User talk:Mhmrodrigues/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Rupert I of Legnica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Premislaus Noszak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Louis I of Legnica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:MargaretaCelje.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Boleslaus I of Opole.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Barbara of Brandenburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Henry VIII of Legnica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Frederick III of Legnica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Frederick III and Catherine of Mecklenburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Vlad III Tepes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:VladislavIVlaicu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Chiajna of Moldavia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boleslav II of Bohemia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Boleslav II of Bohemia.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Krd 17:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Ediciones incorrectas y masivas relativas al Casal d'Aragó / Casa de Aragón

Hola Mhmrodrigues. He tenido que arreglar los errores que cometiste eliminando Casal d'Aragó de todos los artículos y sustituyéndolo por una categoría llamada Casa de Barcelona. Como las fuentes secundarias fiables es lo que tenemos que seguir, te pongo la cita:

"La documentación medieval de cualquier procedencia habla tan sólo de la Casa de Aragón" [...]

Alberto Montaner Frutos, El señal del rey de Aragón: Historia y significado, Zaragoza, Institución «Fernando el Católico», 1995, pp. 27-28.

Esta obra, además, se puede consultar en línea, con lo que no tendrás ningún problema para comprobar la veracidad de la información:

Así pues, queda claro que House of Barcelona / Casa de Barcelona / Casal de Barcelona es una denominación impropia para referirse a la Casa Real de Aragón. En todo caso, Casa de Barcelona es admisible para denominar a la dinastía condal, pero no a la real, puesto que no hay ningún documento medieval, de cualquier lugar, que la utilice. Es ahistórica, siendo Casal d'Aragó (en catalán), y Casa de Aragón en castellano, la única denominación existente, ya sea en documentación catalana o de cualquier otro tipo, hasta que modernamente se produjo esa denominación, poco rigurosa. De hecho, quien creó la categoría trabajó en la wikipedia en catalán sobre ese tema y llegó a la misma conclusión: que la única denominación histórica era Casal d'Aragó (en catalán), para el linaje de los Aragón, que comienza con Ramiro I y se extiende hasta Fernando II, el Católico. Por ello, no vuelvas a eliminar la denominación correcta de los artículos con la categoría Casal d'Aragó, ni te inventes denominaciones inexistentes como House of Barcelona in Catalonia (¿?) u otras similares. Todo tiene que hacerse con conocimiento de las fuentes fiables expertas en la materia. Me ha costado mucho tiempo arreglar lo que estropeaste, por lo que si quieres poner cambios discutibles, te ruego que lo consultes antes. Gracias por tu comprensión. Escarlati (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

No hace falta que te disculpes, al contrario, gracias a tí por tu trabajo, amabilidad y comprensión. Lo que ocurre es que todos los reyes de Aragón desde Alfonso II son Rey de Aragón y Conde de Barcelona. Pero el título real siempre precede al condal, por lo que la denominación correcta (e histórica, como muestra la fuente fiable que te mostré), es Casa de Aragón. Ramón Berenguer IV de Barcelona, contrae matrimonio con la reina Petronila I de Aragón, pero era ella quien transmitía la Casa Real, pues la barcelonesa era condal. Si bien es cierto que Ramiro I pertenece a la línea de la dinastía Jimena de Navarra, con el se considera inaugurada la Casa Real de Aragón, como puedes comprobar en trabajo experto en genealogía. Más información sobre la Casa puedes ver aquí.
Se puede dejar Dinastía Jiménez, en Ramiro I de Aragón, pero el último miembro de la Casa Real de Aragón es, al menos, Fernando II de Aragón, llamado el Católico, quien casa con Isabel de Castilla, los reyes Católicos; aunque el linaje familiar continúa en nobles de esta dinastía hasta al menos el siglo XVIII. Y es que, como dice el miembro de la Real Academia Española de la Historia José Ángel Sesma Muñoz:

El breve reinado de Fernando I no supuso de ninguna manera una nueva etapa para la Corona, ni siquiera se puede hablar de un cambio de dinastía. La Casa Real de Aragón seguirá en el trono, al menos durante el siglo XV.

J. A. Sesma Muñoz, El Interregno (1410-1412), 2011, pág. 224.
Estoy de acuerdo la Casa de Aragón enlaza con tres dinastías: Jiménez, Barcelona y Trastámara; de hecho, una opción sería llamarlas Casa de Aragón (dinastía Jiménez), Casa de Aragón (dinastía Barcelona) y Casa de Aragón (dinastía Trastámara), pero el problema es que serían nombres inventados por nosotros y en wikimedia no se puede hacer investigación original. Ahora estoy trabajando en mejorar lo que puedo en esa categoría.
Muchos saludos y encantado de conocerle. Escarlati (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mariano IVdiArborea.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 08:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Categoria incorrecta em File:José Malhoa 1.jpg

Olá, Mhmrodrigues.

Não entendo a reversão que fez à minha correcção da categoria em File:José Malhoa 1.jpg. Inúmeras fontes secundárias identificam esta obra de José Malhoa enquanto um retrato da Rainha D. Leonor (1458-1525), esposa de D. João II; para invocar algumas, cito o website do próprio Museu José Malhoa ("Em 1926, correspondendo a sugestão de Montês, Malhoa oferece “Ao Povo das Caldas” o óleo “Rainha D. Leonor”, obra que estará na génese da instituição."), e no MatrizNet (catálogo colectivo on-line dos Museus tutelados pelo Ministério da Cultura, através do Instituto dos Museus e da Conservação) existem pelo menos dois estudos de José Malhoa para o mesmo quadro (aqui e aqui), onde igualmente consta identificada como a Rainha D. Leonor.

Por último, e atendendo agora somente às características formais do quadro, note-se que o escudo de Portugal que aparece acima da rainha corresponde ao da Casa Real de Avis -- o escudo de armas real de Portugal, com as pontas da cruz de Avis (verdes) intercaladas aos castelos na bordadura -- e não ao vigente no tempo de Leonor Teles de Menezes. RickMorais (talk) 01:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Ora essa, obrigado eu! Saudações. RickMorais (talk) 23:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

RE:Mais ficheiros na Categoria: The Portuguese Genealogy (Genealogia dos Reis de Portugal) (1530-1534) - BL Add MS 12531

Viva!

Antes de mais, peço imensa desculpa por tardar tanto em responder; ultimamente não tenho tido o tempo que gostaria para estar activo aqui no Commons. Ainda falta, de facto, fazer o upload das iluminuras de várias personalidades nessa genealogia, e eu ficaria contente se também realizasse tarefa, porquanto só a poderei levar a cabo quando me encontrar um pouco mais folgado no que toca a tempo.

Não sei se percebi a questão que me colocou: como transferir as imagens do visualizador online da British Library, é isso? Eu tenho feito zoom máximo nas imagens e tirado várias screencaptures que depois monto numa única imagem de grandes dimensões com o MS Paint. Não sei se haverá uma maneira mais fácil de fazê-lo, simultaneamente mantendo a alta resolução das imagens.

Saudações, RickMorais (talk) 22:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ArnulfIIFlanders.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ArnulfIIFlanders.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 01:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ponç III d'Empúries.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 01:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Photos of 3D objects are copyrighted. See Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet. --Martin H. (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coin Guillem II i Bernat II de Besalú.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Coin Ponç Hug IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. Please stop adding Bagrationi dynasty category because they are already there with their respective subcategories. Thanks. Jaqeli 22:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Welfen

Sämtliche Artikel über Mitglieder der Welfenfamilie waren bereits durch vorhandene Unterkategorien in Category:House of Welf eingeordnet. Das ganze Kategoriensystem war durchdacht und es hat eine Menge Arbeit gemacht, Ordnung in die Welfenartikel zu bekommen. Siehe hierzu bitte auch Category_talk:House_of_Welf. Mache deine Änderungen bitte alle wieder rückgängig, ich habe wenig Lust über 100 Artikel von Hand zu revertieren. Bitte in Zukunft erst einmal die vorhanden Kategorien anschauen, bevor du solch umfangreichen Änderungen vornimmst. Ggfs. so etwas auf der Disk ansprechen. Tönjes (talk) 10:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

??? Tönjes (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

House of Dejanović has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

ucivo.wz.cz/panovnici2.html

Hi, i cant find any <1923 publication. The images are very similar, it looks like the same artist created them the same time. Including the drawings of Havel. This means the date of creation is >1990. What evidence do you have for publication <1923? --Martin H. (talk) 23:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

..or, considering your last edit [1], what evidence do we have that the creator died >70 years ago? Most likely, as argued above, the work is from the 1990s and artist who created the drawing is still alive. --Martin H. (talk) 23:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Art from artanas.net

Hi again, you uploaded files like File:Vasilii II.jpg. You argue, that the creator of that work died more then 70 years ago and that therefore the file is in the public domain. Thats untrue, the artist (http://artanas.net/PROFILE.HTM) is alive, the work is in copyright. Do you have other uploads from this artist? You should nominate such file for deletion using {{Copyvio}}. --Martin H. (talk) 23:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent artistic portraits of historic people by Irena Bierwiaczonek

And again, you did upload very recently created portraits by polish painter [[::pl:Irena Bierwiaczonek-Polak|Irena Bierwiaczonek-Polak]] such as File:Przemko II of Glogow.jpg. Bierwiaczonek died in 2009, so the date at mentioned upload is wrong obviously. However, the file is not public domain because contrary to your statement the artist is not dead for 70 years. The work is in copyright untill January 1 2080, untill this date the upload here is a {{Copyvio}}. --Martin H. (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

One file from that set is File:Rudolph of Zagan.jpg. You did upload another set with files such as File:RudolfZagan.jpg. We see that the file is from the same artist. The artist is not "unknown" as you claim, the artist is not dead for >70 years as you claim but is known and died 2009. The upload is a clear copyright infringement.
Oh man, there is a lot of work to do here! You uploaded a lot of very recent artworks that you falsely labled as old public domain works. There also is a lot photos of 3D objects - statues, coins, seals - in violation of the photographers copyright. --Martin H. (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Also

This file are credited to Bierwiaczonek at your own source (!!) - the artist is not unknown as you claim and thats not old paintings as you think. There is no way keeping this file without the copyright holders written permission for publication under a free license. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain. --Martin H. (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Boleslaus II.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boleslaus II.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

House of Arianiti has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 21:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

House of Topia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Princes_of_Kastrioti has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Mhmrodrigues/Archive 3, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Maria Theresa I of Austria.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Pay attention to copyright
File:Azzo VIIIEste.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 04:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Mieszko the Fat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.205.143.38 21:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Margaret of Celje.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 08:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Tvrtko I seal1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Tvrtko I seal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:KraljDabisa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Kralj Ostojic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Jelena Gruba of Bosnia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Elisabeth, Queen of Hungary.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Kralj Ostoja.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Catherine, countess of Celje.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Kralj Tomas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Kraljica Katarina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Maria, countess of Helfenstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:KraljTvrtkoII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Stjepantomasevic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Seal Ostoje.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Stjepan II Kotromanic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:MatejNinoslav.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Ostoje Kotromanic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Ioan Kantakuzin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Isak Angel II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Konstantin VII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Leon VI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Nikifor Foka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Nikifor I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Teodosii II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Zoia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:TheodoraByzantium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Coin Hug III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Coin Hug IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Coin Guillem II i Bernat II de Besalú.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Guillem II i Bernat II de Besalú.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Hug IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)