User talk:Medeniacus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Medeniacus!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little point[edit]

Hello Medeniacus, thanks for your good pictures. A little tip: please have a look here: Commons:Categories.
When you can identify the species, it is not useful to put the pictures in all taxon-categories. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 18:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Medeniacus, on a similar note, if you put a picture in Category:Pirot, then you should not put it in Category:Pirot District because this is overcategorization (for more explanations please re-read COM:OVERCAT), and not in Category:Pirot municipality either because it is a redirected category. Thank you in advance--LamBoet (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I will have that on mind. Thanks.--Medeniacus (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Similarly, you are not supposed to put anything in Category:Butterflies, the species-level categories are enough. ;-)--LamBoet (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha. Ok. Thanks. Should I remove all those butterflies tags? I have problems with following all the rules, obviously :D--Medeniacus (talk) 20:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you have removed them. Thanks for that :) This won't happen again :)--Medeniacus (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, no problem at all :-)--LamBoet (talk) 21:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polyommatus admetus 1 Esper, 1783.jpg[edit]

Hi Medeniacus, thank you for uploading your butterfly pictures. May I just make two remarks:

  • I think this one is daphnis, not admetus: do you agree, and can you please make the correction?
  • Please don't categorize your pictures in Category:Butterflies, it's not what it's meant for, and putting just the species category is enough :-)

Cheers--LamBoet (talk) 15:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the body of text, but I dont know how to rename file. I see that I made mistake accidentally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medeniacus (talk • contribs) 16:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Medeniacus; so, you can't rename the file yourself, but you can request a renaming : use the "more → move" function near the top right of the page (as mentioned in this page) and indicate the new name you want. A user with filemoving rights (like me) will then do the renaming.--LamBoet (talk) 23:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Species name is changed now. Waiting for admin to approve it.--Medeniacus (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it looks like you need some help to create Category:Hipparchia volgensis. What I suggest is: look at the source code of a similar category, for example Category:Hipparchia neomiris, and copy it into your new category, just changing the species and author name. Then, you can re-categorize your 5 H. volgensis pictures using the HotCat gadget. --LamBoet (talk) 12:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We meet again :D Im hopeless :D I changed the page as you suggested. Thanks again! --Medeniacus (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hi Medeniacus, may I ask what made you identify these butterflies as P. mannii? The sharp wing shape would suggest P. rapae; have you seen the upper side? --LamBoet (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Medeniacus, I have just set these as Pieris sp., and I did similar changes to a few other pictures (see your watchlist). Please be cautious with butterfly identification: staying at genus level is generally better than putting an uncertain species name ;-) --LamBoet (talk) 01:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]