User talk:Marinarodenzia999
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Re: User:Marinarodenzia999/Sandbox/Caricamenti[edit]
Ciao, scusa ma non capisco una cosa: perché dai istruzioni per caricare foto su Flickr quando le foto sono su altri siti? --Ruthven (msg) 19:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Il link che dai: https://it.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130521063201AALKgdR è relativo a Flickr, mi pare. Servirebbe semplicemente di scegliere la licenza CC BY-SA 4.0 oppure di apporre un template come spiegato (questo link si che lo puoi dare) a https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OTRS/Procedura_2
- L'ideale sarebbe di vedere sui siti specifici come si inserisce una licenza libera, se è possibile, ma mi rendo conto che ti appare difficile. Un'altra cosa che puoi fare è di levare "[ Foto ]" dal testo, perché è un'indicazione per chi compila il modulo che tu hai già completato inserendo il link alla foto. --Ruthven (msg) 11:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- D'accordo. Questo lo vuoi spedire agli utenti che hanno immagini con una licenza non libera, no? Lo sai che su iNaturalist ci sono file con licenza libera che si possono direttamente caricare? --Ruthven (msg) 06:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Non tutte ovviamente: devi trovare le immagini che hanno una licenza corretta. Quando le carichi devi inserire esattamente la stessa licenza su Commons, scrivere chi è l'autore e il link da dove l'hai preso. Infine devi categorizzare correttamente e inserire il Template:LicenseReview come indicato. (magari fatti una tabellina per non dimenticare nulla) In bocca al lupo! --Ruthven (msg) 06:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Le licenze ammesse sono quelle con la spunta verde in Commons:Licensing/it. Caricare ogni altro tipo di file può portare alla diretta cancellaizone e al blocco dell'utenza. Buon lavoro! --Ruthven (msg) 07:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Non tutte ovviamente: devi trovare le immagini che hanno una licenza corretta. Quando le carichi devi inserire esattamente la stessa licenza su Commons, scrivere chi è l'autore e il link da dove l'hai preso. Infine devi categorizzare correttamente e inserire il Template:LicenseReview come indicato. (magari fatti una tabellina per non dimenticare nulla) In bocca al lupo! --Ruthven (msg) 06:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- D'accordo. Questo lo vuoi spedire agli utenti che hanno immagini con una licenza non libera, no? Lo sai che su iNaturalist ci sono file con licenza libera che si possono direttamente caricare? --Ruthven (msg) 06:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (5).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Leoboudv (talk) 06:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Viola corsica ilvensis (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 07:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Viola corsica (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Leoboudv (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (7).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 07:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Prunus webbii (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 07:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Scrophularia yoshimurae.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 21:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (10).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Leoboudv (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (11).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (12).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content[edit]
File:Torri e fortini di Punta Giglio.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (16).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (18).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (17).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (14).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (13).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (9).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (8).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (6).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (4).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (1).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (3).jpg
- File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (2).jpg
- File:Viola corsica ilvensis (8).jpg
- File:Viola corsica ilvensis (7).jpg
- File:Viola corsica ilvensis (6).jpg
- File:Viola corsica ilvensis (5).jpg
- File:Viola corsica ilvensis (1).jpg
- File:Viola corsica ilvensis (2).jpg
- File:Viola corsica ilvensis (3).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (12).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (11).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (10).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (9).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (8).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (6).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (4).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (5).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (2).jpg
- File:Viola corsica (3).jpg
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Ho trovato cose preoccupanti nei file che hai caricato. Vedi per esempio File:Scrophularia yoshimurae (19).jpg : cosa ti dice che si possa caricare su Commons? Ruthven (msg) 12:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: e @Ruthven: , Fatto, grazie per avermi aiutato e segnalato.--Marinarodenzia999 (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)--
- No that is not ok, this kind of page is about a taxon, not about a specific observation. The links must lead to this kind of page, where the image upladed, and the license are directly available. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I just deleted a lot of your images, because they didn't have the right licenses, I advise you to read this: Commons:Licensing/it. In case you don't understand these rules well, maybe you should ask me or ask Ruthven, before bringing the image, if you can upload the image here.
- Google translation: Ho appena cancellato molte delle tue immagini, perché non avevano le licenze giuste, ti consiglio di leggere questo: Commons:Licensing/it. Nel caso in cui non capissi bene queste regole, forse dovresti chiedermi o chiedere a Ruthven, prima di portare l'immagine, se puoi caricare un'immagine qui. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Grazie.--Marinarodenzia999 (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)--
File tagging File:Amaryllis paradisicola foglie (5).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amaryllis paradisicola foglie (5).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amaryllis paradisicola foglie (5).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (1).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (1).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (1).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (2).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (2).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (3).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (3).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 21:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (4).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (4).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amaryllis paradisiscola foglie (4).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Amaryllis paradisiscola.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amaryllis paradisiscola.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amaryllis paradisiscola.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Viola corsica (7).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Viola corsica (7).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Viola corsica (7).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 12:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prunus webbii (3).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prunus webbii (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prunus webbii (3).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 16:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prunus webbii (2).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prunus webbii (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prunus webbii (2).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prunus webbii.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prunus webbii.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prunus webbii.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Cancellazione file (vedete sopra, notifiche arrivate 2 giorni fa)[edit]
Buonasera, @Christian Ferrer: e @Ruthven: volevo scrivervi per scusarmi per i file caricati, infatti il bot @INaturalistReviewBot: me li ha cancellati, sono mortifato/a. Scusatemi tanto, mi assumo tutte le mie responsabilità, immagino che mi meriterei il blocco a tempo indeterminato per commons. A presto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marinarodenzia999 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 29 lug 2020 (UTC)