User talk:MasterRus21thCentury/Archives/2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Exact duplicate

Hi. "Exact duplicate" is a high condition, and different file type, and different derivations are not exact duplicates and fail the test for speedy deletion. If you think that it should be deleted then please put it through a deletion request process. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

I see no response to @Billinghurst from last December yet. Perhaps, you can comment.
On January 3, 2023, here: [1] you wrongly tagged a file as an "exact duplicate." It was not an exact duplicate.
Please, take more time to compare files before using any criteria for speedy deletion, especially tagging files with the "duplicate" tag. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Victory Day Parade 2005-9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 10:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Files of Senate of Poland

Check Template_talk:Polish_Senate_partnership. So it seems that you are not doing a right thing. Masur (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@Masur Opened a related discussion. Now I'm waiting for an answer. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

High image quality version from the Russian Presidential Press and Information Office

First of all, thank you for having found a high quality version of the file File:President Putin laying a wreath at a monument to the liberating Soviet Army in Pyongyang.jpg, this kind of contribution on Commons is quite underestimated and I'd like to thank you for this good modification!

So I'm asking you for something else, could you find high quality for these other similar photos ?

Thank you very much! — Koreller (talk) 10:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Copying a large number of photos of officials, etc

Hi! There is no need to add all the official meeting photos from government websites. Wikipedia is not a file hosting service for officials; a few photos for articles are enough. Photos that are not valuable to the Wikimedia Commons will be deleted. And also for each photo you need to give a description. Rtfroot (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

@Rtfroot As for the numbering of photographs, it will be temporary and exists to facilitate uploading photographs (for example, they are listed in the order given on the website of the Russian Ministry of Defense). In the future, they will be renamed - this takes less time than uploading photos to Wikimedia Commons. Also in the future there will be uploading of photographs from Sergei Shoigu’s working trips around Russia and abroad - there are 127 of them in the album and they will also temporarily be in order. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
I have to agree with Rtfroot here. It's really helpful or practical to upload every single image of Sergei Shoigu twiddling his thumbs at a random meeting over the last 10 years or whoever long. And the explanation for why did that makes zero sense. Especially the bit about renaming files files int he future. As if that has anything to do with it. Regardless, next time it would be better you if just picked the best ones out of the set and uploaded them instead of just indiscriminately uploading every image from the Russian Ministry of Defense's website while expecting everyone else to deal with them. And just an FYI, but it looks like the links to the original images on the Russian Ministry of Defense's website don't work because of them blocking IP addresses outside of Russia from accessing it, which really doesn't help. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
It seems you don't understand what I'm talking about. I'm saying that you are uploading a lot of photos that are of no value to the community and Wikipedia (random official handshakes, etc.), a few photos are enough, but you are downloading all the photos from official sites. Wikipedia is not a file hosting service. There is no need to add all the photos from every trip of government officials. In addition, you poorly format the uploaded photos (incorrect names, incorrect sources, often no description, etc.). By the way, where do you get improved copies of old photographs? This is AI upscaling am I right? Rtfroot (talk) 10:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
@Adamant1, @Rtfroot: I understand this very well - I try to upload only the important, and if necessary, only in high resolution (for example, on the Kremlin website there is a section Putin. 20 years at http://20.kremlin.ru, where the best moments of Vladimir’s presidency and premiership are posted Putin from December 31, 1999 to December 2019).
Meanwhile, here the photographs are uploaded in high resolution and I am happy to post them on Wikimedia Commons. In turn, on the main website of the Russian President, photographic materials from 2000-2009 have a resolution of 500x334, which is extremely low quality for large computers. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Where do you get high resolution photos for old ones? If this is AI upscaling, then this must be explicitly stated. AI upscaling of old photos is not the same as original. Rtfroot (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding such requests: an image can be renamed without the redirect only if this image is not used. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

@MasterRus21thCentury: Apparently your still uploading every random image of Sergei Shoigu against our requests and sources to the original files still don't seem to be working. Plus you seem to be redundantly adding Sergei Shoigu to the images along with a "Sergei Shoigu" by year category. When only the by year category is necessary. Can you at least fix the problem with the dead sources and stop adding the pointless parent category to the files if your not going to stop uploading them completely? You still aren't adding descriptions as requested either and a basic level files need both sources and descriptions to be hosted on Commons. Especially sources. It does no good if they are just links to blank archive.org pages though. So please fix it and the overcategorizing. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

@Adamant1 As for archived pages, they are usually removed from the current list, while photographs remain on the servers of the Russian Ministry of Defense website, and the pages themselves are not archived.
Currently, I have completely completed the series of uploads of photographs of Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu and will now be distributing them by year. Either way, this could make excellent material for Wikipedia articles and Wikimedia Commons galleries. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
No offense, but I don't care about or understand the insider baseball in regards to how your doing this whole thing. But you clearly didn't get the images from the archive.org links since they are blank pages. So just fix the sources so they point to the actual places where the images are being hosted. I don't care if that's archive.org, mil.ru, or somewhere else, but the sources clearly need to be corrected since they don't work as things currently stand. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Move requests

Hi. It is the file mover's decision whether to create a redirect or not. Also, a file mover cannot move a file without leaving a redirect if the file is in use on any Wikimedia wiki. So you actually don't need to write in almost every of your move requests I have seen that you don't want a redirect. If it really does matter to you, I do recommend to directly choose a right name or leave the file name as it is. Thanks and take care Killarnee (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, you did it again. If you ignore me, I will ignore your ”Reason: rename withown redirect“ statement. As I said it's not my opinion, it's a Commons rule and with the file move tool it's even technically not possible to uncheck the leave a redirect box if the file is in use. Killarnee (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
@Killarnee The fact is that I want to ensure that the files I uploaded are easier to find in the Foundation’s projects - for example, I am now working with photographs of Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, and I am also working on concretizing all the available photographs. For example, this happened with high-resolution photographs of Vladimir Putin. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Moving files is not the problem. The problem is that you want me not to leave a redirect behind, but that's just not possible. Killarnee (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
@Killarnee Okay, I’ll try not to leave a rename request without redirects then. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Oh dear. Special:diff/850302827. I cannot move the file without leaving a redirect because the file is already in use. What's so difficult to understand about it? Killarnee (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
@Killarnee You can understand that there will be an empty space on Wikipedia. And if there is not a single case of use in the Foundation’s projects at the time of renaming, then I carry it out without redirection. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Please read the Commons guidelines for file renaming. It's very clear that your current request to move the files without a redirect is violating the guidelines. If there are further move requests like the previous, I will just decline the requests. Have a nice day Killarnee (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Template:Mvd.ru has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Template:Senatinform.ru has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Спутник астероида (1999-10-06).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gikü (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Добрый вечер, MasterRus21thCentury. Заметил, что вы видоизменили вышеупомянутый файл. Не сказал бы, что соглашусь с решением поменять вырезанный портрет на полное фото, т.к. этот файл используется в инфобоксах (en:2012 Russian presidential election, kk:Владимир Вольфович Жириновский, ru:Выборы в Государственную думу (2016)) и иных таблицах (en:2024 Russian presidential election#Opinion polls) и новый вид файла вместе с «соседними» файлами выглядит не очень. Предлагаю вернуть старую, вырезанную версию. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

@Malik Nursultan B А вот может быть в таком случае залить новый файл заново и откатить старый назад? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Приднестровье

Привет, попрубую на сайте Правительства убедить разместить лицензию, как на сайте Президента и МИД ПМР. Kodru (talk) 20:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Спасибо за отзыв! Очень долго ждал Вашего ответа. В идеале лучше единая открытая лицензия по примеру {{GJSTU-2.0}}. Ещё также хочу сказать, что на форуме белорусской Википедии я открыл обсуждение, поскольку я планирую отправить письмо в пресс-службу белорусского президента с просьбой перевести сайт http://president.gov.by на свободную лицензию - у них крайне невнятный копирайт, а также сложности с подачей обращения ввиду того, что для регистрации на портале нужен белорусский номер телефона. Между тем, я живу в приграничном регионе (город Брянск) и мне самому выезжать в условный Гомель за покупкой симкой очень невыгодно, а виртуальные номера часто используют мошенники и несут потенциальные правовые риски.
Ещё просьба следить за списком, который я собираюсь переносить на Мету из-за закрытия ВМ РУ. Сам я между прочем убедил Минюст России перевести сайт на свободную лицензию, равно как и правительство Краснодарского края. В настоящее время жду ответов от Минтранса и Минкультуры России, а также нескольких правительств российских регионов. МИД России также учтёт мои пожелания по использованию информации сайта - его политика в области АП самая строгая из главных российских министерств в отличие от Минобороны, МЧС и некоторыми другими.
В свою же очередь убедить ввести свободную лицензию на сайтах постсоветской страны гораздо легче, чем 15 или даже 5 лет назад. 15 лет назад это было просто нереально, но Russavia стал вики-героем России за перевод кремлёвского сайта на свободную лицензию (он таковым и по сей день является), а также получение разрешений от нескольких российских дипведомств и авторов фотографий по теме российской авиации. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Architektur-Drahtgewebe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Датировки фотографий с mos.ru

Уважаемый участник, вы залили на Викисклад кучу снимков с mos.ru, поставив им параметр "неизвестная дата". При этом дата у них содержится в названии файла: File:20210906 NOV 8848.jpg - 6 сентября 2021 года. По этой дате легко выясняется, где и по какому поводу изображён на снимке господин Собянин. Было бы любезно с вашей стороны, если бы, заливая фотографии, вы давали себе труд выяснить, что же это вы такое заливаете, и указать в описании. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

@Андрей Романенко Хорошо, в ближайшее время постараюсь переименовать все загруженные мною файлы. Но здесь главная проблема в том, что мои загрузки в русскоязычном разделе практически не используются, хотя несут большую практическую пользу (пример тому - снимки с дочерних kremlin.ru доменов http://putin.kremlin.ru и http://20.kremlin.ru - в первом значительная часть фотобанка в высоком разрешении, в другом все высококачественные снимки и часть из них опубликована впервые). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Я думаю, что вам следует подать заявку на разблокировку в АК русского раздела, запросив разблокировку основного пространства под обещание в течение полугода использовать доступ к русскому разделу только и исключительно для добавления иллюстраций и больше ни для чего - и с правом запросить смягчение этого ограничения при условии полного отсутствия замечаний к вашей деятельности по истечении этого срока. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)