição de arte e fotografia, como parte da campanha #VisibleWikiWomen deste ano, sobre "Corpos plurais no esporte"!

Estamos recebendo fotos, ilustrações, e outras formas de arte que retratem mulheres e pessoas não-binárias nos esportes — como atletas, torcedoras, juízas, jornalistas, e muito mais. Nossa competição #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra os corpors de mulheres e pessoas não-binárias e coloca ao centro suas vozes, imagens, histórias, e experiências em toda sua pluralidade e glória.

Você pode encontrar todas as informações necessárias em nossa página: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports.

Sunshine Fionah Komusana (talk) 15:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you[edit]

Dear fellow Commons photographer,

I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.

At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission![edit]

Hello OwenBlacker !,

Camera1 mgx
Camera1 mgx
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gender self-identification in the Americas.svg[edit]

Chile and Uruguay recognize self-ID for close to 3 years now, needs update 87.116.166.1 15:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OwenBlacker&oldid=866725677"