User talk:Medeniacus
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Little point[edit]
Hello Medeniacus, thanks for your good pictures. A little tip: please have a look here: Commons:Categories.
When you can identify the species, it is not useful to put the pictures in all taxon-categories. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 18:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Medeniacus, on a similar note, if you put a picture in Category:Pirot, then you should not put it in Category:Pirot District because this is overcategorization (for more explanations please re-read COM:OVERCAT), and not in Category:Pirot municipality either because it is a redirected category. Thank you in advance--LamBoet (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- I will have that on mind. Thanks.--Medeniacus (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! Similarly, you are not supposed to put anything in Category:Butterflies, the species-level categories are enough. ;-)--LamBoet (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hahaha. Ok. Thanks. Should I remove all those butterflies tags? I have problems with following all the rules, obviously :D--Medeniacus (talk) 20:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- I see that you have removed them. Thanks for that :) This won't happen again :)--Medeniacus (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, no problem at all :-)--LamBoet (talk) 21:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! Similarly, you are not supposed to put anything in Category:Butterflies, the species-level categories are enough. ;-)--LamBoet (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- I will have that on mind. Thanks.--Medeniacus (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Polyommatus admetus 1 Esper, 1783.jpg[edit]
Hi Medeniacus, thank you for uploading your butterfly pictures. May I just make two remarks:
- I think this one is daphnis, not admetus: do you agree, and can you please make the correction?
- Please don't categorize your pictures in Category:Butterflies, it's not what it's meant for, and putting just the species category is enough :-)
Cheers--LamBoet (talk) 15:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I changed the body of text, but I dont know how to rename file. I see that I made mistake accidentally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medeniacus (talk • contribs) 16:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Medeniacus; so, you can't rename the file yourself, but you can request a renaming : use the "more → move" function near the top right of the page (as mentioned in this page) and indicate the new name you want. A user with filemoving rights (like me) will then do the renaming.--LamBoet (talk) 23:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Species name is changed now. Waiting for admin to approve it.--Medeniacus (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, it looks like you need some help to create Category:Hipparchia volgensis. What I suggest is: look at the source code of a similar category, for example Category:Hipparchia neomiris, and copy it into your new category, just changing the species and author name. Then, you can re-categorize your 5 H. volgensis pictures using the HotCat gadget. --LamBoet (talk) 12:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- We meet again :D Im hopeless :D I changed the page as you suggested. Thanks again! --Medeniacus (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Medeniacus, may I ask what made you identify these butterflies as P. mannii? The sharp wing shape would suggest P. rapae; have you seen the upper side? --LamBoet (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Medeniacus, I have just set these as Pieris sp., and I did similar changes to a few other pictures (see your watchlist). Please be cautious with butterfly identification: staying at genus level is generally better than putting an uncertain species name ;-) --LamBoet (talk) 01:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)