User talk:Mysid/archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

You could use {{GFDL-self}} instead of plain {{GFDL}} for own files.

Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Keyboards.

EugeneZelenko 14:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll do that. –M.

I don't think the license is compatible, the flag should be in the PD for being a millitary insignia. --Cool CatTalk|@ 23:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a lot of discussion about the licensing of flag images on Wikipedia. I think most of the time the result has been that representations of flags may be licensed under e.g. GFDL, if they establish enough originality. (Does this one?) Mysid 10:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for svg'ing this flag. It looks nice and better than the FOTW image. I feel glad the the other image isn't lonely anymore. :) Hoshie 02:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment, and nice to hear you like it. :) Mysid 11:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright Image:R2-D2 Kenner.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

GeorgHH 11:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I misinterpreted the law. My bad. Mysid 12:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you tag my photo with {{Derivative}}? I have multilicenced it under two free licences, what else do you want? ZeroOne 22:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Lego figures are copyrighted works of art. Thus, all photographs taken of them are derivative works, and their copyright belongs to Lego. Please see Commons:Derivative works. Yours, Mysid 08:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So where do you draw the line? Should every picture of every building be tagged as derivative, surely the copyright belongs to their architects? How about a street view — if there is any commercial advertisement in the photo, is it a derivative work not allowed in Commons? ZeroOne 09:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read COM:DW already? Mysid 10:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so how about this: I changed the GFDL-tag to include the disclaimers. See the Trademarks-section. Isn't this enough? ZeroOne 13:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is still a derivative of a copyrighted work and against policy. I didn't invent this though. Mysid 19:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toy soldiers[edit]

Why did you tag Image:Soldatini cowboy.jpg, Image:Marxfigures.JPG, Image:Soldatini plastica.jpg and Image:Airfix54mm.JPG with {{Derivative}}? They are all copy of uniform, they are not original. --Luigi Chiesa 22:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See above. Mysid 08:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flagg name[edit]

Hello,how could i change the flagg name from Flag of the Kabyle people.svg to Flag of the Berber people.svg Jugurten 15:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your images[edit]

Do you care if I move all the numbers a bit down manually then? --Ysangkok 21:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I think I'll do that sometime then. --Ysangkok 09:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures showing a librsvg bug[edit]

Hello, I noticed you tagged some of the chemical compound pictures in this category. However, the PNG rasterisations of Image:Aztreonam structure.svg, Image:Diphenylalanine structure.svg and Image:Phenylthiocarbamide structure.svg look to me identical, even down to the pixel level, to the Firefox renditions of the original SVG images. So I wanted to ask you, why were those tagged? --Fibonacci 10:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look carefully you'll notice that the subscripts are not working correctly, i.e. it reads H3C instead of H3C. This is because librsvg ignores the baseline-shift property, bug #5792. User:Ysangkok has modified some of the pictures now, so perhaps all of them don't fit in the category any more. Mysid 08:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Radio_propagation_noise.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 23:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, the tag was indeed missing. It is in the public domain. Mysid 07:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My voice travels far and wide[edit]

Cool, and thanks for the note. I do, of course, put things on Commons to encourage their reuse, but I love to hear about it when somebody does something wonderful with something I started. (Should you ever need to reach me promptly, try my Wiktionary talk page.) --Dvortygirl 22:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pieni & yksinkertainen kuvanluontipyyntö[edit]

Moi. Tarvetta olisi kääntää suomeksi muutama kuva (image:No free image woman (en).svg ja image:No free image man (en).svg), pystyisitkö pyöräyttämään nämä? Koetin itse ja totesin, että ei ennen Illustrator-alkeiskurssia. Kirjasinlajiksi sopisi Berlin Sans FT Demibold tai joku vastaava (Arial Rounded ja mitä niitä on), pyöreä ja selkeä. Tekstiksi vaikka: 'Ei vapaata kuvaa saatavilla'. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 04:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hei. Tältä ne nyt näyttävät:
Tekstiä oli vähän pienennettävä, jotta suomenkieliset sanat mahtuisivat. Mysid 08:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kiitos paljon. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 07:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG[edit]

Thank you for uploading SVG-images of flags and coats of arms! I renamed some of them.--Ahonc 18:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks. :) Mysid 19:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, why have you renamed a "coat of arms" as "coat of Arms"? As far as I know, "arms" is not a proper noun and should not be capitalized. Also renaming like this causes tedious work, because the image is already being used in several wikis. Mysid 06:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But in the titles used capital letters (I ask admin before renaming). Also this is not tedious work because there are bots that replaced images in all projects.--Ahonc 16:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So all image names should have all words capitalized? :o Weird, I didn't know this. Mysid 09:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know.:)--Ahonc 15:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image turned out really nice, but its a bit purple and thats not the real colour of the glass :)! Lusitana 19:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. :( That's what I thought, actually. Should it be reverted? Or tried to further adjust the colors? Mysid 19:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you made an SVG of this patch. That is wonderful. However I have one slight request in that light. Could you add a small black border on the outer edge? That would make it better visible and more recognizable on some pages. The jpg originally had a black background and that wasn't really accounted for when someone made a PNG of it, which makes it blur into pages somewhat. Would adding a new black border be possible? TheDJ 20:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

like this version of STS-100 has Image:Sts-100-patch.jpg. Also, are you planning on doing more SVG conversions of patches? If you are, I could give you a list of sources, because the listed ones, and the images in wikipedia, are not always the best versions of the images. TheDJ 20:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comments. I've now uploaded a version with a black border, and it indeed looks better now. And yes, I'm planning on doing more of them and I'd appreciate good-quality sources. :) Mysid 22:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mysid I want to do this flag in svg, here has a vesão in jpg [1].--Ramonne 21:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Here you go: Mysid 22:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Ramonne 22:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mysid You could put the blue edge on the right side, and in another image.--Ramonne 23:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added it into the same picture. Mysid 08:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You became good.--Ramonne 15:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Flag_of_NATO.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 19:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was one fast discussion. Mysid 17:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?? Long discussions are needed when no clear information about the copyright status of a item is available. As long as the proper licensing information on the NATO logo has been provided, what kind of long discussion is needed? The issue is pretty clear: does the image comply with Commons' licensing conditions? As the provided licensing information states that the NATO logo cannot be used with commercial purposes no further discussion is needed. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 10:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, next time you should use a template that doesn't say "We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this". Mysid 14:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand, institutions like this are not always the most accurate when it comes to licensing. Just look at all the baseless claims NASA often puts in their "license" statements. Half of that is simply not true. Where they say "cannot be used with commercial purposes" they often intend to say: "we request you inform us about commercial usage". I'm not totally convinced just yet. Besides, the fact that this instantly broke several hundred articles is my biggest worry. We should always act with utmost care when so many articles are indirectly affected. TheDJ 13:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Flag of Alsace.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--Adw 21:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you very much making those vote symbols into SVGs. I was going to do it myself but never got around to it. Your other vote symbols/icons you made look great! And please feel free to add anything to User:Rocket000/Useful icon gallery. Treat it like it's not in the userspace. I try and keep it up to date but I'm not always aware of when people upload new stuff. :) Cheers, Rocket000 06:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've done that now. Mysid 22:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WestMeadowBeach_01_.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 14:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY! WRONG FUCKING BUTTON XD CWii(Talk|Contribs) 14:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Celecoxib structure.svg[edit]

Thanks for the quick update on Image:Celecoxib structure.svg. It looks great. Had I bothered to check to see if the creator of that image was active here, I would have left a message for you rather than tagging with {{Disputed chem}}. Feel free to replace instances of my .png image with your new .svg image as you see fit. Edgar181 (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

correcting conscription map[edit]

hi these countries have not conscription: (from asia: 1- Afghanestan. 2- Irag. 3- Yemen. (from Africa: 4-Tanzania 5-Ghana (from America: 6-Peru

and these countries have no enforced conscription, although the law allow this but not enforced, so we should consider their now condition and paint them blue:

1- Ethiopia(Africa) 2-Uruguay(America) 3- Chile(America) 4-Bolivia for seeing refrence go to the: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2024.html.

I do not Know how i Correct it, please correct it. thanks


Retrieved from "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:Conscription_map_of_the_world.svg"

Thanks for the update! I confirmed from CIA that Iraq, Tanzania, Ghana and Peru have no conscription; they are blue now. However, Afghanistan still seems to have, and I'm not sure enough about Yemen and the "theoretically no conscription" countries to change them blue. Mysid (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Entecavir structure.svg[edit]

I have added the {{Disputed chem}} tag to Image:Entecavir structure.svg‎ because it is missing sterechemistry at one position and inverted at the other two. Compare with Image:Entecavir structure.png‎. Can you take a look and see if you can fix it and then remove the dispute tag? Thank you. Edgar181 (talk) 13:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mysid, that is an awesome picture! I'm trying to create a pretty similar one. Can you tell me how you managed to get the gradient like that? Ciao! Simon

Oh, I just cheated a bit. Just like the description says, "the colorspace is an embedded PNG raster"; in other words, I copied the gradient from a high-resolution raster image and saved it as a PNG raster layer. Mysid (talk) 19:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Cefaclor structure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 19:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure to categorize your uploads as thoroughly as you can. In this case you left out the species category, which makes it hard to find for people looking at species specific categories. Cheers. Richard001 (talk) 23:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will! Thanks for the reminder. Mysid (talk) 08:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you make Lithuania "blue" per [2]. In legal terms there is no more conscription in Lithuania. I would do it myself but I don't have the necessary .svg processing software. Thanks in advance. Mieciu K (talk) 00:30, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! Lithuania is blue now. Mysid (talk) 08:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music request...[edit]

Do you still have appregio.ogg?

It's being considered for use on Wiki Campus Radio ... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arpeggio.ogg. Mysid (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Located - and reused in respect of Image:WCR_START.OGG, unless you have objections! (added attribution/licence) :) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

chemical structures[edit]

Helly mysid, I noticed that recently several of your chemical formulae (e.g. Image:Beta-alanine structure.svg) display incorrectly especially when they are scaled (perhaps due to a change in the librsvg?). You can fix that error by converting the text in the SVGs to paths. I also noticed an error in your image Image:Curcumin structure.svg (see the description page for further info). Regards, --NEUROtiker  19:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mysid, one of your SVG graphics was reused in combination with an unfree Commons logo. This combination constitutes a tricky license problem as your diagram was licensed under a share-alike license which conflicts with the restricted license of the logo. If you like, you could resolve this case by adding a reuse permission for your diagram for this special case to this image which no longer insists on the share-alike condition. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The SVG graphic I made is a derivative of File:Stop hand nuvola.svg, itself licensed as CC-BY-SA; I can't really modify the license. Mysid (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mysid, thanks for your quick response. You are right and I've followed the chain of reuses up to File:Stop hand.svg which was created by Silsor. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 10:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico City metro.svg[edit]

Hello Mysid

In 2008, august 25, station Tecnológico, line B was renamed Ecatepec.

Could you change the name in File:Mexico City metro.svg?

Thanks

--Sofree 04:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update! I've renamed the station now. Mysid (talk) 12:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mysid, --Sofree 23:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Converting copyrighted raster to free vector[edit]

Hey there,

I see you convert raster to vector - somehow I would like to make use of various GSM coverage map posters within Wikipeida or Commons. Instead of getting OTRS permission for free use from the copyright holders (which might be quite difficult), do you think there is a way to re-create these maps in vector under free licence? Sure it would not be 100% poster copying to avoid possible copyvios - country borders and coverage colors and a simple legend would be enough for the free versions. The original posters would be linked as data sources... Thanx for advice and take care! Kozuch (talk) 16:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

New changes in names of Mexico City Metro:[edit]

Hi Mysid

New changes in names of Mexico City Metro:

  • Garibaldi changes to Garibaldi/Lagunilla
  • Etiopía changes to Etiopía/Plaza de la transparencia
  • Viveros changes to Viveros/Derechos humanos

Reference: http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/campanas/cambios.html

greetings, --Sofree 01:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:BCDMH.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:BCDMH.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Edgar181 (talk) 16:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]



File:Poacher.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herr Kriss (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Mysid!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mysid (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Sedang.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

J Milburn (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the RMAF roundel should have a 'solid' sun, as on the National Flag. Could you please correct it? Or do you have a photo to prove your version is correct? (Milesli) 14:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is a mistake in the image, because if the «precession movement is CCW, not clockwise» when we represent it from the interior of the "celestial sphere", or if you prefer, against the sky, it becomes "clockwise" seen "overhanging". It was a pleasure to speak to you. (I'm french, excuse my english). Blogbreather (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to revert the File:Earth precession.svg to its original correct CW version as I explained at File talk:Earth precession.svg but was unsuccessful. Could you please revert to the CW image? — Joe Kress (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. It was a caching problem. The image now shows the correct CW precession. — Joe Kress (talk) 02:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Sodium laureth sulfate.png is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Sodium laureth sulfate.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Edgar181 (talk) 18:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]



The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Benzophenone hydrazone structure.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Benzophenone hydrazone structure.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 09:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)