User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houten, straatzicht Het Kant-Imkerseind foto4 2015-08-06 15.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diepenheim, Huis Diepenheim RM12880 foto6 2015-08-22 10.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilsteren, de Vilsterse molen (RM31504) en boerderij foto8 2014-10-04 17.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ommen, molen de Konijnenbelt RM31484 foto7 2014-10-04 16.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harreveld, de Sint Agathakerk RM516287 foto5 2015-08-21 16.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lintelo, de Wenninkmolen RM6848 foto3 2015-08-21 15.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apeldoorn, Zutphensestraat en Ina Boudier-Bakkersingel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utrecht, de Vismarkt-Choorstraat vanaf de Maartensbrug foto5 2015-11-01 11.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Domdomegg 19:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utrecht, de Planeet en de Viebrug foto8 2015-11-01 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Domdomegg 19:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utrecht, de Sint Martinusbrug foto10 2015-08-06 15.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maarssen, tussen de Vecht en het Amsterdam Rijnkanaal foto4 2015-08-06 16.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Monnikenhuizen, straatzicht Sperwerstraat foto5 2015-12-30 12.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Geitenkamp, straatzicht Middenweg foto4 2015-12-30 12.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Velperweg Noord, kruising Rosendaalseweg-Raapopseweg foto3 2015-12-30 11.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, kantoorgebouw ING aan de Velperweg foto14 2015-12-30 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 23:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, sculptuur bij de Ooststraat foto4 2015-12-30 10.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Gulden Bodem, straatzicht Bakenbergseweg foto3 2015-12-30 15.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gloomy mood corresponding to the season. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Gulden Bodem, straatzicht Van Lawick Van Pabststraat foto6 2015-12-30 14.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijsbergen, de Sint Bavokerk 0879WN037 en kerkhof 0879WN038 foto9 2015-06-17 13.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint Oedenrode, molenromp RM527511 foto1 2014-05-19 14.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veldhoven, windmolen De Adriaan RM37040 foto10 20147-05-19 11.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 23:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor calibration[edit]

Hi. In my opinion you are wrong calibrated monitor. All your pictures are too dark and look unnatural, dirty colors. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breda, het Baroniemonument RM519034 foto2 2014-12-28 09.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berkel-Enschot, sculptuur bij de Eisenhowerlaan-Durendaelweg foto6 2015-08-13 15.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lage Zwaluwe, de Sint Johannes de Doperkerk GM1719160160a foto6 2015-08-01 10.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ. --Palauenc05 21:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hooge Zwaluwe, de protesantse kerk RM22205 in straatzicht foto6 2015-08-01 10.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wagenberg, de Sint Gummaruskerk RM521492 foto3 20115-08-01 10.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijnandsrade, de rooms-katholieke kerk RM30903 foto11 2014-09-28 16.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oud Valkenburg, de Johannes de Doperkerk RM36816 foto8 2014-09-28 15.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 21:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubachsberg, de rooms-katholieke kerk RM37900 foto5 2014-09-28 12.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaatsheuvel, de Sint Jozefkerk RM530274 foto7 2015-08-13 17.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 21:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loon op Zand, sculptuur Doctor van Kesselstraat-Kerkstraat foto6 2015-08-13 16.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moergestel, standbeeld generaal C.M. Barber foto4 2015-08-13 13.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milheeze, de Sint Willibrorduskerk RM8596 vanaf het kerkhof foto8 2014-05-18 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schaesberg, de Onze-Lieve-Vrouw van de berg Carmelkerk foto9 2015-08-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pey, de O.L.V. Onbevlekt Ontvangen-kerk RM14264 foto4 2015-03-08 15.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schalkwijk, de Sint Michaëlkerk RM22704 foto4 2015-08-06 14.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done Thanks, I hope it's Q1 now --Michielverbeek 21:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Better, but not yet there, the church is tilted and the right side is still leaning in. I added 2 notes Poco a poco 18:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for the notes, I hope this time it will be a Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The last version was still not a QI to me. The perspective problem was not fixed on the right side and the top crop got really bad (it was tight earlier but not acceptable now). I've uploaded a new version to give you an idea of what I was asking for. If you don't like it or what you give it one more try, feel free. If you want to keep my version then we need an additional opinion. Poco a poco 12:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC) It's okay --Michielverbeek 05:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please, we need a third opinion Poco a poco 08:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment if buildings are vertical the left side of the church is still leaning. Moreover the luminaires are steeply inclined, thus strengthening an aspect of distortion.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also have the impresion that the spine is not straight, looking at a different picture I came to the conclusion that it isn't a camera distortion but reality. Poco a poco 15:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Ok for me. --Hubertl 19:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lottum, de Houthuizer Molen foto4 2015-11-02 12.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, de Groote Kerk vanaf de Haven RM26609 foto4 2014-04-14 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Gennep en Oeffelt, de Maas foto6 2015-11-02 14.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grubbenvorst, sculptuur bij de rotonde aan de Kloosterstraat foto8 2015-11-02 12.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, de Fortegrachtbrug in straatzicht GM0556-1521 foto3 2014-04-14 12.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful place. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment[reply]
Thanks, I grew up in this town --Michielverbeek 11:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, Kerkeiland met de Groote Kerk RM26609 foto6 2014-03-09 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michiel,[edit]

I´m working on two large monitors, both are different, one is warmer, the other, the calibrated one, is colder. On both - even with different lightening conditions - most of your pictures are too dark. This could be because of different reasons, one reason is, that it makes a difference, if you work during the day or at night. But maybe you ask Uwe for a third opinion, he has an Eizo reference monitor. I once bought a hardware calibration tool (Spyder4) and I´m quite satisfiede with that - I should calibrate it every month, actually I do it every two month. The best is to darken the room where you work, but this makes me depressive ;-) --Hubertl 00:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course don't darken the room - it will have an unwanted effect to your images. The requirement ist to work at a light temperature of 5500 K. For that purpose, I have a set of 5500K neon tubes in my working room. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hubert, thanks for advice. Sorry, but at first I did not understand the word "calibration" (or the Dutch equivalent) in this context. However I realize that I have not installed my monitor correctly; a maximum brightness might have been the most important reason why I developed most photos too dark. I have changed this value and hope it will improve my photos.

I am developing photos mostly in the evening and I am having one small light. I have never realized that the light in the room would also influence the result. When I am busy I am drinking a bit alcohol (mostly Belgian beer) and I am listening to alternative music.

At this moment I am busy to select 2015photos (and Dutch WLMphotos from 2014) for possible Q1promotion. Some of those photos I will make a bit brighter or redevelop.

This Sunday it was a perfect day to make beautiful photos ands I have been working in my living place Arnhem. I will soon upload some of those photos and please stay critical.

Greetings, --Michielverbeek (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lottum, de Sint Gertrudiskerk in straatzicht foto8 2015-11-02 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Verticals need to be straight --Uoaei1 05:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done[reply]
Is this looking better? --Michielverbeek 22:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment it is too dark for me. --Hubertl 19:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)✓ Done[reply]
I have made it a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 22:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok for me now --Uoaei1 09:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, beeld van Prosperina plaatsen op de Jansbuitensingel foto8 2016-01-17 10.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, beeld Neptunes op de Jansbuitensingel foto5 2016-01-17 09.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your review at QIC on January 28th, 2016[edit]

You reviewed this photo of mine

which I corrected then. I am still waiting for your either "DECLINE" or "PROMOTION". Perhaps you forgot. Thank you in advance for paying another look at the image. ;=) --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, beeld van Juno op de Jansbuitensingel foto6 2016-01-17 10.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Foreground on the dark side (easy to fix), but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, ingang parkeergarage bij Velperplein foto3 2016-01-17 09.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, station Arnhem centraal positie2 foto3 2016-01-17 11.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, station Arnhem centraal positie1 foto4 2016-01-17 11.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, de Willemstunnel foto7 2016-01-17 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, Willemsplein met spoortunnel naar de Zijpendaalseweg foto6 2016-01-17 10.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, fontein tussen Juno en het Willemsplein op de Jansbuitensingel foto4 2016-01-17 10.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, fontein tussen Neptunes en Prosperina op de Jansbuitensingel foto2 2016-01-17 10.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail with a lot going on --Daniel Case 06:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heenvliet, straaatzicht de Markt met de Sint Maartenskerk (RM9381) op de achtergrond foto2 2015-08-02 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Themidget17 21:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlaardingen, zicht op de haven met toren van de Grote Kerk op de achtergrond RM37423 foto5 2015-0802 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Themidget17 21:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, de Mallemolen RM527660 foto5 2015-08-03 12.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, de Julianasluis foto5 2015-08-03 12.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwerkerk aan den IJssel sculptuur met de Gele Brug RM30438 foto6 2015-08-03 10.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhoon, sculptuur bij de Dorpsdijk-Korhoenlaan foto2 2015-08-02 16.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, het Mauritshuis RM17650 foto5 2015-08-05 19.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, de Muzentoren en de tram foto5 2015-08-05 18.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwerbrug, de Klokketoren of de Onafhankelijkheidstoren GM1901WN050 met tolbrug foto3 2015-08-03 15.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK but please mind COM:OVERCAT next time before nominating --A.Savin 14:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Preview photos 30 January[edit]

Hi. I saw your comments below my entries, but can not see the new pictures, they are still the same. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Erasmusbrug met de Kop van Zuid foto3 2015-08-02 20.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Sharpness could be better and noise less, but OK for a QI. --C messier 12:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Even if you cropped what is supposed to be your main subject (the brigde), the photo works as a cityscape. --C messier 11:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Comment The bridge is the main object, but I took the photo from an unusual position --Michielverbeek 23:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Rozenburg, de Calandbrug foto3 2015-08-02 13.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, sculptuur bij de Erasmusbrug foto8 2015-08-02 20.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, loopbrug in Leuvehaven foto9 2015-08-02 20.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Willemsbrug foto4 2015-08-01 20.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Witte Huis RM334003, de Willemsbrug en de Oude Haven foto5 2015-08-01 20.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Regentessebrug RM32851 foto12 2015-08-02 21.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 15:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Kraneschipbrug in Leuvehaven foto5 2015-08-22 20.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Even for the early evening it´s a bit too dark. But this one is ok! I don´t understand the difference in brightness between your first and last upload!!--Hubertl 14:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Comment sky colour is not dirty --Michielverbeek 14:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Beurstraverse foto7 2015-08-01 18.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, zuidelijk deel van de Hef RM513922 foto7 2015-08-01 16.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, zicht op Leuvehaven vanaf Terwenakker foto3 2015-08-02 10.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Stands very much in the picture (busy background), but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ´s-Hertogenbosch, beeld op de Stationsweg vlakbij de brug foto12 2016-01-23 10.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentThe color balance is bad (too warm). --Jacek Halicki 23:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)✓ Done Sorry I am used to make photos when skies are blue and I have made this one a bit colder --Michielverbeek 08:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Oeps......., I forgot to upload new version --Michielverbeek 10:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Support--Jacek Halicki 18:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ´s-Hertogenbosch, station ´s-Hertogenbosch foto6 2016-01-23 09.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentThe color balance is bad (too warm). --Jacek Halicki 23:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)✓ DoneSorry I have lost the original Ps-copy, but I think this version is a bit colder --Michielverbeek 08:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC) Comment Oeps......., I forgot to upload new version --Michielverbeek 10:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Support--Jacek Halicki 18:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haarlem, de Gravestenenbrug GM039259-0140 en de toren van de Bakenesserkerk RM19811 positie2 foto5 2015-01-04 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haarlem, het stadhuis RM19255 foto4 2015-01-04 12.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Delfshaven, windkorenmolen de Distilleerketel RM32880 foto3 2015-08-02 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, straatzicht1 vanaf de Binnenrotte foto11 2015-08-01 20.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ouderkerk ad Amstel, zicht op de Ronde Hoep foto2 2015-08-28 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ouderkerk ad Amstel, de Kerkbrug RM31977 foto6 2015-08-28 13.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huizen, de Oude Kerk RM22719 foto1 2014-03-09 14.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Zuiderkerktoren RM6498 foto2 2014-01-12 12.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aalsmeer, stellingmolen De Leeuw RM6841 foto4 2015-08-28 15.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amstelveen, de brandweerkazerne foto7 2015-08-28 12.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Weel, de Heelbrug foto7 2015-10-12 14.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursem, de Sint Bavokerk in straatzicht foto5 2015-10-12 16.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recreatiegebied Spaarnwoude, sculptuur van Frans de Wit zonder titel foto6 2015-08-29 13.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velsen, monumentaal pand aan de Torenstraat RM37085 foto11 2015-08-29 12.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Waver en Uithoorn, ophaalbrug de Jac C Keabrug foto7 2015-08-28 14.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haarlem, het Teylermuseum RM315441 en de Sint Bavokerk RM19264 vanaf de Korte Spaarne foto4 2015-01-04 10.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aalsmeer, straatzicht Stommeerkade foto7 2015-08-28 15.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, de Stadsbrug foto10 2016-02-17 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Exemplary composition and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colijnsplaat, de Oude Molen RM23777 foto7 2015-05-30 10.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poortvliet, de Sint Pancratiuskerk RM35375 foto5 2015-05-24 13.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 00:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tholen, de Grote of Onze Lieve Vrouwekerk RM35344 in straatzicht foto2 2015-05-24 12.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 00:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veere, korenmolen de Koe positie1 RM36991 foto9 2014-03-16 11.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, het Schokkermonument foto3 2016-02-17 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, de Kalverhekkenbrug en de Buitenkerk foto2 2016-02-17 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gorgeous view of Netherlands.  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, het Bevrijdingsmonument aan de De La Sablonairekade foto8 2016-05-17 11.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very impressing image. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, kantoorgebouw ABN Amrobank aan de IJsselkade foto7 2016-02-17 10.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, schip langs de IJsselkade foto5 2016-02-17 10.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Jan Vermeer is back! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zuidzande, de Zuidzandese molen RM31549 foto6 2015-09-29 11.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sluis, ophaalbrug positie2 foto4 2015-09-29 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retranchement, de Retranchementse Molen RM33921 foto6 2015-09-25 14.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Sluis, vuurtoren RM31526 foto6 2015-09-25 12.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zierikzee, de Zuidhavenpoort in straatzicht RM41012 foto6 2015-05-30 12.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lewedorp, de Rooms Katholieke kerk in straatzicht foto4 2015-09-29 17.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lewedorp, beeldhouwwerk aan de rand van het dorp foto4 2015-09-29 17.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuw- en Sint Joosland, korenmolen Buiten Verwachting RM29733 foto4 2015-0929 16.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlissingen, straatzicht Nieuwendijk foto8 2015-09-29 14.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Delfse Vaart foto8 2016-02-28 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Potlood door de Markthallen heen foto5 2016-02-28 10.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Cascade op het Churchillplein foto3 2016-02-28 10.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Hofplein met het zicht naar de Weena foto10 2016-02-28 09.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, kantoorgebouw Houthof Buruma foto7 2016-02-28 09.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Admiraliteitsbrug foto7 2016-02-28 13.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 22:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, binnenhaven Het Boerengat foto3 2016-02-28 13.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 22:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Maagd van Holland op de Nieuwemarkt foto4 2016-02-28 12.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 22:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Nieuwe Delfse Poort foto5 2016-02-28 11.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 22:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Kralingen, ingang Park de Nieuwe Plantage positie2 foto8 2016-02-28 14.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality, for info the right is maybe leaning out about 1°, and the bright areas are a bit "too bright", but all is acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Kralingen, Park de Nieuwe Plantage positie1 foto7 2016-02-28 14.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction. It's leaning in. --XRay 08:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks, it was not so easy improve it, I hope this one satisfy you --Michielverbeek 10:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks for the new version. It's OK now. --XRay 11:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ureterp, de Sint Petruskerk RM31865 foto2 2015-05-10 13.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Hi, thanks for your comment on my nom for File:Bridge of tugboat Boss (1995).jpg as QI. I take a lot of pics, mainly just to have photos for articles on Eng WP, but I was curious as to how good my tech stuff (cameras, scanners, programs) were. The main reason for nominating the pics was to find this out, so I appreciate all such comments and now I know how to move on. Best, w.carter-Talk 16:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rottevalle, de Hervormde Kerk RM33993 foto3 2015-05-10 12.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted cw, elsewhere good quality. --Cccefalon 20:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)✓ Done Difficult to make it perfect because I didn't see the problem in first instance, I made an attempt to improve the image and I hope I got it --Michielverbeek 21:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft standbeeld Hugo de Groot op de Markt foto3 2016-03-13 10.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, trap bij ingang van het station foto3 2016-03-13 09.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, straatzicht de Oude Delft vanaf de Bagijnhofbrug foto6- 2016-03-13 12.08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, straatzicht Dertienhuizen-Verwersdijk foto4 2016-03-13 11.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, straatzicht Voldersgracht-Vrouwjuttenland-Vrouwenregt foto5 2016-03-13 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, straatzicht Oosteinde vanaf de Molslaan foto7 2016-03-13 10.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Anyone seen Jan Vermeer? Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment You are in the right town! If you walk straight till de Nieuwe Kerk you will find his house left in de Voldersgracht (see photo next day) --Michielverbeek 08:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, treinstation Schiedam Centrum foto3 2016-03-13 13.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halavar 01:33, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, straatzicht de Breestraat foto5 2016-03-13 13.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 01:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, Huis te Riviere positie2 foto5 2016-03-13 15.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I enjoy the mellow light of the afternoon. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, Huis te Riviere positie1 foto3 2016-03-13 15.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Artistic composition. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment Thnaks for nice comments, IMO it's funny to see the ducks are diving for the photograph and I have made several parts at this photo a bit darker to avoid overexposure and noise --Michielverbeek 06:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment You invested lots into this photo. The result is perfect. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, schip in de Korte Haven bij de Korenbeurs foto3 2016-023-13 14.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Stunning colors. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, sculptuur de Zakkendrager aan de Nieuwe Sluisstraat foto5 2016-03-13 14.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great hues. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedam, straatzicht Rotterdamsedijk-Broersvest foto4 2016-03-13 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:15, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, straatzicht Oosteinde vanaf de Oostpoort foto9 2016-03-13 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ElBute 13:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo, Brüder beeld van Arno Coenen op rotonde bij Goltziusstraat positie2 foto1 2016-03-26 11.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfeld, kunstwerk op rotonde foto6 2016-03-26 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milsbeek, molenromp aan de Rijksweg foto5 2016-03-26 16.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Smart composition. Good quality as usual. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gennep, de Sint Martinuskerk foto3 2016-03-26 15.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuw-Bergen, markant torengebouw op het Raadhuisplein foto5 2016-03-26 14.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Subtle composition. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aijen, de Sint Antoniuskapel foto3 2016-03-26 14.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Personally, I would be cut under a piece of grass, but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC) Comment I am very pleased with your comment, but I like the shadows on the grass. However it might have been not obvious enough --Michielverbeek 10:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
De schaduwen op het gras voegen inderdaad iets toe aan de foto. Zo had ik het nog niet bekeken.--Famberhorst 18:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Well, auberge de Grote Waaij foto5 2016-03-26 13.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's tilted on the right-hand side --A.Savin 00:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I have improved perspectrive and hope it's well done --Michielverbeek 08:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC) OK Good quality. --A.Savin 22:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roermond, de plaats waar de Rijksweg Zuid over de snelweg gaat foto7 2016-03-26 09.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, centraal station voor trolleybussen foto5 2016-04-17 18.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting perspective... --Hubertl 19:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-de Laar west, kunstwerk op de Kroonse Wal-Beersstraat foto9 2016-03-23 09.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, sculptuur in de Lauwersgracht foto5 2016-04-17 19.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not sure what do you want to know. Do you have an image to compare it with? What is better in your opinion? I don't really do anything special, just my standard processing as I do with all night photos and which is not far from the daily processing. Poco2 21:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diego. I don't have any experience with making photos in the night, but I have found out that it is possible for me to make Q1photos at moments just before street lights are going on. I was very surprised when I saw your photos because you make those ones with ISO100 and f-value=11. The two photos I have promoted yesterday morning and evening are excellent. I am just wondering how far you are using Photoshop to improve it? I have nominated yesterday his photo: File:Arnhem, straatzicht Rijnstraat voor Giro d'Italia positie3 foto8 2016-04-17 18.01.jpg and I realize the shops are too dark. When I saw your photos I was thinking "how have you done this?" but I realize I just forget to use my flash. Do you also think that using a flash would have given much better photos? --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michielverbeek, ok, I see what you mean. The pictures that you promoted are HDR images, in this case a tone-mapping mix of 3 frames with different exposition times: 1, 5 and 25 seconds. The picture of yours is indeed to dark, but if you increase the exposure or the ISO the result would be a burnt out sky. That is the point in using HDR. When the contrast of the scene is high you need a way to increse the dynamic range of your capture, and this you can do with HDR and, of course, a tripod. As said, after the pictures are mixed in one (I mostly use Lightroom CC for that) I don't do anything special during processing. Regards, Poco2 21:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diego, I did not think about using HDR in my case, because I don't know how it works. Coming autumn and winter I might invest time to learn all kind of things about those techniques. Many thanks for your information --Michielverbeek (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michiel, HDR is the method I use, specially for night shots but you can also get good results without it but shooting RAW. Do you shoot in RAW format? That will allow you to recover (through darkening) areas that are overexposed and brightening of areas that are underexposed as it occurs in your street shots in CR at QIC. Before trying HDR, you should first discover the possibilites of RAW photography in the case that you are not using it. Poco2 08:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diego, thanks for your information, but I am already shooting photos in RAW. HDR might be the next step --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, centraal trolleybusstation met Eric de Noorman foto2 2016-03-13 17.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, in het Musiskwartier voor Giro d'Italia poging1 foto5 2016-04-17 18.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, fiets voor Giro d'Italia in steegje van de Ketelstraat foto8 2016-04-17 18.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, straatzicht Rijnstraat voor Giro d'Italia positie1 foto5 2016-04-17 17.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HDR / flashlight[edit]

Hello Michiel,

I've seen your comment about your withdrawn image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arnhem,_straatzicht_Rijnstraat_voor_Giro_d%27Italia_positie3_foto8_2016-04-17_18.01.jpg

I don't know how you develop your photos, you take RAW files, don't you? I could imagine that your image could be improved by incrementing the shadow values. In Lightroom there is an option for it, have you such an option in Photoshop?

Viele Grüsse aus dem Baskenland!

--Basotxerri (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment, I shoot my photos in RAW and I develop my photos in LR and PS. I have already tried to reduce shadows locally in PS but I think it looks not natural; I know the option in LR, but I only use LR for perspective, sharpening and noise reduction. I am told about the HDR-possibilities and I will find out how it works when I have more time.
I think it is just difficult to make photos in narrow streets. I know another option, a higher ISI-level , but more ISO gives more noise and this is only sometimes acceptable.
Greetings form Arnhem, --Michielverbeek 21:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand what you mean: some of my photos look too HDRish and artificial when I lower highlights and increase shadow values. OK, best regards, --Basotxerri (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, Willemstunnel kant Nelson Mandelabrug voor Giro d'Italia IMG 9419 2016-04-30 09.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Minor halos from sharpening at the wires. --XRay 04:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, Willemstunnel bij Willemsplein voor Giro d'Italia foto9 2016-04-17 17.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Minor halos from sharpening at the wires. --XRay 04:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, vlaggen op de Nelson Mandelabrug voor Giro d'Italia foto2 2016-04-17 17.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:30, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, straatzicht Nieuwe Stationsstraat voor Giro d'Italia met Happy Italia in de achtergrond positie2 foto13 2016-04-17 17.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, hotel Haarhuis voor Giro d'Italia kant centraal station IMG 9553 2016-04-30 19.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, straatzicht de Vijzelstraat voor Giro d'Italia positie2 foto5 2016-04-17 19.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar west, narcissen op de Brabantweg foto6 2016-03-30 15.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and sharp enough for QI. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem Gelredome-traverse, Tom Dumoulin in het rose Giro d'Italia 2e etappe IMG 0150 2016-05-07 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Newsworthy image. Brand-new. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem Gelredome-traverse, peloton Giro d'Italia 2e etappe IMG 0147 2016-05-07 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow! I`m a big fan of cycling. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem Gelredome-traverse, Giro d'Italia IMG 0142 2016-05-07 12.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Current photograph from today. Compliments. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, straatzicht de Vijzelstraat voor Giro d'Italia foto4 2016-04-17 19.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The high low light contrasts are not optimum but I think this is sufficient for a QI. --Basotxerri 19:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, straatzicht Rijnstraat voor Giro d'Italia positie2 foto6 2016-04-17 17.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archiveren?[edit]

Hoi Michiel, het viel mij op dat de laatste templates hierboven niet meer werkten. Dit komt omdat er teveel sjablonen op je pagina staan, en er dan een bepaalde limiet overschreden word. Misschien verstandig een archief op te zetten? Akoopal (talk) 22:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlak voor de Posbank, Giro d'Italia IMG 0167 sportauto reclamecaravaan 2016-05-08 15.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, hotel Haarhuis voor Giro d'Italia kant Willemstunnel IMG 9431 2016-04-30 09.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, zijkant Hotel Haarhuis voor Giro d'Italia foto8 2016-04-09 06.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oss, watertoren foto3 2016-04-20 13.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Haren en Dieden, de Alticom-toren aan de Ravensteinsedijk foto9 2016-04-20 12.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neerlangel, de kerk van Sint-Jan de Doper foto7 2016-04-20 11.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Ravenstein en Niftrik, spoorbrug over de Maas foto5 2016-04-20 10.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Oosteinde en Ruinerwold, narcissen bij een boom foto10 2016-04-09 09.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It satisfies the criteria of being a QI. --Johann Jaritz 03:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Elderveld, narcissen bij binnengaan van de wijk (de Hollandweg-Batavierenweg) foto6 2016-03-30 14.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough for a QI. --Johann Jaritz 03:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar oost, narcissen op de Randweg foto7 2016-03-30 14.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berkel Enschot, rotonde bij de Puccinilaan foto3 2016-04-20 18.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cromvoirt, het voormalige gemeentehuis foto9 2016-04-20 17.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosmalen, kunstwerk Running Squares foto4 2016-04-20 15.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dwingeloo, straatzicht bij de Brink foto11 2016-04-09 12.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Oosteinde en Ruinen, sloot in veenlandschap foto9 2016-04-09 10.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vught, het Drongelens Kanaal vanaf de Lunettenbrug foto8 2016-04-20 16.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dwingelderveld, de radiotelescoop foto5 2016-04-09 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dwingelderveld, panorama2 foto10 2016-04-09 11.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dwingelderveld, panorama1 foto7 2016-04-09 11.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meppel, het beurtscheepje de Vereeniging III bij het Oosteinde met twee ophaalbruggen foto6 2016-04-09 09.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK Ezarate 11:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norgervaart, de Drentsche Hoofdvaart naar Kloosterveen foto5 2016-04-09 14.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 07:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smilde, de Venhoopsbrug over de Drentse Hoofdvaart positie2 foto6 2016-04-09 14.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoogersmilde, kunstwerk- kleurige paal bij de ingang van de kalkzandsteenfabriek foto9 2016-04-09 13.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Hazerswoude Dorp en Alphen aan den Rijn, panorama foto3 2016-05-01 14.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alphen aan den Rijn, theater-cinema het Castellum foto4 2016-05-01 14.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpen aan den Rijn, fietsenstalling bij het station foto4 2016-05-01 13.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpen aan den Rijn, rotonde Raoul Wallenbergplein foto4 2016-05-01 13.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zoetermeer, treinstation Willem Dreeslaan foto6 2016-05-01 15.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zoetermeer, stadsspoorlijn aan de noordkant van de stad foto3 2016-05-01 15.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smilde, herinnering aan deportatie Joodse Gemenschap 1942 foto6 2016-04-09 14.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you reduce the shadows, please? This is quite dark. --Basotxerri 14:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I have made the plants right in the background quiet dark to emphaszie the memorial and the church behaind the trees. However I realize I have been exagerating this too much, is it better like this? --Michielverbeek 20:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's better now, I think I would have let the darker parts brighter but this is perhaps a personal taste. --Basotxerri 20:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Prins Alexander, de Rotte bij Hoogerbruggepad foto2 2016-05-01 18.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Zevenkamp, skyline van de wijk met de Zevenhuizerplas op de voorgrond foto2 2016-05-01 17.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roxel, straatzicht Auf den Dorm-Alter Gemeinde Platz foto5 2016-04-03 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havixbeck, Kriegersgedächtniskapelle foto4 2016-04-03 11.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tungerloh-Capellen, veldkapel foto8 2016-04-02 11.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brinkerhook, straatzicht foto7 2016-04-03 16.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Brinkerhook en Heek. moderne windmolens foto7 2016-04-03 15.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heek, de Dinkel foto7 2016-04-03 15.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöppingen, straatzicht die Bergstrasse met beeld op sokkel foto8 2016-04-03 14.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöppingen, straatzicht die Hauptstrasse bij die Lindenstrasse foto8 2016-04-03 14.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, der Aasee foto3 2016-04-03 09.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. By the way, the filename is a bit unfortunate, isn't it? --Basotxerri 07:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment You are right, just after I have uploaded this photo I realize I made a mistake in the file name; der Aasee is in Münster ofcourse and not in Aachen; I don't know how to change the filename after uploading --Michielverbeek 13:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Just request the renaming of the file (with the renaming template). But in this case: I've just renamed your file. --XRay 05:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Danke, --Michielverbeek 06:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uphoven, Jezus aan het Kruis foto8 2016-04-02 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition, but need some perspective correction.--ArildV 11:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks, New development from RAWfile with a serious perspective correction --Michielverbeek 19:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Support--ArildV 06:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, de Solvay fabriek foto5 2016-05-05 13.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, sculptuur op verkeersplein foto6 2016-05-05 12.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uedem, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius foto7 2016-05-05 15.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malden, rotonde bij de Grootveldschelaan foto7 2016-03-26 17.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, traverse naar de ingang van het treinstation Sonsbeekzijde vanaf perron 3-4 IMG 9459 2016-04-30 09.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, trap bij de ingang van het treinstation IMG 9439 2016-04-30 09.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wankum, toren van de Sankt Martin Kirche foto10 2016-05-05 09.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altenburg, straatzicht langs doorgaande weg foto7 2016-04-03 13.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lochem, fiets- en voetgangersbrug over de Berkelstuw IMG 9545 2016-04-30 18.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen-Dukenburg, kunstwerk de Observatietoren van Ronald Tolman foto5 2016-04-20 09.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, stadszicht vanaf de spoorbrug foto5 2016-03-26 17.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laer, kapelletje in de Pohlstrasse foto3 2016-04-03 12.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laer, die katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Bartholomäus in straatzicht foto4 2016-04-03 12.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijchen, keramiek-Waar het oog al is, wil de voet naar toe foto14 2016-04-20 09.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijchen, rotonde Kamerlingh Onnesstraat-Buys Ballotstraat foto4 2016-04-20 09.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Veluwezoom, panorama met hek foto8 2016-05-08 17.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoofddorp, Calatravabrug de Luit foto11 2016-05-11 11.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoofddorp, singel bij de Ter Veenlaan foto5 2016-05-11 11.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, kantoorpand 52 aan het Jonkerbosplein foto8 2016-04-20 09.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. At first I thought it was a distortion on the photo )) --A.Savin 03:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment I am not surprised because it is an optical illusion --Michielverbeek 20:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuw-Vennep, Calatravabrug de Harp foto7 2016-05-01 12.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The Category:Calatravabruggen is orphaned --A.Savin 03:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC) Do you want to tell me this category name in my own language is not allowed? If so, it is no problem for me to use the word "bridges" in stead of "bruggen". --Michielverbeek 20:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC) It has no categories, no one will find your bridge --A.Savin 22:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment I realize I don't have enough experience with ceating new categories. So I have made this one empty and put all those three bridges in Category:Bridges in Haarlemmermeer (Haarlemmermeer is the municpality) --Michielverbeek 07:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Calatrava is notable, so I have fixed the category, please move the relevant files back there --A.Savin 13:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ✓ Done --Michielverbeek 22:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC) In the end, OK for QI, please don't do overcategorization; if you create a category, please add relevant categories --A.Savin 01:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, rotonde met anker bij het politiebureau foto6 2016-06-06 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, de Calypso van Dorothé Jehoel op rotonde Westlandseweg-Wagenstraat-Rozenlaan foto4 2016-06-06 12.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, vloedpaal met beeld van Friedie Kloen bij de Koepaardbrug foto7 2016-06-06 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 21:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, straatzicht de Doctor Kuyperkade foto6 2016-06-06 15.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Charming and beautiful. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, kunstwerk drijvend op vlot bij Oleanderpark-Ververij foto10 2016-06-06 14.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, straatzicht de Weverskade met het Zwaluwflat op de achtergrond foto6 2016-06-06 14.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, straatzicht de Weverskade achter het Buizerdflat foto6 2016-06-06 13.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, straatzicht de Weverskade achter het Zwaluwflat foto8 2016-06-06 13.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, hoogste flatgebouw van de stad (aan de Merellaan) foto7 2016-06-06 13.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Your´re an adept of photography, Michiel. What a balanced composition! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was standing on a dyke, the grass is very high here and unfortuantely the train did not come --Michielverbeek 05:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, ophaalbrug bij de Zuidergrachtswal en woonboot de Ark Fryslân bij de Nieuweweg foto8 2016-06-05 16.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, De Onwemelber van René Knip en het Fries Museum foto4 2016-06-05 16.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, de Achmeatoren foto3 2016-06-05 15.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renkenörener See[edit]

Hi Michiel,

if you're interested, this lake is private and opens only a few days a year to the public. You can find the according dates here: http://www.heimatverein-borgloh.de/verein/verein_Renksee.php

We were lucky to got there quite early and we were the only guests when shooting the images. It was a pity that the sky was that dull. The site is very nice and surprisingly relatively unknown for the people of Osnabrück but a lot of locals of the Borgloh area go there for "Kaffee und Kuchen" when it's open.

To go there, get to the A33 and take the Borgloh exit, soon, before arriving to Borgloh, you'll see some sign on the right indicating the lake and the Wolfsquelle.

Best regards,

--Basotxerri (talk) 15:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, straatzicht het Naauw foto9 2016-06-05 18.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and perspective. However the shadow side isn't optimum, the darks could be brightened a bit. Nevertheless, already OK for a QI. --Basotxerri 16:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I have made it a bit brighter, but it might have been not the right time (later) for this composition --Michielverbeek 09:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Much better now. :-) --Basotxerri 11:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, straatzicht Nieuwestad-Naauw foto5 2016-06-05 15.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enschede, sculptuur op de Boulevard 1945 foto3 2016-04-03 18.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, het Dieserpoortenbolwerk foto9 2016-06-05 10.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, fietsbrug bij het Rodetorenplein foto8 2016-06-05 10.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, kanon bij de Sassenpoort positie1 foto3 2016-06-05 10.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enschede, het Stationsplein foto8 2016-04-03 18.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, watertoren aan het Almelose Kanaal foto10 2016-06-05 11.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, buste van Everhardus Johannes Potgieter foto6 2016-06-05 12.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, straatzicht Gasthuisplein foto7 2016-06-05 11.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, fontein in Stadsgracht bij Museum de Fundatie foto4 2016-06-05 10.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, het centrale station voor trolleybussen foto9 2016-06-25 21.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, station uitgang Sonsbeekzijde vanaf perron 8-9 foto12 2016-06-06 18.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]