User talk:Nightflyer/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordrhein-Westfalen, Xanten, LVR-Archäologischer Park Xanten NIK 4474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Complex structure handled well (try to do something about the slight CA on the windows at left, though) --Daniel Case 19:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

WikiLovesMonuments 2018

Lieber Nightflyer!

Die Korrektur der falschen Koordinaten zu dem Bild bekomme ich nicht hin. Die Umrechnungshilfen überfordern mich. Statt der Kameraposition (51°07'43.26"N / 09°58'21.30"E) habe ich jetzt die Geodaten der Kirche eingesetzt, in der Hoffnung, dass das besser ist als unrichtige Angaben.

Vielen Dank für Deine Nachricht und vor allem:

Herzlichen Dank für Deinen Einsatz und Deine Mühen bei den „Wiki loves“-Wettbewerben. Ich, und sicher viele andere, wissen das sehr zu schätzen und sind voller Respekt.

Verliere bitte nie die Lust am Weitermachen! Mit herzlichem Gruß --Heinz K. S. (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Moin User:Heinz K. S., so geht es natürlich auch. Für diese Fälle gibt es das Template: Template:Object location. Ich hab dein Foto entsprechend angepasst. Und danke für die netten Worte, das entschädigt für den vielen Stress der Sitzungen Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 17:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2029.jpg

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2029.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 16:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Interior of Jagdschloss Grunewald

Hallo Nightfligher, es macht meiner Meinung nach keinen Sinn ein einzelnes Bild in die Kategorie die das Innenere eines Gebäudes darstellen soll zu kategorosieren. Das Bild ist über die Kategorie "Paintings in Jagdschloss Grunewald" ja in der Kategorie vertreten. --Wuselig (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Moin Wuselig, nach deiner Aktion gab es oft gar keine Kategorien mehr. Das hätte früher oder später ein bot bemerkt und Alarm geschlagen. Atamari hat jetzt alle Fotos erneut verschoben: Category:Interior of Jagdschloss Grunewald (Hauptgebäude). Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Nightfligher, dass die Bilder gar keine Kategorien mehr hatten ist sicher ein Cat-a-lot Unfall. Der war so nicht geplant. Ich versuche, beim Hochladen meiner Bilder gleichzeitig die Unordnung in der Kategorie "Paintings in Jagdschloss Grunewald" zu beseitigen, die durch unsere GLAM-on-Tour und die damit verbunden Massenuploads verbunden sind. Du und Atamari haben die Sache nicht gerade leichter gemacht, da, ich hoffe Du nimmst mir die Kritik nicht krumm, Eure Bildbeschreibungen und auch die Kategorisierungen mehr als dürftig waren. Ich finde die Kategorie Category:Interior of Jagdschloss Grunewald (Hauptgebäude) sollte nur Innenansichten, aber keine Einzelbilder enthalten. Einzelbilder, die noch nicht in einer Einzelkategorie in der alle Versionen, Teilansichten etc. des jeweiligen Bildes zusammenfassen enthalten sind, sollten, noch in der Kategorie "Paintings in Jagdschloss Grunewald" verbleiben (bis aufgeräumt wurde), aber nicht in der jetzt von Euch gewählten Kategorie. --Wuselig (talk) 21:39, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Is ja nich weiter schlimm, Wikipedia ist unzerstörbar Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
PS: Ich würde dich ja gerne als Orga-Mitglied nach Berlin einladen, aber du darst ja sowieso dabeisein.
Ich werde in Berlin schon dabei sein. Ich würde mich aber freuen, wenn sich aus der Jury noch jemand findet mir den Preis auch zu überreichen.
Bezüglich der Kategorisierung. Überlegt Euch bitte nochmal, ob Ihr die Bilder nicht besser in die Bilderkategorie verschiebt und Bilder vom gleichen Motiv in eine gemeinsame Kategorie. Die "Interiors" Kategorie ist meines Erachtens eine Architekturkategorie in die keine Einzelansichten von Objekten gehören. --Wuselig (talk) 11:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Museum Europäischer Kulturen, GLAM on Tour im Museum Europäischer Kulturen (2018) NIK 5716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Gut Qualität --Daniel Case 05:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Museum Europäischer Kulturen, GLAM on Tour im Museum Europäischer Kulturen (2018) NIK 5719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Es scheint leicht geneigt zu sein --Daniel Case 05:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Sorry, ist korrigiert --Nightflyer 20:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. --Aristeas 15:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Anliegeplätze an der Stör NIK 5638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Anliegeplätze an der Stör NIK 5632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wittenborn, Ehrenmal NIK 6002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wittenborn, Ehrenmal NIK 6000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Workaround Lions´Head from Daniel Case

Sers, ich finde Deine BEA nicht schlecht, nachdem nun der dritte in den farbliche Topf (Richtung) greift, scheint es so sein zu sollen. Daniel ist dieses WE auf einer Veranstaltung, dann ist Wiki-day am Montag (ich hatte was geschrieben, nur wieder mal den html-coder bei QI zerwuselt, ist echt schlimm hier). Commons ist in der Form nicht gedacht, Bearbeitungen auszutauschen, was ich aber gerade für wertvoll erachte. Man lernt ja nie aus....Mich wundert Deine Bildgrößeǃ Naja, ein psd habe ich für Daniel hier abgelegt inkl Doku der Einstellungen in ACR. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gST1ri7xJVqsf-Sl3c4PeYZfXplZb0jd Damit lassen sich meine Einstellungen nachvollziehen und persönliche Vorlieben direkt umsetzen. (Mir fehlt zB der rote Steinanteil, direkt im Löwenkopf). Ich sehe das übrigens nicht als final an, sondern als Arbeitungsgrundlage. Sein Sensor ist schmutzig wie ein Fußabstreifer und eigentlich ist es auch schon ziemlich frech von ihm, or just a lazy dude.... Schönen Sonntag, --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Die Bildgröße mcht Gimp, ich hab keine andere Bilbearbeitung. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hohenhörn, Chemietanker NARCEA NIK 5742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Schafstedt, Ehrenmal NIK 5750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Unterfeuer Glückstadt 2018 NIK 4400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Oberfeuer Glückstadt 2018 NIK 4414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:11, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nightflyer/Archive_4&oldid=659202273"