User talk:Multichill/Archives/2020/April

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Vertek 0.10 (= centrale hal) Interieur, detail noordzijde van de hal- beelden van voorouders van het geslacht van Zuylen - Haarzuilens - 20381099 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 03:18, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

File:B. Lens - Misschien - SZ31633 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Henxter (talk) 12:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Ranex 10 Band World Receiver.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ARTol (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Files from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Some files of the Met-Museum have been uploaded before. For example File:MET DP153888.jpg / File:Wang Wu - Peony - 1989.363.140 - Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg. Your files have the better file names. The old ones have the better description. Is it possible to transfer the descriptions to the new files? --RobertLechner (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

@RobertLechner: transfering the descriptions is just a matter of copy and paste. So that's easy. I only left out the permission field because the {{Cc-zero}} is already further down the page.
@Pharos and Fuzheado: any thoughts on this? It's weird that the files look the same, but are not exactly the same (otherwise the software would have flagged it).
Multichill (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Maybe don't publish "download=" from Geograph?

BotMultichill has recently uploaded some images from Geograph Britain and Ireland, for instance File:Cow Gap - geograph.org.uk - 6000000.jpg. In the first revision it logged the full URL it got the image file from, including the "download" parameter. As I understand it, this parameter is included in the URL to make it hard to generate Geograph image URLs without first fetching another page from Geograph. Obviously, if your bot were to make all the URLs of images on Geograph publicly visible, that would rather defeat the purpose of the parameter, so you might want to suppress it from the published URLs. --bjh21 (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

@Bjh21: Yeah, I can change it to something else. This was just a quick modification of the bot I used to upload images like File:Izegem Molstraat 75 - 142504 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg. Probably https://www.geograph.org.uk/reuse.php?id=6000000 is a nice option. What do you think? I still have to improve some other things and get rid of some bugs. Multichill (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
@Bjh21: ✓ Done didn't forget about this, see File:Regia House, Teignmouth - geograph.org.uk - 6000794.jpg. Multichill (talk) 16:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
File:UK motorway A167(M).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:04, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway A194(M).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway A3(M).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway A58(M).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway A64(M).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway A66(M).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway M12.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway M12.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UK motorway M22.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nathan A RF (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Tegels

Ik heb aan File:Aangifte goederen in Weert.jpg de tegel eigenschap Q468402 toegevoegd. Heet lijkt mij verstandig even de discussie in Tiles_signs voor dat ik de files in de Commons categorie `Station tile signs in the Netherlands` aan pas.Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rschen7754 00:50, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Multichill! I wonder. Do we usually delete "old" files or do we keep them? What if someone used one of the files in a book and wrote the file on Commons as a source? We do not free any space by "deleting" the files. --MGA73 (talk) 10:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
See my comment on the deletion request, no should never be deleted IMHO. Akoopal (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Transferring files to Commons

Hi! I wanted to move all files from vi:Thể_loại:Cuisine_of_Vietnam to Commons but I can either do it one-by-one with FileImporter or try the bot. When I try the bot it keeps failing. Do you know how to transfer the images? I plan just to put all the files in Category:Cuisine of Vietnam. Then they can be put in better categories when someone come around that speaks Vietnamese :-) --MGA73 (talk) 16:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Lammas, Norfolk has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


DmitTrix (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)