User talk:Mliu92/archive01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mliu92!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Issue[edit]

Hi. Your image of population density has Colorado and Wyoming switched. You may want to update the image. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Population_Scaled_US_Map.svg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 153.90.118.166 (talk) 17:35, 04 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've uploaded a new version to fix the mixup. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hello. Can you please check out this request whenever you find sometime, or recommend someone who is capable of doing this if you have no experience dealing with sth like this. Thank you!باسم (talk) 08:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rutgers athletics logo.svg[edit]

File:Rutgers athletics logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

128.6.37.250 19:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Korean People's Army[edit]

Is it possible for you to create File:Flag of the North Korean People's Army.svg using File:Flag of the Korean People's Army Ground Force.svg based on this: [1]. Korean text is "조국의통일독립과" on top and "인민의자유와행복을위하여" on the bottom. Also, ignore the emblem below the 4.25.

Is it also possible to set the same file to be created to be set as the flag to be used in the page Korean People's Army Ground Force?

Is it also possible for File:Flag of the Korean People's Navy.svg and File:NKAF flag.svg to be created based on the requested File:Flag of the North Korean People's Army.svg? For Korean People's Navy [2] and for Korean People's Air and Anti-Air Force [3]. --Migs005 01:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Migs005: Hi, sorry for the late reply. I haven't been ignoring the request but have been a little bit confused, since it seems like this request is identical to the flags I worked on last year. These are the flags I worked on:
  • KPA
    KPA
  • KPAGF
    KPAGF
  • KPAN
    KPAN
  • KPAF
    KPAF
If these are not correct, or require further corrections, please let me know. I know that, looking at them, at least one of these had the font updated after I published the initial version. The source I used for the flags were the existing representations on Wikimedia and a high-resolution raster file which wasn't complete. The Hangul looks correct to me but I'm not literate in Korean.
Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't notice that you already have those files already. I think these files could be updated using the new KPA flags files and with an updated font. Also, the Hangul on your files is correct. --Migs005 01:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

en:File:Alphago logo.svg[edit]

The administrator depicted the logo as unfree in US and UK. Shall you delete File:Alphago logo Reversed.svg, File:Alphago logo Outlines.svg, and File:Alphago logo Original.svg from Commons? --George Ho (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

George Ho (talk) 10:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:CRI&P E7A 641 with The Rocky Mountain Rocket at Chicago's Englewood Union Station on April 21, 1965 (23849311573).jpg[edit]

File:CRI&P E7A 641 with The Rocky Mountain Rocket at Chicago's Englewood Union Station on April 21, 1965 (23849311573).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:CRIP 42 (F2A) passing Joliet Union Station on October16, 1966 (22394059565).jpg[edit]

File:CRIP 42 (F2A) passing Joliet Union Station on October16, 1966 (22394059565).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR&IP 46 at Ottawa, IL in July 1963 (21771304064).jpg[edit]

File:CR&IP 46 at Ottawa, IL in July 1963 (21771304064).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ford Bridge Schematic open-close.gif[edit]

That's a beautiful animation of the old bridge. As I was watching it, I started to feel as though it might be a little less "busy" if it paused for just a second (maybe less) on the terminal frames of the movement... what do you think? lol --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 01:16, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Junkyardsparkle: Agreed, updated, and thanks for the suggestion! Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:0777 Mazingers (13324333273).jpg[edit]

File:0777 Mazingers (13324333273).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

G I Chandor (talk) 02:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paper of the day left behind (14832041567).jpg[edit]

File:Paper of the day left behind (14832041567).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Julle (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request to improve my uploaded image[edit]

Hiǃ I uploaded this image of the coat of arms of the Norwegian Military Academyː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Norwegian_Military_Academy.svg
As you can probably see, the edges of the image does not look good. Could you erase the background, making it a vector image?

Thank you in advanceǃ -- Arntor 26 November 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arntor (talk • contribs) 13:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunshine for the evening (14831918140).jpg[edit]

File:Sunshine for the evening (14831918140).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mitte27 (talk) 05:00, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hello.

If you are interested and have the time, would you like to look at my requests I put in Commons:Graphic Lab/Map workshop: Time zone maps of Europe.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 09:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jhsdc mural1.png[edit]

File:Jhsdc mural1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for edditing File:Sheffield_Area_1950.svg[edit]

Hey, I wanted to say sorry to corrected the file discussed in Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Can_the_labeling_of_this_diagram_be_fixed_at_all?, after you said you will do it, I was a bit unpolite. You did a great work, I just wanted to repair the file, since I knew how to repair it without redrawing.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JoKalliauer: I did not take offense. I redrew the map not just to resolve the bug but so that I could practice editing radius curves. Thank you for fixing the original file and pointing out the font kerning bug, which also affects the station names in Caltrain map.svg - would it be possible for you to fix this one as well? I tried by redrawing it three years ago and gave up. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Caltrain_map.svg
I took the old version of 2006, or should I take (your version) the actual one? (I don't mind)
I noticed you made some text bold, I can add also this also to "my/ChrisRuvolo" version.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 23:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Johannes Kalliauer! It looks fine as it is. I have a bias against the readability of angled text, but that's a personal bias and not a very rational one. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According to Commons:Overwriting_existing_files (Commons_talk:Avoid_overwriting_existing_files) I decided to make a new version: File:Caltrain_map_horizontal.svg  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 23:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald Trump tweet 2017-06-14 at 0548.png[edit]

File:Donald Trump tweet 2017-06-14 at 0548.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AEM-7 categories[edit]

I don't think there's any need to create separate categories for individual AEM-7 locomotives (except for #915, because it has become a museum piece). Separating into these subcategories doesn't provide any benefit, and in fact makes it more difficult to find useful images. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It's one thing if the individual locomotives are uniquely decorated, like the PCCs in San Francisco, but the AEM-7s of Amtrak are mostly indistinguishable if the number is covered up. I've "reverted" the change by copying the files back out into the parent category. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I can go ahead and delete the individual categories, then (and same with the MARC AEM-7 cats) unless you have strong objections. It may be worth making a category for #945; it sounds like it's headed for the Illinois Railway Museum. (Sorry about the roll back, btw - Commons loads weirdly on mobile and it's easy to accidentally hit rollback instead of diff). Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - according to Trains it sounds like IRM is getting 945, but I don't have access behind that paywall (and the other sources available through Google all point to amateur/railfan YouTube videos showing 945 en route). Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 20:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Embarcadero Freeway T-shirt (5152315497).jpg[edit]

File:Embarcadero Freeway T-shirt (5152315497).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caltrain Platform (135822931).jpg[edit]

File:Caltrain Platform (135822931).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oh, and dressed up, @SeashoreTrolley shirt and cable car earrings -D (29273524174).jpg[edit]

File:Oh, and dressed up, @SeashoreTrolley shirt and cable car earrings -D (29273524174).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Category:SVG symbols of municipalities in XXX Prefecture[edit]

Please move Category:SVG symbols of municipalities in XXX Prefecture back to Category:SVG emblems of municipalities in XXX Prefecture. Ideally, within Category:Symbols of municipalities in XXX Prefecture (should be empty but right now they're full of emblem files) there should be 2 subcategories: Category:Emblems of municipalities in XXX Prefecture and Category:Flags of municipalities in XXX Prefecture; and within each of them the corresponding SVG subcategory. Category:Symbols of municipalities in Kagoshima prefecture is an example. Also, if you had time, please move the files within Category:Symbols of municipalities in XXX Prefecture to the subcategory Category:Emblems of municipalities in XXX Prefecture. There are just too many to move. Thank you. --Xeror (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Xeror: Please check c:Category:Symbols of municipalities in Hyogo prefecture to see if this meets what you are describing above. I read the request above as saying the structure should be:
  • Symbols of municipalities in XXX Prefecture (meta category only using {{metacat}}, should contain no files)
    • Emblems of municipalities in XXX Prefecture
      • SVG emblems of municipalities in XXX Prefecture
    • Flags of municipalities in XXX Prefecture
      • SVG flags of municipalities in XXX Prefecture
    • Symbols of YYY, XXX (specific sub-categories for major municipalities named YYY in XXX Prefecture)
Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 14:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, exactly. Although IMHO Symbols of YYY aren't necessary, probably won't work for Tokyo Metropolis and too much work to me. Thanks for pointing out c:Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot to me. I didn't know that existed. And thanks for helping me to organize the categories. Cheers, --Xeror (talk) 16:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic: when you vectorize an emblem, could you name it Emblem of <City/Town/Village>, <Prefecture>.svg? Or even request to rename the old ones? "Chapter" has been a mistranslation used in many file names because of the shared same kanji of both words in Japanese. I've been requesting to rename them back to "Emblem" restlessly and some of the requests even got rejected lol. Cheers, --Xeror (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transbay Tube Route (1).svg[edit]

Would you be able to edit this image to more accurately show the approach to San Francisco? Google Maps isn't quite correct; the tube actually curves out of Emabarcadero and passes directly underneath the transition structure. I believe the route shown on openrailwaymap is correct. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: I redrew it and the image that's being used on the Transbay Tube article. Thanks, the routing on OpenRailwayMap makes more sense. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:North Beach Banksy (4584984213).jpg[edit]

File:North Beach Banksy (4584984213).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth K. Joseph and other Muni images[edit]

I encourage you to be a bit more selective when transferring flickr images of Muni streetcars, especially those by Elizabeth K. Joseph. We have more than enough good images of almost every Muni heritage streetcar (mostly thanks to your efforts!); indiscriminately adding more images, especially those of mediocre quality, doesn't really have any benefit for Commons. Would you be offended if I pared down some of the images of #496 that you transferred in late February? A number of them are weird interior shots or too distant to be much use. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: Not at all - please prune images as you see fit. I tend to err on the side of inclusiveness, but after trying to organize Buildings in Chinatown, San Francisco, to say nothing of my own flickr account (same username), I understand what a huge task it is to keep a database of images organized. Thanks again for your contributions. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thanks for not minding! I've done some trimming. By the way, I recently created Category:San Francisco Municipal Railway in 2018 (and most everyother year as well); it'd be awesome if you can add those when you upload. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll add c:San Francisco Municipal Railway in 20xx when I find images from here on out. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 13:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bayshore Cutoff map.svg[edit]

You've done a really nice job on this. However, I'm not sure about some of the station locations. You have Valencia too far to the west - at Dolores rather than Valencia - and Elkton too far north (it was at Ocean Avenue). Oceanview was at Sickles, and Rup near Naglee; Rup was mostly a freight station without regular passenger service. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! This makes a lot more sense, spacing-wise, as well. I based the locations on the tiny illustration in Hofsommer (Hofsommer, Don L. (1986) The Southern Pacific: 1901 – 1985, College Station: Texas A&M University Press, p. 18 Retrieved on 20 May 2018. ISBN: 978-1-60344-127-8. ), which necessarily omits details of the street grid. The image has been updated with your corrections. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great! My source is When Steam Ran on the Streets of San Francisco which is a bit hard to find, but highly recommended. The David Rumsey collection also has a number of old maps that may be helpful. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for your help. I had an opportunity to see the Roundhouse today (an official tour was being given by Universal Paragon, the current owner of the Bayshore Yard and landfill) and spoke with Cris Hart (sanfranciscotrains.org) and Walter Boland (son of Fred Boland, http://wx4.org/sp_employees/pages/people/boland/bio.html) ... I guess that makes me a little bit of a foamer. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 03:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muni Metro with CS.svg[edit]

I didn't realize that File:Muni Metro with CS.svg was also your map! You did a fantastic job. Could I ask for a couple of tweaks to it?

Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: Thanks for the tweaks - as you can tell from the history of that file, it takes a lot of iterations to get it right. I didn't realize that so many stations had been closed since 2016; I occasionally ride with my kids from Wawona/46th (free parking on Sloat!) to Embarcadero and it sure feels like we stop at every. single. intersection. The in-progress construction picture at Irving & 6th also looks like a high platform will be built. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 14:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! The L Taraval project is quite an undertaking. I did miss one - en:Taraval and 19th Avenue station will also be getting high-level platforms. This 2014 document lists the 6th Avenue high-levels as possible, but I don't know if the plan has changed since. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Taraval & 19th has been included, and I relocated West Portal's label into some unused white space. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 23:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mliu92/archive01&oldid=304914043"