User talk:Nunux34

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nunux34!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Au pied du barrage de Cotatay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image taken with old school settings. Like the colour temperature that leads to an greyish impression of equality of main subject, trees and washed-out sky. --Jotzet 15:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Observatoire météorologique au sommet du mont de l'Homme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Colors could be improved, crop at the bottom too. --XRay 16:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Garde-Guérin ( Prévenchères ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Perspective IMO acceptable, but sharpness/DoF could be better. I wonder why, because it's f/10. May be another focus point would be better. --XRay 06:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intérieur du pertuis du barrage de la Rouvière ( Gard - Occitanie ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Noise is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 16:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le barrage de la Rouvière (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Un peu trop de bruit, pourquoi 400 iso ? Mais qualité suffisante pour QI. --Selbymay 09:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Déversoir à surface libre du barrage de la Rouvière (2) ( Gard - Occitanie ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Étienne depuis le Guizay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality picture but description needed (il faut décrire l'image de façon plus complète, en français et en anglais.) --Selbymay 16:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC) Description ajoutée --Nunux34 17:30, 28 October 2017 (UTC) "& en anglais", ce serait parfait, commons est une banque d'images internationale. --Selbymay 18:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La « source véritable » de la Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de La Roche (Saint-Priest-la-Roche) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oppidum du Rocher du Causse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO, quality good enough --PJDespa 22:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menhir du Col de Bès (HDR).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Ceyrac (vue du ciel).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Charbonnière

Charbonnière has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 03:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tour CMA-CGM.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine de Pilate (La Jasserie).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Iketsi 14:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)