User talk:Orgio89

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Orgio89!


I am very occasional contributor from Mongolia. Orgio89 (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Orgio89,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate/empty categories and overcategorizing[edit]

Hello Orgio89, please read about categories and about how this project is run before you edit dozens of files. Specifically:

  1. Do not create categories that are vague in scope (e.g. Category:Green energy)
  2. Check whether the category you want already exists (e.g. Category:Solar-powered aircraft exists, no need to create Category:Solar plane)
  3. Do not overcategorize (Commons:OVERCAT). Categories are not tags. If one file belongs to a category that is a sub-category of Category:Solar-powered vehicles, that is already enough.

In case you have doubts, ask around. This will save a lot of work down the line. Thanks, Ariadacapo (talk) 07:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Categories#Over-categorization and try to respect our rules. If you disagree with any of them it is better to discuss your doubts in Commons:Village pump with other users instead of enforcing your own point of view. Ankry (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion deleting the categories (Category:Solar cell, Category:Solar car, Category:Technological development, Category:Solar technology) was the right decission:
  • They were not categorized and too specific to be top-level categories
  • I see no significant differences between Category:Solar cell, Category:Solar cells; existence of both is misleading, merging leads to overcategorizing
  • Category:Solar technology is limited to only few of your images; if it includes everything reletes to solar technologies -> overcategorizing
  • Category:Technological development? no reason for this category with only these few images; shoud be disputed over obout whot it is intended to contain. But if very narrow, the name is misteading; if broad -> overcategorizing again.
Ankry (talk) 08:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tree blooming in Mongolia 2014.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 10:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked for a duration of 1 month[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 month for the following reason: Edit warring after warning.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Why my image of Tree_blooming_in_Mongolia_2014.png is "author unknown" ? And please explain why are you deleting my categories like "Trees of Central Asia", "Trees of Mongolia" why these categories infringe policies here?"
Decline reason: "No reason to unblock given. But to make it clear: You didn't react after several warnings, just continued what you did before. Edit warring, adding meta-categories, and creating nonsense categories. Have a look at your deleted contributions. That's plenty for a block. Only one month block - you are lucky. The blocking administrator seems to believe you can learn. The block is valid. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

 Info Regarding your question about file:Tree_blooming_in_Mongolia_2014.png: The seems to be a problem with the collage you made, as stated in the deletion request: Unknown origin/authors of the photos, and "for Wikipedia usage only" remark in the description implies an invalid license
Use for Wikipedia is an unacceptable restriction on Commons. Further, the origin of the 6 photos used for the collage is not clear.
The category Trees in Central Asia should be Trees in Asia. The category Trees in Mongolia is fine, as long as it is used. We don't keep empty categories. Please read Com:Cat and Com:Overcat --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If me making clearly botanical study image making montages is wrong then why these photos are acceptable can you explain this?! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anemone_hepatica_var._japonica_color_variation.JPG or https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Asahidake_and_the_flowers_in_Ashahidake_2000-7-30.jpg. And I want to change the "Wikipedia use only message!" but blocking me to changing this is very strange. Plus in Wikicommons there are many images have private limited copyright notices like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sunflower_sky_backdrop.jpg Orgio89 (talk) 02:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Deeltei Mongol Naadmaar 20140713.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 19:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naadam 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 19:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

INeverCry 05:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:NaadamDeel2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Edit warring and violation of COM:Overcat (see also last block by INeverCry). Next time you will be blocked indefinitely. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back[edit]

Hi there, and welcome back to Wikimedia Commons. I am a patroller here, and hope that per your last block by Steinsplitter, you have decided to become a less disruptive contributor (with your edit warring and violations of COM:OVERCAT). Also, I hope that you stop the personal attacks against others, too. If you do not stop this behavior, like Steinsplitter said, you will end up being blocked indefinitely. DLindsley Need something? 00:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:InfiniumAtAirStrip.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ariadacapo (talk) 07:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the original link the problem is original file link and the file was could not be shown on Mongolian wikipedia so I re-uploaded the file to show it on daily news reel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Michigan_Solar_Car_Team#/media/File:InfiniumAtAirStrip.JPG 03:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orgio89 (talk • contribs) 03:40, 06 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In copying the information over, you did not attribute the author correctly, you changed the date, and you changed the license. This is terrible work. I just fixed it. Next time, please use the automated import tools linked to in the en.wikipedia file page description. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Uvul - Winter 2016-11-19.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Uvul - Winter 2016-11-19.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Uvul - Winter 2016-11-19.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to source every single photograph used in collages! Please see Com:Collages and Com:DW for more info. Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NEVER revert an admin. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The source section of the image clearly says "Own work", what else source information are you requiring from me and is that special requirement equally requiring from other uploaders?? It is my mobile phone image stitched togther so that is why it does not have metadata. Orgio89 (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Collages, Com:Collages and Com:DW. Upload the single elements and source the collage as required. You need to calm down a lot, other admins would already have thrown the book at you and blocked the account (again). --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I received your email. You need to request unblock here. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "the source entry explanations are difficult to understand so I was confused about (Own work) type of source but later after sometime found out about collaged image source entry things. Orgio89 (talk"
Decline reason: "Per below and COM:BLOCK: no acknowledgement or understanding of issue and no commitment, credible or otherwise, to discontinue problematic behaviour. Эlcobbola talk 22:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

That doesn't explain or excuse your constant(!) behavior of blaming others for your mistakes, reverting admins, and accusing others of vandalism. You got blocked for exactly the same behavior on the English and the German wiki. All I see is that you repeat the same pattern here. We have better things to do than to listen to your accusations of vandalism and the poor little user from Mongolia being harassed everywhere. You are around long enough on wikis, you should know better. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Especially those of command line instructions are not well written for people who speak different language than english. Maybe europeans easily get one anothers points since they have closer culture. So after finding some examples later I found out about the differences. On other wiki cases those are different separate issues and my whole opinions are just simply ignored by admins. Orgio89 (talk) 02:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict)

What's the reason you can do as you please and the community has to accept that? Because you can't behave yourself we have to accept your bad behavior? Because you feel ignored when you don't get what you want we have to accept your bad behavior? Because you are from Mongolia we have to accept your bad behavior? Because you have problems reading rules we have to accept your bad behavior? No thanks, if I want to see bad behavior I turn on the TV. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok your opinion rules here. Thanks for your time! Orgio89 (talk) 03:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My guess is the whole Wikipedia system lacks about clear dispute judging procedures here and due to different cultures there are a lot misunderstandings are occurring. If you check some random article especially linked to Mongolian history in English Wikipedia. You will see even tons of arguments and disputes all over. Because Chinese editors are systematically vandalising Mongolian history related articles in Wikipedia well due to some weird historic things. Just commenting about the general atmosphere. Orgio89 (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification I will try to obtain their official permission statement soon. Can you keep these for few more days? Orgio89 (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've sent the permission letter to the commons. Thanks. Orgio89 (talk) 04:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to obtain their permission letter from the owner maybe can you let the file be here for few days. Thanks. Orgio89 (talk) 04:41, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The Fine Arts Zanabazar Museum poster - Mongolia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:The Fine Arts Zanabazar Museum poster - Mongolia.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 19:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to see the museum director to get their official permission letter but she is on business trip for a week so maybe you can leave the file for 10 days. And will send you the permission letter. Thanks. Orgio89 (talk) 04:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Foods_of_Mongolia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opera poster of Mongolia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 12:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is public display poster why deleting? Orgio89 (talk) 12:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Follow our deletion requests pages, do not be centered only on your files or those about Mongolia, you will see that you will learn quickly how we do things in Commons. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 12:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion but there are too few photos related with Mongolia here in commons and from Mongolia very likely only me uploading few tens of photos per year. The Commons mission is likely prohibit any discriminations hence uploading more isolated world corner photos is likely best suited for Commons mission. Thanks. Orgio89 (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Fine arts high school students works in Mongolia 3.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fine arts high school students works in Mongolia 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright can be rather complicated for any country and Mongolia is no exception. As far as I can see Mongolian copyright generally lasts for 50 years after the death of the artist per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Mongolia and there does not appear to be any Freedom of panorama exception for creative works publicly displayed per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Mongolia. You uploaded several more images of artworks and display posters that all have essentially the same problem. By the very fact of taking photograph, copyright is established by the photographer but they may license that image as they wish but the copyright belongs to them. However, photos of other peoples artworks or photos are a different matter and the original works are copyright to the artists but some country's laws are different. So, every painting in your photos is copyright to the individual artist and require their permission as well as the permission of the photographer. The same goes for the large display posters. Unfortunately, you have not given an evidence that each of the copyright holders of the original works has given permission for you to use their work in a photo. You may possibly get the opera to verify their permission for the display posters but even they may not own the copyright of the photos they used; copyright is not necessarily transferred to the user unless by a contractual arrangement. Being on public display outdoors does not mean they are freely licensed. Just to let you know that the OTRS Team who deal with copyright permissions are quite backlogged about 60 days, so even if permission emails are sent by the copyright holders, do not expect a quick result. If an image is deleted before the permissions are verified, that image will be restored again when it is cleared. I hope this explains why your image are getting problem notices but we take copyright issues very seriously for everyones protection. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 09:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Folk tsoor musicians in Mongolia early 1900s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Offline Wikipedia Outreach in Mongolia poster.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Offline Wikipedia Outreach in Mongolia poster.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulaanbaatar book fair 2019 - 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lucifer our Lord (Talk to satanist) 15:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanjaasuren Zorig2015-10-04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]