User talk:Meneerke bloem/Archive 3
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Identities[edit]
Hi Meneerke - these two pics File:Pinus pinaster immature cones 01.jpg and File:Pinus pinaster male cones 01.jpg are of two different trees of two different species ;-) In immature cones 01.jpg, note the nearly white bud scales (on the shoot tips) which are straight, and in male cones 01.jpg, note the dark orange-red bud scales, which are strongly recurved. The first is Pinus nigra, whereas the second is Pinus pinea or Pinus pinaster (hard to tell which, but the needle length and thickness is closer to P. pinea). Also compare the needle basal sheaths, long and pale in immature cones 01.jpg, and short and dark in male cones 01.jpg. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 09:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! The Bay of the Somme is not too far north for Pinus pinea (in cultivation, it is hardy north to at least 56°N in southern Scotland), but if the crown is the wrong shape, then I'm happy with it being P. pinaster. - MPF (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Picea breweriana[edit]
Hi Meneerke - thanks! I thought I could see the shoots should be pendulous from the background as well, but I am happy to accept your orientation of them. I'm not sure what's happened to File:Picea breweriana (flowers).jpg, from the file history your original upload was correctly oriented, but it was rotated by someone else on 15 December 2011; I instructed rotatebot to rotate it back again yesterday, but the page history is showing that rotatebot is not working at the moment, so it didn't work. It probably means your rotatebot instruction won't work either. But what is even stranger, is if I click on the thumbnail of your original 15 April 2009 upload, it still comes up mis-rotated. That I do not understand! PS are you also finding Commons to be extremely slow today? I am finding it hard to view any images; they take several minutes to upload, instead of the usual few seconds :-( MPF (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Sternbergia lutea[edit]
Bonjour, Reginald. -- Quelques mots pour vous remercier d'avoir prêté attention à ma photo de crocus prise en septembre et d'y avoir adjoint, avant-hier, le nom binomial de la plante. Le fichier a ainsi davantage de chances de servir à quelqu'un sur Wikipédia. Comme je vous l'ai déjà dit, je suis plus passionné de photo que de botanique et, malgré mes efforts en ce domaine et l'aide de la page "Quelle est cette plante ?", je reste très incertain de mes faibles et lointaines connaissances concernant la flore... Merci donc au spécialiste que vous êtes, depuis les campagnes de ma Charente du sud, puisque vous la connaissez un peu. -- Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you[edit]
Image:Picea breweriana cones01.jpg is in this week on Estonian wikipedia Main page, because en:Picea breweriana is the article of the week. Thank you for nice picture! Taivo (talk) 23:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Groeten[edit]
Réginald...ja, ik herkende ze nog van een wandeling aan de Zwalm. Het kan zijn dat ik in de nabije toekomst opnieuw beroep moet doen op jouw plantenkennis. Hartelijke groet. Paul Hermans (talk) 13:18, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Réginald, please could you take a look at this discussion: [1]. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Dear Réginald, thanks for your check! Obviously I slept. Best greetings. Orchi (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Message transféré[edit]
Bonjour Réginald, Je viens de recevoir ce message : Hi Ghislain - do you have locations for File:Cytisus purgans 1.jpg, File:Cytisus purgans 2.jpg, File:Cytisus purgans 3.jpg, File:Cytisus purgans 4.jpg, File:Cytisus purgans 5.jpg, please? "Cytisus purgans" is no longer an accepted species name, and plants so named are either Cytisus oromediterraneus (if in France, or central & northern Spain), or Cytisus balansae (if in southern Spain or NW Africa). Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Pouvez-vous renommer ces fichiers ? Amicalement --77.194.154.241 15:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Lilium bulbiferum[edit]
Dear Réginald,
I noticed your (deleted) message regarding my recently uploaded fire lily photos. The determination feature of the bulbils is not very reliable, unfortunately. Even the subspecies/variety croceum often has bulbils, but not as many as bulbiferum. Also, the blossom's color is more orange instead of red and the typical locations are sandy fields in the plains instead of rocky spots in the hill country. My photos were taken in the northern German lowlands. The site has long been known among botanists and is considered to be one of the most important ones. The Dutch Fire Lily specialist Fred Bos comes to visit there regularly. So, I think, the determination of the subspecies is absolutely confirmed.
Best regards, Fice (talk) 10:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Fice,
- I have deleted my own message because I realised that I was wrong, when I saw that your pictures were indeed of the (true) var. croceum, which is present (and threatened!) in the rye field of Northern Netherlands and Germany.
- I have met the Lilium bulbiferum var. croceum in the French Alps, with light orange flowers and no bulblets, and the var. bulbiferum in the Dolomites, with orange-red flowers and a lot of bulblets.
- Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 16:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Réginald, I stumble on this discussion by chance. Centaurea dealbata was first described by Carl Ludwig Willdenow 1765-1812. It was later reassigned by Karl (Carl) Heinrich Emil (Ludwig) Koch 1809-1879. The information on Wiki commons (Category:Psephellus dealbatus includes C. dealbata as a synonym, while Category:Centaurea does not include C. dealbata) is not consistent with Wikipedia (which does not have an entry on Psephellus, nor is it listed as a synonym of Centaurea, while C. dealbata (vernacular names Persian Cornflower, Whitewash Cornflower) has its own entry and is listed as assigned to Centaurea). This is confusing and inconsistent. The question is what the pervailing opinion is about the validity of the genus Psephellus. I am not an insider, but this article suggests that Psephellus is accepted. So does this website. I hope this helps. Met vriendelijke groet, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 11:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Cyclamen hederifolium in Sardinia[edit]
Hello, you categorized my as yet unidentified Cyclamen image from Sardinia as C. hederifolium. If you are sure about the identification I will rename the file and alter the description accordingly. I'd appreciate a brief notice either here or on my own discussion page. Thanks in advance, --Pjt56 (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Pjt56 (talk) 09:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, so far I knew Cyclamen only as a potted plant. Interesting to learn that it also grows easily in gardens. I have to try it! Thanks again, --Pjt56 (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Dracunculus vulgaris[edit]
greetings Meneerke bloem. It is not a native plant of Ireland but it has established here.see Reynolds, S.C.P. (2002). A catalogue of alien plants in Ireland. pp. [4], 1-413. Dublin: National Botanical Gardens, Glasnevin.I have placed it in a new category (Introduced species (Ireland). Is this ok with you? My object is to provide habitus/close-up illustrations of all the flowering plant species found in Ireland regardless of where they were photographed.Thanks for the hint.Best regards Notafly (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 3⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Merci![edit]
Pour une fois les experts du spipoll auxquels sont destinées ces photos n'auront pas trop de commentaires à faire sur mes identifications ! Merci. Á bientôt --Daniel Villafruela (talk) 22:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Meneerke bloem,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
New Message and need for some assistance[edit]
I am back online after three years off the internet, sorry I could not get in touch with you. Hello again and thanks for keeping in touch, I think it was Linkedin? There was some confusion while I was gone and some @#$# on Wikipedia has banned me so now I can't edit there?? I am currently uploading botanical photos related to a 1980 manuscript on Botanical Gardens of Canada which is an article on Wikipedia called List of botanical gardens in Canada. As I am unable to attach photos to theaarticles I had written, could you place some relevant ones for me? E-mail me at materia @ live.ca Thanks so much and hope you are doing well. WayneRay (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 16:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
PH-4 | This user is able to take professional quality photographs. |
Juniperus sabina locations[edit]
Hi Meneerke - thanks for adding the location data! It is one of those species very common in cultivation but rarely photographed in the wild, so in the absence of location data, I assumed it was likely cultivated. Whereabouts is Queyras? A bit more detail would be invaluable ;-) MPF (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! - MPF (talk) 10:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Lycopode des Vosges[edit]
Merci beaucoup pour l'identification ! Du coup, pouvez-vous également renommer File:Lycopodium annotinum (massif des Vosges 4x3).jpg ? Bonne continuation. Florn (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
@Meneerke bloem: heeft U interesse om uw kennis te delen op de beta versie wikiversity? Ik ben de mening toegedaan dat iemand met kennis van zaken daar best een oogje in het spreekwoordelijke zeil mag houden. 
Lotje (talk) 15:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
|
File:Colchicum alpinum RHu004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lotje (talk) 15:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Speedy delete[edit]
@Meneerke bloem: in de linkerrand van elke foto bevindt zich een link: "Nominate for deletion", daar kan U terecht. Lotje (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Colchicum alpinum RHu003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lotje (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Colchicum alpinum flower2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lotje (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
@Meneerke bloem: , zoals U ziet, maakte ik een category die duidelijk niet correct is. Kan U dit eens van dichtbij bekijken. Alvast bedankt. Lotje (talk) 14:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Leea > Anacardium[edit]
Hi! The following photos require some attention:
.jpg){kind=link}
._Locatie,_Hortus_(Haren,_Groningen).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Long time ago, I came across these photos and recognized that they could not be Leea guineensis. However, I could not tell which species actually this is. Recently having seen flowers of Anacardium occidentale, it is quite clear to me now, that at least it is the same genus. I would not hesitate to identify these photos as A. occidentale, if they were taken in Africa or tropical Asia, but you might have visited tropical America at some occasion. As far as I know, all species of Anacardium are neotropical and only A. occidentale is cultivated at a wide scale also in the Old World. Anyway, you will know where these photos come from. Regards --Franz Xaver (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Bedankje[edit]
|
Botany Barnstar | |
| Beste Meneer bloem, deze "Herfsttijloosfamilie barnstar" voor uw blijvende inzet op commons. Lotje (talk) 13:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC) |
Meneerke bloem, heeft U interesse? Lotje (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hernoeming file[edit]
Meneerke bloem, deze file moet imo hernoemd. Heeft U enig idee? Alvast bedankt. Lotje (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Anagallis arvensis[edit]
Creé la página Anagallis arvensis por las referencias (seis), que figuran en la misma, aceptan dicho nombre y no hay referencias de que haya sido cambiada ultimamente. Si tiene información reciente de su cambio, puedes anular la edición. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 09:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Dag Meneerke bloem, heeft U er enig idee wat de correcte benaming is van deze papaver? Lotje (talk) 05:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Dag Meneerke bloem, wil U eens nazien of de beschrijving bij deze afbeelding correct is en eventueel aanpassen? Alvast bedankt. Lotje (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Idem dito voor deze afbeelding. Lotje (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Dag Meneerke bloem, ik wilde alleen even checken bij U of de mededeling op de File talk correct is, en of U dit desgevallend wil aanpassen. Alvast bedankt. Lotje (talk) 15:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Categorization of files[edit]
Hallo Meneerke bloem, deze File dient hernoemd en in de correcte categorie geplaatst. Graag uw tussenkomst. Lotje (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Dag Meneerke bloem, weet U welke anjer dit is? Lotje (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Dag Meneerke bloem, opnieuw heb ik er eentje "ontdekt" dat uw hulp nodig heeft. Lotje (talk) 06:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Dag Meneerke bloem, zekerlijk heeft U foto's genomen tijdens uw bezoeken aan het park van Beervelde. Wil U deze delen met commons, of had U reeds een category aangemaakt? Lotje (talk) 12:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Categorization[edit]
Dag Meneerke bloem, heeft U enig idee waar deze en deze afbeelding kunnen worden ondergebracht? Lotje (talk) 06:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Dag Meneerke bloem, kan U hier een category op plakken? Lotje (talk) 12:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
._Locatie,_Hortus_(Haren,_Groningen).jpg){kind=link}
Dag Meneerke bloem, heeft U weet van iemand hier die met kennis van zaken kan oordelen of de benaming van deze file correct is? Dank U. Lotje (talk) 09:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
._Locatie,_Hortus_(Haren,_Groningen).jpg){kind=link}
Dag Meneerke bloem, in deze category staan een paar afbeeldingen van bloemen die misschien wil vervolledigen. Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Dag Meneerke bloem, heeft U enig idee hoe deze Syringa vulgaris cultivar heet? In de De wandelaar ging verder staan heel wat afbeeldingen die uw aandacht verdienen. De benaming voot deze category vind ik nogal vreemd klinken, maar enfin, Des Menschen Wille ist sein Himmelreich... Lotje (talk) 13:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***[edit]
|
* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * * | |
| * Zalig Kerstfeest en Gelukkig Nieuwjaar! * Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Lotje (talk) 10:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
Hallo, Meneerke bloem, enig idee wat de Nederlandstalige naam van deze plant is? Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 08:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
