User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief24

Wiki Loves Heritage Belgium 2021

Beste vriend van Wikimedia België, De jury heeft beslist, de prijzen zijn bekend. U bent bij de 10 winnaars. Gelieve het juryrapport te lezen. Van harte gefeliciteerd. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Gent, de Graslei vanaf de Korenlei met oeg24758tm61 IMG 0407 2021-08-13 16.42.jpg

Dikke proficiat Lotje (talk) 15:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Splendor Gloeilampenfabriek GM0268-1504 IMG 0543 2022-03-13 11.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heumen, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM22003 IMG 0560 2022-03-13 12.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groesbeek, de Zuidmolen RM18171 IMG 0600 2022-03-13 15.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen-Lent, houten sculptuur bij de Dalidastraat-Barbarastraat IMG 0622 2022-03-13 16.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuijk, Molen Jan van Cuijk RM11621 IMG 0578 2022-03-13 12.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ven-Zelderheide, Beltmolen Rust na Arbeid RM16101 IMG 0583 2022-03-13 14.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuwkoop-Ter Aar, de Gereformeerde kerk GM0569WN045 IMG 0655 2022-03-27 14.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alphen aan den Rijn-Koudekerk aan den Rijn, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM23797 IMG 0661 2022-03-27 15.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Erasmusbrug en de Kop van Zuid IMG 0684 2022-03-27 20.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Maastoren ontworpen door vastgoedontwikkerlaar EDGE Technologies IMG 1128 2022-04-17 18.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Erasmusbrug vanaf de Holland-Amerikakade IMG 1164 2022-04-17 19.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Konininginnebrug RM513925 en de Hef RM5132922 IMG 1182 2022-04-17 19.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, het voormalige gebouw van de Holland America Line RM513872 vanaf de Rijnhavenbrug IMG 0728 2022-03-28 09.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, Hotel New York RM513872 vanaf de Rijnhavenbrug IMG 0732 2022-03-28 09.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barendrecht, de Watertoren RM520878 IMG 0738 2022-03-28 10.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwijndrecht, de Pietermankerk RM41916 IMG 0752 2022-03-28 12.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moerdijk, het Dorpshart IMG 0774 2022-03-28 13.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ronde Venen-Mijdrecht, de Janskerk RM30143 IMG 0650 2022-03-27 12.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hangman'sDeath 12:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drimmelen-Hooge Zwaluwe, de Protestantse kerk RM22205 IMG 0780 2022-03-28 14.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drimmelen-Hooge Zwaluwe, de Willibrorduskerk RM521501 IMG 079 2022-03-28 14.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drimmelen-Made, watertoren IMG 0804 2022-03-28 15.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drimmelen-Made, het gemeentehuis RM521497 IMG 0814 2022-03-28 15.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geertruidenberg, de Geertruidskerk RM15950 IMG 0838 2022-03-28 17.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, de Servaasbrug RM28026 met op de achtergrond het Dinghuis RM27223 het stadhuis RM27382 en de Augustijnenkerk RM27175 IMG 0977 2022-04-03 12.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, stadszicht over de Maas met de Sint-Janskerk RM27704, de Augustijnenkerk RM27175 en het stadhuis RM27382 IMG 0905 2022-04-03 10.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, kunstwerk Pilaar met Waakzame ogen van Joop Beljon (leerling van Theo van Reijn) IMG 1014 2022-04-17 10.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, kunstwerk Pilaar met Waakzame ogen van Joop Beljon (leerling van Theo van Reijn) IMG 1019 2022-04-17 10.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, standbeeld van Jan Pieter Minckelers IMG 0917 2022-04-03 11.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardinger Ambacht, het voormalige gemeentehuis IMG 1070 2022-04-17 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, de watertoren IMG 1074 2022-04-17 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, de Vulcaanhaven en de Wiltonhaven in Schiedam IMG 1099 2022-04-17 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, binnenschip de Assam ll IMG 1024 2022-04-17 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, het oude stadhuis RM37416 IMG 1037 2022-04-17 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, de Sint-Janskerk RM27704 IMG 0877 2022-04-03 10.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, Vopak in de Wilhelminahaven, de Vulcaanhaven en de Wiltonhaven (in Schiedam) IMG 1084 2022-04-17 12.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Isn't that a bit too much water in the foreground? --Steindy 12:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC) I have cropped  Done the water --Michielverbeek 21:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaardingen, Vopak in de Wilhelminahaven, de Vulcaanhaven en de Wiltonhaven (in Schiedam) IMG 1096 2022-04-17 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Isn't that a bit too much water in the foreground? --Steindy 12:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC) I have cropped  Done the water --Michielverbeek 21:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)7  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardenberg, het gemeentehuis IMG 1247 2022-05-08 11.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardenberg-De Haandrik, Sluis De Haandrik IMG 1217 2022-05-08 10.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardenberg-Bergentheim, de Wiekebrugge IMG 1261 2022-05-08 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Ommen-Lemele, de Beneden Regge IMG 1273 2022-05-08 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deventer-Frieswijk, de Zandbelterbrug GM0150-DEV01341 IMG 1333 2022-05-08 17.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Deventer-Schalkhaar, de Zandwetering vanaf de Ganzeboombrug IMG 1338 2022-05-08 17.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raalte-Luttenberg, de Rooms Katholieke kerk GM0177-WN044 IMG 1288 2022-05-08 15.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. I propose light up the dark parts a bit. But good enough for QI. --Milseburg 15:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulpen-Wittem Epen, de Sint-Paulus Bekering RM39150 IMG 2425 2022-06-12 12.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simpelveld Bocholtz, de Jacobus de Meerderekerk RM33600 IMG 2455 2022-06-12 14.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulpen-Wittem, Partij, heuvelpanorama IMG 2388 2022-06-12 11.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epen, dorpspanorama vanaf Camerig IMG 2439 2022-06-12 12.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulpen, de Gulp IMG 2384 2022-06-12 11.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaals Holset, de Sint-Lambertuskerk RM36673 IMG 2446 2022-06-12 14.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo Michielverbeek,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Energiecentrale van Engie in Nijmegen

Hoi Michiel. Ik heb zojuist deze en deze foto van jou van de energiecentrale in Nijmegen van een nieuwe categorie voorzien. Ik was ook van plan de namen van de bestanden aan te passen, omdat die suggereren dat het bouwwerk in Weurt ligt (dat slechts de plaats is van waaruit de foto's zijn genomen). Een volgende stap zou dan zijn om op Wikipagina's waarin dezelfde suggestie wordt gedaan, zoals de Nederlandstalige pagina over Weurt (zie de fotogalerij), de betreffende foto('s) te verwijderen. Maar ik begrijp dat dit enigszins rigoureuze stappen zijn. Vandaar dat ik eerst aan jou vraag hoe je hierover denkt. Groet, Apdency (talk) 13:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Apdency In eerste instantie dacht ik toch echt dat de voormalige energiecentrale in Weurt lag, maar toen ik goed keek hoe de gemeentegrens precies ligt, realiseerde ik mij dat deze energiecentrale zich in de gemeente Nijmegen bevond. Ik kan mij daarom volledig vinden in jouw voorstel en ik zal dit binnenkoert ook in mijn eigen persoonlijke pagina's aanpassen. Groeten, --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Hoi Michiel, dank voor je reactie! Voor de zekerheid heb ik er gisteren ook nog maar een topografische kaart bij gepakt. ;) Maar goed, we zijn het eens dus. Ik heb zojuist op drie wiki's de nodige aanpassingen gedaan en de bestanden hier op Commons hernoemd. Succes verder, groetjes, Apdency (talk) 14:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk, kerktoren van de Jacobskerk RM39053 vanaf het Vrijheidspark IMG 2598 2022-07-18 17.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk, de Watertoren RM523469 IMG 2610 2022-07-18 18.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maassluis, stadszicht vanaf Rozenburg IMG 2501 2022-07-11 11.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam-Botlek, Shin Etsu (fabriek voor het produceren van vinylchloridemonomeer) IMG 2507 2022-07-11 12.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam-Botlek, Air Products (fabriek voor het produceren van industriële gassen en chemicaliën) IMG 2515 2022-07-11 12.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam-Botlek, opslagtranks van Esso raffinaderij IMG 2525 2022-07-11 12.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk, sculptuur het Strijktrio van Jan Bons IMG 2583 2022-07-18 17.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk, voormalige gemeentehuis (nu VVVkantoor) GM0294-66 IMG 2585 2022-07-18 17.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoeksche Waard Nieuw-Beijerland, Molen De Swaen RM30393 IMG 2540 2022-07-11 14.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoeksche Waard Heinenoord, de watertoren RM525095 IMG 2550 2022-07-11 15.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leiden, de Hooglandse kerk RM24917 vanaf de Burcht IMG 3651 2022-09-17 19.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leiden,de Marekerk RM25069 vanaf de Burcht IMG 3654 2022-09-17 19.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leiden, de Rembrandtbrug en Molen de Put in het donker IMG 3664 2022-09-17 20.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoeksche Waard Mijnsheerenland, de Oostmolen RM3051 IMG 2562 2022-07-11 15.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Argenberg 15:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sterksel, de Sint-Catharinakerk GM1658-WN031 IMG 3707 2022-10-30 11.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Someren, Molen den Evert RM34114 IMG 3715 2022-10-30 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lierop, de Heilige Naam Jezuskerk RM34115 IMG 3739 2022-10-30 12.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deurne, Woonhuis De Wieger (nu museum) RM517783 IMG 3745 2022-10-30 14.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Den Haag, het Strijkijzer en de Harem IMG 2483 2022-07-10 21.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark, I believe --Poco a poco 08:07, 8 November 2022 (UTC) I took the photo at 21.32, just before sunset. Otherwise I will make another attempt next summer and use a longer exposure time --Michielverbeek 22:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok then, but I would have tried here indeed a longer exposure to get detail everywhere (and probably a HDR) --Poco a poco 22:36, 9 November 2022 (UTC) Thanks for comment --Michielverbeek 06:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Wettsteinbrücke vanaf de Mittleren Brücke IMG 1418 2022-05-14 19.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Johanniterbrücke vanaf de Mittlere Rheinbrücke IMG 1522 2022-05-15 09.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Mittlere Rheinbrücke KGS1588 vanaf de Wettsteinbrücke IMG 1534 2022-05-15 10.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Theodorskirche KGS160 IMG 1472 2022-05-15 08.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Many people don't like compositions where there are light and dark so strong. This one, however, it is completely successful. Good quality. --Terragio67 08:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Basler Münster KGS15+7 vanaf de Wettstein Brücke IMG 1463 2022-05-15 08.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, het Schilthof KGS1816 IMG 1547 2022-05-15 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, het gymnasium Leonhard IMG 1486 2022-05-15 08.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd apply some sharpening, but overall ok --Poco a poco 08:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, het gymnasium Leonhard IMG 1489 2022-05-15 08.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd apply some sharpening, but overall ok --Poco a poco 08:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Barfüsserplatz IMG 1501 2022-05-15 09.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Amazone Pferd Führend van Carl Nathan Burckhardt KGS1837 IMG 1518 2022-05-15 09.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Fischmarktbrunnen KGS1568 IMG 1661 2022-05-15 15.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Basler Münster vanaf de Mittlere Brücke KGS1597 IMG 1453 2022-05-14 20.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 18:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Groesbeek, heuvelpanorama IMG 2462 2022-06-26 19.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 17:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Sankt Alban bij de jeugdherberg IMG 1611 2022-05-15 13.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Roche Turm Bau 1+2 IMG 1617 2022-05-15 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Strassburger Denkmal met tram op het stationsplein IMG 1559 2022-05-15 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Strassburger Denkmal op het stationsplein IMG 1566 2022-05-15 12.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Better without the tram --Poco a poco 14:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Strassburger Denkmal IMG 1586 2022-05-15 12.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seltz, dorpszicht met l'église Saint-Etienne op de achtergrond IMG 1978 2022-05-20 12.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Basler Münster KGS1597 met de Wettsteinbrükce op de voorgrond IMG 1537 2022-05-15 10.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are dust spots on the picture. E.g. one is left to the left spire --FlocciNivis 10:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Michielverbeek 21:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, standbeeld Helvetia KGS1839 ontworpen door Eichin IMG 1631 2022-05-15 15.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, zwemmen in de Rijn IMG 1634 2022-05-15 15.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Basel en Riehen 500 jaar bij elkaar IMG 1635 2022-05-15 15.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Kleinbasel vanaf Les Trois Rois IMG 1636 2022-05-15 15.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, Kleinbasel vanaf Les Trois Rois IMG 1649 2022-05-15 15.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, the Hammering Man ontworpen door Jonathan Borofsky (laagste positie) IMG 1682 2022-05-15 18.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kynšperk nad Ohří, Kostel Nanebevzetí Panny Marie Dm20540-4-649 IMG 3220 2022-08-09 14.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheb-Jindřichov, de Ohře IMG 3229 2022-08-09 16.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheb, straatzicht Náměstí Krále Jiřího z Poděbrad met Dm16826-4-3653, Dm47270-4-3780, Dm17990-4-3613 en Dm30877-4-3654 IMG 3269 2022-08-09 18.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 15:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheb, Gablerovský dům Dm46772-4-3610 IMG 3278 2022-08-09 18.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheb, Kostel svatého Mikuláše Dm19124-4-3633 IMG 3302 2022-08-09 18.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:09, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basel, de Oberer Rheinweg vanaf de Mittleren Brücke IMG 1437 2022-05-14 20.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kadaň, Hřbitovní kostel svaté Anny Dm203215-922 IMG 2694 2022-08-01 14.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit too dark. Could brighten the image, 1/3 EV? Thank you. --XRay 07:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chomutov, kostel Nanebevzetí Panny Marie Dm398015-882 IMG 2701 2022-08-01 18.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Údlice, Zuil met een standbeeld van Sint-Jozef Dm358565-794 IMG 2730 2022-08-02 09.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Žatec, sloup se sousoším Nejsvětější Trojice Dm435395-1600 IMG 2759 2022-08-02 12.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Měcholupy-Velká Černoc, kerk Dm435375-1467 IMG 2766 2022-08-02 14.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:46, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klatovy, de Černá věž Dm16050-4-2651 en de Jezuitský kostel Neposkvrněného Početí Panny Marie a svatého Ignáce Dm41220-4-2646 vanaf de zijkant IMG 3019 2022-08-06 19.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Soft and nice composition... Good quality --Terragio67 08:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velemyšleves-Zálezly, de kapel IMG 2738 2022-08-02 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Matthias Süßen 06:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Dolany-Balkovy en Slatina, weg over de Poleňka IMG 3060 2022-08-07 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dnešice-Černotín, kapel IMG 3063 2022-08-07 14.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marianské Lazne, straatzicht Hlavní tř. en Mírové náměstí met Dm45891-4-4232 IMG 3175 2022-08-09 10.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 13:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stod, de Špitální kaple IMG 3067 2022-08-07 16.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stod, de Špitální kaple en de kostel sv. Máří Magdaleny IMG 3102 2022-08-07 19.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:45, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klatovy, de Černá věž Dm16050-4-2651 vanaf de Vančurova IMG 3037 2022-08-06 19.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dobříč-Čivice, kostel Nejsvětější Trojice Dm33681-4-1183 IMG 2830 2022-08-03 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Věšín, kaple svateho Františka Serafinského IMG 2885 2022-08-04 14.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plzeň, Huis Pražská 19 en watertoren Dm31114-4-4399 IMG 2840 2022-08-03 18.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plzeň, monumentale panden op het Náměstí Republiky met Dm44251-4-4737 + Dm30552-4-159 + Dm22451-4-160 + Dm44252-4-4696 IMG 2853 2022-08-03 18.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariánské Lázně, hotel restaurant Villa Dino IMG 3158 2022-08-09 10.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Kynšperk nad Ohří-Dvorečky, panorama IMG 3213 2022-08-09 13.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Příbram, kostel svateho Jakuba Většího Dm38783-2-2508 IMG 2931 2022-08-04 19.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blatná-Skaličany, kapel IMG 2943 2022-08-05 13.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Planá-Chodová Planá en Chotěnov-Skláře, panorama IMG 3156 2022-08-08 14.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plzeň, fontein op Náměstí Republiky met op de achtergrond Dm44251-4-4737 + Dm30552-4-159 + Dm22451-4-160 + Dm44252-4-4696 IMG 2865 2022-08-03 19.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rakovnik, stadhuis Dm35820-2-2712 IMG 2774 2022-08-02 19.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rakovnik, Vysoká brána Dm19867-2-2706 IMG 2792 2022-08-02 19.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Všesulov, kostel svatého Martina Dm30450-2-2759 IMG 2813 2022-08-03 10.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:49, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Čistá en Kožlany, panorama IMG 2824 2022-08-03 11.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:49, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velemyšleves,kaple svatého Antonína na návsi IMG 2747 2022-08-02 10.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky is too noisy IMO. --Tournasol7 12:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Matthias Süßen 06:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strakonice, městská spořitelna Dm16726-3-5154 IMG 2954 2022-08-05 19.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 vanaf Nijmegen Bloxx IMG 3793 2022-11-13 15.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable blur on the edge and Good quality. --Terragio67 20:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, het Gezicht van Nijmegen IMG 3926 2022-11-19 15.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bohutín, kostel Máří Magdaléna IMG 2901 2022-08-04 15.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both sides leaning out --Poco a poco 15:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC) New version  Done --Michielverbeek 10:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 vanaf Nijmegen Bloxx IMG 3810 2022-11-13 16.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 vanaf Nijmegen Bloxx IMG 3943 2022-11-19 16.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 vanaf Nijmegen Bloxx IMG 3946 2022-11-19 16.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stod, rivier de Radbuza IMG 3078 2022-08-07 16.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stod, de kostel sv. Máří Magdaleny IMG 3103 2022-08-07 19.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rakovnik, sousoší Panny Marie Dm13972-2-2724 IMG 2804 2022-08-02 19.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rakovník, Husovo náměstí 53 tm 55 met Dm32869-2-2717 IMG 2809 2022-08-03 09.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strakonice, Hrad Strakonice Dm35221-3-3945 IMG 2971 2022-08-05 19.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frasselt, Katholische Pfarrkirche Frasselt Dm30 IMG 0465 2022-02-28 12.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedburg-Hau-Qualburg, Katholische Kirche Sankt Martinus Dm19 IMG 0495 2022-02-28 14.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Siebenteufelsturm Dm3 IMG 2572 2022-07-18 12.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Flaesheim, brug Flaesheimer Strasse over Wesel-Dattelnkanaal IMG 3593 2022-08-16 11.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Flaesheim, Schleuse Flaesheim IMG 3609 2022-08-16 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer, vliegtuig in het Techink Museum IMG 2140 2022-05-23 15.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer, Speyerer Dom KDm IMG 2162 2022-05-23 17.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

slijterij Huiskamp

Hi, Weet je zeker dat Huiskamp ergens staat aangeduid als 'slijterij'? Voor zover ik weet is Huiskamp in Kotten altijd een bakkerij geweest. (Nav File:Brinkheurne, boerderij bij slijterij Huiskamp foto6 2016-07-19 10.43.jpg) Ciell (talk) 21:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC) Hallo Ciell, ik heb deze foto ruim zes jaar geleden gemaakt en ik mij absoluut niet meer herinneren waarom ik dit pand als een slijterij heb aangeduid. Waarschijnlijk heb ik van dichtbij een foto gemaakt van dit pand waarop stond dat hier een slijterij is. Telefoonboek.nl geeft echter de volgende omschrijving "Bakkerij, detailhandel in levensmiddelen brood en slijterijartikelen, tevens beperkte verkoop geneesmiddelen". Dus ja, zeg het maar? --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

'Slijterij' hier is vermoed ik de oude (brede) toepassing van het woord. Het was primair een bakker, maar daarnaast hadden ze een kleine winkel waarin allerhande supermarktartikelen werden verkocht. Van soep tot thee en koffie, snoep en wc-papier, tot ook wel sigaretten en laag-alcoholische dranken. Maar primair was het een bakker: bron. Ciell (talk) 09:33, 21 December 2022 (UTC) Dankje voorde informatie, ik heb het aangepast op de wikipedia-pagina van Brinkheurne. --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberried, ehemaligen Bergwerks Grube Schauinsland Barbarastollen IMG 1804 2022-05-17 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emmendingen, het Marktplatz met toren van de Evangelische Stadtkirche IMG 1825 2022-05-18 10.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kenzingen-Hecklingen, ruïne Burg Lichteneck IMG 1830 2022-05-18 11.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbolzheim-Wagenstadt, de Sankt Mauritiuskirche IMG 1835 2022-05-18 12.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer, sculptuur van de pelgrimsroute naar Santiago de Compostela IMG 2164 2022-05-23 17.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer, Altpörtel KDm IMG 2174 2022-05-23 19.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuenbürg, Gasthof Eyachbrücke IMG 2056 2022-05-22 07.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Michielverbeek! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)   Thanks, the same for you! Michielverbeek (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelberg, panorama naar de stad met der Alter Brücke en Heilig Geistkirche IMG 2312 2022-05-25 10.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelberg, de Alte Brücke IMG 2317 2022-05-25 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelberg, de Ziegelhäuser Landstrasse IMG 2327 2022-05-25 11.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 vanaf Nijmegen Bloxx IMG 3953 2022-11-19 16.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 vanaf Nijmegen Bloxx IMG 3959 2022-11-19 16.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Efringen, de evangelische kerk IMG 1371 2022-05-14 10.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Efringen-Kirchen Istein, kerktoren in straatzicht IMG 1382 2022-05-14 10.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Istein en Huttingen, panorama over de wijngaarden IMG 1390 2022-05-14 11.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 08:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schopfheim, straatzicht Hauptstrasse IMG 1699 2022-05-16 11.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality .--Famberhorst 07:24, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schopfheim, de Wiese IMG 1710 2022-05-16 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausen im Wiesental, het Altes Rathaus IMG 1721 2022-05-16 12.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:18, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zell im Wiesental, de Katholische Stadtpfarrkirche IMG 1734 2022-05-16 13.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:18, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zell im Wiesental-Mambach, zicht op het dorp met de Dorfskirche IMG 1743 2022-05-16 14.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:18, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Efringen-Kirchen Blansingen, de Peterskirche IMG 1403 2022-05-14 12.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zell im Wiesental, de Kalvarien Kapelle IMG 1778 2022-05-16 20.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:43, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atzenbach, sculptuur IMG 1790 2022-05-17 09.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:43, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brucksal, Stadtkirche Unsere Liebe Frau IMG 2121 2022-05-22 19.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark --Poco a poco 14:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC) The light conditions were also terrible --Michielverbeek 21:34, 23 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok, but I'd expect that if light is bad the exposure is increased to retain detail of the subject --Poco a poco 09:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesenheim-Oberschopfheim, Christusbeeld langs de weg IMG 1874 2022-05-19 10.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesenheim-Oberschopfheim, Sculptuur van Christus aan het kruis langs de weg IMG 1877 2022-05-19 10.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 20:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utzenfeld, de Sankt Apollonia Kapelle IMG 1764 2022-05-16 15.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mannheim, de Quinto 2 in de Rijn IMG 2356 2022-05-26 09.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruchsal, sculpturen op de Holzmarkt IMG 2112 2022-05-22 19.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark but Good quality. --Cayambe 09:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baden Baden, toren van de Stiftskirche IMG 1939 2022-05-19 18.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottersweier, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Johannes IMG 1907 2022-05-19 14.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iffezheim, sculpturen van witte paarden op de rotonde IMG 1952 2022-05-20 10.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:51, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rastatt, Einsiedelner Kapelle, watertoren, Pagodenburg,en de schoorsteen van de brouwerij IMG 1981 2022-05-20 13.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelberg, Zieglhäuser Landstrasse IMG 2286 2022-05-25 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelberg, de Ziegelhäuser Landstrasse IMG 2320 2022-05-25 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaggenau-Bad Rotenfels, Sankt Laurentiuskirche IMG 2018 2022-05-21 11.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gernsbach, stadszicht met de Sankt Jakobskirche IMG 2036 2022-05-21 13.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rastatt, de Sankt-Alexander-Kirche IMG 1998 2022-05-20 18.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark but  Support. Good quality. --Cayambe 18:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neckargemünd, Katholische Pfarrkriche Sankt Johannes Nepomuk IMG 2261 2022-05-24 19.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)