User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief15

Global account

Hi Michielverbeek! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Michiel Verbeek op de roei-ergometer positie1 foto2 2013-12-15.jpg

And also:

• File:Michiel Verbeek op de roei-ergometer positie2 foto5 2013-12-15.jpg
• File:Michiel Verbeek op de roei-ergometer positie3 foto2 2013-12-15.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda, de Poolse kapel foto5 2014-12-28 11.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 23:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda, het Spanjaardsgat foto4 2014-12-28 12.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Is it better like this? --Michielverbeek 20:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC) *  Support Yes, QI for me now --Hubertl 22:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --Hubertl 22:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oerle, korenmolen Sint Jan foto6 2014-05-09 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Is it better like this? --Michielverbeek 20:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)*  Support QI for me now! --Hubertl 22:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunrade, straatzicht Heerlerweg-Pontstraat foto2 2014-09-28 11.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, het Bonnefantenmuseum foto2 2014-10-19 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check the image. On the right side it's leaning in.--XRay 10:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Done Is it better like this? --Michielverbeek 08:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment It's better, but the building at the right is still leaning in.--XRay 12:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Done Is this good enough for Q1? --Michielverbeek 20:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO it's good for QI now.--XRay 06:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haarlem, molen de Adriaan foto2 2015-01-04 09.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heemstede, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hemelvaartskerk foto3 2014-04-13 16.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Sharpness and DoF (f/4) not the best. --XRay 16:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noordwijk, straatzicht Heilige Geestweg-Raadhuisstraat foto2 2014-04-13 11.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why not f4 and f8 or f11? but for me, good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Dein Bild Gasselternijveenschemond, kunstwerk foto3 2014-07-12 16.39.jpg

Hallo Michiel, dein Foto Gasselternijveenschemond, kunstwerk foto3 2014-07-12 16.39.jpg gefällt mir sehr und ich möchte es auch promoten. Wie ich gesehen habe, bearbeitest du deine Bilder mit Lightroom. Daher ersuche ich dich, vorher die Häuser auf der rechten Seite gerade zu stellen (sie hängen alle nach innen) und das Rauschen zu reduzieren (noise reduction). Beste Grüße --Isiwal (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellaire, oorlogsmonument 1e Wereldoorlog foto7 2014-10-19 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerpen, straatzicht Sint Paulusplaats foto5 2014-12-14 12.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasselternijveenschemond, kunstwerk foto3 2014-07-12 16.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality after rework --Isiwal 20:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheratte-Hauteurs, watertoren in straatzicht foto4 2014-10-19 13.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haarlem, molen de Adriaan foto2 2015-01-04 09.37.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haarlem, molen de Adriaan foto2 2015-01-04 09.37.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/KTC (talk) 22:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nollevaux, église Saint-Urbain in straatzicht foto5 2014-0612 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 00:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smuid, l'église Ste-Marguerite foto5 2014-06-12 15.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mogimont, l'église des Saints-Pierre-et-Paul foto8 2014-06-11 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anloy, château La Rochette foto8 2014-06-12 13.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly too dark imho. --Tuxyso 00:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)  Done More highlights, good enough? --Michielverbeek 21:18, 15 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Yes, its good enough --Hubertl 17:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Please don't downgrade your images!

Hi, Michielverbeek, please don't downgrade your images! For instance in your images File:Duisburg, Seilscheibe der Schachtanlage Rheinpreussen foto3 2013-07-28 15.40.jpg and File:Duisburg, modern straatzicht1 in het centrum foto7 2013-07-28 15.12.jpg the now "warmer" but actually unnatural brown sky is a big change to the worse. If these images look better now for you please check your computer monitor! Greetings, -- Ies (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echternach, kapel aan de Rue de la Chapelle foto1 2014-06-08 21.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vianden, die Neikiirch beschermd erfgoed foto6 2014-06-07 16.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 08:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastonge, begraafplaats met chapelle Saint-Laurent 82003-CLT-0013-01 foto4 2014-06-13 12.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 14:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Useldange, château d'Useldange foto3 2014-06-09 17.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Isiwal 07:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Photo request: Rotterdam Japanese School

Hi! Are you interested in doing a Rotterdam photo request? If so, I would like to have somebody take a photo of the en:Rotterdam Japanese School at Verhulstlaan 19 3055WJ, Rotterdam. Are you interested in doing this?

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi WhisperToMe! I am very honoured you ask me to make a photo from the Japanese School in Rotterdam. I am living in Arnhem (100 km east from Rotterdam) and I regularly go by train and mountain bike to everywhere in my country. I really don't know when the possibility for me will be to go to Rotterdam. I am seriously interested but I realize User:1Veertje lives in Rotterdam and she is able to make good photos. Greetings, --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the pointer :) - I'll contact the Wikipedian! WhisperToMe (talk) 08:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rambrouch, gemeentehuis met kerktoren foto1 2014-06-14 11.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, even weak, for me. Weak because of a lack of contrast --Hubertl 10:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition

WLM CH (Deutsch) Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH Gerne bedanken wir uns hiermit noch einmal für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb WLM. Die Liste der Gewinner kann nun auf unserer Website sowie auch auf Wikimedia Commons eingesehen werden. Wir gratulieren den Gewinnerinnen und Gewinnern, die wir persönlich kontaktieren werden, ganz herzlich. Der Verein Wikimedia CH trifft gerade die Vorbereitungen für Wiki Loves Earth 2015, ein Fotowettbewerb rund um das Thema Natur und Nationalparks. Dieser neue Fotowettbewerb wird bereits am 1.Mai 2015 starten. Wir freuen uns sehr, wenn ihr wieder mit dabei seid! Mit besten Grüssen, Das Organisationsteam

WLM CH (Français) Cher/chère participant(e) au concours Wiki Loves Monuments CH, La liste des gagnants est disponible sur le site ainsi que sur son pendant Wikimedia Commons! Nos félicitations aux vainqueurs, qui seront contactés séparément. Wikimedia CH se prépare maintenant pour Wiki Loves Earth 2015, un concours photographique consacré à la nature et aux parcs, qui débutera le 1er mai prochain et auquel nous vous invitons à participer! Meilleurs messages, Le Comité d’organisation

WLM CH (English) Dear Wiki Loves Monuments CH participant, We would like to inform you that the list of winners has been published on our website as well as on Wikimedia Commons - our congratulations to the winners, who will be contacted individually. Wikimedia CH is now gearing up for Wiki Loves Earth 2015, a photo contest dedicated to the nature and to parks. This new contest will start on May 1st, 2015: feel free to join! With our best regards, The organization's committee

WLM CH (Italiano) Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH Vogliamo informarti che la lista dei vincitori é stata pubblicata sul nostro sito come anche su Wikimedia Commons - le nostre congratulazioni ai vincitori, che saranno contattati individualmente. Wikimedia CH sta ora organizzando u nuovo concorso per Wiki Loves Earth 2015 dedicato alla natura e ai parchi. Questo concorso inizierà l'1 maggio 2015: ci auguriamo di avervi tra i nostri concorrenti! Saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore

My dear friend, I am very sorry!

You are expecting from other colleages reviewing your great pictures, so they will be promoted as Quality Images. You wanted your pictures to be examinated with due diligence and in the best way possible. Because, Quality, Valued and Featured Pictures are a showcase not only for Wikimedia-Commons, even for your own personal work, reputation and success.

But you never do this with the pictures from other photographers. What are you waiting for??

Reviewing means, that you ask anyone - you don´t know personally - to take a look to your very private work. That means also, that the reviewer has to download your picture (sometimes more than 20 MB), then open it in a special program, and then he has to check it as follows:

1. perspective distortion, the images must be aligned straight
2. check for over- and underexposed areas
3. check, if there are some dustspot left from the sensor
4. check for so called jpg-artefacts and posterized areas
5. Sometimes, you can see some vignettations.
6. Blurryness, sharpness, oversharpening, brightness...
7. Color abbreviations and overprocessed, unnatural colors (oversaturation)
8. White balance check.
9. Checking for possible lens flares
10. looking for disturbing elements, composition.
11. Check, if the picture have the minimum size and the photographer is a WikiCommoner.

This is the same check everyone has to do, when preselecting his own pictures for QI. Nothing more. And you know, this can be sometimes pretty time-consuming. And because of this, everyone is able to review pictures, otherwise he won´t be able to nominate by his own. Because this is part and precondition to meet the QI-Guidelines

But this is not all, there is a lot more to do:

• Checking, if the picture is properly categorized
• If the file has a proper, meaningful filename
• is there an good description of the subject (eventually in english too - but this is not mandatory!)
• If there are geo coordinates (useful, but not mandatory too!)

This all makes a normal image to a Quality Image!

But even this is not all which has to be done! If you give someone an advice for repairing, you have to follow the reactions. When you see then the  Done sign, you have to check, if it´s really done!

When I edit this list step by step for every picture I review, it takes me a lot of my very limited time. Time, I would like to spend for writing articles in Wikipedia. On the other hand you expect a good, neutral and diligance examination within a short time. Like all other candidates too.

But, if you expect from your colleagues that someone dedicate his time and you're not willing to make the same effort, then I can and will not review your pictures in the future anymore.

I think it´s a shame, but I prefer to review pictures of colleagues who make more than just QIC to get a promotion for their own pictures.

I really don´t expect that you rate my pictures on the contrary.

This would be very bad for the whole review process.

The more distributed participants are active in this evaluation, the neutral and independent the examination process will be.

I wish you great success with your images.

Greetings from Vienna, --Hubertl (talk) 19:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

OK. --C messier (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ureterp, kunstwerk in straatzicht foto3 2015-05-10 14.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem, kantoorgebouw van waterleidingbedrijf Vitens foto4 2015-04-05 10.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groningen, straatzicht Hoge der Aa bij de Brugstraat foto7 2015-03-22 15.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groningen, het Groninger museum positie1 foto8 2015-03-22 10.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, van Lanschot Bankiers in het Pasleiskwartier foto4 2015-03-08 08.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:38, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruisland, de Heilige Gregoriuskerk in straatzicht foto4 2015-05-30 16.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 23:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etten Leur, Hill's Pet Nutrition Manufacturing BV langs de Mark foto4 2015-05-24 19.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:11, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Michiel,

deine Bilder machen den Eindruck (jenseits der wirklich hervorragenden Schärfe und sehr guter Komposition), dass der Magentaanteil etwas zu hoch ist, ebenso auch die Belichtung etwas zu niedrig. Bei gleißendem Sonnenschein wirken sie manchmal so, als ob es gerade eine beginnende Sonnenfinsternis ist. Der Effekt ist zwar beeindruckend, aber halt nicht ganz der Natürlichkeit entsprechend, wie ich meine. Ich habe es auf zwei verschiedenen Monitoren (einer davon kalibriert) angeschaut. Etwas mehr Belichtung würde den Bildern gut tun. Schau dir das mal generell an. Ich habe zwar gesehen, dass du den Weißabgleich händisch durchführst, aber auch mit dem richtigen Referenzpunkt?--Hubertl (talk) 07:35, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-de Laar, viaduct Kroonse Wal foto7 2015-06-25 08.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwolle, sculptuur bij het Hanzeplein in straatzicht foto3 2015-06-15 10.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steenbergen, watertoren foto4 2015-05-30 16.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etten Leur, de Leurse Haven foto9 2015-05-24 19.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Left side slightly leaning in but beyond complaint level.) --Cccefalon 08:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oud Zevenaar, de Pegasusburg foto6 2015-05-14 18.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Schuytgraaf, natuur op de rand van de stad bij de Laan van de 17e september foto4 2015-06-25 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drachten Noordoost, de Oase foto2 2015-05-10 13.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voorstonden, Huis Voorstonden foto6 2015-04-05 13.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijkerk, landgoed de Salentein foto2 2015-06-15 15.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please create the missing category. --XRay 04:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Sorry, typing error in category --Michielverbeek 06:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Rijkerswoerd, brugje bij eindhalte trolleybus foto9 2015-06-30 09.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Schuytgraaf, kunst met boomstammen bij de Winterjan foto4 2015-06-25 10.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 19:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Rijkerswoerd, eindhalte trolleybus foto5 2015-06-30 10.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There's a bit too much of grass here for my taste. --Cayambe 07:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Vredenburg, straatzicht Groningensingel bij de Frieslandsingel foto5 2015-06-25 16.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Stadseiland, de Wijdserijn in straatzicht foto15 2015-06-30 18.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Malburgen oost, sculptuur bij de Snoekstraat foto8 2015-07-01 10.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar oost, ingang Jublieumpark foto6 2015-07-01 09.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem centrum, Airbornemonument Jacob Groenewoudplantsoen met John Frostbrug op achtergrond foto3 2015-06-30 18.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Rijkerswoerd, sculptuur bij de Doctor Joop Den Uylsingel foto8 2015-06-30 16.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verviers, église Saint Antoine foto8 2015-04-15 12.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-centrum, het Airborne-monument op het Airborneplein foto5 2015-07-02 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 19:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem- Immerloo, sculpturen in het Immerloopark foto5 2015-07-01 16.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The shadow could be a bit brightened. Anyway good quality. --Hockei 19:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Stadseiland, brugje bij de Wijdserijn foto3 2015-06-30 19.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too much empty sky.--XRay 16:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)  Done I have cut off to reduce sky --Michielverbeek 21:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. That's fine. Thanks. --XRay 11:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem centrum, stuk van de Eusebiuskerk bij het Airborne monument Jacob Groenewoudplantsoen foto4 2015-06-30 18.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar west, kunstwerk bij Kroonse Wal-Brabantweg foto4 2015-06-27 19.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen St Gerard en Pontuary, watertoren in straatzicht foto5 2015-06-05 11.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. May be too much sky, but QI anyway --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engis, industrieterrein aan la Mégarnie foto4 2015-06-04 13.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but please create the missing categories.--XRay 05:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roclenge sur Geer, l'église Saint-Remy foto5 2015-04-14 14.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for QI. --XRay 05:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassenge, la chapelle du Vi Mosti foto2 2015-04-14 13.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for QI. DoF could be better. --XRay 05:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Meinerwijk, de vogelkijkhut foto7 2015-06-30 11.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 11:31, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Malburgen oost, straatzicht Valeriaanpad foto5 2015-07-01 10.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villers-la-Ville, l'église Notre-Dame de la Visitation foto6 2015-06-06 12.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mazy, oorlogsmonument foto7 2015-06-06 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Lesve en Bois de Villers, watertoren foto5 2015-06-05 10.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 09:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tienen, oorlogsmonument bij de parochiekerk Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-ten-Poel foto4 2015-06-09 15.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brussels, Jardin du Mont des Arts foto5 2015-06-07 14.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orsmaal-Gussenhoven, de Sint Petrus-Pieterkerk in straatzicht foto5 2015-06-09 16.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I suggest cropping out the house at the left (see note) and you used the same f number with me :). Everything else is OK. --C messier 23:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment The same weird thing over the clouds is also visible here, but to a much less degree than in the other picture. I don't think it is a big deal in this one --Xicotencatl 07:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC) Thanks indeed it is better to crop out the house at the left because it enlarges the focus to the church ( is main object). I have reduced colour green to reduce weird effect in the clouds --Michielverbeek 21:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --C messier 09:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brussels, straatzicht Rue Lebeau foto9 2015-06-07 13.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me --Daniel Case 15:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westerscheps, molen foto2 2010-05-16 11.03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very fine work --Hubertl 22:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattingen, Menschen aus Eisen foto5 2012-03-27 16.08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Michielverbeek,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015

Beste deelnemer,

Bedankt voor het insturen van jouw foto’s van cultureel erfgoed in het kader van Wiki Loves Monuments 2015. Een professionele jury kiest straks uit alle inzendingen de beste foto’s in drie categorieën: beste foto van een monument, beste foto van een ornament en beste foto van een Dudok monument. Daarnaast is er ook een speciaal klassement voor de inzenders van de meeste foto’s van unieke monumenten. Wil jij ook kans maken op één van de vele prijzen, beschikbaar gesteld door onze partners en sponsoren? Vergeet dan niet om op Wikimedia Commons, onder voorkeuren (rechts bovenin, naast je gebruikersnaam) het vinkje bij e-mail van andere gebruikers toestaan (onder het kopje e-mail in het gebruikersprofiel), aan te vinken. Alleen deelnemers met een e-mailadres maken kans op prijzen. Benieuwd welke prijzen je allemaal kunt winnen? Kijk dan op http://www.wikimedia.nl/projectpagina/prijzenoverzicht

Groeten,

De Wiki Loves Monuments werkgroep 2015 13:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monschau, straatzicht op vakwerkhuizen met oa Dm80 vanaf brug over de Roer foto4 2015-04-15 16.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Straat in Apeldoorn

Hallo Michiel, ik heb een van je foto's uit Apeldoorn hernoemd, omdat de aanduiding niet juist was. Zie File:Apeldoorn, Zutphensestraat en Ina Boudier-Bakkersingel.jpg. De kruising met de Laan van Osseveld ligt op een kleine 400 meter van de getoonde plek. Op twee van je eigen pagina's staat de naam van die laan nog wel als onderschrift bij de foto. Groet, Apdency (talk) 18:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2015!

Hallo Michielverbeek!

Vielen Dank, dass Du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 mitgemacht und Deine Fotos von Kulturdenkmalen mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast! Weltweit wurden im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs über 230.000 Bilder hochgeladen. 38.953 davon stammen allein aus Deutschland, wo sich 866 Teilnehmer beteiligt haben.
Hier findest Du weitere statistische Informationen zu den Ergebnissen von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015.

Und so geht’s jetzt mit dem Wettbewerb weiter:

• Die WLM-Vorjury hat alle im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs hochgeladenen Bilder gesichtet und bewertet.
• Vom 16. bis 18. Oktober tagte die Hauptjury in Fulda und legte auf Basis der Vorjury-Bewertungen die Platzierung der besten Aufnahmen fest. In der darauf folgenden Woche wurden dann die besten Bilder des Wettbewerbs und natürlich die Preisträger veröffentlicht.
• Für die Vergabe unserer tollen WLM-Preise wird dann Wikimedia Deutschland in den Wochen bis Weihnachten nach und nach alle Preisträger anschreiben und bitten, sich einen Preis aus unserem Sachpreispool auszusuchen. Bitte sorge daher dafür, dass Du in Deinen Account-Einstellungen Deine E-Mail-Adresse hinterlegt hast und auf ggf. dort ankommende Mails innerhalb von höchstens einer Woche antwortest.

Auch wenn der diesjährige Wettbewerb jetzt vorbei ist, möchten wir Dich einladen, auch weiterhin Fotos hochzuladen und bei der Pflege von Wikipedia-Artikeln und Listen zu helfen. Wikipedia und Wikimedia Commons leben durch Menschen wie Dich, die ehrenamtlich helfen, freie Inhalte zu erstellen und für alle zugänglich zu machen. Weitere Informationen dazu, wie genau Du an der Wikipedia mitarbeiten kannst, findest Du in unserem Tutorial, und wenn Du Dir dabei eine persönliche Unterstützung wünschst, kannst Du Dich einfach an unser Mentorenprogramm wenden.

Viel Glück für den Wettbewerb und viel Spaß bei der weiteren Mitarbeit in der Wikipedia und hier auf Commons wünscht Dir das Wiki Loves Monuments Team Deutschland 2015 (Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boven-Leeuwen, de Hervormde Kerk in straatzicht RM38245 foto9 2014-11-24 14.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beneden-Leeuwen, korenmolen de Wielewaal RM38248 foto2 2014-11-24 13.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echteld, de Hervormde Kerk RM14267 foto3 2014-11-24 13.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herveld, kerk RM36751 foto6 2011-05-14 19.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winssen, de Beatrixmolen RM9561 foto9 2014-11-24 15.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Netterden, de Sint Walburgiskerk RM16072 foto4 2015-05-14 15.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 00:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spankeren, de Gelderse Toren RM42135 foto6 2015-04-05 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 00:12, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lathum, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM8149 foto3 2015-07-21 15.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lunteren, windkorenmolen de Hoop RM14481 foto1 2015-06-15 16.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stokkum, Düffels Möl RM9286 foto5 2015-05-14 16.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elden, molen de Hoop RM8387 foto5 2015-04-20 20.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herwen, de Sint Martinuskerk RM515549 foto4 2015-08-20 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 22:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westervoort, de Westervoortse Brug foto4 2015-08-20 09.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Culemborg, molen de Hoop RM451862 foto3 2015-08-06 13.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Malburgen, kunstwerk op straat aan de Eldenseweg foto4 2015-08-03 19.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lochem, de Berkel vanaf de Graaf Ottoweg foto6 2015-07-21 18.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk, de Sint Jacobskerk RM39053 foto4 2015-05-14 08.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. It is very brown. Please check WB at the white parts at the market place. --XRay 07:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Done I have redeveloped the photo, thanks for advice --Michielverbeek 13:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)  Support Much better. Thank you. --XRay 06:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hengelo, de Remigiuskerk RM21506 in straatzicht foto4 2015-08-20 15.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apeldoorn, waterbak bij Woudhuizerallee-Het Kasteel foto8 2015-08-23 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 23:13, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borculo, de Onze Lieve Vrouw Tenhemelopnemingkerk GM1859wikinr162 foto3 2015-08-22 17.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerdt, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM21959 foto4 2015-08-20 10.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See the note - dust spot on the corner. --Halavar 22:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC) I have removed some spots in left bottom corner and I hope it's  Done --Michielverbeek 08:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment Why left corner? Have you see the note on the image? The dust spot is on the right bottom corner. --Halavar 00:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC) I have found the note on the right top corner and removed  Done the dust --Michielverbeek 07:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)  Support OK, good now. QI for me --Halavar 10:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ommen, de molen op Den Oordt RM31479 foto4 2014-10-04 16.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 22:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vriezenveen, de Leemansmolen RM38149 foto5 2014-10-04 14.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, spoorbrug over het Maas-Waalkanaal foto6 2015-12-09 15.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wijchen, kunstwerk bij het Laantje foto8 2015-12-09 14.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 22:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Niftrik en Balgoij, spoorbrug over de Maas foto6 2015-12-09 13.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millingen ad Rijn, toren van de Sint-Antonius van Paduakerk in straatzicht foto7 2015-10-26 11.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borculo, de Joriskerk RM9881 foto6 2015-08-22 17.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:50, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rekken, de Piepermolen RM14624 2e poging foto11 2015-08-22 16.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality fo me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:38, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar oost, kunst op straat Kroonsewal bij Anne Frankschool foto3 2015-07-21 13.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 18:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruurlo, de Rooms Katholieke Sint Willibrorduskerk GM1859wikinr174 foto4 2015-08-21 17.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)