User talk:Michael32710

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Michael32710!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 20:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --Michael 19:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Antonius Raab[edit]

Danke für das Foto, das man allerdings nicht sehen kann. Ich nehme aber an, dass das ein Serverproblem ist, und das Foto in den nächsten Stunden erscheinen wird. --Nicola (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Small 82.7.78.78 20:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Chamberlin and his plane that he flew from N.Y. to Germany 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bild Pilatus SB-2[edit]

Hallo Michael32710 danke für das Hochladen des Bildes der Pilatus SB-2. Ich wollte fragen ob Du vieleicht so auch ein Bild der Pilatus P-4 hochladen kannst das es auf wikipedia verwendet werden darf. Ich hab da mit de ganzen Urheberzeugs nicht so den Durchblick. Danke & GrussFFA P-16 (talk) 11:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo FFA P-16!
Das kommt ganz auf das Bild an. Wenn Du mir zum Beispiel ein Bild per Mail schicken würdest, dass Du selbst aufgenommen hast, würden wir das sicher für die Verwendung in der WP hochladen können. Alternativ könnte ich Dir auch den benötigten Content für das "einfache Upload-Formular" zusenden. Und lädst das Bild damit selbst hoch. Schreib mal näher, um welches Bild/Bilder es sich handelt. Liebe Grüße --79.211.42.137 16:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nun ich bin mit der Frage hier her gelangt wegen dem Bild

File:Pilatus SB-2 HB-AEP.jpg Offenbar besteht dort kein Problem mit dem Urheberrecht (Source=ETH-Bibliothek Zürich, Bildarchiv / Fotograf: Unbekannt / Ans_05035-489 / Public Domain Mark). Ich selbst habe kein Fotovon der echten Pilatus P-4 (die ist schon vor meiner Geburt abgestürtzt. ich habe jedoch ein Foto von meinem Pilatus P-4 Modell hochgeladen. Ein Bild der echten P-4 wäre natürlich besser. Jedoch hab ich bisher nur die Bilder von Herman Keist gefunden [1] glaube aber nicht das er der Fotograf ist). Darum war der Sinn meiner Anfrage ob Michael32710 wie bei der SB-2 vieleicht auf die selbe Weise für ein Bild der Pilatus P-4 sorgen kann.FFA P-16 (talk) 17:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo FFA P-16!
Das Bild von der SB-2 habe ich bei der ETH gefunden. Die ETH hat die Bilder ihres Archivs dankenswerterweise unter Public Domain Lizenz freigegeben. Deswegen konnte ich das SB-2-Bild in die Wikipedia bringen. Leider konnte ich im ETH Archiv kein Bild der P-4 finden. Liebe Grüße --Michael 23:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Trump n757af michael bludworth.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Trump n757af michael bludworth.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Peilschiff has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ein Dahmer (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A400M drehen[edit]

Hallo, du wolltest File:Airbus A400M 'Atlas' (28366255975).jpg drehen lassen weil die Fluglage unnatürlich aussieht. Das Bild zeigt jedoch ein übliches Flugmanöver, und ich habe auch ein Video gefunden, in dem genau die abgebildete 90°-Steilkurve mit Kondensbildung zu sehen ist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r-RCrjRyZg?t=118 (nach 2 Minuten). Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 23:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke Sitacuisses, für Deine Recherche und die Korrektur meines Drehauftrags. Liebe Grüße --Michael 06:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:D-ABYA EDDS 2018-02-08.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ba349 Prototyp Senkrechtstart 1944.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Speravir 19:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael, nochmal deutlich: Bitte valide Quelle eintragen und, sofern dort angegeben, den Fotografen. Wen letzterer bekannt ist, kann es sein, dass das Bild trotz der Ergänzung gelöscht werden muss, bis 70 Jahre nach dem Tode des Urhebers, also Fotografen, vergangen sind. Admins könnten es dann wiederherstellen. — Speravir – 19:10, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speravir, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Quelle für (File:Ba349 Prototyp Senkrechtstart 1944.png) eingetragen. --Michael 12:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
OK. Und in dem Buch steht kein Hinweis zu einem Fotografen oder, wo sie das Bild herhaben? Bei Büchern findet man das oft weiter hinten in einem separaten Anhang. Ich meine, solange der Fotograf unbekannt bleibt, kann das Bild bleiben, weil mehr als 70 Jahre nach Veröffentlichung vergangen sind, aber im Zweifel bist Du derjenige, der mit eventuellen Erben Ärger bekommen könnte. — Speravir – 18:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Speravir: Wenn ich Hinweise zum Fotografen gefunden hätte, hätte ich sie unter "Author" eingetragen.
BTW mein persönliches Feedback: Ich hab' kein Herzblut an meinen Tätigkeiten in Commons. Wenn Mitarbeiter wie Du, die "Kontrolleurs"- und "Lizenzprüfer"-Status haben, meinen, dass ich Fehler mache, dann tut, was ihr meint tun zu müssen. Ich komm' damit klar.
Stutzig werd' ich bei Ansprachen wie „Michael, nochmal deutlich: ...“ oder „im Zweifel bist Du derjenige, der mit eventuellen Erben Ärger bekommen könnte“. Da frag' ich mich tatsächlich, ob ich das als kollegiale Hilfe oder als Drohung aufzufassen habe. --Michael 22:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Das war nicht als Drohung gemeint, sondern um den Hintergrund deutlich zu machen. Der Beginn oben bezog sich darauf, dass ich nicht wusste, ob und wenn ja wie gut Du den englischen Löschantrag verstehst, es gibt durchaus Leute, die damit Probleme haben. Ich sollte dann wohl auf solch einen Extratext verzichten. Nach deiner Ergänzung ziehe ich dann diesen Löschantrag zurück. — Speravir – 00:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LeuchtfeuerDornbusch 2016-06-01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 17:55, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-09-26 Kassel-Calden Terminal (KSF).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is acceptable but the CA should be removed --Poco a poco 20:09, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Answer: Thank you for your comments. I uploaded an improved version.--Michael32710 21:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Purple CA is gone, I still see green CA --Poco a poco 21:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Green CA now also improved.--Michael32710 22:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Not totally gone but acceptable now IMO --Poco a poco 10:05, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hann Muenden Downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Loss of sharpness towards the sides but still tolerable. --Ermell 22:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GrossStresowPreussenFriedr.Wilh.IDetail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:17, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DieSchauendeWuepperFront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Awkward crop at the bottom. QI to me if you crop the right to get rid of the people --Poco a poco 12:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Fixed Thanks for the answer, another colleague has already removed the people. --Michael32710 18:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErsterOeffentlicherFlugzeugSchlepp1927-04-18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nicola (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Koordinaten[edit]

Es ist nur eine informative Frage: Du hast die Kamererakoordinaten dieses [BGS Puma inner German border.jpg Bildes] relativ genau ermittelt und eingetragen. Hast Du die Koordinaten aus einer mir unbekannten Bildinformation herbekommen oder hast Du sie manuell aus Bild und Karte ermittelt?--79.214er (talk) 10:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo 79.214er,
mit Bild und „Karte“: Konkret benutze ich „Google Earth“ mit der „Gelände“-Option. Damit kann man das vorliegende Bild sehr gut nachstellen. Nach meiner Auffassung kommt man damit der tatsächlichen Kameraposition ausreichend Nahe, um den interessierten Betrachter per Template:Location an den „Aufnahmeort“ zu führen. In diesem speziellen Fall war dieser „Aufnahmeort“ nach meiner Vermutung ein weiterer Helikopter; die Kameraposition lässt sich also nicht auf der „Erdoberfläche“ wiederfinden bzw. einnehmen. Liebe Grüße --Michael (talk) 11:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ich komme aus der Gegend, kann mich in die Topographie hineinversetzten und habe die Position ähnlich ermittelt, kenne aber die Gelände-Option noch nicht.--79.214er (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo 79.214er,
Google Earth (Google Earth Pro 7.3.2.5776 (64-bit)) -> Linke Spalte „Ebenen“ -> [x] Gelände
Damit werden die Höheninformationen in die „flachen“ Bilder reingerechnet, was bei „schrägen“ Ansichten die Horizontline doch sehr realistisch erzeugt. Liebe Grüße --Michael (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:1934-06-09 CoupeMondialeVincennes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New version[edit]

Hi, please don't upload new versions of files like you did here. I reverted your modification. This one has original colors from the source. You can create derivatives if you want with a link, but it's better not to touch uploads from others, in general. They may not appreciate your contributions. You can also ask. COM:OVERWRITE. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Michael32710,

Thak you for uploading the file. however, this file is not automatically free as you can see her. In he.wiki have a special page - OTRS permission requests from IDF Spokesperson (her). This time I will add this file to the list. -- Geagea (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Geagea, thank you for starting the ORTS process for me. I was not familiar with the procedure. --Michael (talk) 08:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:X-59 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 19:27, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Junkers Ju 287 V1 side view.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Xunks (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ju 287 V1 Brandis hangar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: random licensing, source is All Rights Reserved
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Xunks (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ModellEindeckerE4-20WindkanalAva1919.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Credit on source: DLR (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) -> this license is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Raymond 11:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:50 днів активного спротиву окупанту 06.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 21:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SZD-59 Acro 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2023-10-09 Yanshuf SouraskyMedicalCentre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]