User talk:MichaelBueker/Promotions

Quality Image Promotion

File:Valter Peric Monument 2009.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valter Peric Monument 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments With a bit more crop at right may be better IMO. Technically good, so QI. --George Chernilevsky 06:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment Did some cropping, should be better now. --MichaelBueker 10:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antifascist graffiti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment What is the copyright status of the image? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 23:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

 Comment I took this photo myself and released it under the CC-BY 3.0 license. As for the red pictograph in the center, there is no information whatsoever about any copyright claims. It has been widely used in Germany for 20 years and is considered to be in the public domain. --MichaelBueker (talk) 12:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Personally, I like the graphic simplicity of that other image: File:Marburg - Schlosssteig - Synagoge 03 ies.jpg, but I agree with the nominator: the antifascist symbol in the nominated image is widely used and known, and you can understand it even if your are a non-latin alphabet user. The surrounding tags aren't really disturbing here. Do they enhance the main subject? That could be discussed, but at review size the image—and the topic—are clear enough IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Srebrenica massacre memorial gravestones 2009 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, well composed. Small amount of over-exposed sky is okay. -- Avenue 03:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver Target in XPS Spectrometer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and interesting Picture --Antoinetav 22:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inside views of photoemission spectroscopes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very nice photo! I suggest to add some annotations to this picture to make it more understandable. I have done it for one example. The scope seems to be appropriate to me and it does illustrate its subject well (except for the missing annotations). After a few edits it is well described and categorized. Also I do not insist on a geocode, since it is somehow like a studio work, it has been taken on a physical location and it may be of interest to a few people. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 20:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

 Comment I've added some annotations, thank you for your work! As for the geocode, there is a link to a photo of the entire apparatus in the description, and that is geocoded. --MichaelBueker (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MichaelBueker (talk) 22:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Silver Target in XPS Spectrometer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silver Target in XPS Spectrometer.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gold Target in XPS Spectrometer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 07:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Jesus on the cross in the forest near Ljubljana Castle.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesus on the cross in the forest near Ljubljana Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Something sad in atmosphere here. Good IMO.--Jebulon 23:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Slovenian Parliament Panorama 2010.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Assembly Building of the Republic of Slovenia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope, all criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 23:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle Square in Warsaw.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - I think it is best in its category though I would like to see more visible area in the lower part of the photo.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)