User talk:Nightflyer/Archive 11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a cat about the subject --Poco a poco 19:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done Gruss --Nightflyer 22:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 Support Not really what I was asking for, I added the cat --Poco a poco 10:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2783.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2784.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2785.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2787.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2771.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:22, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2772.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2773.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2775.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2776.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2776.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2777.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 07:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Risum-Lindholm, Naturerlebnisraum Wätj Lönj NIK 1916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 05:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 407, D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 407, C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 406, D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 406, C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 404, D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 404, C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 403, D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 403, C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1973, MiNr 453.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1973, MiNr 408, A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1972, MiNr 411, A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Deutsche Bundespost - Deutsche Bauwerke - 1 Deutsche Mark.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Deutsche Bundespost - Deutsche Bauwerke - 80 Pfennig - grob.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Deutsche Bundespost - Bedeutende Deutsche - Albertus Magnus - 5 Pfennig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1982, MiNr 671.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1982, MiNr 670.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 13:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1990, MiNr 874.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 13:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1986, MiNr 755.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 05:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Elpersbüttel, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Jägersburger Heide NIK 3317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Puls, Dorfplatz NIK 4549.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hadenfeld NIK 9696.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Störkathen, Teich NIK 2861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krogaspe, alter Baum NIK 4988.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What about perspective correction? Both sides are leaning in.--Milseburg 14:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done Gruss --Nightflyer 18:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC) OK now in my eyes. --Milseburg 13:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt Fiel, Ehrenmal NIK 2871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt Fiel, Ehrenmal NIK 2882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt Fiel, Ehrenmal NIK 2870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Rendsburg, Eisenkunstgussmuseum Büdelsdorf NIK 3591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support DOF issues, so a very weak qualification --Virtual-Pano 18:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Friedrichstadt, Sankt-Christophorus-Kirche NIK 4971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Itzehoe, Museumsfest 2016 NIK 2416.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Itzehoe Panorama Prinzesshof IMG 2278.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Risum-Lindholm, Naturerlebnisraum Wätj Lönj NIK 1927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenhörn, Fähre Audorf NIK 2552.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steenfeld, Anleger der Kanalfähre Fischerhütte NIK 1610.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenhörn, Fähre Audorf NIK 2568.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niedersachsen, Hemmoor, Zementmuseum NIK 2638.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Risum-Lindholm, Naturerlebnisraum Wätj Lönj NIK 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot to remove. --Steindy 15:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, ✓ Done Gruss --Nightflyer 17:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 Comment There is one more. --C messier 18:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, ✓ Done Gruss --Nightflyer
 Support Good quality. --C messier 07:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Quickborn, Gedenkstätte an der Kirche NIK 8287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)