User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peterskirchen, die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Peter und Paul Dm59340 foto5 2017-08-09 16.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meggenhofen, die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Martin Dm59060 foto11 2017-08-10 11.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Could be improved with a little bit more contrast. --XRay 08:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks I have added ✓ Done a bit more contrast --Michielverbeek 20:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kematen am Innbach, Katholische Filialkirche heilige Josef Dm58678 foto3 2017-08-10 11.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. De toren kon er maar net op! Maar die vriendelijk groetende man maakt alles weer goed. --Agnes Monkelbaan 07:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Dankje, het is inderdaad mooier als de kerktoren op de voorgrond staat; ik moet echter natuurlijk altijd denken aan de lichtval, dus ... --Michielverbeek 07:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Kematen am Innbach en Pichl bei Wels, boerenbedrijf in panorama foto3 2017-08-10 11.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichl bei Wels, Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Martin Dm59368 foto6 2017-08-10 12.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Could be improved with a little bit more contrast. Sharpness at the church tower not the best, but acceptable. --XRay 08:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks I have added ✓ Done a bit more contrast --Michielverbeek 20:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Am Irrach, wegpanorama foto3 2017-08-10 13.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalchau, die Wallfahrtskirche heilige Peter Dm58833 foto4 2017-08-10 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fallsbach, die Wallfahrtskirche Mariä Himmelfahrt Dm58289 foto11 2017-08-10 13.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gunskirchen, die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Martin Dm58507 foto4 2017-08-10 14.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Misling, der Attersee foto4 2017-08-11 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attersee am Attersee, zicht op der Attersee foto6 2017-08-11 16.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 22:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attersee am Attersee, zicht op der Attersee foto7 2017-08-11 16.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attersee am Attersee, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt Dm57988 foto7 2017-08-11 16.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwanenstadt, das Rathaus Dm59635 und die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Michael op de achtergrond Dm59633 foto7 2017-08-10 18.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I think the left tower is crooked.--Famberhorst 07:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you are right; tomorrow I will look to it. --Michielverbeek 13:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's quiet difficult to realize ✓ Donea perfect perspective because of the tight bottom crop --Michielverbeek 19:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchberg, Katholische Filialkirche heilige Stefan Dm117060 foto6 2017-08-12 11.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kammer am Attersee, der Attersee tussen Attersee am Attersee en Unterbuchberg foto12 2017-08-12 12.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weyregg am Attersee, zicht op de Attersee foto4 2017-08-12 12.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach am Attersee, die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Andreas Dm59844 foto10 2017-08-12 13.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Mooi voor zwart/wit.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Steinbach en Weissenbach, der Attersee foto8 2017-08-12 13.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mondsee, das Schloss Mondsee Dm125213 foto11 2017-08-12 17.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weyregg am Attersee, die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Valentin Dm60218 foto5 2017-08-12 12.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I think the tower is tilted.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I have ✓ Done improved the perspective a bit --Michielverbeek 19:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schärding, stadszicht vanaf Neuhaus am Inn met der Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Georg Dm59647 foto5 2017-08-09 09.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hard to decide but I think it's ok --Berthold Werner 07:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weyregg am Attersee, vanaf Attersee am Attersee 1e poging foto3 2017-08-11 16.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weyregg am Attersee, vanaf Attersee am Attersee 2e poging foto6 2017-08-11 17.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attersee am Attersee, de jachthaven foto6 2017-08-11 17.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attersee am Attersee, zicht op der Attersee foto3 2017-08-11 17.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plomberg, panorama vanaf Mondsee foto7 2017-08-12 17.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Burgau en Unterach, der Attersee foto5 2017-08-12 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberburgau, panorama vanaf tussen Marienau en Pichlauhof met de Mondsee op de voorgrond foto52017-08-12 15.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberburgau, panorama vanaf tussen Pichlauhof en Marienau met de Mondsee op de voorgrond foto62017-08-12 15.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thalgau, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Dm13101 foto5 2017-08-13 11.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dust spot in the air but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Where? Please make a note --Michielverbeek 08:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I added a note, but you do not have to remove the stain. It's nothing. Greetings, --Agnes Monkelbaan 17:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Thanks, but I have removed it --Michielverbeek 19:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mondsee, das Schloss Mondsee Dm125213 poging2 foto6 2017-08-12 17.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enzersberg, panorama van het buurtschap foto6 2017-08-13 11.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eugendorf, bij de Kraimoosweg foto3 2017-08-13 11.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:43, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Weyregg am Attersee en Steinwand, der Attersee foto7 2017-08-12 12.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you add some boat-related category, please? --Basotxerri 19:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have added ✓ Done Thanks, you are right: a lot of categories, but none boat-related --Michielverbeek 22:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zilling, brug Westautobahn over fietspad foto5 2017-08-13 12.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallwang bei Salzburg, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Dm12068 in dorpszicht foto5 2017-08-13 13.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Söllheim, Wallfahrtskapelle Sankt Antonius von Padua Dm12072 foto9 2017-08-13 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg, stadszicht vanaf der Makartsteg met der Festung Hohensalzburg Dm60894 panorama1 foto2 2017-08-13 16.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg, stadszicht vanaf der Giselakai met der Festung Hohensalzburg Dm60894 panorama3 foto102017-08-13 18.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eugendorf, wegpanorama naar het westen foto13 2017-08-13 12.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Still a bit dark but o.k. --Ermell 14:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eugendorf, die Katolische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Dm11385 foto9 2017-08-13 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Höribach en Keuschen, huizen-panorama foto3 2017-08-13 10.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments o.k. --Ermell 11:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Appingedam, plein voor station Appingedam IMG 0033 2018-01-07 10.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Appingedam, de Stadshaven met op de achtergrond de Nicolaïkerk RM8247 IMG 0045 2018-01-07 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Appingedam, het stadhuis RM8249 met daarachter de toren van de Nicolaïkerk RM8247IMG 0057 2018-01-07 11.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nijmegen 'City view of Nijmegen'[edit]

Hoi Michel, bij het catalogiseren van nieuwe images in cat Nijmegen trof ik deze cat aan "City view of Nijmegen". Deze naam lijkt mij onjuist omdat de categorieën op Commons meestal in meervoud gespeld zijn. Uitzondering aangetroffen betreft een stadscezicht van Van Gogh. Wil je aub de categorie hernoemen voordat ik hem verder ga gebruiken? Wat is de bedoeling ervan? Alleen plaatjes van overzichten centrum Nijmegen en niet de hele skyline? Gefeliciteerd met je bijzonde mooie foto's, bijvoorbeeld die van het Valkhof bij sneeuw is geweldig imo. MvG. Peli (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC) PS. de cat zou evt hernoemd kunnen worden als "Panoramic views of Nijmegen" daarmee past hij binnen het voor NL gangbare systeem en is direct duidelijk wat de bedoeling is. Peli (talk) 13:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC) Ik kan mij eigenlijk niet meer herinneren waar om ik deze category heb aangemaakt. Ik heb de foto daarom teruggeplaatst naar Views of Nijmegen en de door mij aangemaakte category kan verwijderd worden. --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, de Sint-Jozefkerk RM18869 IMG 0068 2018-01-07 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, Hooghoudt (destilleerderij) naast de Martinitoren RM18553 IMG 0074 2018-01-07 14.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, de Nieuwe Kerk RM18583 IMG 0085 2018-01-07 14.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not my favourite composition but the main subject is visible and sharp. OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)  Comment thanks, it is very difficult to find a good composition for this church; the trees are often spoiling the photo --Michielverbeek 19:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lighthouses[edit]

Hi. Thanks for the post on the lighthouses. I was going to post this: " Thank you, but the sky is natural. We get sky like that very often here, of course not every day. I did not add blue, nor change luminence nor saturation at all. PumpkinSky 23:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)" but edit conflicted with you. PumpkinSky talk 23:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag-Chinatown, straatzicht Wagenstraat-Stille Veerkade-Amsterdamse Veerkade foto3 2017-09-24 11.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, centrale hal van Station Centraal foto3 2017-09-24 09.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, Station Centraal voor treinen en trams foto7 2017-09-24 09.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, straatzicht Hoefkade-Stationsweg-Oranjelaan foto6 2017-09-24 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo, kunstwerk the Boots of the Hunter van Pii Daenen tijdelijk op de Maasboulevard IMG 0107 2018-02-18 09.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo, Twee Wachters (ontworpen door Shinkichi Tajiri) bij de Maasbrug naar Blerick IMG 0118 2018-02-18 10.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo, ingang van het Limburgs Museum IMG 0124 2018-02-18 10.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, de Zwijndrechtse Brug IMG 0170 2018-02-25 11.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, de Groothoofdspoort RM13310 vanaf de Taankade IMG 0177 2018-02-25 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the heavy shade right. But good image quality for me.--Famberhorst 18:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment I have already reduced the shade in the right bottom corner, but I realize a bit more would have been better --Michielverbeek 21:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, de Immerlooplas in de winter vanaf 't Duifje IMG 1752 2018-02-28 10.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Delft, de Oostpoort RM11968 foto11 2016-03-13 10.32.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Delft, de Oostpoort RM11968 foto11 2016-03-13 10.32.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, zicht op de Wijnhaven vanaf de Nieuwbrug RM14043 met links de toren van de Bonifatiuskerk RM13998 IMG 0140 2018-02-25 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Maybe slightly tilted, maybe not. Good quality anyway. --C messier 13:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment You are right it is a bit tilted, so thanks --Michielverbeek 18:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, straatzicht Visbrug-Groenmarkt met standbeeld van de gebroeders De Witt, slagerij (in RM13352) en ijssalon (in RM13352) IMG 0152 2018-02-25 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for QI, maybe it could be a bit sharper to the edges. --Milseburg 20:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, het Binnenhof diverse RM met de Hofvijver op de voorgrond foto8 2015-08-05 18.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, zicht op de Grote Kerk RM13417 vanaf de Lange IJzeren Brug RM14041 IMG 0132 2018-02-25 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, deWaag RM16858 in straatbeeld foto3 2017-04-30 12.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. At the first view there may be perspective correction necessary, but IMO the buildings aren't straight. --XRay 07:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, molen 't Slot RM16919 foto10 2017-04-30 12.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* Comment Vertical perspective correction required.--Famberhorst 06:10, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I did some small perspective changes, but please realize the corner in which I took the photo was quiet difficult for perfect perspective --Michielverbeek 19:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oké, Huis links staat nog wat scheef, maar verder een mooie opname.--Famberhorst 16:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, straatzicht de Veerstraat vanaf de Monstersche Sluis tijdens de Furiade IMG 4279 2016-10-01 15.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:05, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Erasmusbrug vanaf Hotel New York IMG 1782 2018-03-18 10.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Leuvehaven vanaf Terwenakker IMG 1834 2018-03-18 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, zicht op de Wijnhaven (met het Witte Huis-RM334003) en de Willemsbrug vanaf Noordereiland IMG 1851 2018-03-18 12.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 21:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Entrepothaven IMG 1863 2018-03-18 13.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Erasmusbrug vanaf de verhoging bij de Wilhelminakade IMG 1810 2018-03-18 11.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:27, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Bierhaven-de Leuvehaven vanaf de Jufferkade IMG 1830 2018-03-18 12.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de landenvlaggen van alle nationaliteiten die in Nederland verblijven (op alfabetische volgorde in het Engels) IMG 1877 2018-03-18 13.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 16:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Bierhaven-de Leuvehaven vanaf de Jufferkade IMG 1815 2018-03-18 12.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Koninginnebrug (RM513925) en de Hef (RM513922) IMG 1854 2018-03-18 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 09:21, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, monumentale havenkranen bij het Maritiem Museum IMG 1884 2018-03-18 14.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, zicht op het Scheepvaartkwartier (met de Euromast) vanaf Hotel New York IMG 1786 2018-03-18 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *   Weak support Both sides could have been sharper.--Famberhorst 15:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Verwoeste Stad IMG 1898 2018-03-18 14.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Sacharovbrug, het Dansend Vierkant van Marijke de Goey IMG 1910 2018-04-06 09.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Leuk!--Famberhorst 17:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhederlaag, Kunstweg Eén aan de Rivierweg IMG 1913 2018-04-06 10.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittebrink, de Wittebrinkse Molen RM40413 IMG 1946 2018-04-06 13.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halle, de Hervormde kerk GM1876wikinr68 IMG 1955 2018-04-06 13.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lievelde, de Christus Koningkerk GM1586LV08 en de pastorie GM1586LV06 IMG 1975 2018-04-06 16.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe a bit too much pavement in the foreground. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)  Comment ✓ Done Good comment, but I was thinking about the rule of thirds. 1/3 sky, 1/3 buildings and 1/3 pavement. However I also realize the 1/3 of the pavement might be a bit too large --Michielverbeek 08:59, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groenlo, de Sint-Calixtusbasiliek RM18163 IMG 1995 2018-04-06 16.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Almen, de Dorpsstraat met de Hervormde kerk RM16710 IMG 2008 2018-04-07 09.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woold, boerderij aan de Wooldseweg waarschijnlijk de GM0294-129 op 80-82 foto9 2017-10-18 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice picture --Verum 12:08, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doesburg, moderne woonpanden aan de IJsselkade met sculptuur Passi d'Oro van Roberto Barni IMG 1926 2018-04-06 11.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Looks tilted CW a little bit. --Halavar 23:38, 13 April 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done I have improved the perspective a bit. Please realize the main building has got an oval shape --Michielverbeek 19:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Still not good. You should stretch image in the upper parts both to left and right. --Halavar 12:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version --Michielverbeek 14:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK, good now. Thanks! QI for me --Halavar 19:25, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Test User:The Photographer/QICvote.js[edit]

Dear Michielverbeek,

Please, could you test this user script on QIC adding importScript("User:The Photographer/QICvote.js"); on your page User:Michielverbeek/common.js It could do the review procedure more easy.

Thanks --The Photographer 02:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubbergen, de lezende Nescio van Ronald Tolman foto13 2017-09-27 10.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Background a little bit disturbing. --XRay 19:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olst, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM31437 IMG 2011 2018-04-07 11.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olst, de watertoren IMG 2025 2018-04-07 11.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijhe, de Wijhese Molen RM39642 IMG 2029 2018-04-07 12.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijhe, villa op het Van Dedemplein IMG 2045 2018-04-07 12.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windesheim, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM41907 IMG 2061 2018-04-07 13.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windesheim, de Windesheimer Molen RM41908 IMG 2065 2018-04-07 13.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hasselt, bed&breakfast de Oude Jan met twee monumentale kalkovens RM489135 IMG 2081 2018-04-07 14.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark overall, but ok --Poco a poco 07:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hasselt, korenmolen de Zwaluw RM20870 IMG 2113 2018-04-07 15.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuinre, de Algemene Begraafplaats oude deel GM1708-IJSH086 IMG 2776 2018-04-20 12.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Borders out of focus but IMHO QI The Photographer Sun, 29 Apr 2018 23:53:15 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuinre, brug bij de Nieuwstad met het voormalige raadhuis RM39893 op de achtergrond IMG 2785 2018-04-20 12.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:53, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ossenzijl, zicht op het dorp IMG 2797 2018-04-20 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Poco a poco Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:17:57 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blokzijl, de Havenkolk met zicht op de Zeedijk en de Hervormde kerk RM10448 IMG 2825 2018-04-20 14.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice location. Good quality. Basotxerri Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:35:38 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blokzijl, de Havenkolk vanaf de Zuiderkade met zicht op de Bierkade en de Hervormde kerk (RM10448) en de Zeedijk IMG 2834 2018-04-20 14.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Poco a poco Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:18:32 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vollenhoven, watergemaal A.F. Stroink RM507461 IMG 2840 2018-04-20 15.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 18:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vollenhove, de Haven met de Grote-of Sint Nicolaaskerk RM10555 IMG 2849 2018-04-20 15.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vollenhove, de Kleine of Lieve Vrouwekerk RM10541 IMG 2862 2018-04-20 15.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:14, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heerenveen, de Crackstate (deel van het gemeentehuis) RM21169 IMG 2127 2018-04-17 10.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 22:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hommerts, de Johannes de Doperkerk RM39787 IMG 2209a 2018-04-17 16.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woudsend, zicht op de Iewal vanaf de ophaalbrug met de gereformeerde kerk IMG 2712 2018-04-20 09.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woudsend, houtzaagmolen de Jager RM39828 IMG 2686 2018-04-19 15.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joure, de toren van de Hobbe van Baerdt Tsjerke Hervormde kerk in straatzicht RM20833 IMG 2161 2018-04-17 11.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments De toren van mijn woonplaats.--Famberhorst 05:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dat is geen verrassing voor mij --Michielverbeek 06:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint Nicolaasga, de Sint Nicolaaskerk RM13252 IMG 2169 2018-04-17 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemmer, zicht op de Kortestreek vanaf de ophaalbrug met de Hervormde kerk RM25749 op de achtergrond IMG 2180 2018-04-17 13.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemmer, de Hervormde kerk RM25749 vanaf de Langestreek IMG 2190b 2018-04-17 13.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeg, zicht op het dorp vanaf It Eilan IMG 2215a 2018-04-18 08.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeg, de Ichthuskerk IMG 2693 2018-04-20 08.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeg, zicht op de Sint Jozefkerk vanaf de brug bij De Syl-De Skatting IMG 2706 2018-04-20 09.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woudsend, zicht op de Iewal vanaf de ophaalbrug met de gereformeerde kerk IMG 2198 2018-04-17 15.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. IMO there are minor JPEG artifacts. --XRay 06:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Question What are JPEG artifacts? --Michielverbeek 22:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Yesterday I checked it twice. Today I can't see artifacts. --XRay 05:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudega, de Hervormde Ankertsjerke RM39811 IMG 2439 2018-04-18 16.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeg, palingaak bij Jachtwerf Piersma IMG 2451 2018-04-18 17.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galamadammen, het Galamadammen Akwadukt IMG 2256 2018-04-18 10.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laaksum, de vissershaven IMG 2278 2018-04-18 11.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 05:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijs, toegangspoort slottuin Rijs IMG 2566a 2018-04-19 12.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warns, het monument ter herdenking aan de slag bij Warns IMG 2286 2018-04-18 11.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warns, het dorps- en cultuurhuis De Spylder in straatzicht IMG 2290 2018-04-18 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warns, de doopsgezinde kerk in straatzicht IMG 2302 2018-04-18 12.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stavoren, het Vrouwtje van Stavoren IMG 2318 2018-04-18 13.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stavoren, zicht op de ophaabrug bij het Vrouwtje van Stavoren IMG 2337 2018-04-18 13.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hindeloopen, de schutssluis met de houten ophaalbrug RM18209 en de sluiswachterswoning RM22191 IMG 2358 2018-04-18 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hindeloopen, de haven IMG 2367 2018-04-18 14.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 07:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hindeloopen, zicht op het IJsselmeer IMG 2377 2018-04-18 14.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 07:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Molkwerum, de Lebuïnuskerk RM21484 IMG 2346 2018-04-18 13.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hindeloopen, de haven IMG 2520 2018-04-19 10.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But please remove the white line top right. --XRay 18:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, ✓ Done removed white edges --Michielverbeek 18:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Hindeloopen en Koudum, moderne windmolen IMG 2533 2018-04-19 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hindeloopen, stadszicht vanaf het bruggetje bij de Sudersewei met de Grote Kerk RM22171 op de achtergrond IMG 2502 2018-04-19 10.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Gaastmeer, sloot in het polderlandschap IMG 2459a 2018-04-19 08.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Workum, de toren van de Grote of Sint-Gertrudiskerk, RM39466 IMG 2387 2018-04-18 15.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Workum, de Waag-Museum Warkums Erfskip RM39461 IMG 2394 2018-04-18 15.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Workum, de Sint Werenfriduskerk RM39479 IMG 2468 2018-04-19 09.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Workum, zicht op de Burefeart IMG 2482 2018-04-19 09.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Workum, boerderij aan de Aldedyk IMG 2490a 2018-04-19 09.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hindeloopen, gebouw bij de binnenkomst van het stadje vanaf Workum IMG 2508 2018-04-19 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Extreme sides are less sharp. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 04:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrega, de Sint Johannes de Doperkerk RM39421 IMG 2402 2018-04-18 16.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koudum, de Martinikerk RM21479 IMG 2558 2018-04-19 11.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:00, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudemirdum, de Hervormde kerk RM15928 IMG 2587 2018-04-19 12.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijemirdum, de kerktoren van Nijemirdum RM15927 IMG 2592 2018-04-19 13.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sondel, de Hervormde kerk RM15935 IMG 2606 2018-04-19 13.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sondel, boerderij aan de Jacobus Boomsmastraat IMG 2611 2018-04-19 13.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koudum, stadspanorama vanaf de polder IMG 2544 2018-04-19 11.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too dark and tilted (+may require a perspective correction) --Poco a poco 08:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done brighter, warmer and a perspective correction - hope it is well done --Michielverbeek 20:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaastmeer, de Pieltsjerke (Hervormde kerk) RM39765 IMG 2230 2018-04-18 08.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The crop on the bottom is not optimal, but overall it´reaching QI level easily, I think. --Milseburg 12:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sloten, stadszicht2 vanaf brug Brouwersteeg met de Hervormde kerk RM33852 IMG 2645 2018-04-19 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:50, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Oudemirdum, panorama naar Gaasterrland IMG 2577a 2018-04-19 12.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:00, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spannenburg, de toren van Spannenburg IMG 2678a 2018-04-19 15.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oosterzee, de Martinuskerk RM25785 IMG 2719a 2018-04-20 10.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like trees, but they can also be very disturbing. Nevertheless QI -- Spurzem 09:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, you are absolutely right; I would not have made this photo if those trees would have had much more leaves --Michielverbeek 11:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Schoterzijl en Slijkenburg, boerderij aan de Zeedijk IMG 2755 2018-04-20 11.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, poster It Giet Oan (Leeuwarden culturele hoofdstad van Europa in 2018) in de Baljeestraat IMG 3606 2018-05-21 10.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden- Fryslân is in 2018 culturele hoofdstad van Europa IMG 3651 2018-05-21 11.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:35, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, sculptuur Love Fountain van Jaume Plensa op het Stationsplein IMG 3716 2018-05-21 12.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, de vlaggen van de Europese Unie op de Stationsweg IMG 3726 2018-05-21 12.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, zicht op Het Vliet en De Tuinen IMG 3635 2018-05-21 11.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, de Oldehove RM24331 in straatzicht IMG 3748 2018-05-23 15.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 04:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, de Oldehove RM24331 IMG 3650 2018-05-21 11.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, de Wester Stadsgracht vanaf de Westerplantage IMG 3665 2018-05-21 11.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmen, voetbalstadion de Jensvesting foto14 2016-09-25 16.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmen, de Grote of Pancratiuskerk RM14958 IMG 3752 2018-05-27 09.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmen, het Atlas theater IMG 3772 2018-05-27 09.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, het INGkantoorgebouw IMG 3693 2018-05-21 12.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, standbeeld Mata Hari IMG 3625 2018-05-21 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weiteveen, sloot in veenlandschap bij de Ir. Biewengaweg - Wethouder G.H. Scherpenlaan foto6 2016-09-25 15.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Nieuw-Dordrecht en Klazienaveen, sloot in veenlandschap foto8 2016-09-25 16.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 06:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Nieuw Balinge en Meppen, boerderij IMG 3858 2018-05-27 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meppel, de watertoren PM1-0171 IMG 2121 2018-04-07 16.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meppel, molen de Weert RM526385 met andere twee molens op de achtergrond IMG 2886 2018-04-20 17.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sleen, het voormalige gemeentehuis RM478222 IMG 3778 2018-05-27 10.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zweeloo, de Hervormde kerk RM41517 IMG 3795 2018-05-27 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 11:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aalden, de Jantina Hellingmolen RM41518 IMG 3832 2018-05-27 11.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 11:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuw Balinge, borstbeeld van Meester Siebering in een pergola IMG 3872 2018-05-27 13.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 11:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoogeveen, het Huis met de Duivengaten RM 22252 IMG 3920 2018-05-27 14.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 11:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Wijk, de Wieker Meule RM39657 IMG 3951 2018-05-27 16.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit on the dark side. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, you are right. I was facing the sun al ttle bit --Michielverbeek 06:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sloten, straatzicht Arjen Rypkemawei en Wijckelerweg met narcissen IMG 2632 2018-04-19 14.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Aalden en Zweeloo, de Aalderstroom IMG 3801 2018-05-27 11.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What a dark hole right between the green. But for me enough quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, zicht op de Nieuwestad IMG 3735 2018-05-21 14.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]