User talk:Marsupium/Archive/1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Marsupium!
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Marsupium (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

City template

Hello, Marsupium/Archive. You have new messages at Template talk:City.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

whym (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Marsupium (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Copy of my answer for deletion of Category:Reconstitution

I propose this category for deletion. I do not see any meaning in it. Marsupium (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Many other virtual reconstitutions of dispersed polyptychs might be in this category. In example of pictures would expose their original state :
Perhaps the word reconstitution it istnot the good word. Which one is better ? (But the expression Reconstitution is used on many books : Roberto Longhi in Officina Ferrarese ; Diane Cole Ahl in Fra Angelico, Phaidon, 2008 ISBN 978-0-7148-5858-6 Reconstitution de la composition originelle, p. 226) Virtual reconstitution (in painting) ? For WGA Digitized reconstruction of panels. (And in french « Reconstitution virtuelle », ou « Reconstitution hypothétique » quand des éléments ne sont pas certains).--- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 08:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
And what ? --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 15:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Marsupium (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Marsupium, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Marsupium/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 65 character 47: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Magog the Ogre/cleanup.js') // [[User:Magog the Ogre/cleanup.js]]

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC).

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Marsupium (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Three Minutes of Damascus Gate.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 20:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Marsupium (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)