User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief17

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, de Scheepsschroef bij centrale treinstation positie4 foto2 2016-06-26 20.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, de Scheepsschroef bij centrale treinstation positie2 foto6 2016-06-26 20.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, de Scheepsschroef bij het centrale treinstation positie1 foto3 2016-06-25 21.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woudrichem, straatzicht Vissersdijk met stadspoort, kanon en de Rooms Katholieke Kerk van Johannes Nepomuk RM39587 foto6 2016-06-19 12.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woudrichem, historische haven met kanon bij de Stadshaven-Rijkswal foto7 2016-06-19 12.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woudrichem, historische haven tussen Rijkswal en Stadshaven foto4 2016-06-19 12.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werkendam, de Maranathakerk foto13 2016-06-19 11.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kievitswaard, de Nieuwe Merwede vanaf de Bandijk foto3 2016-06-19 11.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, stadsschouwburg-muzieum foto4 2016-06-08 10.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, straatzicht op de Van Schaeck Mathonsingel positie2 foto11 2016-06-08 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, straatzicht op de Van Schaeck Mathonsingel positie1 foto11 2016-06-08 10.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, sculptuur zonder titel van Tony Cragg op het Stationsplein foto4 2016-06-08 10.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, main police office het Regionaal Politiebureau Nijmegen foto5 2016-06-08 13.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Striking, nice and crisp --Daniel Case 02:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, het Quackmonument van Willem Bijlard op het Quackplein foto3 2016-06-08 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, straatzicht de Marikenstraat positie2 foto15 2016-06-08 12.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --Daniel Case 02:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, straatzicht de Marikenstraat positie1 foto7 2016-06-08 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments One I wish I could say I took --Daniel Case 02:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harlingen, zicht op de Waddenpromenade foto15 2016-07-03 16.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harlingen, zicht op de Oude Buitenhaven foto3 2016-07-03 16.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harlingen, zicht op de Noorderhaven foto3 2016-07-03 16.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, de tekening op de muur bij het Stationsplein vanaf eerste etage van het treinstation foto6 2016-06-26 20.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Maybe slightly tilted to the right, but OK for me. --C messier 09:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, plein voor het centrale station vanaf de grond foto11 21-06-25 21.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Needs a slight perspective correction and better categories (station and a square category). --C messier 08:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for review, I did a small perspective correction (but it's not perfect) and improved categories from all my station photos --Michielverbeek 18:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK now. --C messier 08:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Gameren en Nieuwaal. de uiterwaarden van de Waal foto9 2016-06-19 15.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Nieuwaal en Gameren, de uiterwaarden van de Waal foto7 2016-06-19 15.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Nieuwaal en Zuilichem, de uiterwaarden van de Waal foto3 2016-06-19 14.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaltbommel, kantoorgebouw Van den Herik-Boskalis foto10 2016-06-19 15.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Zuilichem en Nieuwaal, de uiterwaarden van de Waal foto5 2016-06-19 14.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, de Scheepsschroef in het centrale treinstation positie3 foto5 2016-07-03 12.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp and interesting angle, but the bottom of the hand rail is too fuzzy and there is a shadow on it. Would suggest that you crop that out, see note, it will also balance the pic better. W.carter 09:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Done Bottom crop is down --Michielverbeek 20:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality --W.carter 20:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hombourg, l' église Saint Brice foto5 2016-07-10 14.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok now for me --Hubertl 18:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

I am a novice in photography so you can expect some mistakes from me. Thanks a lot for your tip! Nikhil (talk)

File:Deze file svp deleten - please delete this file.jpg[edit]

Heb je dit bestand per ongeluk opgeladen of wat was de bedoeling? Henxter (talk) 09:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deze file svp deleten - please delete this file.jpg[edit]

File:Deze file svp deleten - please delete this file.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Henxter (talk) 09:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, straatzicht, Stationsstraat foto4 2015-03-22 12.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016[edit]

Hallo Michielverbeek,

In 2014 nam je deel aan de fotowedstrijd Wiki Loves Monuments. In België en Luxemburg wordt deze fotowedstrijd ook in 2016 gehouden. Wees welkom!

Website van Wiki Loves Monuments in België & Luxemburg
Website van Wiki Loves Monuments internationaal (andere landen)

We organiseren ook vier fototochten in Gent, Mechelen, Antwerpen en Luik. Zie: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/nl&setlang=nl

We zien graag je foto's van monumenten verschijnen. Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Michielverbeek!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland![edit]

Hallo Michielverbeek!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freudenberg, brug over de Main foto9 2016-08-08 12.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Boxtal en Freudenberg, wegpanorama foto4 2016-08-08 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bechhofen, sculptuur foto10 2016-08-04 15.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köningshofen an der Heide, dorpszicht met de evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche DmD-5-71-115-41 foto9 2016-08-04 15.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halsbach, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Petrus und Paulus DmD-5-71-139-17 foto6 2016-08-04 14.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustädtlein, katholische Kirche Sankt Margareta foto5 2016-08-04 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenbach, straatzicht met gedenkteken foto4 2016-08-04 12.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thann, evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter DmD-5-71-115-83 foto5 2016-08-04 16.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krombach, straatzicht die Hauptstrasse met DmD-6-71-138-1 en DmD-6-71-138-2 foto3 2016-08-09 12.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Dörnsteinbach en Mensengesäss, wegpanorama foto3 2016-08-09 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mömbris, straatzicht met die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Cyriakus DmD-6-71-143-7 foto72016-08-09 11.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Unterafferbach en Goldbach, sculptuur foto5 2016-08-09 10.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansbach, ehemaliges Gebäude des Gewerbevereins Ansbach DmD-5-61-000-113 foto11 2016-08-05 09.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberdachstetten, die evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche Sankt Bartholomäus D-5-71-183-1 foto6 2016-08-05 11.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aschaffenburg, die Stadtverwaltung in de Dalbergstrasse DmD-6-61-000-22 foto4 2016-08-08 19.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. It was overcategorized, I have fixed. Do it yourself? --A.Savin 17:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Sorry, I have had to hurry to upload my photos for Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland. I will look better before nominating --Michielverbeek 20:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aschaffenburg, spoorbrug bij de Mainwiesenweg foto3 2016-08-08 17.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Mooi!--Famberhorst 17:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Günzburg en Gundelfingen, wegpanorama met maisveld foto6 2016-08-03 11.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leipheim, der Hauselersturm DmD-7-74-155-35 foto2 2016-08-03 09.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Could maybe one f-stop brighter IMO. --Ermell 21:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberfahlheim, die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Dionysius DmD-7-75-134-11 foto9 2016-08-03 09.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burlafingen, die ehemalige katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Jakobus d. Ä. DmD-7-75-135-59 foto3 2016-08-03 08.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Möckenau en Oberdachstetten, wegpanorama met electriciteitsmasten foto4 2016-08-05 11.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitteldachstetten, straatzicht me toren van de evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche DmD-5-71-183-26 foto3 2016-08-05 11.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grossenried, katholische Pfarrkirche St. Laurentius DmD-5-71-115-24 foto6 2016-08-04 16.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauingen, die Donaubrücke foto3 2016-08-03 13.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauingen, sculptuur met die Donaubrücke foto6 2016-08-03 13.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauingen, Spitalkirche Sankt Alban DmD-7-73-144-158 in straatzicht foto6 2016-08-03 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gundelfingen an der Donau, sculptuur op de Haupt Strasse met Ehemaliges Gasthaus zum Stern DmD-7-73-136-13 2016-08-03 12.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gundelfingen an der Donau, Unteres Tor D-7-73-136-30 foto4 2016-08-03 12.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nördlingen, Deininger Tor DmD-7-79-194-23 foto9 2016-08-04 08.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amerdingen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Vitus DmD-7-79-112-3 foto4 2016-08-03 16.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finningen, die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt. Martin DmD-7-73-150-7 foto5 2016-08-03 15.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Finningen en Mörslingen, veld met rode kolen foto9 2016-08-03 15.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaualtheim, die Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Vitus DmD-7-73-125-294 foto5 2016-08-03 14.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktoffingen, die katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt DmD-7-79-177-51 foto4 2016-08-04 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wallerstein, die Pestsäule DmD-7-79-224-7 en die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Alban DmD-7-79-224-1 foto5 2016-08-04 09.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberndorf, die evangelisch-lutherische Kirche Sankt Kilian DmD-5-75-135-24 foto9 2016-08-05 15.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Windsheim, straatzicht Rothenburger Strasse foto9 2016-08-05 14.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urfersheim, die evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche Sankt Bartholomäus DmD-5-75-133-5 foto6 2016-08-05 13.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 07:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktbergel, straatzicht die Würzburger Strasse foto7 2016-08-05 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 07:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktbergel, die evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche Sankt Veit DmD-5-75-143-20 foto7 2016-08-05 12.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hy Michielverbeek, I thought of a writing mistake of yours in Würzbürger and was quite sure you are from the area around here. As you are not a nativ German language speaker it sounded a bit ungraciously.I adore your photographs and your work for wiki. Always good light for the future.--Ermell (talk) 21:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Diebach en Langenfeld, wegpanorama foto7 2016-08-06 09.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustadt an der Aisch, bar Uncle Frank met kerktoren DmD-5-75-153-45 op de achtergrond foto9 2016-08-05 20.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustadt an der Aisch, das Rathaus DmD-5-75-153-55 foto10 2016-08-05 19.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustadt an der Aisch, der Nürnberger Tor DmD-5-75-153-73 poging3 foto13 gedaan 2016-08-05 19.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dietersheim, Kirche in der Hauptstrasse foto8 2016-08-05 16.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Sugenheim, wegpanorama IMG 2172 2016-08-06 12.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rüdern, landbouwbedrijf aan het rand van het dorp IMG 2162 2016-08-06 11.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberlaimbach, die evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul DmD-5-75-161-121 foto7 2016-08-06 10.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ullstadt, katholische Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt DmD-5-75-165-98 IMG 2138 2016-08-06 10.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulm, der Gänstürm Dm0 foto6 2016-08-03 07.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt Einersheim, das sogenanntes Würzbürger Tor DmD-6-75-148-13 foto2 2016-08-06 14.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Comment Würzbürger?--Ermell 07:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You are living in this part of Germany so you might know it better. I compare my image to the one in the list so I think it is the Würzburger; it has been taken from the other side. --Michielverbeek 07:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Siehe auch http://www.markt-einersheim.de/g_sehenswertes.html --Michielverbeek 07:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mönchensondheim, kerkhof met kapel DmD-6-75-139-183 plaatsen foto8 2016-08-06 14.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nenzenheim, die evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche DmD-6-75-139-192 foto2 2016-08-06 13.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Krassolzheim en Ezelheim, wegpanorama IMG 2193 2016-08-06 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharpness. Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ezelheim, dorpszicht IMG 2181 2016-08-06 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iphofen, Mainbernheimer Tor DmD-6-75-139-25 van binnenkant foto6 2016-08-06 15.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iphofen, Mainbernheimer Tor DmD-6-75-139-25 van buitenkant foto9 2016-08-06 15.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktbreit, der Weisser Turm D-6-75-147-32 foto10 2016-08-07 09.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktbreit, straatzicht2 die Bachgasse met das Malerwinkelhaus D-6-75-147-7 foto6 2016-08-07 09.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktbreit, straatzicht1 die Bachgasse met das Malerwinkelhaus D-6-75-147-7 foto8 2016-08-07 09.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etwashausen, die katholische Heilige Kreuzkapelle DmD-6-75-141-163 vanaf die Alte Main Brücke foto13 2016-08-06 16.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up question from QIC[edit]

Hi there,

Thanks for your comments regarding File:Botanical Building in Balboa Park.jpg. I'm hoping to learn a bit more about what you're saying. "main object is sharp, but why fvalue10? Foreground is not obvious enough and reduce quality seriously. If you would have used fvalue4 (and ISO100) I guess it would have been a Q1photo." So, frankly, f/10 wasn't an active decision. It's what the camera's Auto mode chose. Auto seemed to be doing a pretty good job at the time so I stuck with it. Still, if I were in manual or aperture priority mode, I don't think I would've chosen f/4, and that gives me pause. I keep realizing that I'm more of a photography newbie than I thought. :) I wouldn't have used f/4 because I'd be worried that someone would comment that the foreground was too blurry. It sounds like you're saying you would've preferred that (and perhaps if I did want it all to be crisp I should've used an even higher fvalue?). Not asking you to explain aperture :) -- I think what I just don't get sometimes is what people consider to be desirable (or not), outside of the obvious... — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gossmanndorf, straatzicht Zielweg-Zehnhofstrasse foto3 2016-08-07 11.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 21:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ochsenfurt, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Andreas DmD-6-79-170-107 foto4 2016-08-07 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ochsenfurt, straatzicht die Hauptstrasse-Zwinger met das Oberes Tor DmD-6-79-170-93 foto8 2016-08-07 10.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Würzburg, der Sankt-Kilians-Dom DmD-6-63-000-104 foto6 2016-08-07 14.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Würzburg, standbeeld van der Brückenheilige Johannes von Nepomuk op die Alte Main Brücke foto32016-08-07 14.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 19:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Würzburg, zicht op het noordelijke deel van de oostelijke Mainzijde foto6 2016-08-07 13.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please take away the 2 (very small) dustspots in the clouds. --Haeferl 21:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Würzburg, standbeeld van Karel de Grote op die Alte Main Brücke foto5 2016-08-07 13.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Würzburg, sculptuur in de Mergentheimer Strasse foto3 2016-08-07 13.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ochsenfurt, das Klingentor DmD-6-79-170-51 foto7 2016-08-07 10.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erlenbach am Main, stadszicht vanaf Wörth met die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul DmD-6-76-122-1 foto5 2016-08-08 15.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miltenberg, die katholische Friedhofskapelle Sankt Laurentius DmD-6-76-139-177 foto5 2016-08-08 14.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Düdelsheim, die evangelische Kirche Dm0 foto6 2016-08-10 10.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orleshausen, die Alte Schule Hauptstrasse 66 Dm0 foto3 2016-08-10 09.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Büdingen, das Schlaghaus in straatzicht positie1 foto2 2016-08-09 17.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gründau, straatzicht Bachgasse-Hain Gründauer Strasse foto2 2016-08-09 16.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gelnhausen, das Schiftor Dm0 foto7 2016-08-09 14.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klingenberg am Main, stadszicht met die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Pankratius DmD-6-76-134-32 foto11 2016-08-08 15.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitzingen, der Falterturm DmD-6-75-141-13 foto3 2016-08-06 16.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 18:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Fremdingen en Minderoffingen, panorama foto4 2016-08-04 10.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minderoffingen, die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius DmD-7-79-177-11 foto10 2016-08-04 10.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Kaichen en Heldenbergen, hooibalen in panorama foto6 2016-08-10 14.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Assenheim, panorama foto5 2016-08-10 13.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Düdelsheim en Lindheim, panorama foto6 2016-08-10 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windecken, het stadhuis foto7 2016-08-11 09.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windecken, straatzicht Pestalozzistrasse foto7 2016-08-10 15.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt am Main, station perron 18 foto2 2016-08-12 11.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments In my judgment, the overall quality is sufficient. -- Ikan Kekek 09:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt am Main, skyline met der Eiserne Steg op de voorgrond foto3 2016-08-12 09.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt am Main, die Europäische Zentralbank vanaf die Alte Mainbrücke foto5 2016-08-11 16.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massenheim, een nieuwe kerk foto8 2016-08-11 12.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fremdingen, katholische Kapelle Sankt Leonhard DmD-7-79-147-7 foto9 2016-08-04 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Question Why is this one and the two others are still not promoted to Q!? --Michielverbeek 05:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed I think there was a wrong syntax. Hopefully they will be removed tomorrow by the bot. --XRay 10:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Ok, I just wait --Michielverbeek 09:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Georgsdorf, die Georgsdorfer Mühle foto9 2016-09-25 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 02:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Twist en Nieuw Schoonebeek, Alte en Neue Energie foto5 2016-09-25 14.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Twist, sculptuur Nord Stream Doppelpipeline foto9 2016-09-25 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adorf, loopbrug over het Süd-Nord Kanal positie2 foto5 2016-09-25 13.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordhorn, viadukt over der Nordhorn-Almelo Kanal bij die Bentheimer Strasse foto5 2016-09-25 11.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit hazy, but overall good quality. --W.carter 14:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windecken, die Stiftskirche Windecken positie2 poging2 foto7 2016-08-10 20.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for a late afternoon/early nihgt shot --Hubertl 02:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windecken, straatzicht Marktplatz poging2 foto6 2016-08-10 20.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for a late afternoon/early nihgt shot --Hubertl 02:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havixbeck, sculptuur van der Steinhauer met die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Dionysius Dm1 op de achtergrond foto9 2016-04-03 11.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Billerbeck, die Propstei- und Wallfahrtskirche Sankt Ludgerus Dm11 foto5 2016-04-02 13.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 22:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keeken, die evangelische Kirche Dm47 foto4 2015-10-26 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aldekerk, die Sankt Peter und Paul Kirche Dm32 foto5 2016-05-05 10.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herongen, die Amanduskapelle Dm15 foto15 2016-05-05 09.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epe, die katholische Kirche Sankt Agatha Dm15 foto9 2016-04-03 16.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heek, die katholische Pfarrkirche Heek Dm3 foto9 2016-04-03 15.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I assume that having all verticals vertical the distortion of the church would be too much --Poco a poco 08:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horstmar, die Sankt Gertrudis Kirche in straatzicht DmA-26 foto4 2016-04-03 13.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Appelhülsen, Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Maria Himmelfahrt DmA029 foto9 2016-04-02 14.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gescher, Brauchtum verbindet met die Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Pankratius Dm1 foto10 2016-04-02 10.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bönninghardt, die evangelische Pfarrkirche Dm15 foto6 2016-05-05 14.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ossenberg, molen Dm63 foto6 2016-05-05 13.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter Dm79 foto3 2016-05-05 12.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheurdt, Pfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus Dm38 foto12 2016-05-05 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 08:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mainbernheim, die evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche DmD-6-75-144-56 foto18 2016-08-06 15.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective correction required to make verticals straight --Uoaei1 04:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC) Perspective improvement, I hope it is well Done --Michielverbeek 21:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --W.carter 18:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mainbernheim, die evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche DmD-6-75-144-56 foto6 2016-08-06 15.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 22:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mainbernheim, das Oberestor DmD-6-75-144-41 foto2 2016-08-06 15.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goch, straatzicht Am Steintor Dm6 foto7 2016-05-05 16.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Essen-Südviertel, straatzicht Bismarckstrasse foto7 2016-08-13 15.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Essen-Mitte, straatzicht Limbecker Platz foto7 2016-08-13 14.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lembeck, toegangspoort bij Schloss Lembeck Dm84 foto4 2016-07-20 13.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 20:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recklinghausen, schachtbok Zeche Recklinghausen 2 Dm115TKD foto9 2015-07-20 10.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 09:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kessel, Mühlenstumpf Dm2 foto4 2016-05-05 17.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uedem, die evangelische Kirche DmA-04-03-86 foto6 2016-05-05 16.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bönninghardt, die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Vincenz Dm15 foto3 2016-05-05 14.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Michielverbeek, could you please fix that? Otherwise I'd like to go to CR, it is an easy fix Poco a poco 19:54, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks for reviews and comments. I Done a small horizontal perspective correction but the crop does not really satisfy me --Michielverbeek 18:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Niedernberg en Grosswallstadt, graspanorama foto7 2016-08-08 16.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks like a quality image to me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:37, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bochum-Mitte, Bermuda3eck poging1 foto7 2016-08-14 09.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 09:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raesfeld, Schloss Raesfeld Dm1 foto6 2016-07-0913.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you remove the cloning marks on the sky at the left? --A.Savin 04:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks Done, it was a very accurate review, I hope this one is better --Michielverbeek 18:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 08:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationale Intocht Sinterklaas in Maassluis, sleepboot de Furie met Zwarte Pieten IMG 4625 2016-11-12 11.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks, I have tried my standard for first time --Michielverbeek 08:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationale Intocht Sinterklaas in Maassluis, de Pakjesboot IMG 4628 2016-11-12 11.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK but there is an undefined category and the English description text is in Dutch, could you fix this, please? --Basotxerri 08:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Done Sorry, I did not take time for it. --Michielverbeek 11:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Basotxerri 12:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationale Intocht Sinterklaas in Maassluis, beurtvaarder de Jansje met Zwarte Pieten IMG 4633 2016-11-12 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationale Intocht Sinterklaas in Maassluis, motorsleepboot de Tonijn met Zwarte Pieten IMG 46402016-11-12 11.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 10:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bochum-Mitte, sculptuur bij het centrale treinstation foto7 2016-08-13 09.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Subject is in focus and well-composed --Daniel Case 02:31, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Bahnhof Reken, panorama foto4 2016-08-15 15.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavesum, kapel Dm4 foto32016-08-15 14.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationale Intocht Sinterklaas in Maassluis, bergingsvaartuig de Bruinvisch met Zwarte Pieten IMG 4636 2016-11-12 11.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality, despite the dull light and the not very english description :). --C messier 06:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have made the description a bit more English. Please realize Sinterklaas might become nowadays a Dutch national symbol --Michielverbeek 06:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leverkusen, straatzicht Bayer - Science for a better life foto2 2015-04-18 12.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brühl, Pfarrkirche Sankt Margareta Dm73 foto2 2015-04-17 14.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weilerswist, der Swister Turm Dm91 foto7 2015-04-17 13.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Münstereifel, der Heisterbacher Tor foto9 2015-04-16 16.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Witten, het stadhuis Dm90 foto4 2015-04-19 15.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenstein, die katholische Kirche Sankt Johann Baptist DmA154 foto10 2015-04-19 13.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hattingen, der Glockenturm in straatzicht DmA137 foto4 2015-04-19 13.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Haeferl 03:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hatzfeld, watertoren Dm1276 foto7 2015-04-19 10.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solingen, sculptuur Eichenstrasse - Unnersbergerallee foto5 2015-04-18 15.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elten, die Gerritzens Mühle Dm24 foto15 2015-08-20 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anholt, das Rathaus Dm7 foto6 2015-05-14 14.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borken, der Kuhmturm DmA2 foto3 2015-04-20 16.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Alte Rathaus Dm2 in straatzicht foto4 2015-04-20 13.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahsen, Schleuse Ahsen foto2 2015-04-20 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzhausen, straatzicht foto7 2015-09-10 14.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments On the dark side but good sharp for me.--Famberhorst 16:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemgo, sculptuur aan de Mittelstrasse-Ostertor-Papenstrasse foto5 2015-09-10 10.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemgo, monumentaal pand aan de Mittelstrasse 2 foto5 2015-09-10 09.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recklinghausen, Backsteinskulptur am Lohtor foto5 2015-09-13 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund, der H-Bahn halte Technologiezentrum foto3 2015-09-12 15.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wewer, Pfarrkirche Sankt Johann Baptist Dm282 foto7 2015-09-11 13.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahmbeckerheide, kapel bij begraafplaats foto11 2015-09-10 11.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Category added --A.Savin 10:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks --Michielverbeek 19:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehr, sculptuur op de kruising Severinusstrasse-Dorfstrasse foto7 2016-08-31 12.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehr, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Severinus Dm43 foto6 2016-08-31 11.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 08:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goch, rivier (de Niers)-der Dr. Terordeweg foto4 2016-08-24 17.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veert, Sankt Martin Kirche DmGE10026 foto9 2016-08-24 15.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 08:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Waldfeucht en Saeffelen, wegpanorama met moderne windmolens foto3 2016-08-11 14.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 23:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldfeucht, die Windmühle Dm8 met kerk foto8 2016-08-31 14.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 23:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heinsberg, ehemalige Stiftskirche Sankt Gangolfus Dm20 foto3 2016-09-08 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 23:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tripsrath, die Sankt Anna Kirche Dm49 in straatzicht foto4 2016-09-08 13.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 23:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schmerlecke, Windmühle Am Alten Hellweg Dm4 foto3 2015-09-11 16.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Foreground to the dark side. Can be made lighter. But the quality is good for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Done I have made foreground a bit brighter, but original RAW-file is already quiet dark --Michielverbeek 22:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

QI nominations[edit]

Hi, Your nominations were broken. Please do it again with the proper gadget (click on "Nominate this image for QI" above each picture). Regards, Yann (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen, sculptuur bij de Marschiertor foto5 2016-09-08 19.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lammersdorf, die katholische Pfarrkirche Dm128 in straatzicht foto3 2016-09-09 12.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paustenbach, straatzicht Paustenbacher Strasse foto8 2016-09-09 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simmerath, die Pfarrkirche Dm26 foto3 2016-09-09 13.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Vogelsang, panorama met hooibalen foto5 2016-09-09 15.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 22:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einruhr, die Sankt Nikolaus Kirche foto5 2016-09-09 14.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looks good, nice light. --Slaunger 22:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariawald, die Abtei Dm83 foto10 2016-09-10 10.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Einruhr, die Rur foto5 2016-09-09 14.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Einruhr en Kesternich, der Eiserbachtal positie2 foto6 2016-09-09 14.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Kesternich en Einruhr, panorama foto5 2016-09-09 13.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hastenrath, katholische Kirche Sankt Josef Dm38 foto6 2016-08-31 13.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I suggest cutting the mast on the left. --Milseburg 08:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC) I was hoping nobody would give this command, but unfortunately, so I have Done, thanks --Michielverbeek 21:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Support Sorry for my late reaction. It´s undoubtedly good quality. --Milseburg 20:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gemünd, brug over die Urft foto4 2016-09-09 16.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heimbach, Burg Hengebach Dm1 foto8 2016-09-10 10.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waarschijnlijk Kommerscheid en Warscheid, dubbel dorpszicht vanaf Schmidt foto2 2016-09-10 13.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Lammersdorf, panorama met electriciteitsmast en moderne windmolens foto5 2016-09-10 14.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rekkem, parochiekerk Sint-Niklaas oeg56295 foto3 2015-08-09 17.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zillebeke, parochiekerk Sint-Catharina oeg30897 foto3 2015-08-09 13.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menen, stadhuis met de Belforttoren in straatzicht oeg55745 foto7 2015-08-09 11.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, sculptuur bij de Kleine Sint Jansstraat foto5 2015-08-09 09.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Would be interesting to see it in action. --Ermell 20:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, straatzicht Grote Markt met de Sint Maartenskerk oeg59787 foto2 2015-08-08 20.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esen, de Heropgebouwde kapel Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-ter-Hulpe oeg78193 foto5 2015-09-28 13.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loppem, parochiekerk Sint Martinus oeg209818 met begraafplaats oeg209871 foto6 2015-09-28 10.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berg op Zoom. watertoren oeg 87306 foto5 2015-09-26 16.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sijsele, de Sint Martinuskerk oeg78954 foto6 2015-08-10 14.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oedelem, de Sint Lambertuskerk oeg89281 in straatzicht foto8 2015-08-10 14.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 21:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme, de Schellemolen oeg78661 foto9 2015-09-29 09.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 13:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Pieterskapelle, de Sint-Pieterskerk oeg55080 foto42015-09-28 15.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 13:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keiem, de Sint Niklaaskerk oeg78280 foto7 2015-09-28 15.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 13:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, stadhuis (oeg29238) gebouwencomplex foto14 2015-09-27 19.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is acceptable. -- Ikan Kekek 00:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, sculptuur bij de Sint-Salvatorskathedraal foto15 2015-09-27 18.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 23:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, straatzicht vanaf de brug bij Hoogstraat-Verversdijk met de Sint Annakerk (oeg83424) op de achtergrond foto5 2015-07-29 13.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, onbekend deel van een gracht foto7 2015-09-27 13.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, stadsgracht bij de Wollestraat met de Belfort-Hal of Halletoren (oeg29457) op de achtergrond foto5 2015-07-29 10.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heimbach, stadszicht vanaf Henriette Platz foto4 2016-09-10 10.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The images seems tilted CCW, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 10:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC) I have Done made a general perspective corrective and I hope it's Q1 now --Michielverbeek 21:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK now. --Basotxerri 21:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gemünd, die Sankt Nikolaus Kirche Dm75 foto7 2016-09-09 15.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's acceptable now IMO, with Lr you can do practically everything, also this kind of things --Poco a poco 17:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC) Thanks --Michielverbeek 06:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Basel[edit]

Hallo Michielverbeek; danke für das schöne Foto File:Basel, straatzicht Sankt Alban Kirchrain foto1 2013-07-27 09.31.jpg. Ich glaube, ich weiss ziemlich genau, wo du es aufgenommen hast (war auch schon in der Jugendherberge St. Alban), habe daher Koordinaten ergänzt und hoffe, dass sie stimmen. Ausserdem habe ich mich bemüht, die Beschreibung etwas zu korrigieren: Du schriebst "Blick auf eine Strasse: Sankt Alban Kirchrain", was etwas verwirrend ist, da es sich ja um einen Blick auf einen Kanal handelt - nicht auf die Strasse St.-Alban-Kirchrain, welcher diesen Kanal des St. Alban-Teichs mit der Brücke überquert. Da ich kein Niederländisch kann, wäre ich froh, wenn du die niederländische Beschreibung noch entsprechend anpassen könntest. Nochmal besten Dank! Gestumblindi (talk) 21:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC) Viele Dank --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, de Belfort-Hal of Halletoren (oeg29457) op de Markt 3e poging foto2 2015-09-28 19.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit of grainy, just OK for QI --A.Savin 01:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, het Provinciaal Hof (oeg29455) met met het standbeeld van Jan Breydel en Pieter de Coninck en de DiamondScope uit spiegelglas foto16 2015-09-27 19.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar, houten brug bij Baakhovenstraat-kinderboerderij in herfstkleuren poging2 foto5 2016-10-29 11.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, de Belfort-Hal of Halletoren (oeg29457) op de Markt 2e poging foto4 2015-09-27 19.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge, de Sint-Salvatorskathedraal (oeg29716) vanuit de Steenstraat foto2 2015-09-27 19.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Sonsbeek, watermolen - de Sint Agnietenmolen RM528860 foto5 2015-12-30 14.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, huize Sonsbeek (RM528856) met twee sculpturen op de voorgrond foto12 2015-12-30 14.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Hazegrietje, betonnen viadukt Apeldoornseweg over de Cattepoelseweg RM516891 foto7 2015-12-30 13.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar, de herfst bij elkaar geveegd in de Bredasingel foto13 2016-11-23 14.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice shot. A bit on the dark side.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Comment Sky is quiet white so I cannot develop (bewerken) the photo very bright --Michielverbeek 08:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grazen, parochiekerk Onze-Lieve-Vrouw oeg41835 foto2 2015-06-09 17.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velm, parochiekerk Sint-Martinus oeg23141 foto4 2015-06-09 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortenbos, Basiliek van Onze-Lieve-Vrouw van Kortenbos oeg22998 foto5 2015-06-09 11.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar, sculptuur bij de Kroonse Wal - Brabantweg in herfstsfeer foto13 2016-09-21 18.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The foreground to make a little lighter the whole is less sad, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 08:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Thanks Done and I have improved the photo --Michielverbeek 19:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raesfeld, sculptuur Kappes Anna positie2 foto8 2016-07-19 13.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raesfeld, sculptuur Kappes Anna positie1 foto4 2016-07-19 13.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weseke, die Bockwindmühle foto7 2016-07-19 11.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bos, de Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekapel oeg43185 foto4 2015-06-0917.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 06:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint Truiden, parochiekerk Sint-Maarten in straatzicht oeg22956 foto5 2015-06-09 12.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice perspective and composition --Daniel Case 06:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eagles Nests Trail 13.jpg[edit]

Hello ScotchMist! It is an excellent composition and I think it is also technical better. This evening I will give more details --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Hello ScotchMist! I have been looking to your photos nominated on 21, 22 and 23 December. Your compositions are good but I don't understand the why you use ISO250 or more and f-value 10 or 11. The light conditions are good so I think ISO 100 or 200 is more than enough. I also think that for your photos f-value 4 to 5 is more than enough. I am used to Lightroom and Photoshop so I don't know your software RawTherapee 4.2.1375. However I think the higher the ISO-value, the more noise-reduction and sharpening is necessary. BTW: If your photo is declined you might ask for a discussion and several other people will say something about it. Greetings --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review my photos and for your thoughtful advice. Admittedly during my last summer holiday I struggled with my camera (Nikon D3200) as at times it appeared to have a mind of its own! Over the course of two weeks I took nearly 2,000 photos as we moved from town to town in central Europe, with a mixture of family shots and scenic views interspersed with some live 'action shots'. Both in 'Auto' and 'Landscape' modes, as well as when 'flash' initiated, my camera appears to favour high ISO settings, and although I have attempted to adjust the camera settings to counter this it appears I still have work to do! Thanks again and best wishes for the festive period! ('Mail' not functional so comment posted at talk page of Michielverbeek (talk): --SM1 (talk) 08:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vreden, fontein op de Markt foto5 2015-08-22 14.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borken, sculptuur op den Markt foto7 2016-07-20 14.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marl, sculptuur bij de Marler Stern foto2 2016-07-20 11.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems that taper to walk, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marl, Jezuskruis bij de Hertener Strasse foto7 2016-07-20 11.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful scene. some trees on the dark side for me.--Famberhorst 07:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussels, townhall oeg2043-00090 foto3 2015-06-07 08.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scherpenheuvel, de Onze-Lieve-Vrouwebasiliek oeg42731 foto4 2015-06-08 15.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teuven, parochiekerk Sint-Pieter oeg37940 foto6 2016-07-10 14.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biesme, l'église Saint Martin oeg92087-CLT-0002-01 foto2 2015-06-05 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettet, chapelle Saint Roch oeg92087-CLT-0003-01 foto3 2015-06-05 12.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussel-Schaerbeek, église Royale Sainte-Marie oeg2264-00030 foto5 2015-06-07 14.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Stevenskerk (RM31181) en de Waalbrug (RM523067) vanaf de spoorbrug foto5 2016-05-05 20.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, villa Heyendaal RM523004 foto8 2016-05-05 19.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niftrik, toren van de Rooms Katholieke kerk in dorpszicht RM39640 foto8 2016-04-20 10.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 19:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sippenaeken, château de Beusdael, oeg63088-CLT-0010-01 foto4 2016-07-10 14.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steenokkerzeel, parochiekerk Sint-Rumoldus oeg41318 foto2 2015-06-08 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me now, --Cayambe 10:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Michiel[edit]

Beste Michiel, Bedankt voor opmerking. Ik had het domweg niet gezien, maar heb de fout inmiddels hersteld.
Groetnis uit een koud Fryslân,

Dominicus.--Famberhorst (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de (Verlengde) Waalbrug RM523067 en de Lenteloper foto10 2016-08-24 20.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de (Verlengde) Waalbrug RM523067 en de Lenteloper positie1 foto6 2016-05-05 20.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Probably need a little perspective correction, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

de:WP Detmold Martin-Luther-Kirche[edit]

Hallo Michielverbeek, Dank für Dein Foto im Art. Detmold. Nun frage ich mich, ob die Beschriftung mit "Martin Luther King Kirche" nicht insofern irreführend ist, als der Leser an "Martin-Luther-King-Kirche" denkt - und so hast Du es ja zuerst gelabelt. Oder soll "King" hier "Haupt-"(kirche) (main church) bedeuten? Mir scheint aber, es wäre besser, das Wort "King" zu streichen und das Fotofile umzubenennen. Frohes Schaffen wünscht --Wi-luc-ky (talk) 14:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de (Verlengde) Waalbrug RM523067 en de Lenteloper positie2 foto7 2016-05-05 20.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Note: necessary perspective correction to me. Look at the light poles left.--Famberhorst 06:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Done Is it looking better like this? --Michielverbeek 19:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Namur, pont de Jambes oeg92094-CLT-0150-01 foto4 2015-06-05 17.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is slightly tilted CCW and possibly needs a perspective correction (the right side is leaning in). --Basotxerri 08:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC) I did Done a small perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 21:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, this is still leaning to the left. I've left you a note on the image. If you give it about +1,1 of rotation and -5 of vertical manual transform in Lightroom, this look quite OK. Could you try? --Basotxerri 18:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Thanks for the tip, Done the perspective is looking much better I think --Michielverbeek 19:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much better now, sorry for insisting. --Basotxerri 20:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I realize a perfect perspective is often very difficult for me --Michielverbeek 07:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, when tilting and perspective distortion are mixed, sometimes it's quite difficult to resolve... --Basotxerri 18:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]