User talk:Mattbuck/Archive14

Archives October 2007 - June 2008 June 2008 - August 2008 August 2008 - December 2008 December 2008 - April 2010 April 2010 - September 2010 September 2010 - May 2011 May 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - March 2012 April 2012 - July 2012 August 2012 - October 2012 November 2012 - January 2013 February 2013 - April 2013 May 2013 - July 2013 August 2013 - October 2013 November 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - February 2014 March 2014 - April 2014 May 2014 - July 2014 August 2014 - September 2014 October 2014 - November 2014 December 2014 - February 2015 March 2014 - September 2015 October 2015 - December 2017 Current

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth railway station MMB 05 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «95 Narroways Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted CW (judging from the housing in the background) --Kreuzschnabel 10:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC) I think I based the verticals on the various poles and chimneys, which do appear to be vertical to me. Mattbuck 11:27, 27 July 2013 (UTC) Maybe I was misled by the horizon slope. Anyway, the pic is a bit soft in detail, can you improve this? Not sure if it’s sharp enough for me to promote. --Kreuzschnabel 09:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC) Added a bit of sharpness. Mattbuck 18:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC) That didn’t raise the level of detail of course but I think it’s OK. --Kreuzschnabel 21:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:London_2012

London 2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Flickrworker (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 03 Fair Head Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 10:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otterington railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 11:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedford railway station MMB 22 150109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting. A little overexposure at the signboard, but OK. --Bob Collowân 20:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 05 313109 350235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 01 350248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pateley Bridge MMB 03 The Bridge Inn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me, but I don't like the cropped car --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 05 144010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 11:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolton Abbey MMB 16 River Wharfe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Bridge station MMB 08 465188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple CA on the stack at right --Christian Ferrer 11:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 11:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC) Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 18:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 03 317883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Just wanted to say hi …

… when I saw we could almost have met at Grosmont station – you took a picture there on July 7th and I did so on July 11th. Maybe next year :-) --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 15:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

oops sorry, you were there two years earlier. Anyway … --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 15:52, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

If it's any consolation, I was also there in September 2012. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 17:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Trykin 04:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB W5 International House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «O7 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 17:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 11 Hole of Horcum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful Heuschrecke 09:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB K5 Tower Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pickering MMB 12 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (Newbridge level crossing).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting perspective --Kreuzschnabel 20:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 78 170523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Retford railway station MMB 09.jpg

Hi, I've make a test (and also a big hell, take a look at the QIC page for this picture) and uploaded it, revert if you don't like, but if you do it you must improve your version, you can do it, I have been too faster to decline --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

QIC

Hello Mattbuck, Even if QICbot is stalled at the moment (I asked Dschwen for help), would you please have a second look on File:01 Florac Vibron.jpg nominated as QIC on August 10? It has been edited as suggested in your first review. Thanks and regards, --Myrabella (talk) 07:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the version you've edited. Bolder and better enhancement than mine! Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 08:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Mascots/Requests/Penyulap (de-Mascot)

Commons:Mascots/Requests/Penyulap (de-Mascot) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AFBorchert (talk) 13:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB I5 Russell Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit of CAs (notes), but I think that it must be QI: Good--Lmbuga 16:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 08 Humber Road South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB S2 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Probably the description is confusing "Canary Wharf". The eye-catcher is imho the Citygroup tower, or is Citygroup tower equal to Canary Wharf? --Tuxyso 07:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC) The Citigroup (i, not y) Centre (re not er) is one of the biggest buildings in Canary Wharf, which is a business district. I went with Canary Wharf on the grounds that it shows other buildings, and could get massively long filenames if I named every building. Mattbuck 09:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shepherd's Bush railway station MMB 06 377201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open University MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK Support --Rjcastillo 23:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB X4 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK Support --Rjcastillo 00:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 37 57302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 00:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idridgehay railway station MMB 02 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 05:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 44 175115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB D2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Z3 Ancaster Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gospel Oak railway station MMB 09 172005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 04 185104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 12:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy sky but otherwise a nice shot. Heuschrecke 23:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rowsley South railway station MMB 02 68013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 22:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 71 156408 153XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 17:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolverhampton railway station MMB 12 221111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 18:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury MMB 01 Fairwood Junction 43003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective and colors could be improved Borvan53 18:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)  Colours I can do. Perspective... I'm looking along a train, they're fairly horizontal, and there are no verticals at the edges to test. Mattbuck 21:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 17:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO you need to rework it, I've tried on my pc : 1.sharpened 2.little more expo 3. little more contrast and IMO it's much better --Christian Ferrer 18:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 15:57, 11 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Good now --Christian Ferrer 18:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB O5 Science City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 10 222022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 60 166218 458006 43131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Kreuzschnabel 16:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB C6 395028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 83 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulse Hill railway station MMB 12 319382 319373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:42, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 27 1992-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 22:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is what I meant, I see where the water is flowing. The loss of detail because of the narrow aperture is a pity (buy a ND filter haha). It will improve a lot if you can brighten the upper part (trees and rocks), it's very dark. --Kadellar 09:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not your masterpiece, but correct ;) --Kadellar 12:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marylebone station MMB 26 165020 165031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 12:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB V3 Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 21:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 08:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 05 170511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail; how a train-station photo should look --Daniel Case 07:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail --Daniel Case 07:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB U3 Derby Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I’d crop the foreground shadow completely out, the image won’t lose anything important. Then QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 16:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 15:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)  Support --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oakleigh Park railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit dark, can you brighten it? --Kreuzschnabel 16:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 15:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC) OK --Kreuzschnabel 18:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Martin Falbisoner 17:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosmont railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Courtesy deletions

I noticed your comment on a recent DR. I understand this page was intended to be a help page for newbies. I have no problem with that. Perhaps the concept of courtesy deletions can be first amended into the deletion policy which links to this information page (essay?). I am worried about it turning into a rivaling new deletion policy that has a vaguely defined morality and ethics at its core. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 00:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Conflict

As an active participant, you aren't allowed to close it, especially considering your relationship with the incident. You were involved in the discussion. The copyright claim is outstanding and part of the matter. You really should know better. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I made 3 comments before closing, those were:

1. Informing Amadscientist about the erotic media available on Commons;
2. Correcting you when you claimed that a file has to be used to be educational;
3. Complaining about people trying to turn Commons:Courtesy into a proscriptive policy.

Not one of these is a comment about the subject of the DR, and I only have a relationship if you consider having an opinion about something a relationship. The image was within scope, and if there are copyright issues which apply to the source photo they would be better discussed in a DR of that source image, where the level of drama will be lower. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Being actively involved and having an opinion are clear denoters of a conflict of interest. You knew that there were plenty of other admin that could have closed it yet you didn't let it happen. There was also clear policy for a deletion without there being any for keep, which suggests that bias definitely played a roll. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I must agree with Ottava Rima: there are plenty of other admins who could have closed this and who did not even participate in the discussion. As a discussion participant (and also being involved in other related discussions), the conflict that arrises from your closing of this deletion request is concerning. Tucoxn (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I would have closed this the same way, but he beat me to it. --O (谈 • висчвын) 04:51, 21 August 2013 (GMT)

11 deletes with strong rationales, and no keeps with a legitimate rationale (there are only 10 keeps). Pointing to an image being kept isn't a policy based rationale especially when the image was kept because it could have been used on an article. The scope policy, which Mattbuck pretends doesn't exist, makes it clear that theoretical use is not enough to claim it is educational, and that educational does require use. That use was put in to keep porn as educational. He can't then claim that educational isn't attached to use. A lack of understanding our policies is why Russavia is being removed from a Crat, and you two are just giving evidence as to why you shouldn't be allowed to close any image related discussions. We have policies for a reason. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

It says theoretical use does not necessarily make something educational, but it nowhere states that use is required. If you required that images be used on WMF projects, we'd likely nuke about 90% of our collection. To quote:

A media file which is neither:

• realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor
• legitimately in use as discussed above

falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons.

Note the neither/nor - if either criteria is satisfied then it is within scope. And I believe that a notable painter painting is within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

I question your ability to read the English language. There was no possible way to say that this was realistically useful in any kind of way. I would think that your mere attempt to claim such is so laughable that if one was to treat it as serious that you should be immediately desysopped and banned for disruption. The mere fact that it says "In the sections below, any use that is not made in good faith does not count." makes it really clear that use is necessary. Then there is this "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons", which makes it clear that not only is use necessary for it to be educational, not all uses count as educational. Your statements are so incredibly outrageous that I hope a passing admin blocks you for disruption. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

For the record, I am not interested in debating issues about nudity and sexual content (apart from illegal stuff, obviously). I just execute based on community consensus, mostly enshrined in policies and guidelines. Deletion requests have never been and will never be vote counts. That is all I will respond; do not expect me to continue conversing about this on this user talk page. If you would like to have policy/guideline interpretations clarified, you'd best go on the talk pages of those individual policies/guidelines. For what my uninvolved self is worth, mattbuck's interpretation of our project's scope and the arguments in relation to that DR are pretty reasonable. --O (谈 • висчвын) 08:35, 22 August 2013 (GMT)

" been and will never be vote counts" Yep, and that is why this was a clear delete. The opposes point out lack of use which is necessary for sexual content like that. There clearly was none and none of the supporters provided a policy based reason. Administrator tools require actual upholding of our policies. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

O, thanks for taking the time to review Mattbuck's actions as an admin in this case. I doubt that you could add anything more here and based on Ottava Rima's statements above, he is unlikely to find anything else but a block or ban for Mattbuck and the others on his declared target black list as sufficient. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Without commenting on whether the closure was correct or not, it is quite obvious that Matt shouldn't have closed it. As one of the most vocal and opinionated supporters of the pricasso thing, he should have recused himself. Do you not see how it puts yourself into a position that could have been avoided? Rather than the closure decision being reviewed on purely procedural grounds, it gets personal. Matt's post at AN/User to ask for OR to be blocked is also inappropriate. Again, I'm not judging here whether OR has "gone beyond the pale" but whether Matt should be the one calling for his head. You guys are fighting, so really the most I'd expect Matt to do is find some detached wise owl and ask them to review and suggest what should be done. Please take this as good-faith advice, that your wiki-friends should be offering you rather than than leaping to defence. Admins should be working hard to be seen to be impartial and fair, not just being impartial and fair, and avoid personal or conflicting situations when someone else could handle it. Colin (talk) 18:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Colin, that was well-expressed, especially the part about the detached wise owl. Mattbuck, It looks like another user agreed about the closing, here. Perhaps it would be a good idea to find a way to get this misstep behind you. Maybe a detached wise owl will have some advice on how to do this. Tucoxn (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

I wouldn't claim to be an uncontroversial admin, I tend to take action where other people might not, and yes I get involved in some high profile cases. However in regards to Ottava I don't see why I shouldn't have been the one to request he be banned. In fact, as one of his more frequent targets, it seems perfectly sensible for me to request it. If someone else had brought it up I would not have closed it, as yes that would be a conflict of interest, but someone needed to bring it up and frankly Ottava hates me anyway so this way he doesn't spit his venom at anyone else.

As for the closure, I am happy with the way I acted. Admins cannot be impartial on DRs, they have to make a decision, and that means they end up having an opinion on it. Frankly I'm a bit ambivalent about the whole thing, and if it were for instance Russavia who was videoed making the picture I would delete that as Russavia is not a notable painter. But, like it or not, Pricasso is. A video of a notable painter painting is without doubt within our scope - ask yourself, were this a painter who painted using brushes, would we be having the slightest controversy? Clearly no, it would be snow-closed as within scope. The same applies here in my view. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

That is a good argument, but entirely besides the point. The issue is that you are seen as heavily involved in the whole "porn on Commons" issue, as you are very active on most discussions regarding it. Thus, you should not also be the person to close contentious discussions regarding the same issue. --Conti|✉ 21:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

While I understand your point, I don't quite agree. If I'd seen the DR when it started, I would have closed it immediately on the grounds that nothing had changed since the last DR and there was no point rehashing. I tend to be proactive and make the decisions other people won't. To some that can seem like being involved, but I tend to believe that someone has to make the decisions, so why not me. Would you argue that because I am involved in "porn on commons" issues I shouldn't close a nudity DR as delete? Most people I think would say no, I'd quite possibly be the perfect person to close as delete because I have more knowledge about the repository we have. In that case it seems an unusual contradiction in that you can only ever delete that which you consider important, and people with little to know knowledge of the subject are the only ones who can choose to keep things. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

I wouldn't say you should keep out of nudity DRs entirely, no. More often than not, they is a very clear consensus to either keep or delete the image, and so it would not be at all controversial if you would close the discussions correspondingly. However, in this case, the DR was clearly going to be controversial, and it would have been best to let an entirely uninvolved admin close the discussion. There is no cost in doing so, and it easily avoids further potential controversy. --Conti|✉ 23:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Matt, I think you've made the mistake lots of people get into (at work or in a club for example) when people become so involved they think they are indispensable, of thinking their experience and knowledge makes them the best person to do something, and to over-rate how important and how much Commons needs you to be the one closing or opening, etc. Your "I'd quite possibly be the perfect person" is an example of this thinking. It is the sort of thinking that makes people reluctant to retire as a club secretary long after they should have, for example, because they can't see how anyone else in the club could do their job as well. But when they do, they realise the world doesn't end and the club carries on and the new guy grows into the job just like they did. I'm not at all suggesting you retire or trying to silence you but I do think you perhaps need to realise that Commons doesn't need you (or any one person for that matter). Rather than the (positive sounding) "I tend to be proactive", what comes across is more "I tend to think my judgement is required in many situations", and "I tend to act before thinking of how it might look". Your experience here is valuable and you (unlike some) aren't just a windbag. If you let other admins close in situations where you personally are strongly involved or you have strong opinions (like pricasso) then you'll find they are capable too. To consider otherwise is rather insulting to them, is it not? If you have strong opinions, make a comment at the discussion rather than close it. I don't think you are quite right about admins/opinions/closure -- for example an admin should be able to close a discussion in a way that their opinion disagrees with. An admin should be able to say "Personally, I'd keep/delete this, but the community has argued otherwise and their argument (while I disagree with it) has merit". Remember, an admin is not a more important person and their opinion is not more important than that of the plebes. I'm not arguing whether the closure was correct or not, but just that you shouldn't have done it. I'm not suggesting you steer clear of all porn DRs, but with the pricsasso video, you are possibly (with the exception of russavia) the least appropriate admin to close it. Colin (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I have to concur with Colins statement above. I could not have written it more precisely myself. I am sure that both you, I and many other are sick and tired of the ever relentless polarized 'cabal' claims, which pop up following these incidents, but you are not helping by doing these kinds of closures, knowing your view points on the balance between the value of having media in scope and the possible harm by hosting them. Actually, the more times this happens, as this is certainly not the first time that you are to a small or larger extent involved or have a very strong opinion of the discussions you close, I am beginning to doubt myself if you are actually capable of making the right decisions in these kinds of closures. That said, you are a valuable and hard working contributor, but maybe you should have more confidence in that actually, one of your fellow admins will eventually stand up and make the controversial closures and fill the gap - even if it takes a little longer time than you would have originally hoped for. --Slaunger (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

You may be right, I shall try and refrain from such actions in future. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

That is great to hear. Thanks for listening. --Slaunger (talk) 07:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 90 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB V1 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --AleXXw 06:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornbeam Park railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little dark, but OK for me. --AleXXw 06:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Ukraine

hello! i am really glad that you have decided to join our jury. thank you very much! i would need your e-mail for contacting you. just drop me a line or two, ok? --antanana 21:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2010 MMB 25 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like this photo. -- Spurzem 10:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 11:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wessex Main Line MMB 02 159003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thirsk MMB 01 A170 Sutton Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «P7 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO --Christian Ferrer 04:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 79 170523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just ok --Christian Ferrer 04:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB I4 Meriden Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 04:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camden Road railway station MMB 19 66501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple CA at left --Christian Ferrer 11:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 18:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Yes, there is less but always CA --Christian Ferrer 11:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)  Support There are no CA-free lenses out there (except maybe Olympus’ ones). Here CA is quite maginal IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 20:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

You and Ottava Rima

Hi Mattbuck,

I just want to caution you about certain comments with regards to Ottava Rima. Edits like this are simply going to make him angrier and your tag teaming on IRC to get him to lose his talk page and email access was not your finest moment. I know you mean well and don't intend harm, but it doesn't take much more than a sarcastic comment to enflame him. I tried to help on his talk page, but he continued his anger there. I will comment at here when I get a chance, but just be cautious and let me know if anything else occurs, albeit you probably can handle it yourself :) Happy editing, Mattbuck. --WorldTraveller101  T  C  G  E 01:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

m:Requests for comment/Global ban for Ottava Rima

(Copy of the message sent by email out of laziness now that I'm done with the steps per policy; I'm busy today and won't be online for a while.)

Please add to the first section
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Global_ban_for_Ottava_Rima

Nemo

--Nemo 10:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marylebone station MMB 08 168216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 69 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 12:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northampton railway station MMB 04 350266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 15:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 17 378XXX 378219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs see note --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Fixed. Mattbuck 21:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redland railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you brighten a bit the shadow at right? --Christian Ferrer 04:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC) yes. Mattbuck 21:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 04:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

CA ?

Hi !
I'm french and I don't know what is CA... Bourgeois.A (talk) 09:29, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Aberration chromatique (en: Chromatic Aberration, CA). -mattbuck (Talk) 12:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I understand, but I do not know how to fix them. Bourgeois.A (talk) 14:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Photoshop has a function called "Lens Correction" which I generally use as the first thing to do when editing a photo. That does a fair amount of fixing of CA. Any more has to be done manually by painting it out or desaturating the area using the sponge tool. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

OK thank you, I'll test it. Bourgeois.A (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:The Dubai Mall (Fashion Avenue & Round Hall).jpg

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 11:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Sexuality user galleries

Please see Commons:Village_pump#NSFW_-_unexpected_inclusion_of_images_in_a_user.27s_sexuality_gallery.3F. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --A.Savin 09:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 43 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice cat and good photo. -- Spurzem 08:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC) He is a lovely cat. Mattbuck 19:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 45 395018 395017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 93 Goose Fair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 16:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB C6 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »24 Unilink 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Xicotencatl 15:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 02 180101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 16:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Train image category vandalism

I see you've been reverting a lot of anonymous vandalism recently. File:Helensburgh Central 334020 334030.jpg has been done twice this week so I've been reverting a few of these edits myself. Geof Sheppard (talk) 07:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

To make your job easier, you now have rollback and filemove rights. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

User:Mattbuck/Nudity/2013 April 1-10

User:Mattbuck/Nudity/2013 April 1-10 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	For all your stomaching. -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doncaster railway station MMB 04 185136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 32 150120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lily Allen gig Nottingham 2009 MMB 26 Professor Green.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality considering the demanding circumstances! --Martin Falbisoner 17:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB U8 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Pont Maréchal Foch, Sète, Hérault 04.jpg

Hi Mattbuck, I don't understand why you not promote my picture, you say 'Needs perspective correction on left' but the background, the bridge and all the rest are straights, please add notes but if your reference is the fence, it is not good because is leaning in all directions, for prove take a look at this File:Sadi-Carnot Bridge, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg it is the same fence in foreground --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Removal of thousands of sorted photos from Scottish counties

I spent many months sorting out tens of thousands of photos that were placed in Scottish counties and conducted this laborious sorting with the knowledge of a wikimedia.commons Administrator. Then that Administrator decided that he didn't want the photos to be sorted into Scottish counties and tries to convince people that Scottish counties now do not exist. They do. They are used for Land Registration purposes, maps have been made of their boundaries as noted in Acts of Parliament, there are Lord Lieutenants of those counties, there are Chambers of Commerce for those counties, there are several Country Women's Associations in each county with their county name, etc. etc. Now there has been widespread vandalism of Scottish counties both on wikipedia and wikimedia.commons where whole county categories have been deleted. You can say I am more than hopping mad, and it does not help when this situation of widespread vandalism is occurring and seemingly condoned. It makes a widespread mockery of both wikipedia and wikimedia. Scotire (talk) 13:04, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Maps of county boundaries noted in Acts of the Scottish Parliament 2009 - the counties are not "former"

• The Scottish Government CAN authorize county maps, and they CAN be purchased. The maps of the boundaries of the Counties or Shires of Scotland are recorded in the 2009 Acts of the Scottish Parliament, Scottish Statutory Instruments 2009 No. 171. Registers and records. The Fees in the Registers of Scotland Amendment Order 2009. Made 29th April 2009. Coming into force 31st May 2009. Registers of Scotland. Data set of registration county boundaries. 150 pounds. http://www.lawalphabet.com/document_ssi-2009-171 Scotire (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Local Government areas have changed with changes to Local Governments

The Local Government areas have been changed a number of times during the last 100 years. By placing the photos in the Local Government areas, those areas probably will be changed in the future, and those photos will be in the wrong place. The PLACE is where the photo should be, and that place is the COUNTY. Those people that are vandalizing wikimedia.commons by removing photos and categories from Scottish counties should be blocked. Instead, you say that I should be blocked for pointing out this vandalism. By blocking me from any input in the discussion page, it was similar to gagging the press. Scotire (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

You were only blocked for three days. You could have asked to be unblocked on your Talk page, and/or asked for comments to be added to the RFC. As it is, you continue to raise this issue almost anywhere but in the RFC, which is still open for community discussion, and has about a week to run. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Need help

Hi Mattbuck, can you help me please? You have put to my talk page an archive, but I don't know what to do, I've renamed my current talk page in 'User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive2' and now I am lost, take a look please. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

You need to modify the Abox template to add the new archive. I've done that. The steps for doing it all are:

1. Move talk page to /Archive9 or similar.
2. Recreate User talk:Christian Ferrer with {{User talk:Christian Ferrer/Abox}}
3. Update User talk:Christian Ferrer/Abox to add the new archive page.

-mattbuck (Talk) 14:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

• I think I've find alone, thanks anyway... --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Oups, it's you, I've find also --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Chartreuse de la Verne 2013 01.JPG

Hi dear Mattbuck, you have decline this file, I've tried to improve it, can you take a look please? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

• Reworked and last version, a last look? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

About Ohmi Railway logo deletion

Hi, Mattbuck.

I am writing you to ask about the deletion of the Ohmi Railway logo I realized for Wikipedia. I guess I cannot consider myself an expert Wikipedia user, however it wasn't the first time that I realized by myself a corporate logo to put it into Wikipedia commons. I know that it is forbidden to upload into commons copyrighted pictures and logos found in the internet. In fact I tried to draw it by myself by referring to the original, as I did also in other occasions.

If you could suggest me how to do in order to keep the logo I would be glad.

Thank you!

--Dabikun (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dabikun. I checked your other logos, and judged them to be {{PD-ineligible}} due to simplicity. However, this one looked more complex than most. If you drew it yourself, I'm afraid that doesn't make things better as it's then a derivative work of copyrighted work, rather than just a copyrighted image to begin with. Think of it like taking a photo of a photo. I'm not sure that this one can be kept on Commons, though if you want a second opinion I'd be happy to undelete and send it to a deletion request instead. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «45 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --A.Savin 18:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shottle railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ealing Broadway station MMB 04 360204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 80 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --VT98Fan 16:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 49 185101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --A.Savin 16:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB F8 Mathematics and Physics Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - a good picture, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 07:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham MMB 01 Nottingham to Grantham Line 158847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dudley Port railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 06 171801 377XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «H1 Clifton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 12:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long Eaton railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need sharpening and less dark at the shadows --Christian Ferrer 11:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Much better --Christian Ferrer 11:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 18 158799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't know, ca (see notes), a bit unsharp, a bit dark and need perspective corrections --Christian Ferrer 16:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC) Done. Mattbuck 21:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC) A bit less dar (the shadow), is it possible? --Christian Ferrer 05:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Good quality.--Jean11 19:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Please be respectful to uploaders

Mattbuck, in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Freshly shaved and powdered pussy.jpg you gave the deletion reason as "Low quality genitalia". The images may be of low quality, but you are not in position to make statements about the genitalia themselves. I have asked you once before to stop doing this and I assumed you had. This behaviour is inappropriate for an admin. Please stop. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 63 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 15:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Netherfield railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments need a little sharpening and less dark at the shadows --Christian Ferrer 06:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Brightened, but sharpening further produces artifacts. Mattbuck 10:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok like that --Christian Ferrer 14:58, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matlock Riverside railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

DR

You may wish to comment on this one as well from the same uploader. Fry1989 ^eh? 00:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starbeck railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need perspective corrections on the left --Christian Ferrer 18:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC) I have more faith in the gantry being vertical than anything on the platform. Mattbuck 21:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC) So you will be agreed to apply a little correction (see note) --Christian Ferrer 10:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC) I tested it using a guide, it's vertical already. Mattbuck 20:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)  Support It's ok, my eyes have been bad --Christian Ferrer 07:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 08 Ford Escort and Vauxhall Chevette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't really see the subject of the picture. Pleclown 11:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Subject is Nottingham Autokarna, good composition IMO --Christian Ferrer 12:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

about deletion

Hi, Mattbuck !

I could see that all my pictures are under control for eventual deletion !

1st - I noticed that I cannot make a picture that contains others, because of the copyright problem and I understand that you removed them. OK.

2nd - some old pictures (postcards) are not mine (see Category:Ocna_Sibiului_de_altă_dată) and I now understood how to change the licence ; I wrote

This file is in the public domain because anonymous old postcard (over 70 years) This template must not be used to dedicate an uploader's own work to the public domain; CC0 should be used instead. This work must carry justifications for free usability in both the United States and its country of origin.

I hope, it's OK. If not, please tell me.

3rd - I did'nt know about the "watermark" problem in wikimedia. So you can delete the "watermarked" pictures from
- "Category:Anonymous people of Paris" (number 02-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-13-16-19-20-22-30-33-36-40-48-49-54-71-74-93-94-96-97),
- "Category:People at the Champ-de-Mars" (pictures number 11-12-23-24),
- "Category:Rue du Commerce (Paris)" (number 23 and 33),
- "Category:Square Saint-Lambert (Paris)" (number 15-16-17-18),
- "Category:Allée des Cygnes (Paris)" (number 09).
I can upload them again without watermark ; just tell me about it. I look further for other "watermarked" pictures and then, I'll tell you.

I think that pictures of my own are'nt a problem for wikimedia, are'nt they ?

Thanks for your help, and excuse my english !--Martin Greslou (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Thirsk railway station MMB 03.jpg

Hi Mattbuck, I've edited your file, what do you think? (if you manage to open it, me only with ZoomViewer: flash) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Sexuality categories

In order for the bot to continue creating the sexuality galleries, please tell me that you agree to the TOS at User:OgreBot/gallery/warning. It comes down to: 1) they're your responsibility to monitor, and 2) if someone removes an image because it is miscategorized, please don't reinstate it.

Also, if you want to combine the galleries into one, that option is now available. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Tat's a redlink but fine, and yes, please do combine nudity and sexuality. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Er, User:OgreBot/gallery/notice. My preview button must be broken. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

They're now both at User:Mattbuck/Sexuality. If you want to put it in a different gallery name, change it at any time. Also, I think you won't find the disclaimer especially onerous; and if you find it really onerous anyway, the source code is available under a free license, and you can run it yourself and not worry about it. But really, the disclaimer is a good idea IMO so there should be no reason to go without it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 35 444003 444017 158881 444035 66124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 14:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «E3 Lenton & Wortley Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me--Lmbuga 16:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 16:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston Milton railway station MMB 06 150232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please, clean noise from the sky. --Nino Verde 08:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)  Done. Mattbuck 20:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 07 170511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 16:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «F2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 16:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading MMB 20 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 19:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 71 43032 221132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luton Airport Parkway railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I hesitate: it is unsharp, but there are no small details on the image to suffer from that. Let's say QI. Heuschrecke 19:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Abu Dhabi images

Hi!! why you request deletion of picture being shoot by our own works?--Neogeolegend (talk) 01:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Because there is no Freedom of Panorama in Abu Dhabi. Unless you personally took the photos that make up the poster, this is a derivatibe work of non-free content. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hola Hay imagenes mia de Abu Dhabi que estan propuestas para ser borradas, quisiera saber la razon de ello. Un saludo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto-g-rovi (talk • contribs)

Please see above - there is no Freedom of Panorama in Abu Dhabi, which means that if you take a photo of a building it is a derivative of a copyrighted work. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Sigh...

Hi Mattbuck, I'm sure you are already tired of this, but since your name was mentioned, just in case you want to add something, check this out Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Biographies_of_Living_Persons_and_Defamation. --Dschwen (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 11:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Pleclown 11:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Can you change yours votes please ?

I have done the necessary work :

• Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#File:2013-Fort de la Miotte 04.JPG
• Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#File:2013-Fort de la Miotte 08.JPG
  

Bourgeois.A (talk) 13:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, on holiday, back Monday. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishops Lydeard railway station MMB 10 D3462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I1 South Wales Main Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB I2 A6464 Woodside Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 21:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 86 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The rather slow exposure keeps the movement of the flames while the plants in focus are sharp. I like it. --Vassil 16:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross St Pancras tube station MMB 08 1995-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birmingham MMB 02 Grand Junction 43207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool. --Smial 23:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulse Hill railway station MMB 01 319375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB P2 Riverside South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Rjcastillo 13:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosmont Depot MMB 08 30926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice atmosphere --Kreuzschnabel 14:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB I9 Graduation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadwell railway station MMB 07 378151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 16:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountains Abbey MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support foreground disturbing but ok --Christian Ferrer 17:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 04 165037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 20 2530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB A2 150221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 22:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Thomas

I've just uploaded the photos to right from the aftermath of a Thomas event on the South Devon Railway. However a few questions for someone more familiar with train categorisation:

1. What locomotive is this Thomas - any idea?
2. How to categorise this and other diesel locomotives, or for that matter, other rolling stock? Category:Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends (real steam locomotives) is obviously inappropriate; a broader cat might be useful.
3. And an unpleasant thought... I wonder if FOP is an issue? After all these are in copyright (the original books don't become PD until 2067), and aren't permanent...--Nilfanion (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Steam locomotives are not my strong point, so no idea on that. For diesel stuff, just chuck it in via the standard {{Ukt}} template and add the Thomas parent category, BR MkX stuff can be done by {{Ukc}}, but I have nothing for other stock. FoP... hard to say really, I think we assume not until something else happens. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Generally for unidentified trains, I ask at en:WT:UKRAIL. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, think I will drop a line there, thanks.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 20 390046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 38 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I’d prefer a off-centre composition here but there’s a nice capture of ε Lyrae included (left edge) --Kreuzschnabel 17:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 17:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB P4 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please, remove CA (left building lot of, right not so much) --Nino Verde 08:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)  Done. Mattbuck 20:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Sorry, but left building still have green CA at right and some magenta at the top. --Nino Verde 12:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC) tried again. Mattbuck 22:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Sorry for delay. It is nice now. --Nino Verde 11:43, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

QI possibility

I see you're an active contributor to Commons:QIC, so I'd like to ask for advice. How do you think, if an image was prepared in film age, may it be QI? Let us take two examples: File:Pn-shilov-n-d-2001-02.jpg and File:Pn-borozdna-a-p-2001-gazette.jpg. Thank you. --Переславская неделя (talk) 00:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

It's not impossible, but I'm not sold on that as QI - quite noisy, and blurred at the edges. That said I'm generally a very hard judge, so you might get lucky, and I'm not sure I'd decline that one, just wouldn't promote it either. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Second one definitely no - chromatic noise and noticable chromatic aberration. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:37, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Where did you find chromatic aberration? I will try to reduce. --Переславская неделя (talk) 16:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

 Comment I usually do not interrupt running discussions between two persons but Переславская неделя, please keep in mind that the QI-guidelines require that the creator of an image must be a Wikimedian in order to be a possible QI-candidate. The images you present above are not a Wikimedian's work. As such there's no chance for a QI-badge. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for comment. This means, no film shot may become QI, for people who made film shots rarely become the WikiCommons users. Everything's clear now :-). But maybe something from this collection can award some other badge?--Переславская неделя (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «O5 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 30 59203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's CA, otherwise ok. --Kadellar 18:45, 9 September 2013 (UTC) I'll take a look in a few days, only stopping in briefly today. Mattbuck 12:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 16:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks. --Kadellar 20:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 15 377514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Underexposed, blurred (maybe your camera) and of course again a train picture. Do not be afraid to get out of the train station --The Photographer 17:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC) I'll take a look in a few days, only stopping in briefly today. Mattbuck 12:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC) I don't see any blur. Also I am not afraid to leave the station, I just LIKE railways - I'm sure you take numerous photos of things you like, and frankly your opinion on the subject is entirely irrelevant. Mattbuck 16:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «Z0 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments spot and is there ca (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC) I'll take a look in a few days, only stopping in briefly today. Mattbuck 12:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)  Done - I don't see any CA on the arm, possible on the forehead (fixed), spot removed. Mattbuck 16:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Scotire

Hi Matt. I've revoked talkpage access for Scotire due to some serious personal attack statements he made. I've reverted the last two and rev-del'd them. They concerned you and a couple others. It might be better to indef block his account now, especially with an edit like this but I'll leave that up to you. INeverCry 23:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

(Note) The IP 59.167.60.9 blocked by Hedwig is Confirmed to be Scotire. It's static, so should be watched for continued abuse after the month block is up. INeverCry 01:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, indefed. That behaviour is never acceptable. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

I've extended the IP block to one year. INeverCry 07:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otterington railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parson Street railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB S9 Cripps Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 36 158767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 18 Routemaster RM108 (VLT 108).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB B1 67024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 16:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I2 Bristol to Exeter Line 220004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 49 220013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I also think it's good to see where the train is facing. --Kadellar 11:16, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 11 5521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stourbridge Town railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very small Kate Perry, but ok for me to show the stage. -- Smial 11:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC) I said it was a photo of the gig ;) Mattbuck 19:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 01 317652 317664 90013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 10:58, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NRM Locomotion MMB 04 "Light Engine".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White balance off (magenta cast), otherwise OK. --Kreuzschnabel 17:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC) I'll take a look in a few days, only stopping in briefly today. Mattbuck 12:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 16:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC) OK --Kreuzschnabel 15:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 11 C-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB A9 Boundary Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 08 390028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 13:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB D5 Castle Combe Sports & GT Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading MMB 25 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Netherfield railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 16:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Natasha Falle

Hi Matt,

I noticed that you deleted the photos I uploaded of Natasha Falle. I just saw the messages from you saying that I need to send in the permissions to OTRS. I already sent the permissions to OTRS a long time ago. Were the e-mails not received? I am about to upload several photos of Tara Teng and had planned on sending the permissions to OTRS the same way I did before. Should I be doing something differently? Also, I have been trying to merge my Commons "Ambassador Neelix" account with my Wikipedia "Neelix" account, but that has not been working. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Ambassador Neelix (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Otterington MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:37, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 19 S Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 08:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «A5 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «45 City Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I suggested a new crop, because I find the tower too distracting (you can remove a part of the water or leave it, that's up to you if you want the whole reflection). Could you brighten the shadows a bit too? Thanks. --Kadellar 13:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Yes, I think it's no so disturbing now. Thanks! --Kadellar 10:10, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «B1 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 99 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gospel Oak railway station MMB 21 172007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB G2 Market Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 22 Rievaulx Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «H7 Cross Country Route 43207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkend railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 15:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, nice composition --P e z i 17:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB K2 Tower Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit unsharp in the upper areas of the towers; still QI --P e z i 17:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «64 Queen's Medical Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:23, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice imo and good quality. --JLPC 14:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:51, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillingdon tube station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I could do without the left quarter of the pic in favour of more to the right bit QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 04:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB S7 Cripps Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very hard shadows, could be enhanced by some s-curving. -- Smial 10:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 08:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Better, yes. --Smial 10:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hucknall station MMB 01 156414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «27 Westferry Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 20:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fenchurch Street railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 11 222010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Golden Gate Bridge File:Golden Gate Bridge in fog from Pier 39 2013.jpg

Hi Mattbuck! Thanks for your comment on the photo mentioned in the caption. IMHO perspective is a bit tricky here (the bridge is not straight), thus could you add one or more notes how the perspective should be. Thanks. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

I've uploaded a new version. Could you take another look? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 49 185120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:57, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tiny shift but still QI --P e z i 09:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitechapel station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 09 455841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «34 City Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Dirtsc 16:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Levisham railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 61 222005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:12, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. --Kreuzschnabel 18:52, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 37 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB R3 Docklands Light Railway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB V8 New Providence Wharf and Ontario Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 18:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you brighten the shadows abit please? --Christian Ferrer 15:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 35 43017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you brightened the shadows please --Christian Ferrer 19:16, 3 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «D6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice IMO. I like the composition, but CAs and perhaps the dark areas are a bit dark--Lmbuga 18:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 12:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality and nice--Lmbuga 14:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of a file

Hello, can you please delete this file, I've uploaded a better png version. Thank you--باسم (talk) 22:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Delete an SVG for a PNG? No, not happening. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB T9 Pierhead Lock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 22 153362 150127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «71 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «77 Cabot Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:28, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB G8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «F1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but is the image bit bluish? --JDP90 16:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 87 DR98923 92032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As a rail photographer, I think the present crop is good. --Bahnfrend 08:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coventry railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail and perspective --Daniel Case 05:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 12 Hole of Horcum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 21:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice IMO. I like the composition, but CAs and perhaps the dark areas are a bit dark--Lmbuga 18:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 12:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality and nice--Lmbuga 14:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luton Airport Parkway railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Bahnfrend 13:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pickering MMB 04 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (New Bridge Signal Box).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 21:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open University MMB 11 Alan Turing Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments purple CA in foliage top left --Christian Ferrer 20:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 92 Uphill Junction 220XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 17:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please brighten a bit the girders --Christian Ferrer 20:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add name of the bird in dscription (Corvus monedula) --Christian Ferrer 20:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 56 91115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria station MMB 02 455825 455838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 19:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 06 365XXX 365529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 19:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Paddington station MMB 98 Gromit Unleashed.jpg

And also:

• File:Paddington station MMB 99 Gromit Unleashed.jpg

Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 08:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 41 185135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Llorenzi 11:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clifton Down railway station MMB 15 150221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool Street station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Cum_pool video

Is that you? If so I would like you to know that I would love to suck you off and take in your whole load of cum.

It's not. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 09 170511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and good quality. Pymouss 22:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Otterington MMB 06 Coverdale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Otterington MMB 03 Station Farm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marton MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just ok (unsharp at right) --Christian Ferrer 05:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Croydon station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 62 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 09 390037 390046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Bahnfrend 05:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 21 66086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 20:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 20:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 18 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 71 Polish War Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 39 43012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ca on the sign at left --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 18:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Y9 City Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side (crane) is tilted --A.Savin 21:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 18:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 19:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 04 357021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments purple ca at top --Christian Ferrer 10:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 18:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 22 43047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 10:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI – good photo! -- Spurzem 07:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carlton railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 22.jpg

File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oxyman (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 23.jpg

File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oxyman (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB C7 150106 153369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 93 Uphill Junction 220XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dudley Port railway station MMB 21 170506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:49, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 12:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 13 375813 375808 465043 465008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. Small perspective disortion possible to correct.--ArildV 08:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB A1 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «A9 Wood Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB T8 Newark Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. You may consider to crop some of the lower image part. --NorbertNagel 19:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job! --NorbertNagel 19:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acton Works MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe crop some of the boring foreground?--ArildV 15:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC) I thought this was about right. Mattbuck 18:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «D2 Cabot Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «51 The Atrium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB K1 Lenton South Junction 222008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leyburn railway station MMB 11 20166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:00, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Netherfield MMB 01 Meadow Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Typo in file description. --NorbertNagel 17:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --ArildV 07:29, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glaisdale railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 10:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 13 390037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «41 River Trym.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 07:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB A6 319447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 34 158864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 82 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

WLM 2013 in Ukraine

Thank you for your work!--Anatoliy (talk) 16:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy to help. I do like how on the website I'm the only one whose name isn't cyrillic. It was fun, I should get in on more of these things. Where do I see the winners' page? -mattbuck (Talk) 18:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

We write your username instead of name and surname because you said that you prefer to use username, as I remember. The page with winners is not yet ready.--Anatoliy (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

I actually meant I wanted to be referred to as "mattbuck", but bit late now, so no worries. Just drop me a line when I can see the results. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Now I add finalists here (I shuffle the images there now, we will say real places for winners at the victory ceremony ;)). Later we will publish about them on the wlm.org.ua website.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati with his chess variants(Invented).JPG

Hi, I don't do a lot of work on Commons so please forgive me if this is a FAQ but why was this photo deleted? The reason given was "Contains identifiable personal information." but I'm pretty sure the picture was uploaded by the subject or his father. --NeilN (talk) 01:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm willing to accept it was uploaded by the child's father, but it seems to me that blasting the name, age, school, etc of your child over the internet is an incredibly bad idea. Beyond that, the whole series was pretty much an advertisement. -mattbuck (Talk)

The info is already out there (e.g., [1], [2]]). I agree the family goes overboard with promotion but I'm just looking to get the best pictures in the article. How can I get it restored? --NeilN (talk) 13:35, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

You're right, I overreacted. I have restored them and got rid of the War and Peace that made up titles and descriptions. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Matt! --NeilN (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leyburn railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 08:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB L3 The Exchange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments left is leaning in --Christian Ferrer 16:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 21:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 37 43299 43296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right and left are leaning out --Christian Ferrer 16:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 21:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB K9 Lenton North Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:51, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 83 37419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birmingham MMB 14 Cross-City Line (B4217 Church Road) 43366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not sure about the perspectives but it's hard to say so ok --Christian Ferrer 15:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 94 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 18 G-BZVU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 78 Market Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective, sharpening --A.Savin 11:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 08:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --A.Savin 12:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redcar MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:04, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB E2 750MC Toyota MR2 Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CAs (see notes), noise and poor detail (see note)--Lmbuga 00:13, 25 October 2013 (UTC) You didn't leave a poor detail note. Fixed the rest. Mattbuck 18:26, 25 October 2013 (UTC) QI for me--Lmbuga 18:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB H9 Market Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, crop bottom a bit? --Ralf Roletschek 08:15, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosmont railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it possible a little less highlights and the shadows a little brightened? --Christian Ferrer 15:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Yes Mattbuck 22:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC)