User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 10 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--19:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bath 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo Mayor 2015 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 249 - Ajuria threshing machine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
please rename, otherwise ok --Plozessor 18:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 250 - Ajuria threshing machine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture could be a bit sharper but is ok. Filename is not, please rename it. --Plozessor 18:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 251 - Ajuria threshing machine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
please rename, otherwise ok --Plozessor 18:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jameos del Agua 2022 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO, it perspective should be corrected. --C messier 21:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks for looking, perspective tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 14:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMHO, tilted a bit CCW. --C messier 21:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks for looking, rotated. Thanks. Mike Peel 14:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Bath 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective overcorrected and (I think) a big dust spot (upper right corner) --ArildV 14:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review and clarifications, perspective tweaked and spot cloned, does that look better? Thanks. --Mike Peel 20:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. Thank you --ArildV 20:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI imo. --ArildV 14:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chester Zoo 2016 021 - Banteng.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chester Zoo 2016 035 - Oakfield Manor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chester Zoo 2016 036 - Oakfield Manor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collared Dove at Tenerife 2023 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dyrham Park 2018 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dyrham Park 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catalyst - gate valve 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dyrham Park 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Centro de Visitantes Telesforo Bravo 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Centro de Visitantes Telesforo Bravo 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Centro de Visitantes Telesforo Bravo 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dyrham Park 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment geocode would be useful --Imehling 15:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Imehling: Thanks for looking, object coordinate added (from the parent category). Thanks. Mike Peel 16:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 17:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collared Dove at Tenerife 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Crescent, Bath 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Lincoln's Inn 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pi bot and GridEngine

Apparently Pi bot is still using GridEngine, which the WMF is planning to disable soon, see phab:T319967. (I don't know anything about it, I'm just leaving you a note here because I recognised the name and saw that it had been classed as "unreachable") - Nikki (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikki: Thanks for letting me know! I'll look into this...! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Picture is ok but needs better filename. --Plozessor 06:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilt/perspective needs some fine tuning. --C messier 20:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks for looking, I've had another go at the perspective, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:43, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK. --C messier 18:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:43, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 120 - Alocasia odora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Not really sharp. Also would need a more specific filename. --Plozessor 06:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened, renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 045 - Central Fire Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could be sharper, and needs better filename. --Plozessor 06:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened, renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Centro de Visitantes Telesforo Bravo 2023 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Would be better with the full plate though. --Plozessor 06:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 125 - At Supertree Grove.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems a bit tilted. Also the shadows could be brighter. --Plozessor 10:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, rotated, brightened. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 20:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Centro de Visitantes Telesforo Bravo 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demolition of the Grosvenor Hall of Residence 2015 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demolition of the Manchester Precinct Centre 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demolition of the Manchester Precinct Centre 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 360 - Drago Centenario Tacoronte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Would need perspective correction and a more specific filename. --Plozessor 06:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Perspective tweaked, but this is looking up at a tree canopy, I can't get verticals perfectly straight. File renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 12:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Y, now it's good! --Plozessor 13:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 348 - Mesa del Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but please give it a more specific filename. --Plozessor 06:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please check again the perspective correction. --C messier 19:47, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks for looking, rotated and perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now it is overcorrected. --C messier 17:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: with rotation or perspective? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Probably both, but the perspective is surely overcorrected (in both sides the verticals lean out) --C messier 21:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks, I've had another go, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 13:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality; as usual I suggest a more specific filename. --Plozessor 08:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, maybe make the filename a bit more specific. --Plozessor 06:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, could need a more specific filename. --Plozessor 06:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolsa do Café, Santos 2017 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 19:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rudyard Lake Steam Railway 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, filename could be more specific. --Plozessor 06:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Florencio Sánchez, Montevideo 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Florencio Sánchez, Montevideo 2017 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2019 227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to get the recent changes in a Wiki?

Hi Mike, can you give me a hint how i can get the recent changes (maybe even filtered) in a Wiki? I need it for my Bot and your Pi Bot seems work with it. Thank you in advance... --Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 11:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aschroet: Have a look at pywikibot documentation, particularly pagegenerators.RecentChangesPageGenerator and also NewpagesPageGenerator. The latter is what the new biographies script uses (line ~665). (For the work Pi bot does here on Commons, though, it uses nightly database queries.) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a José Enrique Rodó 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
do we need all the noms? --Charlesjsharp 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp What do you mean? --Plozessor 14:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder why people nominate so mnay of essentailly the same image. Looks like a way to accumulate more QIs. Do these images serve any purpose? I don't think so. --Charlesjsharp 12:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the question is if these similar images should all be in Commons in the first place. But I don't see why pictures that are in Commons should not be nominated for QI if they are good, whether they are similar to other images or not. --Plozessor 05:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Will you be reviewing any of them, please? Suggest the discussion should be on the talk page. Thanks. Mike Peel 12:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This has a bit CA at the top of the monument. Otherwise it is not razor sharp but acceptable. --Plozessor 14:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a José Enrique Rodó 2017 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 326 - view of the beachfront from Parque Roberto Mário Santini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Two dust spots to be removed and a more precise file name would be welcomed. --C messier 21:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks for looking, I've tried to remove the dust spots, and have renamed the file. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 22:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demolition of the Grosvenor Hall of Residence 2015 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Carlos 2018 183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2019 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted, look at the see horizon --Poco a poco 19:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted --Poco a poco 19:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good IMO. --JiriMatejicek 09:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good IMO. --JiriMatejicek 09:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment No issue with the promotion, but the filename "At Tenerife" somehow doesn't match the actual subject "Ford Mondeo Mk4 hatchback". --Plozessor 10:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Any chance to recover the shadows (under the roof) a bit? --Plozessor 05:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes! --Plozessor 19:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A little bit too dark, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I'm not the biggest fan of this crop, but technical quality is good. --MB-one 10:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check for CAs (at the branches). --XRay 05:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@XRay: Thanks for looking, CAs tweeked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Yes, thank you. --XRay 05:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 181 - Bust of Catulo da Paixão Cearense.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support This is ok but please give it more specific filename. --Plozessor 17:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 16:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 314 - road to Mesa del Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is ok but please give it a more specific filename. --Plozessor 19:41, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Slightly overprocessed smartphone picture, but just about acceptable IMO. --Plozessor 19:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Florencio Sánchez, Montevideo 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a José Enrique Rodó 2017 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Acceptable at 3MP, though not as good as I would expect from an APS-C camera at ISO 100. --Plozessor 19:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Wish you a very happy Christmas! :-) Haoreima (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Carlos 2018 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 195 - Busto de Juscelino Kubitschek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, please give it a better filename. --Plozessor 05:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is a bit noisy and a bit dark and lacks sharpness. Maybe all of that can be fixed with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, brightened, sharpened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, now it's too much denoised, check the trees. --Plozessor 09:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've had another go, backing off on denoising, but the background trees aren't in focus. --Mike Peel 09:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx, I think now it's an acceptable compromise. --Plozessor 11:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sorry, but this is too noisy and lacks sharpness. Unfortunately many of your images, @Mike Peel, are far below what I'd expect from conditions (camera, ISO, exposure time). Maybe there's a flaw in your RAW conversion process or camera settings. --Plozessor 05:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened and denoised, but I think the focus was slightly off here. The older photos I post here were taken with a superzoom lens, which unfortunately degraded image quality in all but the best light, but ones from the last 2 years are with a new lens so should generally be better. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks for explanation. Now this one is just about acceptable. --Plozessor 09:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you get that sharper? --Plozessor 19:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Acceptable now. --Plozessor 07:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please think about the verticals, left part is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 07:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Michielverbeek: Verticals tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
QI now --Michielverbeek 07:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demolition of the Manchester Precinct Centre 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment A bit noisy, isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs 10:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for looking, noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looks good now. --Plozessor 09:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:10, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Carlos 2018 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Thi 21:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 057 - Vitória de Samotrace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, should have more specific filename referring to the actual object. --Plozessor 12:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you crop the remains of the building at the top right border? --Poco a poco 12:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Thanks for spotting that, cropped. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 182 - Bust of Catulo da Paixão Cearense.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, maybe make the filename more specific. --Plozessor 05:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 09:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a José Enrique Rodó 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Right windows haven't vertical lines. --Sebring12Hrs 19:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for looking, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes ! Thanks. --Sebring12Hrs 22:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The building is a little bit leaning. I find it disturbing. --Sebring12Hrs 10:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for looking, tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better now. --Sebring12Hrs 22:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO the image is leaning out. Automobiles at the left, right and bottom are cropped. And it's a little bit dark. --XRay 06:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@XRay: Thanks for looking. PC tweaked, but I think it was close? Left and bottom cropped, but I can't see a good crop for the right. Brightened. How does it look now? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only a very weak  Support. It's better, but not more. --XRay 07:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a José Enrique Rodó 2017 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Fuerte de Adeje 2020 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Adeje 2020 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Playa de las Américas 2020 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2023 033 - Bananas at Parque del Drago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, filename should be more descriptive. --Plozessor 05:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FM promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Mesa del Mar waves 2.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Mesa del Mar waves 2.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mir replica at Cite de l'Espace 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Berkeley BART station 2016 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks tilted --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looking better --Poco a poco 20:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 13:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit noisy in the shades. I'd also clone out the branches on the top --MB-one 13:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MB-one: Thanks for looking, I had to crop a bit and then clone the rest of the branches out, also denoised. How does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better. Thanks --MB-one 13:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QIC candidates

Hello Mike! I've seen that a lot of your QIC have names like "At ...". The filenames should be better than "At Barcelona" and so on. Please have a look to the issues found too. Thank you. --XRay 💬 06:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:At Tenerife 2019 619.jpg is QIC (since yesterday). The sharpness should be better. And please have a look to the perspective. The street lights at the right and the left are disturbing. --XRay 💬 06:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@XRay: Thanks for nominating them! I've tweaked that image. With the filenames, I'm happy to rename them individually on request, and I don't mind others renaming them either, but I'd rather spend time catching up on the backlog of files to categorise (all 28k of them... categories like Category:Tenerife aren't so good!), and ones to get ready to upload (~25k photos to sort through)... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit of sharpening would help --Poco a poco 10:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, sharpened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI now to me --Poco a poco 20:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Nominated already. --Sebring12Hrs 18:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Duck 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Duck 2018 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 15:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 22:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (maybe a bit underexposed). --C messier 09:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fire Fighter ship, Long Island 2018 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fire Fighter ship, Long Island 2018 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:At Jardin de Cactus 2022 074 - Euphorbia caput-medusae.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Jardin de Cactus 2022 074 - Euphorbia caput-medusae.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 620 - El Puntero plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, please give it a better filename. --Plozessor 17:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, please give it a better filename. --Plozessor 17:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 074 - Euphorbia caput-medusae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fire Fighter ship, Long Island 2018 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2023 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMHO, some crop to the left (where is a cropped flower) is needed. --C messier 20:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks for looking, cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMHO, it needs a tighter crop to the right so as the front of the truck isn't visible. --C messier 20:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Thanks for looking, cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --IM3847 14:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 720 - Lo Divino (Fran Concepción).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is ok, please rename it to something more specific --Plozessor 05:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Duck 2018 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Duck 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jameos del Agua 2022 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 10:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, I saw that you reviewed my pictures on QI, and declined them: File:Pic de Pian et pic de l'Arche, Hautes-Alpes.jpg, File:Pic de l'Arche, Hautes-Alpes, 39.jpg, and File:Pic de l'Arche, Hautes-Alpes, 43.jpg. Is there anything I can do to improve them? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Yes, sorry, they are good compositions but they are all very soft/nothing in them is sharp. I'm not sure if it's a focus problem or something else going on (@Plozessor: was suggesting post-processing issues on another of your nomination), but it seems to be a general issue with this photo set. The basic camera settings look reasonable, perhaps check the other settings you're using, and if the camera is finding the right things to focus on. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Adeje 2020 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Thi 12:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Almería 2022 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 12:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks tilted, see background --Poco a poco 17:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, rotated so the background is right, I guess Outono must have been tilted like this. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2023 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 00:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:At Chester Zoo 2023 019 - Komodo Dragon (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Chester Zoo 2023 019 - Komodo Dragon.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 006 - Emigrantes by Lasar Segall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, filename could be more specific. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 089 - Nascer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, filename could be more specific. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 007 - Homenaje a Suso Machín (Silverio López).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, filename should be more specific --Plozessor 06:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Background is slightly leaning out but that is IMO not an issue as the subject is the tree. --Plozessor 06:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Duck 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Royal Arcade, London 2023 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Royal Arcade, London 2023 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me, but narrow cut.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Draceane 20:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Almería 2022 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Fuerte de Adeje 2020 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Able to verify the info? Don't think this registration belongs to Singapore of its Air Force. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: In File:At East Coast Park, Singapore 2023 183.jpg you can see tail number 710, which led me to [1] saying 'Republic of Singapore Air Force ' delivered in 1993, and 'Test Registration PH-LXY' - although I didn't notice 'Test' before, not sure what that means. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Test registrations are use by the manufacturer prior to delivery to its customer for w:Flight tests. So I believe that after the delivery to the Republic of Singapore Air Force, this registration is no longer used. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: Ah, I see. Feel free to change the category as needed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catalyst building 2015 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Adeje 2020 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Isn't the stage both blurry and noisy? --Plozessor 05:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Tweaked with both noise and sharpness, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Still a bit blurry at full resolution, but acceptable now! --Plozessor 05:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

File:Bust of Bertie Reed 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Bertie Reed 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catalyst - mill stones.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 13:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 21:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]