User talk:Manuelt15/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 →


Before nominating porn for deletion

Well, if you use that {{Nopenis}} rationale:

  1. Make sure it is being used by clicking Check Usage
  2. If it is in use somewhere, it is automatically considered in scope.

Though I do agree that "commons isn't a photo album for nudists." ViperSnake151 (talk) 20:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Manuelt15!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:La nascita di Venere (Botticelli).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La nascita di Venere (Botticelli).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Burj Dubai 2009-07-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ZooFari 04:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Burj Dubai from Dubai in Sand Storm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ZooFari 04:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Burj Dubai from Dubai in Sand Storm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ZooFari 04:30, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I added source and I was unable to find the author of the poster. BTW, since I was not the original uploader (I just uploaded a higher resolution version) I don't know why you warned me, not Piotrus. --Blacklake (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't think an old image like that (1920) requires an author. Currently, the author is unknown. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


Gracias

Muchas gracias por haberme ayudado con lo del Babel, quisiera conocerte, por favor dejame una foto tuya en mi página de discusión.--Chica PlayBoy (talk) 19:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

No tengo fotos mias en Commons --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 18:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello Manuel, thanks for this revert. It was a known troll from cs.wiki... All the best, --Mercy (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, you're welcome! have a nice day --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 18:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Delete ?

Hi,

Would you like those emptied subpages to be deleted ? If you are planning on re-using them, they're best kept as a blank page else lemme know here or {{speedy}} them. –Krinkletalk 01:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

Our posting service has a lost-in-time message for you. Excuse for the delay. --US Postal Service 22:30, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Manuelt15 !

you've had now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As might know already, the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edit made by anonymous users on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by checking an Anonymous edits checklist and patrol a day-part. There is a short video tutorial which addresses some things you may not know.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC. –Krinkletalk 00:04, 20 March 2010

Welcome to teh cabal :D --Diego Grez return fire 22:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you both =) --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 08:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Manuelt15,
do you know if this image is at least really free? Despite its likely original intent, it may actually be useful, not in regard to the depicted individual, but in regard to tennis playing. But for that it has to be free. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 12 June 2010 (UTC)^


File source is not properly indicated: File:MaxGrabner_RJMarananpics.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MaxGrabner_RJMarananpics.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:MaxGrabner_RJMarananpics.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 23:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 492d0a7f803f400642686e1908dd1297

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Duda

Hola tengo una duda... que significa "No FOP in UAE"?? gracias el armenta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armenta isai (talk • contribs) 04:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

re: por que me aparecen esas notificaciones?

dejo el hilo de la conversación completa

Hola

Me encantaría saber que sucede con las imagenes que subo a wiki commons que me mandaste varias notificaciones de eliminacion, cuando lo que yo quiero es aportar material multimedia a la pagina, no entiendo porque van en contra del proyecto, yo solo quiero aportar material de dominio propio...

agradezco la explicación

Estebanelv (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Violar copyright, ver Commons:Licensing. --Martin H. (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Tengo que leer un monton de cosas, y no tengo tiempo, y seguro me eliminas las imágenes que me costó mucho reunir, todo el trabajo que hice me lo tiras en un minuto, que lamentable esta comunidad, asi no da ganas de aportar nada, la única manera es ser fotógrafo e ir hasta al baño con el jugador para certificar la "fuente". Como puedo hacer para que no las eliminen... Para que tantas horas en subir y armar los artículos?. aparte te ensañaste con todas las imagenes mias.... Una ultima cosa: Como puedo contactarme con alguien para que me ayude, tipo chat u msn...
Gracias por leer mi mensaje!
--Estebanelv (talk) 22:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
You are not the photographer - Tuteo no el fotógrafo! You can not upload pictures here that you not created yourself - no puedes subir fotos aquí que no te crea. Do not give false author information - No dé información falsa autor. Ver Commons:Primeros pasos. Ver File:Gustavo Fernández.jpg, File:Funes Mori.jpg, File:Higuain seleccion 2010.jpg, .. - todo mal. --Martin H. (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


La verdad no se entiende mucho lo que me decis , porque seguramnete me estas traduciendo las palabras con un traductor... no se de que pais sos y la lengua que usas, aparte no entiendo porque pones un link de una pagina y aseguras que el dueño es esa persona, cuando tranquilamente pueden haber robado de cualquier sitio esa foto, quien te asegura que la foto esa con el link que me pusiste es el autor original?
Cuanto tiempo tengo para poder solucionar el problema?
Gracias!
--Estebanelv (talk) 22:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Simply dont add a watermark to other peoples photos and declare them your own work. Thats all. --Martin H. (talk) 23:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I'm explaining him about the licenses on IRC --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 23:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Sucede que ésas imágenes no te pertenecen, y no puedes licenciarlas como trabajo propio, éso es todo. Y si, Martin H. no habla español. --Diego Grez return fire 00:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

:After reading his words, is OK to nuke him, these aren't his pictures. Regards --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 00:34, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


tu ultima respuesta que la agrade y destaque, te la respondo:

te explico que de las 7 fotos que me borraron, una si era mia, y sin enbargo no me dieron una explicacion, la borraron justo con todas, como puedo hacer para autentificar que es mia, un usuario me dijo que las suba a su tamaño original, pero no la tengo mas grande que 800X800 px .... como hago, tengo que pedirle al jugador un autografo con la presencia de la foto para que me crean los moderadores de commons???

desde ya gracias!

.•Estebanelv•. (➨Mensajes) 18:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Esa entonces súbela otra vez utilizando {{Own work}} en la fuente|source --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 05:00, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Gracias!!!! .•Estebanelv•. (➨Mensajes) 15:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Hola ¿Que tal?

He visto que hablas español y que utilizas el modelo Template:Commons policies and guidelines en inglés. He intentado traducirlo. Si estuvieras interesado en cambiarlo en tu página de usuario solo tienes que añadir /es al final del template. Es decir, modificar {{Commons policies and guidelines}} por {{Commons policies and guidelines/es}}

Un saludo--. HombreDHojalata.conversa 20:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Muchas gracias por el aviso :) --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 08:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Thanx! You make a great job too. Greetings. --r@ge (talk) 05:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Notas varias

Hola Manuel. Bueno, pues he regresado de nuevo por aquí ^_^ al tajo después de un stop momentáneo. He estado revisando tus contribuciones y me estaba preguntando si te interesaría que pasáramos por aquí en algún momento. No te apures, piénsatelo y me cuentas. No creo que tuvieses problemas de todos modos aún así reflexiona sobre ello. Un saludo, --Dferg (talk · meta) 08:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Muchas gracias por la propuesta, aunque hay algunas cosillas que espero poder comentártelas por otras vías, acepto tu propuesta, (y me alegra que estés otra vez por aquí :) espero también verte activo por otros lares. Cheers! --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 08:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Me alegra que aceptes mi propuesta. Si hay cosas que deseas comentarme en privado puedes mandarme un email o por IRC. Att, --Dferg (talk · meta) 11:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Su atención, por favor, aquí. Firma el acepto y transclúyela en esta página cuando quieras que comienze. Mucha suerte. --Dferg (talk · meta) 14:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Muchas gracias por todo ^_^ principalmente por el apoyo. Saludos!! --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 14:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Your RfA

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that your RfA has been closed as successful, and as such you are now an administrator. Congratulations! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks all, I hope I can do a better job with the bits. Best regards, --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 08:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Gracias padrino :) --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 12:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Adelante Manuel :) Rastrojo (DES) 22:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Gracias por el apoyo Rastrojo :-) --Màñü飆¹5 talk 02:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Borrados de mapas de Málaga

Hola Manuelt15. Sí, hay versiones actualizadas en svg de todos ellos. Están todos en category:Maps of municipalities of Málaga. Me he aseguarado de cambiar las viejas versiones de todos los artículos de las wikis en todos los idiomas por las nuevas para que no se dañe ningún artículo al borrarlos. Saludos, --tyk (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kiyonaga bathhouse women-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiyonaga bathhouse women-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Subcategorization

Hi, for how many files is needed subcategorization? I am refering this: [1]. I think there might be more of these images.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 07:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, as far as I know here don't say an exact number, my deletion summary is a transclution of the reason of the user who requested the deletion (maybe he replaced the categories in the files too) So, maybe you should contact him and/or recreate the category. Regards, --Màñü飆¹5 talk 11:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

I see, OK. Thank you!--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 19:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Naruto Uzumaki

Hola, quisiera saber porque borraste la imagen File:Naruto-Uzumaki.jpg, si la saque de flickr y con una licencia libre. Si fue que la coloque mal quisiera que me ayudaras a colocarla, es que la necesito para un articulo de la wikipedia en español y soy nuevo en esto de subir fotos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lidertron (talk • contribs) 11:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Aunque la imagen haya sido liberada bajo una licencia libre en Flickr, es un trabajo derivado, el cual posee los mismo derechos de autor que el trabajo original (la serie de Naruto) por lo que sigue siendo una violación de estos derechos. En Flickr se le da la opción a los usuarios de liberar sus imágenes bajo CC, pero esto no da por hecho que éstos sean los autores originales de las imágenes, por eso hay que tener cuidado con el contenido de Flickr. Saludos, --Màñü飆¹5 talk 15:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok gracias, lo tomare en cuenta --Lidertron (talk) 01:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Hola

Hola Manuelt15. Cuando le doy a subir la imagen me dice que un archivo anterior a ese fue borrado y no me deja subirlo. Me puedes ayudar por favor--Inefable001 (talk) 02:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Hola. He logrado subirla, pero sería bueno que le des una mirada para ver si lo hice bien, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 02:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Disculpa se me olvido darte el enlace [2]--Inefable001 (talk) 02:43, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Todo bien, he hecho unos cuantos cambios para más precisión. Un saludo, --Màñü飆¹5 talk 05:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Gracias por los cambios, saludos.--Inefable001 (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

Manuel, Gracias por tu ayuda.

La verdad no se bien la diferencia entre CC-BY-SA, CC-BY 3.0 o CC-BY-SA 2.5. No tengo inconveniente en el cambio.

Con respecto a la imagen:

El OTRS se envió en un email aparte

Gracias y avisame en que más puedo ayudar ----Edwod2001 (talk) 21:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Hola Manuelt15

Veo que has borrado las páginas: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Compound_of_dodecahedron_and_icosahedron.png que yo había subido de la Viquipèdia inglesa, por ejemplo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compound_of_five_cubes.png. Las imágenes de http://web.archive.org/web/20051219075225/www.physics.orst.edu/~bulatov/polyhedra/uniform_compounds/index.html no se parecen en nada a las nuestras y amara son de 2006 mientras que las de la Viquipèdia son de 2005. ¿Se puede arreglar? --JRGomà (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Hola JRGomà, en realidad la imágenes no son copias de la version HTML, sino de la versión VRML. Por ejemplo, si utilizas un cliente VMRL compara este gráfico 3D con la versión borrada de File:Compound of great icosahedron and stellated dodecahedron.png, también como podrás notar, al final de [3] aparece © Copyright 1996 V.Bulatov, e incluso, en Archive.org hay versiones hasta de 1997, por lo que sus imágenes/gráficos están desde mucho antes que las de Wikipedia, desconozco si se pueden reproducir estos gráficos desde cero y que queden casi exactamente iguales a los de physics.orst.edu, en todo caso si deseas puedo volver a abrir la consulta de borrado o bien puedes hacer una consulta de restaurado. Saludos, --Màñü飆¹5 talk 02:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Imagen trasladada desde Wikipedia en inglés fue borrada

Hola Manuelt15. Una imagen que trasladé desde wikipedia en inglés fue borrada supuestamente por Copyvio, pero la imagen dice estar bajo una licencia aceptable en commons. Espero le des una revisada y me puedas ayudar, saludos.Aquí esta.--Inefable001 (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Al parecer es muy probable que el usuario Jaru123 de skycrapercity la haya tomado de otra página, además de que no veo tal cesión de imagen bajo GFDL --Màñü飆¹5 talk 06:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Eso me temía yo también, pero por lo menos hice el intento a ver si me ayudabas. De todos modos gracias, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

OTRS

Could you maybe take care of this: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=5274335 I think the book could be valuable as a source..--DieBuche (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

(tpw) Manuel is away, so I took the liberty to review it. The ticket does not provide the required information, namelly there's no explicit release under a free license, nor a consent. --Dferg (talk · meta) 12:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Asked for more information.
Thanks Dferg. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 06:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Google_Chrome_wordmark.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oxguy3 (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, could you please restore this file? A DR was in progress, and I'm pretty sure it was ineligible for copyright. –Tryphon 12:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)an

Done, my apologies. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 18:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello Manuelt15, please would you tell me, why you have deleted the Sonair.png-logo in my article? Sonair is a daughter of Sonangol and this logo was not discussed nor deleted. Its the same procedure. Regards--— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.195.11.55 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, can you provide a link to the exact title? Cheers, --Màñü飆¹5 talk 18:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, here [[4]] and the article [[5]].I am not happy with your action. Sonair is a daughter off Sonangol company in Angola and the Sonangol-logo is good there in the article, instead the Sonair was removed.--77.195.11.55 21:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
To allow an image here on Wikimedia Commons, we need a valid source/author and need to be released under a free license (see Commons:Licensing), that file was uploaded without author, source and license, so we couldn't verify if the file is free or under copyright, also here is under copyright. So, to allow that file, need to be released under a free license and we need a confirmation of the permission from SonAir, via OTRS. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 02:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I think it's {{PD-textlogo}}, so we don't need permission from anyone. –Tryphon 05:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Hmmm... I really don't see it simple enough, though I'd be wrong, too. I'll ask for more opinions --Màñü飆¹5 talk 05:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
It's borderline, the stuff at the left could be seen as original. NativeForeigner 토론 (talk) 05:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
That is how I feel, the left side of the image would be creative enough to not make it PD. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
The same as Zscout370. I'd not transfer it to commons. --Dferg (talk · meta) 06:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Well looking at Threshold of originality, I'm sure it's fine in the U.S. But of course, I cannot say if Angola has an equivalent or a much lower threshold of originality (it would need to be pretty low for this logo to be copyrighted). –Tryphon 06:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
But if the owner of the company wants to write to OTRS to give permission, I will go for that route. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Duda

Buenos días Manuelt15. Me dirijo a ti como usuario en español y ante alguna duda de interpretación que me ha surgido. He tenido un debate con un administrador, pero me temo que mi inglés no sea lo suficientemente bueno para expresarme o para comprender las normas. En su momento subí algunas fotos colgadas en la página web del Ministerio del Interior de España, en la cual se indica expresamente lo siguiente: Se prohíbe la reproducción total o parcial de los contenidos de esta Web sin citar su origen o solicitar autorización, salvo en las páginas en las que se indica expresamente otra circunstancia http://www.mir.es/aviso_legal.html. Mi inglés no es gran cosa, pero creo que mi castellano sí y aquí dice lo que dice: No se prohibe la reproducción. Se prohibe la reproducción sin citar su origen. Es decir, se permite la reproducción citando el origen. Castellano puro y duro. Por eso subí las fotos bajo licencia CC-BY-SA 3.0 que, hasta donde he podido entender, permite la reproducción atribuyendo el trabajo en la manera especificada por el autor. Vamos, lo que exige el Ministerio del Interior: Citar la fuente. Y es lo que hice. Pues, bien, un administrador cuestiona la legitimidad de esas fotos en Wikimedia. A mayor abundamiento, la Ley 37/2007, de 16 de noviembre, sobre reutilización de la información del sector público [6] establece en su artículo 4 que los documentos de las Administraciones y organismos del sector público serán reutilizables en los términos de esta Ley. Es decir, existe un mandato legal e imperativo a los poderes púbicos de manera que necesariamente, sus documentos (incluidas fotos) son reutilizables aunque los organismos pueden imponer ciertas condiciones. En el caso del Ministerio del Interior, citar la fuente. Me parece que con la ley en la mano el tema está claro como el agua, pero puedo estar equivocado, desconociendo a fondo el funcionamiento de Wikimedia Commons. Te pido, por favor, que me aclares el tema y si te parece, medies en la discusión Commons:Deletion requests/File:Magdalena Alvarez.jpg. Gracias de antemano. Cvbr (talk) 10:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Gracias por tu aportación Cvbr 13:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Klemmbach müllheim ortslage.JPG

hello, i trie this in english (my native speak is german): why did you delete this file? it was an original picture, token from me. perhaps i forgot to mark the rights. thanx for re!--Hungchaka (talk) 14:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I've restored it, when you did this you removed the license tag, I've reverted to the first revision. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 00:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Transferencia de foto

Hola Manuelt5. He transferido esta foto desde Wikipedia en inglés y pasó algo extraño. Espero que lo corrijas, saludos.--Inefable001 (talk) 04:32, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Parece que ya lo arreglaron, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 20:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Plis

Jai der:

Sorri bot i cant tok in inglish, sou culd yu tel mi if this pikchure its olraigt abaut permishions? tenks.... Jajajajaja Saloca (talk) 23:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

LOL, voy a consultar, la licencia es incorrecta, pero creo que puede que esté en el dominio publico por ser muy simple. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 22:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Gracias mani, ¿Puedes traertela? Saloca (talk) 00:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Alvinho

I saw that you've blocked editor Alvinho. It was about time. He is adding pictures as they were taken by him. If he is not stopped at once, we're going to have a serious problem with copyright infringiment. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Que sucede?

Hola Manuelt15.

Un usuario subió esta foto que parece trabajo propio, ya que posee los metadatos y todo lo que indica que es suya. Aún asi, un administrador le puso la plantilla de violación de derechos de autor. Me puedes explicar cual fue el error de ese usuario, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Ya no tienes que explicarme nada, me acabo de dar cuenta lo que pasa con esa foto. Saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Alto_garona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Permisos OTRS.

Hola Manuel soy Sebastián (sebabombero51), un usuario argentino. He subido a Wikimedia Commons la foto de Bradley Manning con licencia libre ya que en el sitio de donde la conseguí aclaraban que la foto ha sido liberada al dominio público. La cuestión es que otros usuarios creen conveniente borrar dicha foto porque no se puede estar seguro que la foto, efectivamente, sea libre de usar pues no hemos podido contactar con el autor. Una alternativa era ponerle permisos OTRS pero al parecer tampoco se puede, según lo que entiendo en esta página de discusión. Entonces mi consulta sería, ¿podrías interceder vos como usuario OTRS para ver si, en el caso que no pueda contactar al autor, es posible de alguna manera otorgarle esos derechos? Tal vez de esa forma se pueda conservar el archivo, de otra manera será borrado el 28 próximo. Saludos.--Sebabombero51 (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

So the images are okay for commercial reuse even if the photographer denies ever having released the image under a license which allowed this?--James Heilman, MD (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Those images were verified after they were uploaded and it was confirmed those images were under a free, commercial-allowable license, and not only by a bot and uploaders, but by a trusted user too. CC licenses are irrevocable, so yes, these images are okay for commercial reuse. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 07:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, this media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. Unless the copyright status is provided, the file will be deleted seven days after this template was added. Thus I reverted your entry. As by the link given on the page thre is a copyright by AsianFanatics.net Site. I do not believe that the picture is public domain. This has to be proofen! cheers --gildemax (talk) 18:58, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

copyvio -- done ----gildemax (talk) 14:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Gaudi arena.jpg

Thank you; I don't really know how OTRS works, and I didn't want to break some sort of link and prevent this image's permissions from being properly sourced. Nyttend (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

File:CartaClow.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I don't share your opinion, but please close the DR correctly at least. --Leyo 20:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

The closure is handled by a script, it didn't detect the others delete template. Thanks for the notice. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 00:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

editprotected

Hi, can you do this Template_talk:Creator#RTL? It is about compatibility with RTL wikis. thanks −ebraminiotalk 13:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

I can't right now, feel free to msg any other admin (maybe Krinkle can?) --Màñü飆¹5 talk 17:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Af ubrax braxton university logo wiki.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Мельников Мадина (talk) 11:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)