User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, de Kerkbrug RM25671 en de stoomdrukkerij RM515045 foto7 2017-06-11 13.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, De Zijlpoort RM25667 met de Haven foto6 2017-06-11 12.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, de Alkemadebrug over de Oude Singel foto3 2017-06-11 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, de Waaghoofdbrug met de toren van de Hartebrugkerk RM24717 foto5 2017-06-11 11.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, De Zijlpoort RM25667 met de Haven foto6 2017-06-11 12.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, de Alkemadebrug over de Oude Singel foto3 2017-06-11 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, le Pont des Arches 62063-CLT-0319-01 vanaf Passarelle Saucy foto4 2017-03-26 16.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, le Pont des Arches oeg62063-CLT-0319-01 foto4 2017-03-26 11.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 00:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Palais des Princes-Évêques oeg62063-PEX-0012-02 foto3 2017-03-26 10.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, straatzicht Place du Marché met links l'église Saint-André oeg62063-CLT-0017-01 en in het midden le Perron oeg62063-PEX-0009-02 foto62017-03-26 17.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Passage Lemonnier oeg62063-CLT-0124-01 foto4 2017-03-26 17.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 09:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westhem, de Bartholomeüskerk RM39822 foto13 2017-06-18 15.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tjerkwerd, de Workumer Trekvaart foto4 2017-06-18 13.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hichtum, de Hervormde kerk RM39349 foto10 2017-06-18 12.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franeker. steeg tussen Dijkstraat en Sint Franciskuskerk positie1 foto9 2017-06-18 10.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franeker, de Stationsbrug foto6 2017-06-18 10.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Linne en Brachterbeek, de Vlootbeek foto7 2017-05-10 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments See editing errors along the tree-sky line. Fixable? Please also remove the dustspot-like bird in the sky. --Cayambe 10:39, 24 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks for comment ✓ Done --Michielverbeek 20:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In 2nd version I discovered an error and I have improved this mistake in 3rd version, please review my nomination --Michielverbeek 10:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)  Support Looks OK to me now. --Peulle 12:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Holstentor[edit]

Hallo! Ich schreibe mal kurz hier und in deutsch. Ich hoffe, es ist verständlich. Du schriebst bei den QIC, dass für mein Bild des Holstentors eine Korrektur notwendig sei. Das ist wohl eher nicht so. Das Gebäude ist über Jahrhunderte 4 Meter in die Tiefe gesunken und kippt um 17 Grad nach vorn. Das ist schiefer als der Schiefe Turm in Pisa. Die beiden Türme kippen nach innen. Es gibt heutzutage keine Vertikalen und Horizontalen mehr. Für mich ein Wunder, dass das Gebäude überhaupt noch steht. Sollte dich mal eine Radtour nach Schleswig-Holstein führen, ein Besuch von Lübeck lohnt sich. --XRay talk 09:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC). Ich habe keine Pläner für eine Radtour in oder nach Schleswig-Holstein --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your new review. Perspective correction and old buildings are always difficult. You could not know this. I've seen a lot of comments like yours, the Holsten Gate is very special. I should have given a hint. Always good luck with your "Fietstochten". BTW: Have you ever taken part in the "Fietselfstedentocht"? --XRay talk 05:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC). No I have never taken part in the "Fietselfstedentocht", I prefer cycling alone: sometimes I am cycling very fast or in difficult area (like the Alpes) and sometimes I am cycling very slow to look for good compositions. --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woerdense Verlaat, rivier de Meije vlakbij de Bosweg foto12 2017-07-09 11.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Meije, rivier de Meije bij Trendyard foto8 2017-07-09 10.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodegraven, watertoren GM1901WN031 foto11 2017-07-09 09.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woerdense Verlaat, koeien in weiland langs de Bosweg bij Lusthof de Haeck foto3 2017-07-09 11.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haarlem-Penningsveer, molen de Veer RM19874 foto13 2016-09-03 14.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Oud-Loosdrecht, de Loosdrechtse Plassen foto5 2017-07-09 15.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality and nice.--Famberhorst 15:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Meije, rivier De Meije bij Loonspuitbedrijf Kerkvliet BV foto5 2017-07-09 09.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amersfoort, zicht op de Onze Lieve Vrouwetoren van het Nieuwe Plein foto9 2017-07-09 18.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loenersloot, ophaalbrug RM511840 foto5 2017-07-09 14.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Staggering and well composed. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Baambrugge en Loenersloot, rivier de Angstel foto5 2017-07-09 14.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gorgeous composition and brilliant quality.  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baambrugge, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM7002 met de Ichtus basisschool op de voorgrond foto62017-07-09 13.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilnis, de Nederlands Hervormde Kerk RM514703 foto3 2017-07-09 12.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilnis, de Bovendijk vanaf de Wilnisse Zuwe foto6 2017-07-09 12.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilnis, de Veldwetering vanaf de Wilnisse Zuwe foto14 2017-07-09 11.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Meije-W, landbouwbedrijf op De Meije vanaf de Hazekade foto6 2017-07-09 10.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Baambrugge en Wilnis, sloot foto4 2017-07-09 13.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frisange, de parochiekerk van Frisange oeg foto2 2017-05-26 13.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hilarmont 21:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fentange, kerk foto5 2017-05-26 11.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 22:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hesperange, kerk met kasteelruïne oeg positie1 foto9 2017-05-26 11.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hilarmont 21:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Itzig, watermolen foto4 2017-05-26 10.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Remich en Bous, panorama foto7 2017-05-26 14.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Welfrange en Bous, sculptuur foto5 2017-05-26 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flastroff, l'église Saint-Éloi foto7 2017-05-27 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ad:Quality image candidates[edit]

I do shoot RAW. Previously it was said that my photos were oversharpened, so now probably I exaggerated the other way with sharpening… My question is: is it possible to re-nominate photo after correcting shortcomings indicated at the first nomination? Karol Szapsza (talk) 12:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC) The focus was also not well done and it is impossible to correct this in Lightroom, just make a new photo from this composition. Please don't renominate this photo because I have change my review. I am waiting for you new version and if it is a decline again you might ask for a discussion (yellow colour) and more people will review your photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, havenkraan achter Parkeergarage Scheldekaaien Noord IMG 1117 2017-08-27 12.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, het voetgangerspad naar Plateau Royal op de Jordaenskaai IMG 1108 2017-08-27 12.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, riviermijnenveger M477 Oudenaarde op het droge bij de Orteliuskaai met het loodsgebouw op de achtergrond IMG 10912017-08-27 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, havenkraan in het Bonapartdok IMG 1071 2017-08-27 12.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, standbeeld Anthony van Dyck op de Meir IMG 1045 2017-08-27 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, bloemversiering en anker op kruispunt Sint Paulusplaats-en straat op de achtergrond lijstgevel Sint-Pietersvliet 29 oeg6180 IMG 1064 2017-08-27 12.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, centraal station oeg7051 IMG 1032 2017-08-27 10.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, centraal station oeg7051 vanaf perron4 IMG 1134 2017-08-27 14.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, centraal station oeg7051 IMG 1179 2017-08-27 14.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, centraal station oeg7051 bij de Pelikaanstraat IMG 1165 2017-08-27 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, centraal station oeg7051 bij het Comics Station IMG 1152 2017-08-27 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen, Museum aan de Stroom IMG 1080 2017-08-27 12.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Slightly tilted CW. --C messier 19:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, in first instance I was thinking you are exagerating but you are right --Michielverbeek 09:43, 31 August 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done It's not perfect but IMO good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC) Support OK. --C messier 09:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Michielverbeek,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 10:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen![edit]

Beste Michielverbeek,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harlingen, de vuurtoren RM20390 foto3 2016-07-03 15.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sixflashphoto 22:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, treinstation RM41815 foto7 2016-06-05 09.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, Museum de Fundatie RM41563 met de Peperbus RM41765 op de achtergrond foto4 2016-06-05 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, sculptuur en de Nieuwe Havenbrug met de Peperbus RM41765 op de achtergrond foto4 2016-06-05 12.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sixflashphoto 22:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batenburg, restanten van kasteel Batenburg RM8725 foto10 2015-12-09 12.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and quality. --ArildV 06:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batenburg, de Boombeelden van Marc de Roover met de Sint Victorkerk (RM87148) op de achtergrond foto7 2015-12-09 12.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 07:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balgoij, toren van de voormalige Dorpskerk RM32132 foto4 2015-12-09 13.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Klarenbeek, watertoren de Steenen Tafel RM516836 foto8 2015-12-30 13.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, Noviomagus en de Waalbrug RM523067 foto7 2016-06-08 12.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 foto2 2016-08-24 20.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Sint Laurenskerk RM32783 foto4 2016-02-28 11.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, de Oostpoort RM11968 foto11 2016-03-13 10.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, de Sint Liduinabasiliek (RM33276) op het Stadserf IMG 8171 2016-03-13 14.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, het Proveniershuis RM33272 IMG 8211 2016-03-13 15.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, de Furie met de Groote Kerk RM26609 IMG 0511 2016-06-06 11.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utrecht, RM-panden aan de Oudegracht 317-329oneven foto4 2015-11-01 09.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments If you remove these bicycles .. - just joking: then it would'nt be NL! Good Quality --PtrQs 13:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loenen ad Vecht, ophaalbrug met toren van Nederlands Hervormde Kerk RM26098 op de achtergrond foto11 2017-07-09 14.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amersfoort, de Koppelpoort RM79287 foto17 2017-07-09 19.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly too dark but good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oud Ade, de Vrouw Vennemolen RM 7135 met de Rooms Katholieke kerk op de achtergrond foto4 2017-04-09 10.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, straatzicht op de Lange Tiendeweg met 't Kaaswinkeltje en 't Grendeltje RM16837 poging2 foto8 2017-04-30 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Perhaps FP? -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for compliment, I think it is a surprising composition. However I was even doubting if it would be a Q1; monumental house in background looks a bit deformed --Michielverbeek 07:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, het stadhuis RM519571 en de Koornbrug RM25673 foto5 2017-06-11 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, de Zijlpoort RM25667 foto7 2017-06-11 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, zicht op de Apothekersdijk met RM515109 foto10 2017-06-11 13.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevensweert, de Hompesche Molen RM34905 foto9 2017-05-10 14.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Light situation isn´t ideal, but handled well. --Milseburg 12:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roermond, de Natalinitoren en de Sint-Christoffelkathedraal RM32552 vanaf de brug over de Maas foto6 2017-05-10 18.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like the framing device! --Crisco 1492 13:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leunen, de Sint Catharinakerk RM37219 foto7 2017-05-17 17.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice motive, well composed and very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santpoort-Noord, windmolen de Zandhaas RM37111 IMG 1185 2017-09-03 10.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burghausen, sculptuur bij het Bürgerhaus foto4 2017-08-07 11.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burghausen, die Hedwigskapelle DmD-1-71-112-28 foto4 2017-08-07 11.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burghausen, stadszicht vanaf Oostenrijk met die Katholische Stadtpfarrkirche Sankt Jakob DmD-1-71-112-227 en de burcht DmD-1-71-112-52 foto52017-08-07 12.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, zicht op de Saar foto8 2017-05-27 09.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarbrücken-Sankt Johann, hoofdstation voor de trams foto11 2017-05-28 10.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, brug over de Saar met Kirche Sankt Lutwinus Dm op de achtergrond foto7 2017-05-28 21.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarhölzbach, dorpszicht met Saar foto7 2017-05-29 09.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burghausen, Uhrturm mit Brunnenhaus DmD-1-71-112-53 foto5 2017-08-07 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. But please check the crop of the image. The half lantern at the left is disturbing. Thank you. --XRay 05:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Nicht gesehen, danke für deine Aufmerksamheit --Michielverbeek 18:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beuningen, het Torentje van de Blanckenburgh RM9538 foto6 2017-02-15 17.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Illingen, die Sankt Stephan Kirche Dm foto4 2017-05-28 13.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Illingen, toren van Burg Kerpen Dm foto9 2017-05-28 13.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burghausen, die Katholische Stadtpfarrkirche Sankt Jakob DmD-1-71-112-227 vanaf de burg foto12 2017-08-07 12.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO too dark and WB too warm. Please check your image. --XRay 05:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for your advice! I have changed some values in Ps and hope you think it is a Q1 now. It was a difficult photo to make because I was facing the sun. --Michielverbeek 18:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you for the modifications. IMO it is good for QI now. --XRay 15:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wustweiler, die katholische Pfarrkirche Herz Jesu Dm foto5 2017-05-28 14.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like the straw man or whatever that is! PumpkinSky 01:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gennep, korenmolen De Reus RM16087 foto5 IMG 8376 2016-03-26 15.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, Station Den Haag Hollands Spoor wegrijdende trein met perronoverkapping RM407999 foto9 2017-09-24 10.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 02:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, de Passage RM46627 foto3 2017-09-24 11.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier, Porta Nigra Dm foto12 2017-05-29 15.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manderscheid, das Verwaltungsgebäude Dm foto6 2017-05-30 20.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manderscheid, toren van die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Hubertus Dm foto6 2017-05-30 21.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manderscheid, die Burg Dm foto8 2017-05-31 10.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gillenfeld, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Andreas Dm positie2 foto5 2017-05-31 11.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strotzbüsch, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Vinzenzius Dm foto12 2017-05-31 12.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarburg, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius Dm1 met de Moezel op de voorgrond foto32017-05-29 11.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salmtal, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Dm foto11 2017-05-30 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Difficult to handle all vertical lines here. The left side of the churchtower is a bit tilted. But quality is high enough for QI, I think. --Milseburg 11:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minderlittgen, die Katholische Filialkirche Sankt Maria, Simon und Judas Dm foto6 2017-05-30 13.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bullay, dorpszicht met der Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Maria Magdalena Dm foto7 2017-05-31 14.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eller, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Hilarius Dm in dorpszicht foto3 2017-05-31 15.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polterrsdorf, der Fährturm Dm foto3 2017-05-31 17.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cochem, die Neue Katholische Kirche Sankt Remaklus Dm en die Skagerrakbrücke foto5 2017-05-31 21.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hatzenport, der Fährturm Dm foto7 2017-06-01 12.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gondorf, der Oberburg Dm foto8 2017-06-01 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 04:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neef, dorpszicht met die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Dm foto3 2017-05-31 15.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlrod, die Evangelische Pfarrkirche Dm foto2 2017-06-02 11.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweich, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Dm foto4 2017-05-29 21.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The upper part of the tower could have been slightly sharper. but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-Hörde, ehemalige Hoesch-Verwaltung Burg Hörde und Erweiterungsbau DmA0362 foto4 2017-06-05 14.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The tower seems to be a bit skewed. But good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund, die Bläserbrunnen met die Adler Apotheke DmA0306 en die evangelische Reinoldikirche DmA0082 foto6 2017-06-05 17.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kellen, die ehemalige katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Willibrord Dm24 foto4 2017-09-27 14.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warbeyen, die Sankt Hermes-Kirche Dm35 foto9 2017-09-27 14.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Marienberg, die Evangelische Pfarrkirche Dm foto9 2017-06-02 17.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality but it would be nice if it had more then one category -- Sixflashphoto 03:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done I have create a new category and add this one to the file. However in the past I have also got comments because of overcategorizing --Michielverbeek 07:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plettenberg, die evangelische Christuskirche Dm9 in straatzicht foto6 2017-06-04 12.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, but again it should have better categorization -- Sixflashphoto 03:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks I have add one --Michielverbeek 06:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmerich, die Rheinbrücke Dm101 foto4 2017-09-27 14.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Michielverbeek!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »
Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Söhrt, dorpszicht foto6 2017-06-02 13.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Betzdorf, knooppunt van fietspaden foto5 2017-06-03 11.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alsdorf, straatzicht foto4 2017-06-03 12.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchen, evangelische kerk aan de Gilsbachstrasse foto10 2017-06-03 14.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oud Zevenaar, de Sint Martinuskerk RM40435 foto5 2017-09-27 16.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me, but it could use more then one category -- Sixflashphoto 20:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks I have add two categories --Michielverbeek 19:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Bergweiler en Wittlich, wegpanorama foto3 2017-05-30 11.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good quality and excellent composition. -- Ikan Kekek 23:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grosslittgen, dorpszicht foto11 2017-05-30 13.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meerfeld, ingang naar het dorp vanaf Bettenfeld foto7 2017-05-30 15.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bremm, dorpszicht vanaf de straat foto14 2017-05-31 15.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really good. -- Ikan Kekek 22:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Ediger-Eller en Bremm, de Moezel foto4 2017-05-31 15.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The fine grain is no issue. Very good quality and composition. -- Ikan Kekek 22:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruttig-Fankel, dorpszicht foto2 2017-05-31 17.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Possibly borderline FP - I really have no idea whether it would have a chance there, but if you decide to nominate it, I'd advise dialing back the highlights a little. But no problem for QI, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 22:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Wittlich en Bergweiler, wegpanorama foto5 2017-05-30 12.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I wish it was geolocated but everything else is perfect and I like this so much -- Sixflashphoto 01:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks, you are absolutely right. I know the geo location approximately but not exactly --Michielverbeek 21:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karden, zicht op stadsdeel foto10 2017-06-01 10.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Messenich en Briedern, de Moezel foto11 2017-05-31 16.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 10:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund, parkeergarage aan de Silberstrasse foto11 2017-06-05 17.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Eiringhausen en Kettling, brug over de Lenne foto3 2017-06-04 13.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Werdohl en Altena, de Lenne foto11 2017-06-04 15.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund, sculpturen tegenover Hauptbahnhof foto10 2017-06-05 17.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Sondern en Attendorn, die Biggesee foto3 2017-06-04 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Attendorn en Sondern, de Biggesee foto6 2017-06-04 10.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Keseberg, panorama foto4 2017-06-04 11.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What on the dark side but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Schwerte en Aplerbeck, knooppunt voor fietsers en voetgangers foto5 2017-06-05 13.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerte, fontein bij Altes Rathaus en Sankt Viktorkirche foto9 2017-06-05 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. May be white could be improved. --XRay 05:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneThanks, you are right, I made white part a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 22:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Gondorf, der Oberburg Dm foto8 2017-06-01 12.53.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gondorf, der Oberburg Dm foto8 2017-06-01 12.53.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlbachl, die Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt en Gasthof foto7 2017-07-29 16.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlbachl, die Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt en die Johanneskirche foto8 2017-07-29 16.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlbachl, die Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt, Johanneskirche en Gasthof foto10 2017-07-29 13.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter en Niederstrasse, panorama vanaf de Brennerstrasse foto4 2017-07-29 13.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 15:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, stadszicht bij de rotonde-Resselstrasse foto8 2017-07-29 12.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good picture over urban image. --Marrovi 15:07, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlbachl, die Johanneskirche foto11 2017-07-29 16.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is the tower leaning back and left? PumpkinSky 12:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks ✓ Done some perspective improvements, it is nearly straight --Michielverbeek 23:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC) OK now. PumpkinSky 02:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, die Innbrücke met die Mariahilfstrasse en Innstrasse foto5 2017-07-30 12.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, die Innbrücke met die Mariahilfstrasse en Innstrasse positie2 foto4 2017-07-30 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, die Hofkirche Dm64204 poging2 foto7 2017-07-30 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlbachl, Straßenbrücke Dm124485 positie2 foto5 2017-07-29 16.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, binnen Rathaus Galerien, Diese Plakat stillt keinen Hunger foto22 2017-07-30 15.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, der Inn vanaf de Universitätsbrücke met der Dom Sankt Jakob Dm64166 en der Stadtturm Dm64167 foto9 2017-07-30 16.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, passage bij der Maria-Theresien-Straße foto3 2017-07-30 19.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs, die Alte Pfarrkirche heilige Jodok und Lucia mit Friedhof Dm64946 foto5 2017-07-31 12.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, der Emile Béthouart Steg met die Stadt Pfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus foto6 2017-07-31 13.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, der Inn vanaf der Innsteg foto5 2017-07-31 16.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dynamic composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, das Altes Rathaus mit Stadtturm Dm64167 poging3 foto5 2017-07-31 17.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck, die Stadt Pfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus foto7 2017-08-01 09.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The white images of the saints are very white. But they were also in full sunlight. For me the photo is good enough.--Famberhorst 18:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hall in Tirol, Herz Jesu Basilika Dm44709 foto5 2017-08-01 10.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hall in Tirol, die Allerheiligenkirche, ehemalige Jesuitenkirche Dm123328 foto6 2017-08-01 10.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 14:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Hall in Tirol en Volders, der Inn foto4 2017-08-01 11.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 14:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolsass, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Heimsuchung Dm64409 foto4 2017-08-01 12.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 14:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strass im Zillertal, die Kath. Pfarrkirche Sankt Jakob Dm64852 foto5 2017-08-02 09.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Carlos yo 15:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landhaus, der Ziller foto5 2017-08-02 09.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 15:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Weer en Pill, zicht op de Inn foto3 2017-08-01 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe better with a bit more contrast or clarity. Small spot in the sky. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks I have ✓ Done a contrast enlargement, but I could not find the spot --Michielverbeek 22:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pill, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Anna Dm64617 foto7 2017-08-01 13.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Margarethen, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Margaretha Dm63928 foto6 2017-08-01 15.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volders, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Johannes der Täufer Dm64935 foto9 2017-08-01 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment It looks like the spire is a bit crooked to the left. Or is that oppressive illusion?--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks, ✓ Done you were right --Michielverbeek 20:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Glückwunsch![edit]

Hiermit überreichen wir

die Urkunde für die erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Wettbewerb

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Kramsach, der Inn foto6 2017-08-02 10.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wörgl, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius Dm71713 foto7 2017-08-02 13.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopfgarten, die Brixentaler Ache foto7 2017-08-02 14.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The posts suggest that the image might require to be detilted or to correct the perspective. Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Hopfgarten en Westendorf, die Brixentaler Ache foto8 2017-08-02 16.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps a bit tilted. Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Westendorf en Hopfgarten, zicht op een beek (waarschijnlijk bij de Mühltal) foto10 2017-08-02 16.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 20:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brixen im Thale, die Pfarr- und Dekanatskirche Mariä Himmelfahrt Dm63923 foto5 2017-08-03 09.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --Carlos yo 20:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brixlegg, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Unsere Liebe Frau Vermählung Dm124148 positie2 foto8 2017-08-02 10.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective correction (and there is a dust spot/bird right of the roof of the tower) --Llez 15:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks for your accuracy and I have ✓ Done the perspective. I have found a strange shadow at the right part of the roof and I have removed it --Michielverbeek 21:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And I have found two small spots and removed them --Michielverbeek 21:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better now --Llez 07:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruckhäusl, die Pfarrkirche foto10 2017-08-02 14.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchberg in Tirol, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Ulrich Dm39569 foto7 2017-08-03 10.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The verticals of the houses look well so I assume that the church tower is leaning a bit in reality. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitzbühel, links die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Andreas Dm64400 rechts die Liebfrauenkirche Dm110107 foto92017-08-03 11.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rattenberg, Spitalkirche Heilige Geist Dm121572 foto5 2017-08-02 11.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you crop out the windows edges that are visible on the right?--Trougnouf 15:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks ✓ Done, you were absolutely right --Michielverbeek 21:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) --Trougnouf 12:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dein Review auf QIC[edit]

Hallo! Vielen Dank für Dein positives Review von File:Zentrale zone mexikoring 02.jpg. Die "Staubkörner" habe ich gesehen. Den schwarzen links werde ich entfernen, auch wenn es durchaus ein Vogel in der Entfernung sein könnte. Den weißen rechts möchte ich aber drin lassen, denn er ist ganz klar ein Flugzeug mit Kondensstreifen dahinter. Die neue Bildversion lade ich wohl heute im Laufe des Abends hoch. Viele Grüße, --Dirtsc (talk) 10:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberwössen, Kirche Maria Sieben Schmerzen foto4 2017-08-04 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:08, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterwössen, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin DmD-1-89-160-4 foto7 2017-08-04 11.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:54, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grassau, kerktoren van die Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt DmD-1-89-120-6 foto10 2017-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not the best perspective, put technically o.k. --Granada 14:35, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rottau, die Katholische Filialkirche Sankt Michael DmD-1-89-120-28 foto6 2017-08-04 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reit im Winkl, das Rathaus foto9 2017-08-03 18.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments well lit, good composition considering the location of the town hall in Reit im Winkl and you had luck with the weather. --Granada 21:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Johann in Tirol, toren van die Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt Dm64811 foto5 2017-08-03 12.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Griesenau en Schwendt, panorama vanaf de Kohlamweg foto5 2017-08-03 14.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwendt, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Ägidius Dm64762 foto6 2017-08-03 14.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kössen, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Petrus und Paulus Dm64432 foto8 2017-08-03 15.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit sad, but you did not have the weather either.--Famberhorst 07:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC) Comment But it did not rain seriously that day --Michielverbeek 08:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberndorf in Tirol, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Philippus und Jakobus Dm64572 foto8 2017-08-03 12.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pfarrkirche Sankt Philippus und Jakobus --Michielverbeek 18:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Volgens mij is er geen kerk voor u veilig. Haha, ja: de kerk in een plaats is vaak het gebouw dat het meeste opvalt tijdens het fietsen. En ik weet dat in Friesland heel veel (kleine) kerken staan. --Famberhorst 19:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopfgarten, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Jakobus d. Ä. und Leonhard Dm64088 foto8 2017-08-02 15.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A somewhat gloomy picture. Maybe 2 steps helps lighter. But good image quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your comment. Realize that it was raining like hell just before I took this photo; the sky was still dark. --Michielverbeek 07:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rimsting, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus DmD-1-87-168-4 foto5 2017-08-04 14.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Endorf, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Jakobus DmD-1-87-128-6 foto7 2017-08-04 15.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seebruck, der Chiemsee foto6 2017-08-04 16.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 17:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitzbühel, Kiegerdenkmal Dm110136 foto5 2017-08-03 10.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitzbühel, toren van der Katholische Filialkirche Sankt Katharina Dm110932 foto3 2017-08-03 11.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Schneizelreuth, de Saalach foto6 2017-08-05 13.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Rotthalmünster en Malching, wegpanorama foto6 2017-08-08 11.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotthalmünster, monumentale panden op het Marktplatz D-2-75-143-27 en D-2-75-143-29 foto5 2017-08-08 11.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotthalmünster, poort en kerktoren die Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt DmD-2-75-143-12 foto2 2017-08-08 11.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:44, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inzell, de Max Aicher Arena foto7 2017-08-05 12.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Laufen en Freilassing, de Salzach foto4 2017-08-06 12.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ering, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt DmD-2-77-118-7 foto3 2017-08-08 10.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments perspectively not perfect, but well lit and sharp apart from the top but that's often inevitable --Granada 07:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malching, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Aegidius DmD-2-75-132-3 foto7 2017-08-08 10.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments as for the picture before (at least it gives me the impression of some kind of perspective incorrectness, does it really lean a tiny bit backwards?) --Granada 07:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes thanks, so I have ✓ Done a small perspective correction --Michielverbeek 18:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karpfham, die katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt DmD-2-75-124-104 foto7 2017-08-08 13.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 18:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzbach am Inn, die Pfarrkirche foto1 DmD-2-75-145-61 foto5 2017-08-08 15.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhaus am Inn, stadhuis foto3 2017-08-08 15.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquartstein, die Pfarrkirche Heilig Blut foto13 2017-08-04 11.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment A bit dark and low on contrast. Could you try and raise the shadows or is this already all you could get out of the RAW? --Granada 14:35, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, it is a bit brighter and it has got more contrast. However the shadows are not stronger --Michielverbeek 20:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks o.k. now. --Granada 10:15, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dommelstadl, kerktoren van die Dreifaltigkeitskirche DmD-2-75-133-20 foto8 2017-08-08 19.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world[edit]

I truly wish you, your family, and your friends Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world. Have a great holiday season. PumpkinSky talk 18:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochburg, die Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt Dm37463 foto7 2017-08-07 13.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gundertshausen, Kapelle foto3 2017-08-07 14.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I think you should crop some of the uninteresting street in the foreground out. --Ermell 20:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, you are right; this improves the composition --Michielverbeek 21:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgkirchen, Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Maximilian Dm58148 foto3 2017-08-07 16.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braunau am Inn, der Stadttorturm - Salburger Tor Dm41795 foto8 2017-08-08 08.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schärding, Burggraben-Innlände vanaf der Alte Innbrücke foto7 2017-08-08 15.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schärding, Burggraben-Innlände vanaf der Alte Innbrücke foto10 2017-08-08 15.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsteuer, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Petrus und Paulus Dm104455 foto2 2017-08-09 12.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aschau, Katholische Filialkirche heilige Bartholomäus Dm57972 foto3 2017-08-07 14.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ort im Innkreis, Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Apostel Andreas Dm59294 foto8 2017-08-09 12.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utzenaich, Katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt in straatzicht Dm60043 foto6 2017-08-09 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurolzmünster, die Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Mauritius Dm58020 foto5 2017-08-09 14.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ried im Innkreis, Katholische Pfarrkirche heilige Peter und Paul Dm59470 foto3 2017-08-09 15.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschlried, kapel foto8 2017-08-09 16.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]