User talk:Musicaline

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Musicaline!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Schubert - Schumann-Heink- Erlkonig[edit]

Hi Musicaline,

I'll like to check about a song that you uploaded and stated as public domain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Schubert_-_Schumann-Heink_-_Erlk%C3%B6nig_.ogg#filelinks

I would like to use the song (Schubert - Schumann-Heink- Erlkonig)in a TV show but would like to confirm with you that the song in indeed in the public domain? If so, credits or attribution would not be necessary? Or do I still need to attribute?

Thanks.

Bistro[edit]

Hello,

Pour le mois de février, les discussion se déroulent ici : Commons:Bistro/archives/février 2013, je ne sais pas pourquoi ils ont décidé de les mettre directement dans les archives... ça pourra être changé dés le mois prochain !

Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Barskiy-v01.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Barskiy-v01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 04:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schubert - Schumann-Heink - Die Forelle (1929).ogg[edit]

File:Schubert - Schumann-Heink - Die Forelle (1929).ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

SchroCat (talk) 10:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schubert - Schumann-Heink - Die Forelle (1929).ogg[edit]

File:Schubert - Schumann-Heink - Die Forelle (1929).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barskiy-v01.jpg[edit]

File:Barskiy-v01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grande rosace.jpg[edit]

File:Grande rosace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Danny lost (talk) 12:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auguste Digot.jpg[edit]

File:Auguste Digot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

90.2.92.18 19:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - June - Clocks/Winners[edit]

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Harold et l'horloge.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Clocks, in June 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France, 27 May 2018[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Earth,

Félicitations, votre photo « RNR Moselle sauvage 06.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 comme image du jour du 27 May 2018.

Pmau (talk) 06:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2^e prix Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France[edit]

Bonjour et toutes nos félicitations,

Le jury français de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 est heureux de vous annoncer que vous avez reçu le 2^e prix pour votre photo « RNR Moselle sauvage 06 ».

Cordialement, pour le jury de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France, VIGNERON (talk) 12:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmotte DSCF5679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Quite dark at the mouth but overall OK --MB-one 10:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cerf élaphe DSCF6109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daim DSCF6042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vari noir et blanc DSCF5461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarpan DSCF9051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paonne DSCF5507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevaux de Przewalski DSCF5542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Tight crop but still ok --Poco a poco 20:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laie et marcassins DSCF8387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF8630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF8668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF8669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looks fierce! How close were you to the fox? -- Ikan Kekek 10:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Oh, I was far away, safe! :-) Maybe 50 meters and above the enclosure. I think he did not like another fox coming toward to him on his right. ~~~~[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ours brun DSCF5932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, I had no idea Europe has bears --Trougnouf 01:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renards roux DSCF8627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Granada 08:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF8628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Granada 08:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daim DSCF6119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 11:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ours brun DSCF5846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. (It’s a pity that we can’t see his/her eyes.) --Aristeas 18:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ours brun DSCF5908 Profil mangeant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raton laveur DSCF9224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Minimally frontfocused but still QI --MB-one 09:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks. Musicaline 04:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2019[edit]

Bonjour Musicaline,

Je travaille sur l'organisation de la cinquième édition de Wiki Loves Earth et je cherche des personnes voulant rejoindre notre jury. Vous avez gagné la deuxième place l'année dernière et nous aimerions vous comptez parmi nous Vous pouvez retrouvez la page de travail de cette édition sur Meta

Seriez-vous volontaire pour nous aider ? Dans l'attente de votre réponse, je vous souhaite une très belle journée, Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 10:05, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Sarah,

Je suis très heureuse (et flattée !) que vous ayez pensé à moi pour vous donner un coup de main (je n'ai encore pas compris comment une de mes photos a pu obtenir la deuxième place l'an dernier

). Cependant, je crains de ne pas être suffisamment disponible cette année en mai pour être membre du jury. D'autre part, j'ai vu que ceux-ci sont hors-concours. Or j'avais l'intention de m'intéresser à une ou plusieurs zones peu documentées dans mon coin (j'ai justement quelques jours de congé, fin avril, que je compte mettre à profit pour améliorer ma technique photo). Bref, c'est plutôt non pour 2019 mais plutôt peut-être pour une des années suivantes...

Je vous souhaite moi aussi une très belle journée et un Wiki Loves Earth réussi !

Bien cordialement,

Musicaline (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhh mais si vous voulez participer au concours vous êtes tout excusée, je reviendrai vous voir l'année prochaine du coup

Seriez-vous d'accord par ailleurs pour participer à une interview écrite pour le blog de Wiki Loves Earth ? Vous y expliqueriez votre démarche photographique ou encore votre volonté derrière votre participation à WLE ? Si oui je reste à votre disposition via ma PDD ou par mail à l'adresse sarah.krichen@wikimedia.fr

Bonne journée et bonne chance pour la compétition ! Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 07:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sarah,

Excuse-moi pour le temps de réponse, j'étais un peu occupée ces temps derniers, (comme souvent). Pas sûre non plus d'avoir le temps l'année prochaine, mais on en reparlera, c'est encore loin !

Une interview, ok. Comment procède t'on ?

Cordialement,

Musicaline (talk) 10:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates[edit]

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear Musicaline, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 21:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mésange bleue DSCF6722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 12:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mésanges bleues DSCF6924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron cendré DSCF1136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support where is the another leg? QI anyhow --Poco a poco 17:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC) Comment Poco a poco, I suppose the other leg is folded under its feathers, it is a common attitude among échassiers... you can see the category Ardea cinerea standing on one leg Musicaline 18:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panda roux DSCF1202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grue du Japon DSCF1360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup gris commun DSCF1575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard polaire DSCF2604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gibbon à favoris roux femelle DSCF3618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panda roux DSCF1218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice portrait and good quality -- Spurzem 11:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --大诺史 14:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF1584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --大诺史 14:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard polaire DSCF2611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --大诺史 14:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panda roux DSCF1293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard polaire DSCF2609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang du Stock DSCF4095 - 4098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang de Parroy DSCF1009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang Merrey DSCF9557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard polaire DSCF2606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF5827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Velving Téterchen DSCF5850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF1576.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron cendré DSCF1065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Could be a bit sharper, but good enough for QI in my opinion. --Tournasol7 06:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang Ste Croix DSCF0784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:07, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF5729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF5823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Epvre DSCF5832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Velving Téterchen DSCF6138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are severals dust spots, see note --Llez 05:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. Musicaline 06:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK now --Llez 09:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Moselle sauvage DSCF4336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF5822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--PJDespa 08:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF5827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--PJDespa 08:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF5828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF5780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNR Côte Delme DSCF4926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --SH6188 09:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Arabsalam 04:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF8015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Arabsalam 04:31, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF7999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 05:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF8054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir DSCF1308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--RockyMasum 14:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir DSCF1321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF8031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir DSCF1294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moineaux DSCF1189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough, in my opinion. I would specify that these are fledglings, but I think the descriptions are OK. -- Ikan Kekek 07:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lynx DSCF0523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lynx DSCF0518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Musicaline,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Siena Pianoforte 1868.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Siena Pianoforte 1868.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Siena Pianoforte 1868.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 11:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viaduc Chavanon P1070264.jpg[edit]

File:Viaduc Chavanon P1070264.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

(note: notice added by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Pas facile de prendre une photo sur ce joli viaduc; j'y ai pensé mais pas facile à travers le parebrise. --Céléda (talk) 14:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Surtout en conduisant !

C'est sûr qu'avec le pare-brise, il y a des reflets partout. Et encore, j'ai recadré pour enlever les essuie-glace en bas et la magnifique étoile du gros insecte écrasé à droite (qui me faisait culpabiliser). ^^ Musicaline (talk) 04:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - June - Five/Winners[edit]

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Loups arctiques DSCF4948.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Five, in June 2021. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 01:50, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirabellier Léomont DSCF3884.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pélican frisé DSCF4913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:56, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pie-bleue ibérique DSCF6661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique Tomblaine DSCF0711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality, but geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 07:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. Musicaline 16:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saut du Brénon DSCF2048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soir d'automne DSCF5818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Azuré des nerpruns DSCF2655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallon de l'Ar DSCF2329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tramont-Émy P1180841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Left part is leaning to the right --Michielverbeek 06:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks for review. The problèm is that the house at left is leaning in reality. You can see that the left pilar under the house is vertical... Musicaline 06:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I know this problem. The quality is good, but it might be better to give this comment before --Michielverbeek 05:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC). Thank you for your remark. Musicaline 18:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups arctiques DSCF4948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont ferroviaire Moselle Liverdun DSCF1881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 15:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grues cendrées DSCF6010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok --Poco a poco 06:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saut du Brénon DSCF2041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A cat regarding the subject (waterfalls) would be good --Poco a poco 21:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Done Thank you for this remark. Musicaline 16:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saut du Brénon DSCF2059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
See comment on the left --Poco a poco 21:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Done Musicaline 16:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups arctiques DSCF2617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups arctiques DSCF2648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups arctiques DSCF2649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups arctiques DSCF2653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup arctique DSCF2720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup arctique DSCF2916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups arctiques DSCF6694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup du Canada DSCF5609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup du Canada DSCF5743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tramont-Lassus P1180862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 08:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Done Musicaline 18:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 09:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prieuré Varangéville DSCF8081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction is needed and the tree on the left should be cropped completely. --F. Riedelio 09:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Done Is it better or not ? Musicaline 17:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Now it is better, but the building tilts a bit to the left. --F. Riedelio 09:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Done Musicaline 05:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not really done (please see annotations) --F. Riedelio 07:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't succeed what you want, sorry… Musicaline 06:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Musicaline: I have uploaded a new version with perspective correction. If you don't agree with it, you can revert it. --F. Riedelio 07:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Thank you very much @F. Riedelio: I trust you. I think I definitely don't have the sense of the perspective… I'm glad there is now at least one correct photo of this historical monument of the 12th. Best regards. Musicaline 18:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality now --F. Riedelio 06:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup du Canada DSCF5785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup du Canada DSCF5778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF1862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF5552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support I'd sharpen a bit more, but just ok --Poco a poco 07:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF6382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF6410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF6386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 07:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand tétras femelle DSCF5157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 07:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmotte DSCF0332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmotte DSCF4966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmotte DSCF5007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 07:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmottes DSCF5000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmottes DSCF4987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prieuré Varangéville DSCF8077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs perspective correction and the blurry foreground cropping (why f/4?) --C messier 21:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for the review. I tried, is it better ? Musicaline 15:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK. --C messier 15:34, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biche DSCF0483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biche DSCF0498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biches DSCF0490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biche DSCF0507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF0035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chien de prairie DSCF0038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daim mâle DSCF2475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daim mâle DSCF2524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daim mâle DSCF0463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup du Canada DSCF6587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups du Canada DSCF5627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lémurs DSCF3239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good for me.--Jebulon 13:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lynx DSCF6712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 09:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lynx DSCF6717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF6335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add taxa name to the file description. --Moroder 17:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raton laveur DSCF0010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bisons d'Amérique DSCF6073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF0603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF0577 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Renne au parc animali--Uoaei1 05:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF0617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renne DSCF2998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 08:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup commun DSCF6318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality --Domob 05:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renne DSCF2996.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good Quality.--ADARSHluck 05:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeune renne blanc DSCF2992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good Quality. --ADARSHluck 05:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gibbon femelle DSCF5542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chouette de l'Oural DSCF5421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigogne noire DSCF6600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MaedaAkihiko 07:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigogne noire DSCF2207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

L'homme et la mer[edit]

Entre Baudelaire et Hemingway avec une description à la Prévert. --Céléda (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jolie formule !

Il faut bien montrer de temps en temps à ces fichus traducteurs automatiques qu'ils ne sont pas omniscients... Musicaline (talk) 04:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vautour fauve DSCF0311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 09:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vautour fauve DSCF0322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 09:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmottes DSCF4990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not Bad for such a short exposure time. Please ad the taxa name to the file description. --Moroder 14:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vautour fauve DSCF0264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vautour fauve DSCF0276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron bihoreau DSCF2159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron bihoreau DSCF2162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 10:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raton laveur DSCF9968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biches DSCF0465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Please write the taxa names in the file description --Moroder 03:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. Musicaline 05:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me.--Jebulon 16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron garde-boeufs DSCF2220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron garde-boeufs DSCF2241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibis falcinelle DSCF9006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibis falcinelle DSCF8966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux DSCF0625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lémurs DSCF3238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuligule milouin DSCF2120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dindon DSCF3721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chouette de l'Oural DSCF0470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oies à tête barrée DSCF1062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grands cormorans DSCF0756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron garde-boeufs DSCF2244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ragondins DSCF0517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glouton DSCF6836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Radomianin 04:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Élan DSCF8860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 09:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arot DSCF2278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ours noir DSCF6051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ours noirs DSCF8263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 09:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ours noir DSCF9877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron bihoreau DSCF2163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loup arctique DSCF0456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. A little bit too dark. --XRay 04:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir DSCF7716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcelle élégante DSCF2036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:55, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron bihoreau DSCF2167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grtek 23:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron bihoreau DSCF2182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dindon DSCF3729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Crop recommended. --Ermell 13:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC) @Ermell: Is it ok like this ? Musicaline 08:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcelle élégante DSCF2152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé DSCF9982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigogne noire DSCF0227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canard pilet DSCF6597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:29, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir femelle DSCF7863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. I would crop the right side. --Tagooty 08:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir DSCF7605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir femelle DSCF7933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loups communs DSCF1607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merle noir femelle DSCF7945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ours noirs DSCF7695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you raise the shadows and/or lower contrast a bit? I know they are black so it's always hard to see but the eye is nearly invisible on my screen. --Trougnouf 11:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC) @Trougnouf: Thanks for review. I tried to make the eye more visible but I am not convinced by the result. What do you think ? Musicaline 16:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's a lot better but I think there is still room for improvement, see File:Trougnouf's sandbox.jpg and [1] --Trougnouf 18:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC) @Trougnouf: New version uploaded (sorry for the late). Thank you for showing me. I don't have the same software as you and it's hard to get the same effects. Is it ok now ? Musicaline 15:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes :) Well done. It looks like we are both using darktable but yours hasn't been updated in a while (yours is version 3.0, latest is 3.6), I think the UI changed a bit. --Trougnouf 16:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC) I'm very bad at computers! :) Musicaline 16:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Figurines et matriochkas (1).jpg[edit]

File:Figurines et matriochkas (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Figurines et matriochkas (2).jpg[edit]

File:Figurines et matriochkas (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 00:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Musicaline

Schubert - Schumann-Heink- Erlkonig[edit]

Bistro[edit]

File tagging File:Barskiy-v01.jpg[edit]

File:Schubert - Schumann-Heink - Die Forelle (1929).ogg[edit]

File:Schubert - Schumann-Heink - Die Forelle (1929).ogg[edit]

File:Barskiy-v01.jpg[edit]

File:Grande rosace.jpg[edit]

File:Auguste Digot.jpg[edit]

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - June - Clocks/Winners[edit]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France, 27 May 2018[edit]

2e prix Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wiki Loves Earth 2019[edit]

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Siena Pianoforte 1868.jpg[edit]

File:Viaduc Chavanon P1070264.jpg[edit]

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - June - Five/Winners[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

L'homme et la mer[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2^e prix Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France[edit]