User talk:Multichill/Archives/2019/March

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Herhaald verzoek

Ik wil dat jij mijn filemover rechten opheft. --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Ik signaleer je dit : [1] En nogmaals, ik wil dat jij mijn filemover rechten opheft. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Deur IN boerderij "WILLEMS HOEVE" ACZ 84 Lichtbeeldeninst. A'dam - Hoogwoud - 20500226 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 06:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification

SEe [2]. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

File:A-366833 structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 00:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Categorizing by bot

Hi, Multichill. Let me confess at the outset that I have next to no understanding of what bots can do, so pardon me if my question seems idiotic. So, would it be possible to get a bot to do some categorizing of the files in Category:Images from Cleveland Museum of Art by using information in the filenames and information template? An example: in Category:Drawings in the Cleveland Museum of Art, the words in the filename before the first dash are typically the artist’s name, for example Abraham Bloemaert in File:Abraham Bloemaert - A Barnyard with Goats and a Goatherd - 1980.49 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tif. Could a bot take the name, read the information template field "object type = Drawing" and on that basis add the file to the category Category:Drawings by Abraham Bloemaert in the Cleveland Museum of Art, and create the category if it doesn’t already exist, making it a subcategory of Category:Drawings in the Cleveland Museum of Art and Category:Abraham Bloemaert? —Rrburke (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - development update, March 2019

This text is also posted on the Structured Data hub talk page. You can reply there with questions, comments, or concerns.

A development update for the current work by the Structured Data on Commons team:

After the release of multilingual file captions, work began on getting depicts and other statements ready for release. These were originally scheduled for release in February and into March, however there are currently two major blockers to finishing this work (T215642, T217157). We will know more next week about when depicts and statements can likely be ready for testing and then release; until then I've tentatively updated the release schedule.

Once the depicts feature is ready for testing, it will take place in two stages on TestCommons. The first is checking the very basics; is the design comfortable, how does the simple workflow of adding/editing/removing statements work, and building up help and process pages from there. The second part is a more detailed test of depicts and other statements, checking the edge-case examples of using the features, bugs that did not come up during simple testing, etc. Additionally we'll be looking with the community for bugs in interaction with bots, gadgets, and other scripts once the features are live on Commons. Please let me know if you're interesting in helping test and fix these bugs if they show up upon release, it is really hard to find them in a test environment or, in some cases, bugs won't show up in a testing environment at all.

One new thing is definitely coming within the next few weeks, pending testing: the ability to search for captions. This is done using the inlabel keyword in search strings, and will be the first step in helping users find content that is specifically structured data. I'll post a notice when that feature is live and ready for use.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions about these plans. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata addition script

Hi Multichill, why does the script not work for these cases: [3], [4], [5]? Thanks in advance for helping, --Arnd (talk) 06:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Looks like Ecummenic is introducing nested {{Creator}} and {{Institution}} templates with wikidata=xxx in it. That breaks it. Multichill (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - early depicts testing

The Structured Data on Commons development team has the very basic version of depicts statements available for early testing on Test-Commons. You can add very basic depicts statements to the file page by going into the new “Structured Data” tab located below the "Open in Media Viewer button." You can use the Latest Files link in the left side nav bar to select existing images, or use the UploadWizard to upload new ones to test with (although those images won’t actually show up on the site). The test site is not a fully functional replica of Commons, so there may be some overall problems in using the site, but you should be able to get a general idea of what using the feature is like.

Early next week I will call for broad, community-wide testing of the feature similar to what we did for Captions, with instructions for testing, known bugs, and a dedicated space to discuss the feature as well as a simple help page for using statements. Until then, you're welcome to post on the SDC talk page with what you might find while testing depicts.

Thanks in advance for trying it out, you'll be hearing more from me next week. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Flickr - cyclonebill - Bacon mints.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

xplicit 07:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)