User talk:Mathiasrex/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Date might be wrong on the 1635 map

FYI [1] Thanks -Chumchum7 (talk) 09:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Władysław_Grabski.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vearthy (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Muscovy cavalryman mid XVI century.PNG

Witam! Czy mógłbyś podać źródło(a) do pliku Muscovy cavalryman mid XVI century? W dyskusji do artykułu "Husaria" została zakwestionowana jego autentyczność. Plikowi zarzuca się powstanie w Photoshopie oraz bycie swego rodzaju kolażem. --83.218.198.165 13:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Please use the correct date format

Hi Mathiasrex,

Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Atanazy Miączyński.PNG. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD format (ie. 2024-01 for January 2024 or 2024-05-16 for 16 May 2024). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}} for "between 1899 and 1903

date QS:P,+1500-00-00T00:00:00Z/6,P1319,+1899-00-00T00:00:00Z/9,P1326,+1903-00-00T00:00:00Z/9

". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in Polish: here. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 18:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

File:SLedóchowski.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Santosga (talk) 13:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Louis2.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Louis2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Herb_Trzaska11.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Herb_Trzaska11.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Herb_Przemysla_II_z_plaszczem.png

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Herb_Przemysla_II_z_plaszczem.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Herb_Przemysla_II_z_plaszczem.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

and File:Herb Przemysla II z plaszczem.png JDavid (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Podlaskie.JPG

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Podlaskie.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Podlaskie.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JDavid (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

and File:Mścisławskie.JPG JDavid (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Jagiellon countries

Look File talk:Jagiellon countries 1490.PNG! Yours' sincerely, Ulamm (talk) 15:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Witaj. Przedstawiłeś w grafice File:Herb Gryfitów.PNG, że jesteś jej autorem i nadałeś jej licencje GFDL i Creative Commons. A ta grafika File:Pommernwappen.jpg została wrzucona do Commons w 2005 roku, gdzie przedstawia się, że autorem jest de:Benutzer:Muggmag. Proszę Ciebie o informacje kto w końcu jest jej autorem, lub jakie może być pierwotne źródło tej grafiki? Dziękuję serdecznie i pozrawiam JDavid (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Powstanie_Listopadowe_symbol.PNG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Powstanie_Listopadowe_symbol.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Powstanie_Listopadowe_symbol.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Warszawa_1861_1.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Warszawa_1861_1.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fieldorf.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fieldorf.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fieldorf.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Dzień dobry. Nowa wersja kolorystyczna była zdecydowanie zanadto niebieska, co aż się rzucało w oczy. Proszę porównać ze zdjęciem na stronie NG. Cancre (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

2th?

Please check it: 12th or 2nd? Your Description: "2th" --91.4.43.232 16:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Henry_I_the_Fowler.jpg

Hello,

I am HR from the french WP. I would like to inform you that this picture : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Henry_I_the_Fowler.JPG#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D is, according to the french book: Nazisme et Société Secrète ((Secret Society & Nazism), from Jean-Claude Frère, P.226) in fact a picture of Heinrich Himmler, under the Henry I's appearence, being use for propaganda. I changed the description already, but i can't change de file name.

Thanks you, HR. --82.238.228.67 22:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

It seems that my information about this picture was wrong. Sorry for that.
Am looking for more information about it.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Deep_Impact_Discovery_Mission_to_Comet_Tempel_1.PNG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Deep_Impact_Discovery_Mission_to_Comet_Tempel_1.PNG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Przepraszam, ale według tego źródłu (www.wilanow-palac.pl) to portret właśnie Józefa Stanisława. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

File:CeciliaRenata.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BurgererSF (talk) 12:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

WBC

Kawał dobrej roboty z umozliwieniem wykorzystania zasobów Wielkopolskiej BC. Czy już skończyłes to dzieło czy będziesz jeszcze kontynuował? Oczywiscie mowie o tematyce militarnej--keriM (talk) 09:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Blaise_Pascal.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nilfanion (talk) 09:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vincent de Paul.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Quantité négligeable (talk) 04:09, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Dzięki za odpowiedź. Sprawa jasna. Pozdrawiam Quantité négligeable (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Halford Mackinder.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Halford Mackinder.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

error fixed?

See [2]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Witaj. Proszę Ciebie o uzupełnienie źródła File:KazKuj.JPG, skąd zaczerpnąłeś ową grafikę. JDavid (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Dziękuję. JDavid (talk) 12:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC) PS Zmieniłem nazwę pliku.

Bitwa pod Budziszynem 1945

"Święta racja", dzięki, już poprawiłem, czekamy aż zrobi to COMMONS. Przy okazji wylazło, że zamieściłem dwa takie same malunki, dzisiaj zawiesiłem poprawny (drugi etap bitwy) i stosownie podmieniłem. Pozdrawiam lonio17 (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Grand_Duke_Constantine_Pavlovich_of_Russia.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shakko (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth

Hi, could you respect subcategories in the Category:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, thanks BurgererSF (talk) 22:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:JanTarnowski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BurgererSF (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Lion_near_Baszta_Prochowa_in_Lviv.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 13:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Judeopolonia 1914.PNG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Judeopolonia 1914.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Judeopolonia 1914.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 14:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Duchy of Warsaw 11.PNG have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 13:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Siege of Danzig 1734.PNG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Siege of Danzig 1734.PNG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cathy Richards (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Cutwind (talk) 15:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Re:Maps in svg

Hello;). Ja wiem, ze Litwa byla czescia Rz-plitej Obojga Narodow- na mapie widac, ze granice panstwowe obejmuja ten obszar. Inny kolor ma sluzyc lepszemu obrazowaniu. Wrzucona przez Ciebie wersja jest obrazem przeklejonym na warstwe przez co nie nie bedzie sie jej dalo skalowac, co neguje cale przedsiewziecie konstruowania obrazu wektorowego. Poza tym jest niewyrazna i trudno z niej cokolwiek przeczytac. pzdr Hoodinski (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Kwestia techniczna- nie da sie skonwertowac obrazu bezsciezkowego (takiego jak JPG czy PNG) na obraz wektorowy. Mapy, ktore stworzylem tylko opieraja sie na Twoich plikach, poniewaz wszystkie ich elementy (sciezki, teksty) wykonalem sam; z grzecznosci umiescilem w opisie adres pliku bazowego. Nie uwazam, jakoby uzycie innego koloru dla Litwy w tym wypadku bylo w jakikolwiek sposob 'misleading' (tak samo jak wyroznienie Szkocji czy Anglii na mapie pounijnej). Oscienne panstwa zostaly oznaczone innymi barwami i dodatkowo odpowiednio opisane w legendzie. pzdr Hoodinski (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Seismosaurus 02.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Mistake in your slavs map

In this map you have a mistake

Where are the Germanics?

Take a look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Hypothetical_ethnogenesis_of_the_Slavs_ca._1000_B._C..PNG#Proto_Finno_Ugric

You have twice the finno ugrics and no time the germanics. --80.39.227.138 00:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bolesław Wysoki seal.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

FYI

User_talk:Masur#Czy_PD-Arty_moga_miec_CC.3F. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Herb Kongresówki

Nie jestem o tym przekonany. Tam nie ma żadnej tarczy. Moim zdaniem jest to samo godło umieszczone na białej powierzchni słupa. Nawiasem mówiąc nie jestem też przekonany czy carski orzeł z "Herbu Kongresówki" występował kiedykolwiek na tarczy. Mam wrażenie że umieszczenie go na jakiejkolwiek tarczy, białej czy złotej to lekki OR. Pozdrawiam. Avalokitesvara (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: Herb Kazimierza Wielkiego

Cześć! Mogę podjąć się tego zlecenia, ale tylko jeśli nie potrzebujesz tego pilnie. Ostatnio u mnie gorzej z czasem... Avalokitesvara (talk) 08:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:HIM byMaurizio Cattelan in Warsaw Ghetto 2013.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Diannaa (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Podpis

Mam inne zdanie. Żeby coś łamało prawo to musi być utworem. Zgłoś na COM:DR jak uważasz to za słuszne. Krzysiu (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag. Mam powody sądzić, że celowo napisałeś do mnie, chociaż widać, że moja aktywność jest bliska zeru, żeby mi to wypomnieć. Proszę o wyjaśnienie czemu byłem adresatem tej wypowiedzi - chciałbym, żeby takie rzeczy zostały wyjaśniane, jeśli są podejrzenia. Cóż, Commons się zmienia i kiedyś rzeczy, które by nie przeszły, teraz są na porządku dziennym, por. Category:Signatures of people from the United States (a kiedyś podpis Kuronia by nie przeszedł, bo był uznawany za utwór, do czego się nie odniosłeś, tylko pisałeś o rzeczach, które nie mają znaczenia jeśli coś nie jest utworem; to jakby zastanawiać się nad tym jakiego gatunku muzycznego jest Wikipedia) czy Category:Logos, a kiedyś logo metra warszawskiego było bez problemów wywalane. Krzysiu (talk) 00:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
PS: No i każde zdjęcie na Commons, poza PD, jest własnościa intelektualną autora. Rezygnuje się z praw majątkowych, czasem częściowo. Krzysiu (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Grafika którą umieściłem w Commons File:Powstanie Styczniowe symbol.PNG została zgłoszona do usunięcia . JDavid (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Płk Ryszard Kukliński.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 08:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Edytor na en wiki zwrocil uwage, ze ta mapa bylaby o wiele lepsza gdyby byly na niej jasne granice przedrozbiorowe. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Obóz przesiedleńczy w Regensburgu

Mam do Pana nietypową prośbę. Otóż szukam jakichkolwiek informacji (także życie codzienne) i zdjęć dotyczących Obozu przesiedleńczego w Regensburgu - lata 1945-1947. Nie znalazłem żadnych informacji na ten temat. Gdzie mam szukać? --Lesław Zimny (talk) 17:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Georgij Konisski.PNG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Georgij Konisski.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Zrodlo

Moglbys dodac jakies zrodlo do File:PolishRuswar1792.PNG? Jest o to prosba na [3]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 06:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Dzieki! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Franciszek Gajewski.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Podział administracyjny I RP.png

Poprawione. Dzięki za uwagę. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 18:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Warsaw (1831) - files

Hi there. I'm pushing the article on the en:Battle of Warsaw (1831) up for GA and FA status. However, there is a problem with two pics you uploaded and apparently scanned: File:5th, 6th, 7th Infantry Regiment of Polish Army of November Uprising.JPG and File:General Staff of Polish Army during November Uprising.JPG. Could you provide the true source of the pictures? Title of a book would do, if there's no more info available. Thanks in advance. Halibutt (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Poprawilbys te swoje opisy. Taken - z ksiazki? Z muzeum? Jak robisz zdjecia w muzeum, opisuj w jakim, chocby przez kategorie. Ps. Grzecznie prosze, bo szkoda by bylo jakby te setki zdjec, ktore porobiles, bardzo cennych, polecialo przez takie drobiazgi. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Prośba o zamieszczenie fotografii na commons

Dobry wieczór

Pisze do Pana trochę z przypadku, bo nie wiem do kogo się zwrócić, a moje dotychczasowe prośby skierowane do wikipedystów spełzły na niczym, dlatego pomyślałem, że zwrócę się do Pana, ponieważ wiem, że zajmuje się Pan fotografiką, a chodzi mi właśnie o zamieszczenie na commons fotografii, które chce w tym celu udostępnić Muzeum w Gliwicach, w którym pół roku temu odbyła się wystawa poświęcona księciu Józefowi Poniatowskiemu i właśnie z tej wystawy mają to być fotografie, i jak dziś się dowiedziałem jest tych fotografii w posiadaniu Muzeum sporo, dlatego umówiłem się z pracownikami, iż mailowo poinformuję o jakie fotografie chodzi, w sensie - co mają przedstawiać, i takie Muzeum postara się udostępnić tyle, że ja nie jestem wikipedystą i nie wiem jak zamieścić te fotografie na commons, dlatego szukam kogoś, kto by poświęcił godzinę swego życiorysu na zamieszczenie tych zdjęć, bo wydaje mi się, że potrzebnych będzie w sumie nie więcej niż 20, góra 30 fotografii, spośród których kilka będzie pokazywać całą salę wystawową, a reszta kilkanaście najważniejszych obiektów, które wiem, że na wystawie się znajdowały i są ważne z punktu widzenia historii, sztuki i biografii księcia Józefa, np. filiżanka porcelanowa z miniaturą portretową przedstawiającą księcia Józefa, porcelanowa fajka ozdobiona miniaturką przedstawiającą śmierć księcia Józefa, figurki porcelanowe oraz brązowe przedstawiające księcia Józefa, pierścień wykuty wg tradycji z podkowy konia księcia Józefa, pamiątkowe medale wybite na cześć księcia Józefa, dokumenty urzędowe z podpisem księcia Józefa, egzemplarz Kodeksu Napoleońskiego z epoki oraz kilka portretów księcia Józefa, a więc fotografie te będą pomocne nie tylko w zilustrowaniu biogramu księcia Józefa, ale także mogą zostać wykorzystane jako ikonografia do artykułów poświęconych Willi Caro, w której wystawa się odbywała, Muzeum w Gliwicach, które było organizatorem, czy wreszcie poszczególnych muzeów, z których eksponaty zostały wypożyczone dlatego, wydaje mi się, że gra jest warta świeczki i dlatego, jeśli tylko jest Pan zainteresowany zamieszczeniem tych fotografii na commons, to proszę o szybką odpowiedź.

Pozdrawiam, Adam

Witam! Dziękuję za odpowiedź, tym bardziej, że jest pozytywna! :) I oczywiście prześlę Panu fotografie, ale jak już poprzednio napisałem, najpierw muszę o nie grzecznie poprosić w mailu skierowanym do Muzeum w Gliwicach, ponieważ to ja jestem petentem (de facto wikipedia) i tylko ze względu no to, że zadzwoniłem i przekonywująco uzasadniłem potrzebę zamieszczenia takich fotografii na wikipedii, władni w tej kwestii pracownicy wyrazili na to zgodę. Dlatego, w pierwszej kolejności musiałem znaleźć kogoś chętnego do zamieszczenia owych fotografii na commons, a skoro już się Osoba znalazła :) wobec tego, teraz muszę wysłać do Muzeum maila, aby już konkretnie powiedzieć, co mają zdjęcia przedstawiać, a więc w chwili obecnej pozostaje czekanie, myślę kilka dni, na przesłanie fotografii z Muzeum i dopiero wtedy będę mógł przesłać je Panu, lub poprosić Muzeum o nadesłanie innych fotografii, bo jak na razie wszystko jest dopiero na etapie dogadywania się i zawsze może się okazać, że część nadesłanych fotografii, może nie nadawać się do zamieszczenia na commons i będzie trzeba prosić o inne. Natomiast, zanim wyślę wspomnianego maila do Muzeum, proszę mi jeszcze powiedzieć jakiego rodzaju licencje mogę pracownikom Muzeum w tym mailu zaproponować, bo z grzeczności wypada wymienić przynajmniej dwie, a z rozsądku - wskazać wśród nich najkorzystniejszą dla nas :) A jak powiedziałem, w chwili obecnej dopiero będziemy dogadywać szczegóły, dlatego w rozmowie telefonicznej z pracownikami Muzeum o licencji nic nie wspominałem, tym bardziej, że nie wiem jakie na commons są stosowane, bo nie jestem wikipedystą i nie mam bladego pojęcia jak zamieszczać fotografie na commons i przecież dlatego w ogóle się kontaktujemy! :) A więc proszę w dwóch słowach powiedzieć jakie licencje mogę zaproponować dla Muzeum, a ja Im to w mailu napiszę i wszystko będzie jasne. Wesołych świąt! :) i do usłyszenia! :) Adam

chyba przeoczył Pan mój post sprzed 4 dni, dlatego wklejam go jeszcze raz

oczywiście prześlę Panu fotografie, ale jak już poprzednio napisałem, najpierw muszę o nie grzecznie poprosić w mailu skierowanym do Muzeum w Gliwicach, ponieważ to ja jestem petentem (de facto wikipedia) i tylko ze względu no to, że zadzwoniłem i przekonywująco uzasadniłem potrzebę zamieszczenia takich fotografii na wikipedii, władni w tej kwestii pracownicy wyrazili na to zgodę. Dlatego, w pierwszej kolejności musiałem znaleźć kogoś chętnego do zamieszczenia owych fotografii na commons, a skoro już się Osoba znalazła :) wobec tego, teraz muszę wysłać do Muzeum maila, aby już konkretnie powiedzieć, co mają zdjęcia przedstawiać, a więc w chwili obecnej pozostaje czekanie, myślę kilka dni, na przesłanie fotografii z Muzeum i dopiero wtedy będę mógł przesłać je Panu, lub poprosić Muzeum o nadesłanie innych fotografii, bo jak na razie wszystko jest dopiero na etapie dogadywania się i zawsze może się okazać, że część nadesłanych fotografii, może nie nadawać się do zamieszczenia na commons i będzie trzeba prosić o inne. Natomiast, zanim wyślę wspomnianego maila do Muzeum, proszę mi jeszcze powiedzieć jakiego rodzaju licencje mogę pracownikom Muzeum w tym mailu zaproponować, bo z grzeczności wypada wymienić przynajmniej dwie, a z rozsądku - wskazać wśród nich najkorzystniejszą dla nas :) A jak powiedziałem, w chwili obecnej dopiero będziemy dogadywać szczegóły, dlatego w rozmowie telefonicznej z pracownikami Muzeum o licencji nic nie wspominałem, tym bardziej, że nie wiem jakie na commons są stosowane, bo nie jestem wikipedystą i nie mam bladego pojęcia jak zamieszczać fotografie na commons i przecież dlatego w ogóle się kontaktujemy! :) A więc proszę w dwóch słowach powiedzieć jakie licencje mogę zaproponować dla Muzeum, a ja Im to w mailu napiszę i wszystko będzie jasne.

Iwo Odrowąż

Bardzo proszę o podanie możliwości uzyskania licencji na wykorzystanie zdjęcia: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iwo_Odrow%C4%85%C5%BC,_Bishop_of_Krak%C3%B3w.PNG

kontakt: info@soulseedmedia.pl

Pozdrawiam serdecznie!

File:RomanCatholicismInEurope.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grsd (talk) 11:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Halford Mackinder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:6A8:3500:B00B:9923:B85B:2115:B08B 09:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

You uploaded File:Bitwa_pod_Oliwą_1627_3.JPG in 2006, dating it to the late 17th century. Recently, someone has added info that this was made by a modern artist who died in 1970. Do you know where you found the original image?

Peter Isotalo 20:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

File:Friedrich Wilhelm Rembert von Berg.PNG is in this week in Estonian wikipedia main page, because et:Friedrich Wilhelm Rembert von Berg is article of the week. Thank you for nice picture! Taivo (talk) 13:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

hello! i have a favour to ask. do you happen to have taken the other side of the coin? with Jacob Kettler on it. if yes - would you please consider uploading it to commons? we have a non-free file locally and it is not right. thanks anyway --アンタナナ 09:25, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Giving thanks

Giving thanks
Thanks for your image of the dragon.
Dafne07 (talk) 12:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Zrodla w mapkach

Czy mozesz dodac zrodla ksiazkowe do File:Religions in Poland 1573.PNG i File:Religions in Poland 1750.PNG? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

A nie pamietasz, jakich konkretnie? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hmmm, nawet taka notke warto by dodac przy okazji. A jak sobie przypomnisz mniej wiecej ktore, to tez - na en wiki niekiedy usuwa sie mapki bez zrodel, a szkoda, bo twoje zawsze sa bardzo wartosciowe. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tadeusz Reytan.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tadeusz Reytan.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)