User talk:Multichill/Archives/2014/August

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Category discussion warning

Fivepenny has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Leyo 00:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

File:US Navy 070210-N-7643B-079 The statue ^ldquo,Unconditional Surrender,^rdquo, which represents a famous photo taken by Alfred Eisenstaedt of a Sailor kissing a nurse in Time Square, New York City 1945, was dedicated to the city.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnolia677 (talk) 03:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Docville Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 11:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

"Way back when" query

Hi, this file en:File:Dactylorhiza-majalis-web.jpg refers to the fact it was downloaded from nl: wikipedia back in 2004! Is there a way to check if this file existed on nl: wiki & what the info was on it? Thanks in advance. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hm, I guess "no"? I'll note it for deletion. Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Question about copyright

Hi,

I'm wondering about the Creative Commons license. I want to use part of a portrait of a photograph from 1901 in a piece of art I am creating. It is under the creative commons license. I am not sure how to provide a link to the license, and give credit to the author, etc. etc....

The image was found on wikimedia commons and the description is below:

Opera singer Marguerita Sylva, The Princess Chic. Performing arts poster by The U.S. Lithograph Co., Russell-Morgan Print, Cincinnati & New York, 1900.

Thank you!

Dana

You're talking about this image?
Looks like it's in the public domain already. I'd suggest you use the really high resolution version from the Library of Congress, you could use "copyright 1900 by The U.S. Printing Co., Russell-Morgan Print, Cincinnati & New York." as a note, but you don't have to do that.
Good luck with it, I hope it turns out nice! Multichill (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Toolserver gestopt

Hallo Multichill, je hebt destijds Template:Spaarnestad-source aangemaakt waarbij via toolserver.org de juiste URL bepaald wordt. Sinds kort is de toolserver vervangen door tools.wmflabs.org maar dat werkt voor dat sjabloon (nog) niet voor de bijna zeshonderd foto's waar dat sjabloon gebruikt wordt. Klik bijvoorbeeld maar eens op de link achter 'Source' bij deze foto. Mogelijk speelt iets soortgelijks ook bij andere sjablonen van jou (ik zie er hier duizenden pagina's met een URL naar 'jouw' deel op de toolserver) al hoeven die niet allemaal nu al kapot te zijn. Kun je daar eens naar kijken? - Robotje (talk) 11:48, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo? - Robotje (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hallo? - Robotje (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
File:WLANL - Ritanila - IMG 2584 Terugkeer van den Ooievaer, Theo Hoytema.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

File:WLANL - Ritanila - IMG 2582 Terugkeer van den Ooievaer, Theo Hoytema.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

File:IMG 0482 - Flickr - Al Jazeera English (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)