User talk:Neoclassicism Enthusiast/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Coffeepot MET DP103144 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Neoclassicism Enthusiast. I noticed that you've made malformed deletion requests. When you want to delete a page with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok--Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 18:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
So what happened here?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
And here? That is the same file.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Piața Romană

Does anyone call Piața Romană "Roman Square"? I've literally never heard that anywhere. Yes, it's a more or less accurate translation (not sure I'd pick "Square" over the cognate "Plaza", but whatever) but still... - Jmabel ! talk 22:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Non-existent category

Looks like https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cercul_Militar_Nat_2.jpg&curid=1035188&diff=557394412&oldid=487078418 changed Category:Columns in Romania to a nonexistent Category:Corinthian columns in Bucharest. Feel free to revert, make appropriate categories, whatever you prefer, but at the moment the effect is that this is no longer anywhere under Category:Columns in Romania, which is clearly wrong. Jmabel ! talk 03:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

I was editing the categories of certain files, and here I wanted to write Category:Corinthian columns in Romania.--Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 03:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Bookshelf in a house from Bucharest (Romania).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Acknowledgment

Salut. Vă scriu această notă ca să vă mulțumesc pentru contribuțiile dvs remarcabile pe acest proiect. Dahn (talk) 10:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Cu plăcere ^_^ Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Copyrighted public works and art of Romania

Hello. Please take note that Romania does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. On Wikimedia Commons, according to COM:Licensing#Forbidden licenses it is not allowed to host content here in which commercial reuses are prohibited. This also extends to works seen in public spaces, like hundreds of buildings from Romania. Please do not upload your photos showing buildings or monuments made by architects or sculptors who are not yet dead for more than 70 years. Also, do not import photos of such works from Romanian Wikipedia. Romanian Wikipedia seems to allow unfree artworks, thus unfree architectural works must stay there for a long time.

Only a change in Romanian copyright law to remove non-commercial restriction will finally allow such public works and art from Romania to be hosted on Commons. If not, wait for the 70th anniversary of architect or sculptor's death, unfortunately. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:12, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality image nominations

Hellow, i saw that today you have nominated more than 20 images for quality images, however you can nominate only 5 per day, so I declined the 19 last because of this rule. You can nominate 5 of them tomorrow, 5 more the day after tomorrow etc. Also, don't forget to sign using ~~~~. C messier (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8A, Bulevardul Aviatorilor , Bucharest (Romania).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 16:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality, but please, sign your nominations --Poco a poco 16:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pair of Spindle Vases - OA 11090 - Louvre (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks dude! Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 11:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Piața Sfântul Ștefan, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21 Calea Griviței, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29 Calea Victoriei, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Harsh contrasts, but still QI --MB-one 15:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salon ovale de la princesse in the Hôtel de Soubise (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Strada Termopile, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)