User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2011/September

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tag des offenen Denkmals

An selbigem ist Zeche Gneisenau, Schacht 2/4, Tomsonbock und Maschinenhalle geöffnet. Leider bin ich dann in Nürnberg. Wenn Du dafür Lust und Zeit hättest.... -- smial (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Leider geht bei mir aus gesundheitlichen Gründen im Moment gar nichts. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Hrmpf. Drück Dir weiterhin alle vorhandenen Daumen. -- smial (talk) 22:47, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Schloss Oberhausen

Hallo, ich habe mich gerade noch mal an dieses Bild herangesetzt. Du hattest es vor einiger Zeit bei COM:QIC angemerkt, dass es leichte Schieflage hätte. Wie sieht's nun aus? Sollte jetzt eigentlich gerade sein... Viele Grüße --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:30, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Es gibt - bei 18 mm kein Wunder - noch eine leichte Verzerrung. Auf jeden Fall eine tolle Stimmung und eine schöne Arbeit. Wenn Du das RAW hast, probier doch einmal die automatische Objektivkorrektur. Sonst lass es einfach so. Für QI reichts auf jeden Fall. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Okay, dann werde ich es noch nicht korrigieren, sondern nehme gerne dein Angebot an und lasse dir das RAW zukommen. Ich habe dir eine Testmail geschickt, auf die du mir bitte antworten müsstest, damit ich deine eMail-Adresse habe und die Datei anhängen kann. Danke und Grüße --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Hilfe für SLA für alte Version

Hallo Mbdortmund, die 20:15 Uhr Version von Schwefe, Turm von St. Severin.jpg ist nicht genügend anonymisiert - kannst Du einen SLA für die beiden alten Versionen stellen? Stephan Hense (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Sei so nett und poste die Links auf die beiden Bilder, damit ich nicht die falschen erwische. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Es geht um die drei nichtaktuellen Versionen von File:Schwefe, Turm von St. Severin.jpg, keine Ahnung, wie man sie gesondert identifiziert, daher weiß ich auch nicht, wie man auf Altversionen eine SLA stellt. Stephan Hense (talk) 14:28, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Ich hoffe, die folgenden Links sind hilfreich!? Stephan Hense (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Entschuldige, wenn ich's nicht einfach weghaue, aber in allen Versionen steht Dein Name. Was meinst Du also mit "anonymisiert"? --Mbdortmund (talk) 02:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hab's kapiert und gelöscht.
done (x)
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Bedankt!!! Stephan Hense (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Habe mich gefreut …

… über Deine Quality Images Nominations. Dankeschön :-) Elya (talk) 21:11, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Gern, gute Bilder! mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 05:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herzogstr 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dark zones underexposed?--Lmbuga 16:36, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-110422-20130-diverse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gibson-110901-20197-LP Custom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Christian Werner has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jwh (talk) 20:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, wohl seinerzeit was schiefgelaufen "Christian" anstatt "Pierre" Werner --Jwh (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Sieht so aus, sorry, habe keinerlei Erinnerung an den Vorgang... --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:30, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
deleted (x) --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)