User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2008/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pyrrhocorax-graculus-0016-a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tetradrachm Ilion Athena obverse CdM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dom-Klinke-IMG 4519.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! IMG 9060-Innsbruck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Cropping
Hallo. Ich denke, daß beschneiden solcher Bilder wie Image:Mountainiron.jpg nicht durchgeführt werden sollte. Es handelt sich hierbei um hstorische Dokumente, die so belassen werden sollen, wie sie sind. --Matthiasb 07:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Namensvetter,
- ich weiß nicht mehr, wer den Beschneidungswunsch reingesetzt hat, kann man ja nachsehen, ich habe reihenweise die Wartungsliste abgearbeitet und nach den Konventionen werden auch aus historischen Fotos Captions, Watermarks und Negativränder entfernt, meist im Sinne der Einsteller, so habe ich etwa eine ganze Serie von Archivbildern aus Canada oder eine andere aus amerikanischen Regierungsquellen bearbeitet. Wenn Du aber anderer Ansicht bist, setz die Änderung doch zurück.
- mfg Mathias B.
- Dem kann ich zustimmen: Negativränder schneidet man besser weg und überträgt allfällige Kommentare dort in die maschinenlesbare Bildbeschreibung. --Ikiwaner 19:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Lach!
Hoi Matthias, musste doch gleich lachen, als ich dein Bild aus Wilten gesehen hab und zum Spass gleich daneben ein eigenes aus diesem Quartier nominieren. Wie klein die Welt doch ist! Dein Bild finde ich, ist grundsätzlich QI-würdig, ich bin mir aber nicht ganz sicher, ob bei dieser geringen Perspektive nun eine Korrektur besser ist oder nicht. Was sind deine Argumente? --Ikiwaner 19:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Ikiwaner,
- nett, dass Du Dich meldest. Ich bin erst durch Deine schöne Häuserreihe am Inn darauf gekommen, etwas zu Innsbruck zu nominieren, an der habe ich mich auch einmal versucht, es war aber leider regnerisch und dann trübe über dem Wasser. Anders gesagt: Ich hab's einfach nicht so schön hinbekommen *g*
- Das Bild von mir habe ich vom Balkon einer Freundin aufgenommen, bei der ich zu Gast war, vielleicht werfe ich mal eine korrigierte Fassung ins Rennen, wenn Du meinst, dass es dann besser rüberkommt, ich hatte das Gefühl, dass die geringe perspektivische Verzerrung einen Eindruck von der Kameraposition vermittelt. Ich bin inzwischen manchmal nicht mehr so ganz sicher, ob es sinnvoll ist, alle Linien völlig geradezustellen, nur weil es so einfach geht. Ich hab da manchmal so einen Effekt wie bei den ersten Flachbildschirmen, wo man dachte, das Bild sei nach innen gewölbt. An dem Bild gefiel mir das Licht, ich seh' mich noch über der Brüstung hängen, leider bin ich trotzdem nicht an der Dachtraufe „vorbeigekommen“...
- Bekomme gleich Lust, mal wieder ins schöne Tirol zu brummen. Hier also mal eine Schnellkorrektur, was meist Du, Mir gefällt das Original fast besser, ich bin aber nicht beratungsresistent.
- mfg
- Mathias B.
- So eine Dachtraufe kann auch ein Kunstgriff sein, eine stehende Autokolonne und etwa 100 verkehrsschilder aus dem Bild zu kriegen. Danke für das Vergleichsbild. Ich hab trotzdem das unkorrigierte genommen, weil es mir irgendwie besser gefiel. am linken Rand fluchteten die Linien der beiden Häuser in der korrigierten Version nicht ganz, also besser gar nicht korrigieren. Weiterhin viel Spass beim Korrigieren. PS: Die anderen Bilder hätten natürlich auch Chancen als QI, aber sein ganzes Werk kann man auch nicht nominieren... --Ikiwaner 08:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
the count at QI CR
I think it is Quality Images Candidate Review, heh. Feel free to add up the count or even move the images around if the time is right -- just put your name on it. There was a vote after I tallied a score and I noticed in the history that you had adjusted the count. The problem for me is that the time stamp for the count is a different day than the last vote which is in that count. In a more real life situation, there could be some problem (perhaps) also because the count that is showing is not the count that I made. I am human, I make mistakes. Software is not human and it makes mistakes but those are usually different kinds of mistakes and there is some consistency with them. At any rate, the reason that I found the difference between the timestamp and the count was that I was looking to see if I had made a mistake with it.
All three of these nomination processes that I watch have problems -- depending on who is cleaning and tallying that is who gets notified or noticed. The bots sometimes make mistakes and award the nominator and not the photographer which to me makes the whole process somewhat void of value. I made a great edit of a mediocore image and totally got skipped in any acknowledgement whatsoever -- the lesson, being nice and respectful to those who came before you doesn't work; at least, I think that is what the lesson has been for me especially over the last almost 5 years.
I try to be the kind of human being that I would like to see the species evolve into; the species instead seems to prefer to move the other way.</waxing philosophical>
btw, do you know any latin? -- carol
Hi Carol,
thank you for your message, I hope I understood everything right, but my English is from the book „Good Pidgin Volume I“ by Franz Beckenbauer. I'm sorry that I caused some problems, but I will try to learn. I did not think about time stamps, when I edited the counter, sorry. Perhaps I should turn into some kind of software, if I understood your proposal, but I have only reduced resources of soft skills.
Concerning your question: I had Latin-lessons at school, but I'm not shure if I can help you, but I can try.
mfg --Mbdortmund 14:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Images
Thank you for recommending my photos for a Quality Images! :) - user:Sabatheus
- They are really good, for some a little correction of the perspective would be useful. You can receive help [here] mfg --Mbdortmund 19:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bamberger Dom-Veit Stoss Detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! IMG 6419-Ostfriedhof.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Lycaon 21:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frankfurt Am Main-Freie Stadt Frankfurt-Plan-1845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fulica atra on ice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! IMG 1179.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pelecanus crispus (Antwerp Zoo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acryllium vulturinum Schönbrunn2008c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calocybe gambosa 080420wb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Doors
Hi,
I can see you appreciate my door knocker. I appreciate your poignée de porte ! ;-)
DocteurCosmos 19:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Funny pictures, both, I think, and there where other interesting images from you, but what is the function of this bilboquet?
mfg --Mbdortmund 22:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- A bilboquet is a toy. You hold the grip in one hand and let the ball hung below (string taut). Then, by a move of your wrist you send up the ball and try to put it on the grip (a hole in the ball fits the grip). This bilboquet is mine (it comes from Saint-Cirq-Lapopie) and I play with it sometimes. Sorry for my poor english. I'll try to make a video ! DocteurCosmos 05:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Witten - Schloss Steinhausen 18 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 16:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kanapaha-2008 04 09-IMG 0195 1-noncropped.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amrum-Nebel-Grabstein IMG 0506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|