User talk:Markdask

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Markdask!

TUSC token c4f5a976c9c2727d0b7a839d75456fa5[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File:Damru.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Infrogmation (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nicola-Hicks A.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ron-please delete this file. It was a failed attempt to upload an image to commons directly - when what I needed was a fair use copy on Eng. Thanks. MarkDask 21:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. No problem. Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Terriffic Dunker Guy on Wikipedia should not be blocked[edit]

The blocking of the user Terriffic Dunker Guy on Wikipedia was largely a mistake. There are some users who is favoring the user to be unblocked as the user continues to use proper spelling and prevent errors in parts of its article including a section or two. If there is one error and another article, I will fix it if a user notify me. Another user can correct an error I made. Also it continues to read more articles and some pages outside Wikipedia. I had already made discussions and explanations on my talk page. After I return, I may get some more protection from another user for making me continuing to following the guidelines, which is pleasing. Also when I am on an editing break, that is about two or three weeks, sometimes one that is a vacation, I should get some more protection for the same thing of following the guidelines as well as correct and proper spelling and keeping perfect sentence for an addition or an update of one article. Also I should hav put a template named Wikibreak on my user page.

As I do not put the Unblock template in my talk page as some users are going to reject it, I put it in other pages for a request for a user to be unblocked as it continues to follow the guidelines and spelling rules and also fixes it where needed. I continue to protect edits from vandalism, though I see no vandalism in other articles which is good. Some users also wants the user unblocked as I am capable of doing good spelling and grammar on Wikipedia and enlarge articles in some parts. Terriffic Dunker Guy (talk) 00:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]