User talk:Manfred Kuzel/Archive/2019

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 22 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 20 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:19, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Hat sich zu mir verirrt …

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Vielen herzlichen Dank für die Info, lieber Aristeas. Offenbar kommt das in letzter Zeit leider immer öfter vor. MfG--M@nfred (talk) 10:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!

Hallo Manfred Kuzel!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheimwikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 07:02, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 22 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 20 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a little sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:54, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 23 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a little sharper. But good enough for me. (Tripod?)--Famberhorst 05:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 22 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse MIstelbach Berggasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novy Saladorf Nord 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novy Saladorf Nord 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novy Saladorf Nord 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novy Saladorf Nord 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 1 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:51, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Hubertuskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. English description would be good --Podzemnik 05:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Pfeilerbildstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:44, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 15:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:16, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sonnberg Barockgarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sonnberg Johannes Nepomuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 14 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Contrast could be increased a bit but o.k. --Ermell 06:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a strange dark pattern on the shadow parts of the green door. Post-processing artefacts? --Zinnmann 07:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Wenn eine Kellertür 2 Meter unter dem Niveau liegt, dann lassen sich extreme Schlagschatten bei vollem Sonnenlicht nicht vermeiden.--Manfred Kuzel 08:12, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Ich meine nicht die Schlagschatten, sondern die gitter/bänderartigen Strukturen innerhalb davon. Das sind keine normalen Schatten. --Zinnmann 10:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Das sind Strukturen im Lack, die man bei genauerer Betrachtung auch im Bereich der von der Sonne beleuchteten Fläche erkennen kann.--Manfred Kuzel 10:34, 9 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Nachdem das geklärt ist :-) --Zinnmann 21:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:53, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals --Ermell 06:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 14:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed --Ermell 06:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC) ??? Die Perspektive ist absolut korrekt. --Manfred Kuzel 08:00, 13 May 2019 (UTC) I don´t think so if you look at the right side and the top windows of the hut. --Ermell 12:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)  Comment Neue Version hochgeladen. Better so? --Manfred Kuzel 15:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 15:58, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Röschitz Glasfenster Kapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:41, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:28, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Franz-Josef-Straße Mistelbach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Franz-Josef-Straße Mistelbach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Franz-Josef-Straße Mistelbach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse MIstelbach Berggasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:27, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse MIstelbach Berggasse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side leaning in. --Tournasol7 05:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)  CommentDanke, neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 06:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Much better, thanks. --Tournasol7 06:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little more contrast might have been nicer. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:24, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:26, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO you should clone out the blurry bird at the top. --XRay 05:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novy Saladorf Nord 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok, sliglhtly soft. --ArildV 09:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I miss the tip of the chimney and it needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 07:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)  CommentDas ist kein Rauchabzug sondern ein hoher Mast, welcher der Befestigung der Zuleitung des elektrischen Stromes dient. --Manfred Kuzel 08:52, 11 May 2019 (UTC) Ok, in that case it only needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:35, 12 May 2019 (UTC) Better so? --Manfred Kuzel 09:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC) Geht es nicht ein bisschel mehr? --Poco a poco 17:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC) Wenn Du das Geländer vor dem Gebäude meinst, das ist schief ! --Manfred Kuzel 10:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC) Und die Hauswände fallen auch nach ihnen? --Poco a poco 20:39, 14 May 2019 (UTC)  Comment: @Poco a poco: Bei solchen Fotos muß man sich nach dem Türstock und nicht nach den Wänden orientieren. Diese Gebäude wurden von Weinbauern und nicht von Fachleuten errichtet und die arbeiteten ohne Wasserwaage und Lot. Schiefe Wände sind in Kellergassen ganz normal! --Manfred Kuzel 04:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Ok, if that is not a distortion but looks like this in real, QI to me --Poco a poco 21:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 06:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)  Done: Neue Dateiversion hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 08:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Stepro 17:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:32, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 1 b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but there are several dust spots in the sky --Llez 06:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC) Die "dust spots in the sky" sind die Vorboten aufziehender Bewölkung, was auch am fehlenden vollen Sonnenschein zu erkennen ist, weil es hinter dem Fotografen bereits bewölkt ist. --Manfred Kuzel 07:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC) Das meine ich nicht. Es handelt sich um kleine, diskrete Punkte (s. Annotation), möglicherweise gibt es noch mehr. --Llez 08:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC) Danke Llez, neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 16:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC) OK now,good quality --Llez 13:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailberg Kellergasse Unterer Zipf 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:38, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goodquality --Llez 06:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 09:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:45, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 7 bis 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolkenformationen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would intensify the colours (especially the trees) a bit --Llez 05:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. There is barrel distortion - at the building. I've seen the shadow at the gutters. Everything fine. --XRay 05:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Schüttkasten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a little sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a little sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:09, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The white sky is a pity. But otherwise good for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:59, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. You can optionally update the white skies of your photos with the graduated filter.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 10:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak promotion. Sky is a little bit overexposed and sharpness could be better. --XRay 04:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 10:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Bitte bei Neuanlage von Kategorien auf Commons beachten:

• [1]
• [2] (Quelle für Commonscats)
• [3]

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki:

ad 1.: ???

ad 2.: ???

ad 3.: ???

Ich verstehe nur "Bahnhof". LG--M@nfred (talk) 06:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

ich habe eigentlich nix anderes erwartet. Die Diffs oben zeigen, was bei deiner Kategorieanlage auf Commons gefehlt hat (Denkmalobjekte). Diffs lesen geht? Was nach neun Jahren so anders nicht ist als anno dazumal, bis auf Wikidata und wikidata infobox. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Lieber Christian, wenn ich nun noch wüßte, was "Diffs" sind, dann wäre ich vielleicht schon wieder um eine Spur klüger. Wenn Du eh nix anderes erwartest, dann gibt es exakt 2 Möglichkeiten:

1. Du nominierst mir jemanden, der mir diesen ganzen Kategorienkram besser verklickern kann als Du es konntest oder
2. Du korrigierst jeden Blödsinn, den ich hier mache, ganz einfach und ohne Kommentar.

Einen schönen Tag und lG--M@nfred (talk) 07:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

nur kurz Diffs sind Differenz zwischen letzte Version und aktueller Version eines Lemmas. --lg K@rl (talk) 08:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Danke lieber K@rl, diese Sprache verstehe sogar ich. Nun kann ich zwar versuchen herauszubekommen, was sich hinter den Diffs verbirgt, ob ich allerdings kapiere warum es diese Diffs gibt, das wage ich zu bezweifeln, weil mir bislang niemand in ebenso verständlichen Worten den ganzen Kategorienkram erklären konnte. LG--M@nfred (talk) 08:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Kellergassenkategorien

Hallo Manfred, danke für die Kellergassenphotos! Kannst du bitte versuchen, die richtig zu kategorisieren?

Deine bisherige Vorgehensweise führt dazu, dass deine Photos wie folgt kategorisiert sind, am Beispiel von gestern: Deine Kellergassenphotos vom Neubergweg Stetten sind in der Category:Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg (die aber noch gar nicht angelegt worden war) und gleichzeitig auch noch in der Category:Kellergassen in Stetten (Niederösterreich) (die auch noch nicht angelegt worden war; außerdem gehören in diese Kellergassen-in-Gemeinde-Kategorie nicht die einzelnen Photos, sondern nur die Kellergassen-Kategorien). Das heißt, dass nach dir immer noch jemand anderer die beiden Kategorien anlegen muss und die Photos umschlichten muss.

Es sollte so sein:

• 1. Du legst bitte als erstes, falls noch nicht vorhanden, auf commons die Kellergassen-in-Gemeinde-Kategorie an, falls es die noch nicht gibt. Die gehört in NÖ immer in zwei Kategorien einsortiert, wie du hier siehst: in die Gemeindekategorie, und in die Kellergassen-in-Bezirk-Kategorie.
• 2. Dann legst du bitte die einzelne Kellergassenkategorie(n) dieser Gemeinde an, soweit du Photos gemacht hast, zB Category:Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg. Dazu ist nicht mehr nötig, als diese Kellergassenkategorie in die übergeordnete Kellergassen-in-Gemeinde-Kategorie einzusortieren.
• 3. Dann trägst du die neue Commons-Kellergassenkategorie in die Wikipedia-Kellergassenlistenzeile ein, so wie du das eh schon immer machst ([4]).
• 4. Und wenn du erst dann über die Wikipedia-Kellergassenliste die Photos so wie du das gewohnt bist hochlädst, landen die Photos auf commons automatisch in der richtigen Kellergassenkategorie statt in der übergeordneten Kellergassen-in-Gemeinde-Kategorie, und niemand muss hinterherräumen ;-)

Danke, lg, —Niki.L (talk) 05:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Niki.L, wie Du dem obigen Abschnitt ersehen kannst, war Herzi Pinki trotz mehrerer Versuche nicht in der Lage, mir den ganzen Kategorienkram in verständlichen Worten zu erklären. Mit Links allein fange ich absolut nichts an. Ich werde versuchen, Deine verständlichere Form der Erklärung beim nächsten Mal zu Rate zu ziehen. MfG --M@nfred (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Manfred, danke. Wenn was unklar ist, kannst du mir bitte auch gerne eine Mail schicken, und ich kann versuchen, die Arbeitsschritte mit Bildschirmdrucken nachvollziehbarer zu machen. Wäre doch gelacht, wenn wir das nicht hinbekommen; bei den vielen Photos, die du beiträgst, würde es sich ja lohnen, wenn du dich auch noch ein wenig in den Kategorienkram einarbeitest. danke, lg, --Niki.L (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Niki.L, da ich heute noch Fotos der Kellergasse Hasengassl in Nappersdorf in die Liste der Kellergassen in Nappersdorf-Kammersdorf hochladen werde, habe ich das (hoffentlich richtig) dort schon einmal vorbereitet. Ich glaube auch schon zu wissen, wo das ganze Mißverständnis herrührt: Beim Hochladen von Fotos erscheint nämlich immer der Hinweis „Zusätzliche Kategorien erwünscht“ oder so ähnlich. Und da habe ich eben alle zutreffenden Kategorien angegeben. Etwas verwirrend, meine ich. LG--M@nfred (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo. Der 1. Schritt (Kellergassen-in-Gemeinde-Kategorie auf commons anlegen) war für Nappersdorf-Kammersdorf eh schon erledigt. Den 3. Schritt (die Commons-Kellergassen-Kategorie in die wikipedia-Kellergassenliste eintragen) hast du heute gemacht, danke!

Fehlt aktuell noch der 2. Schritt, die Kategorie für die einzelne Kellergassenliste auf commons anlegen: Klicke in der Kellergassenliste in der Zeile Hasengassl auf das runde Kategoriensymbol (oberhalb vom Photoapparatsymbol fürs Bilderhochladen). So öffnest du die (noch nicht angelegte) Kategorie auf commons. Klicke dann auf “Bearbeiten“, und gib, in eckige Klammern gesetzt, die übergeordnete Category:Kellergassen in Nappersdorf-Kammersdorf ein (das sollte dann so aussehen, wie du es hier siehst). Dann klicke ganz unten auf das blaue Feld “Änderungen veröffentlichen“, damit hast du die Kategorie angelegt.

Und wenn du dann über die wikipedia-Kellergassenliste die Photos hochlädst, werden die automatisch auf commons in der richtigen Kategorie landen. Lg, --14:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Niki.L, ich hoffe, daß ich bei den letzten Aktivitäten alles richtig gemacht habe. Jedenfalls habe ich beim Hochladen den Hinweis „Zusätzliche Kategorien erwünscht“ geflissentlich ignoriert. MfG--M@nfred (talk) 11:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Maioio_Island_05.jpg in CR bei QIC

Moin! Mit dem Bild ist irgendwas schief gelaufen. Du hattest eine Anmerkung dazu (die ich übrigens teile), die allerdings nur auf deutsch gemacht (was der Nominierende offenbar nicht spricht), wodurch ihr beide im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes "aneinander vorbei geredet" habt. Jetzt steht das Bild auch noch im Review, obwohl das komplett unnötig gewesen wäre. Ich bin gerade dabei, das ein wenig zu entwirren. Daher zuerst meine Frage: hast Du das Bild über die Vorlage "Discuss" in den Review geschickt? Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Dirtsc, zuerst einmal herzlichen Dank, daß Du Dich um die Entwirrung bemühst. Die Vorlage "Discuss" habe ich tatsächlich verwendet, weil ich gehofft habe, damit einen Dolmetscher wie Dich zu finden, der das Sprachenbabel entwirrt. Da ich außer "Good morning" und "Good bye" in Englisch nichts verstehe, tue ich mir bei der Bewertung der Fotos mit Ausnahme der positiven "Promotion" sehr schwer. Ich hätte oft Kleinigkeiten anzumerken, die man - wie in diesem Falle - leicht korrigieren kann um zu einer positiven Bewertung zu kommen. So aber lasse ich es lieber bleiben, was sicherlich nicht im Sinne des Erfinders ist. Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem Land der 1.100 Kellergassen --M@nfred (talk) 09:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

So was habe ich fast befürchtet. ;-) Bei QIC treiben sich zwar viele mit Deutsch als Muttersprache rum, aber die Kommunikationssprache auf Commons ist nun mal Englisch. Natürlich kannst Du Deine Bilder auch ohne Englischkenntnisse einstellen und eine positive Entscheidung ist über das Helferlein auch schnell möglich. Aber alles was darüber hinaus geht, wird an der Sprachbarriere scheitern. Da kann ich Dir noch nicht mal einen guten Rat geben. Höchstens den, bei Bildern, die kein "glatter Stich" sind, sondern an denen Du etwas auszusetzen hast, keinen Kommentar abzugeben. Du musst dann hoffen, dass jemand anders den Review zu dem Bild macht... Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Genau Deinem Rat muß ich leider folgen, lieber Dirtsc. Danke jedenfalls für den netten Kontakt. Ein schönes Pfingstwochenende und freundliche Grüße --M@nfred (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. ----

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wuzelmauerwerk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschala Kellergasse Pinkelstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschala Kellergasse Pinkelstein Ziebrunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschala Kellergasse Pinkelstein f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschala Kellergasse Pinkelstein e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sehr schöne Serie! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 25 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:56, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a bit sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

der komische Himmel

File:Nappersdorf Kellergasse 31-temp.png

Bildausschnitt zur Demonstration

Hallo, möglicherweise habe ich es schonmal gefragt: Wie bearbeitest du deine Bilder? Nimmst du die RAWs (.NEF) oder arbeitest du mit den JPGs? Auch bei deiner aktuellen Nominierung (File:Nappersdorf_Kellergasse_31.jpg) sind wieder komische Streifen im Himmel, die für mich darauf hindeuten, dass da was schiefgelaufen ist. Je nach Monitorhelligkeit und Auflösung mag das nicht auffallen, ich sehe es aber schon, und deutlicher wird es, wenn man die Heilligkeit reduziert (z.B. mit IrfanView die Gammakorrektur runtersetzen). Ich will dich nicht ärgern, bin aber gegen das gegenseitige durchwinken und für die Verbesserung von behebbaren Qualitätsmängeln. Gruß --Magnus (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Magnus, danke für Deine Anmerkungen. Meine Fotos bearbeite ich im jpg-Format mit PhotoImpact und ich kann beim besten Willen nirgendwo einen „komischen Himmel“ entdecken. Und wenn Du an einem Foto etwas zu beanstanden hast, dann ist es durchaus in Ordnung, das im Review auch zum Ausdruck zu bringen. Du ärgerst mich damit keineswegs, auch wenn ich im konkreten Fall keinen Mangel finde, den ich beheben könnte. Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem „Bundesland der 1.100 Kellergassen“ --M@nfred (talk) 08:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but please remove the branches in the air.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Johann Jaritz 05:38, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you clone out the think top left? --C messier 17:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)  Done --Manfred Kuzel 06:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Hopefully C messier will agree. --XRay 07:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)  Support I agree. --C messier 16:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Bildstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment:Ausrichtung korrigiert. --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)  CommentRight side of the column seems still tilted to the left --Cvmontuy 18:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment??? --Manfred Kuzel 11:52, 13 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment Er meint, dass die rechte Seite der Säule sich nach links neigt. Das könnte ein Fehler in der Perspektive sein, aber auch an der Säule selbst liegen. --XRay 07:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment Danke XRay! Das liegt eindeutig an der Säule (siehe Ausrichtung der Tafel im Hintergrund!). --Manfred Kuzel 09:41, 20 June 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinweikersdorf Kellergasse Schintagrube.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse Hasengassl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Steinkreuz Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Steinkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nappersdorf Kellergasse 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:10, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 20 2 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --ArildV 05:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 20 2 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:08, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brücke Fladnitzbach Kirchengasse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guntersdorf Pfarrhof Gartenportal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guntersdorf Kirche Grabstein an der Fassade 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 18 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guntersdorf Kirchenfassade Figurennische.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guntersdorf Kirche Grabstein an der Fassade 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vulkan Amikejo EFWachau 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 04:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 04:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a bit sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a bit sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtswarte Engabrunn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieta Bildstock 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems not super sharp (but ok with me) and I think it would be nicer if there were less grass in front (i.e. the whole view shifted a bit up). --Domob 17:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)  DoneThanks for review. New version better? --Manfred Kuzel 06:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)  Support Yes, I think that's good now. Still not super sharp, but I think it is ok. --Domob 06:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dickes Kreuz Neustift im Felde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 30a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AlteKroneVandans2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 03:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 03:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 22a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quaity, but contrast could be improved a bit --Llez 05:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo is somewhat flat. A little more contrast would probably make the photo more expressive. But still good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WrNeustadtAkademieparkBildstock.A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 12:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not super sharp but quality is ok for me. --Domob 19:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not super sharp but quality is ok for me. --Domob 19:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:03, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Hundsleiten a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. The walls are convex. I assume that this is actually the case.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Die rechte Seite sollte auch senkrecht sein. --Ermell 07:04, 10 July 2019 (UTC)  Done Danke für das Review, neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 08:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 6 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Die rechte Tür müßte auch senkrecht sein. Das Auto würde ich weglassen, das stört enorm. --Ermell 12:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)  Done Danke für das Review. Die rechte Tür habe ich ausgerichtet. Das Auto möchte ich aus 2 Gründen nicht entfernen. 1., würde ich damit auch einen Teil eines relativ seltenen derartigen Doppelbauwerkes entfernen und 2., ist ein Fahrzeug oder ein Mensch ein Zeichen dafür, daß in manchen Kellergassen, die oftmals nur noch aus verfallenen Objekten bestehen oder zumindest dem Verfall preisgegeben sind, doch noch menschliche Aktivitäten zu bemerken sind. --Manfred Kuzel 15:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)  Support o.k. --Ermell 20:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ich würde die Tür genau senkrecht stellen und das Auto rechts weglassen. --Ermell 12:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)  Done Danke für das Review! Neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 14:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 03:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 03:17, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 03:17, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 03:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grund Kellertrift 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But the image could be sharper. (Das Bild könnte ein wenig schärfer sein.) --XRay 05:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The branches top right are a little bit dusturbing. The image could be sharper. (Der Zweig oben rechts stört ein wenig und das Bild könnte ein wenig schärfer sein.) --XRay 05:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mechelen, standbeeld van Margaretha van Oostenrijk IMG 0072 2019-06-23 11.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Am Kirchenweg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Das Bild neigt sich nach rechts. --Ermell 06:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)  Done Danke für den Hinweis, Ausrichtung korrigiert. --Manfred Kuzel 07:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:30, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not very sharp and the sky is blown, but ok for me. --Domob 15:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not very sharp and the sky is blown, but ok for me. --Domob 15:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Shadows are a little bit too dark. --XRay 05:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 05:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse BogengasseMühlberggasse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 05:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:45, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kaiser Franz Josef Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Pfarrhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hart-Aschendorf Weinbau Pamperl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The deck chairs' position is a bit unfortunate, but overall good. --MB-one 09:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purbach Kellergasse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Dmitry Makeev 08:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sauschädelessen 2019 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberretzbach Kellergasse Niederfladnitzer Straße 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberretzbach Kellergasse Niederfladnitzer Straße 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberretzbach Kellergasse Niederfladnitzer Straße 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gediegene Serie. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Silberberg 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Silberberg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Silberberg 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Silberberg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Silberberg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Silberberg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberretzbach Kellergasse Niederfladnitzer Straße 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:38, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Schillergasse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is hanging to the right --Michielverbeek 06:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)  Done Danke für das Review, neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 06:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC) Ok --Michielverbeek 07:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:46, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Kellergasse Silberberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Mariensäule Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Mariensäule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altlichtenwarth Pfarrkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hart-Aschendorf Weinbau Pamperl Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FF Altlichtenwarth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitzendorf an der Schmida Friedhof Grabstein Reihe 2.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitzendorf an der Schmida Friedhof Grabstein Reihe 2.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:04, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hart-Aschendorf Weinbau Pamperl Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FF Altlichtenwarth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:48, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:35, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinsierndorf Kellergasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 16 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus Bildstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 16 b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Note: it had been better that you had removed the chairs.--Famberhorst 05:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC) Antwort: NEIN! So sieht es eben Ende März/Anfang April in einer Kellergasse aus. The chairs are part of the “detail”! --Manfred Kuzel 06:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC) OK. that is how you can view it.--Famberhorst 15:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 12 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)  Opposeonly the bushes are focused --Nefronus 10:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 14 und 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus 2 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immendorf Kellergasse Nähe Jägerhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --M@nfred (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schrattenthal Schloss Spitzbogenfenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schrattenthal Schloss Schlosspark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schrattenthal Schloss Schlosspark 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:00, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:00, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstinkenbrunn Kellergasse Tiefer Graben Hinweistafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FF Schalladorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It seems to leening in slightly, but good quality IMO. --Tournasol7 06:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude Lößformation a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Photo could have been a bit sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)  Support Please remove the wite strip on the left side first --Podzemnik 10:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)  Done Danke für den Hinweis, neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 11:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Thank you! --Podzemnik 00:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think that it need a perspective correction. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 August 2019 (UTC)  Done Neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 07:12, 9 August 2019 (UTC)  Support Thank you now is better. --Tournasol7 05:55, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mittergrabern Grabstein 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mittergrabern Grabstein 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mittergrabern Grabstein 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mittergrabern Grabstein 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mittergrabern Grabstein 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude Lößformation b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 52 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 44 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sehr schöne Serie! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with SITENAME and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

QI

Werter Kollege Kuzel, wenn Sie mit mir einen Kampf austragen wollen, dann können wir das gerne machen. Nur zu, Sie können gerne weitere Bilder von mir abqualifizieren, aber bleiben Sie dabei bitte wenigstens sachlich und benennen Sie Fehler, die tatsächlich welche sind! Mit dieser Art können höchstens Sie, und nicht ich, sich lächerlich machen. Wenn Sie ihre eigenen Bildmängel (Streifen, Moiree), für die Sie nur wenig können und die sich durch Ihre Kamera begründen, nicht sehen, dann tut es mmir leid. Ich könnte noch viele weitere Ihrer Bilder wegen mangelnder Schärfe und/oder mangelnden Kontrasts abqualifizieren, unterlasse dies aber bewusst, weil ich Kollegen nicht die Freude am Fotografieren nehmen will. Sie wissen ja auch wo WMAT ist und wo Sie sich eine gute Kamera leihen können und gute Bildbearbeitungsprogramme gibt es im Internet auch kostenlos. Ich habe kein Problem damit, wenn nicht jedes meiner Bilder ein QI ist. Ich scheide selbst genug Bilder aus, weil sie in meinen Augen Mängel haben. Freundliche Grüße --Steindy ([[User talk:Steindy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

File:Stetten Kellergasse Neubergweg 8.jpg

Hallo, schneidest du da bitte den blauen Rahmen links und oben weg? Danke. --Magnus ([[User talk:Tsungam|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis Magnus, ich habe eine neue Version hochgeladen, aber der Rand ist immer noch da. Hast Du eine Ahnung, was da die Ursache sein könnte? Sowas ist mir noch nie passiert, Schönes Wochenende und lG--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Ist bei mir jetzt in Ordnung. Vermutlich ist das Bild noch im Browsercache (einmal Strg+F5 bemühen). --Magnus ([[User talk:Tsungam|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Danke, lieber Magnus! Jetzt fotografiere ich schon eine halbe Ewigkeit, aber hier bewahrheitet sich wieder einmal eine alte Weisheit: “Man wird alt wie eine Kuh und lernt immer noch dazu”. Template:Smiley --M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 15 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Section resolved.

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 2 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Ich verstehe kein Wort.--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 9 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Nochmal QIC und komisches Muster im Himmel

Mich hat der Effekt nicht ruhen lassen und ich bin mal einem Verdacht nachgegangen, und mittels de:POV-Ray konnte ich einen ähnlichen Effekt nachstellen. Ich habe dazu einen "Bayer-Filter" simuliert und den mit einem leicht schräg gstellten und verkippten Raster überlagert (Man hätte auch das Raster gerade lassen und den "Filter" verkippen können, gleicher Effekt). Bild in 100% Größe anzeigen lassen, sonst gibt es wieder andere Interferenzen mit der verwendeten Bildschirmauflösung. Wenn mein Verdacht stimmt, wäre das leider ein ganz großer Sch.... mit deiner Kamera, wenn nämlich der dem Sensor vorgelagerte Filter eine winzige Kleinigkeit schief draufsitzen würde. Ist die Kamera mal hingefallen? Oder unsachgemäß gereinigt worden? --Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Mühe Smial! Ich kann mir nicht erklären, was da passiert sein könnte, denn die Kamera ist weder hingefallen noch habe ich etwas im Bereich des Sensors gereinigt. Sie ist so eingestellt, daß beim Einschalten eine automatische Sensorreinigung erfolgt. Wird mir nichts anderes übrigbleiben als daß ich mir einen renommierten Händler suche und die Kamera zum Service gebe. LG--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Ich drücke dir die Daumen, daß es kein wirtschaftlicher Totalschaden ist, also sinnvoll reparierbar. --Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Morgen ist die Kamera aus der Reparatur zurück, offenbar wurde nur der Sensor gereinigt (etwas über € 60.- und daher kein wirtschaftlicher Totalschaden), aber mittlerweile vermutet Magnus (siehe “Probleme mit Deinen Bildern auf QI”), daß es sich hier eher um ein Problem mit der Bearbeitungssoftware handeln dürfte, mit der ich seit dem Beginn meiner Fototätigkeit für WP arbeite. Faktum ist aber, daß ich mittlerweile schon so sauer bin, daß ich mir ernstlich überlege, die ganze QI-Nominierung an den Nagel zu hängen. Viele meiner bereits als QI promoteten Fotos, bei denen also zunächst offenbar keine Mängel festgestellt wurden, sind offensichtlich ganz systematisch zur Zielscheibe von “Nachbesichtigungen” mit entsprechender Kritik geworden, die ich nicht nachvollziehen kann, weil ich die Fehler einfach nicht ausmachen kann. Mit freundlichen Grüßen--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:14, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Daß es auch ein Softwareproblem sein könnte, hatte ich ganz am Anfang, als das Drama sichtbar wurde, schon einmal angemerkt (irgendwo in den Archiven verschwunden), bzw. nach dem Workflow gefragt. --Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:PingBei der Revision wurde nicht einmal der Sensor gereinigt, sondern nur die ganze Kamera durchgecheckt und mit dem Befund “alles OK” zurückgeschickt. Offenbar handelt es sich also - wie von Dir auch vermutet - um ein Softwareproblem. Ich habe jüngst die Originale einiger beanstandeter Fotos mit einer anderen Software nachbearbeitet und sie wurden dann als QI gewertet. Zwei Fragen beschäftigen mich dennoch:

1. Warum kann ich die Fehler auf meinem Monitor nicht sehen, obwohl sie mehrfach speziell gekennzeichnet wurden und warum geht es anderen Benutzern genauso?
2. Wie ist es möglich, daß eine Software (PhotoImpact XL) von 2013 bis 2017 perfekt funktioniert hat und dann - zunächst in Einzelfällen, dann immer öfter - fehleranfällig wurde?

Hast Du dafür eine befriedigende Erklärung oder zumidest eine stichhaltige Vermutung?

Freundliche Grüße--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

<einmisch> Ulead wurde von Corel aufgekauft, die es aber nicht weiterentwickeln sondern eingehen lassen, sowas ist üblich. Marktführer Freehand wurde von Adobe gekauft, um das eigene Produkt InDesign am Markt zu platzieren. Corel will sein PaintShop verkaufen und hat sich mittels Kauf von PhotoImpact eines Konkurrenten entledigt. Meine Glaskugel sagt, daß selbst Corel nicht mehr lange Bestand am Markt haben wird. --Ralf Roletschek 11:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC) jetzt erst entdeckt... https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulead_PhotoImpact

Ich kann keine der Fragen beantworten, ohne wild herumzuspekulieren. Ich habe kein Photo Impact und auch keine andere Software, mit der ich Nikon RAW bearbeiten könnte. Kann das Szenario folglich nicht bei mir nachstellen. Daß das ein reines Softwareproblem sein könnte, hat Magnus herausgefunden durch vorher - nachher Vergleich. --Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:23, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Am Sonnabend bin ich bei Calumet zur Hausmesse, da sind Experten der großen Hersteller anwesend. Ich werde mal fragen, ob sie eine Erklärung dafür haben. Betrifft das die 5300? Ich könnte dir auch mal eine garantiert streifenfreies Bild von mir schicken, die du wie gewohnt bearbeitest? Vielleicht sollten wir hier oder auf Wikiversity eine Seite zu dem mysteriösen Thema anlegen... Aber selbst wenn wir die Quelle gefunden haben, sagt das noch nichts darüber aus, warum du es nicht siehst. Das wäre auch noch zu klären. --Ralf Roletschek 17:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Ralf Roletschek! Das Problem an sich scheint ja mittlerweile geklärt zu sein. Da die 5300 vom Nikon-Service als OK gecheckt wurde, bleibt als Ursache nur die Nachbearbeitungssoftware. Fraglich ist eigentlich nur noch, wie es möglich ist, daß eine Software von 2013 bis 2017 einwandfrei funktionieren kann um sich von da an laufend zu verschlechtern (erst wenige Fehler, dann immer mehr) und warum nicht nur ich keine Streifen am Himmel sehe, sondern mehrere andere auch, die zunächst Fotos als QI qualifiziert haben, ehe sie nachträglich von einem anderen Benutzer beanstandet wurden. Ein klassisches Beispiel ist die Diskussion über “File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_44.jpg” auf der Seite der QI-Nominierungen. Das sind die beiden Kernfragen, für die ich keine Erklärung habe. Ein schönes Wochenende und lG--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Section resolved

Probleme mit Deinen Bildern auf QI

Moin Manfred! Ich habe jetzt seit einiger Zeit gesehen, dass Du oft QI Nominierungen nicht durchbekommst, weil auf den Bildern Streifen/Muster sind. Du meinst dann regelmäßig, Du könntest sie nicht erkennen. Leider sind die aber auf den Bildern vorhanden. Ich finde sie immer, wenn sie angesprochen sind. Manchmal mehr, manchmal weniger. Und zB bei dem Bild File:Kirche Arbing.jpg extrem deutlich im Himmel. Irgendwas liegt da im argen und Du solltest unbedingt nach der Ursache forschen. Hast Du die Kamera gewechselt oder eine andere Software benutzt? Hast du sonst etwas geändert? Vergleiche das bitte unbedingt mal mit älteren QIs von Dir. Wenn Du nichts änderst, wirst Du viele Nominierungen abgelehnt bekommen. Falls ich irgendwie helfen kann, sag Bescheid. Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:28, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Lieber Dirtsc, danke für Deine Nachricht. Offenbar hat die Kamera ein Sensorproblem, weshalb sie bereits bei der Sensorreinigung bzw. Generalüberholung in der Werkstatt ist. Was ich allerdings nicht verstehe, das ist die Tatsache, daß ich auf meinem Bildschirm die beanstandeten Verunreinigungen fast nie ausmachen kann.

Meine noch aus der Vergangenheit stammenden Fotos werde ich weiter nominieren und muß in Kauf nehmen, daß sie abgelehnt werden. Da ich - wie oben erwähnt - nicht feststellen kann, ob sie fehlerhaft sind, kann ich mangelhafte Fotos vor der Nominierung leider auch nicht ausscheiden und werde zu beanstandeten Fotos auch keine Stellungnahme mehr abgeben. Alle künftigen Fotos, die ich nach erfolgter Reparatur der Kamera machen werde, sollten dann - so hoffe ich - in Ordnung sein. Mit freundlichen Güßen --M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Es gibt einen Schnelltest, der zumindest in gleichförmigen Bildbereichen die Streifen deutlich sichtbar macht: Im Irfanview in einem verdächtigen Bereich mit möglichst geringen Helligkeitsunterschieden mit der Maus einen Rahmen aufziehen, dann im Menü Image "Auto adjust colors" klicken. Oder Tasten Shift+U drücken. Wenn kein ausreichend gleichförmiger Bereich zu finden ist, halt zufuß an den Helligkeits- und Kontrastreglern zuppeln. Das "Ergebnis" natürlich nicht über das Original drüberspeichern ;-) -- Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:47, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde mir Irfanview beschaffen und das versuchen. Schönes Wochenende und lG--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Solange bis ich selber in der Lage bin, schadhafte Fotos selber zu selektieren, habe ich eine Bitte: Macht das bitte bei den Nominierungen für mich, sichtet meine Fotos und macht nicht viele Umstände wenn Unreinheiten zu sehen sind die nicht behebbar sind, sondern knallt bitte sofort ein „Decline“ drauf. Danke und lG--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Ich kann dir mein Kalibrierungsgerät für deinen Monitor schicken? --Ralf Roletschek 19:24, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Das ist äußerst liebenswürdig von Dir, lieber Ralf, aber mit der Handhabung wäre ich vermutlich überfordert, weil ich mich mit dem technischen Kram nicht auskenne. Schönen Sonntag und liebe Grüße--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Ich bin zunehmend überzeugt, dass das kein primäres Problem der Kamera ist, sondern deines Bearbeitungsprozesses. Als Beispiel: Hier das Originalbild, leicht gekippt, aber ansonsten keine nennenswerten Probleme. Nach der Bearbeitung (übrigens zuweit nach links gedreht) hingegen deutliche Muster im Himmel und an der Wand. Wirf die Software weg, nimm GIMP, wenn es eine günstige Lösung sein soll, oder noch besser: Bearbeite immer die RAW-Fotos (NEF-Dateien) mit einem passenden Programm. Jede zusätzliche Bearbeitung eines JPGs verschlechtert die Qualität. --Magnus ([[User talk:Tsungam|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Sehr interessant. Das könnte m.E. ein entscheidender Hinweis sein. Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:PingTemplate:Ping Gestern habe ich mir die Nachbearbeitungssoftware “Capture NX-D” beschafft, mit dem ich auch Fotos im NEF-Format von Nikon bearbeiten kann, womit die Probleme für die Zukunft hoffentlich behoben sind. Allerdings wird es noch einige Zeit dauern, bis alle bisherigen Fotos, die nicht im NEF-Format zur Verfügung stehen, für QI nominiert sind. Daß dabei ein Teil den Bach runtergeht, muß ich wohl in Kauf nehmen. Was ich allerdings nicht verstehe, warum außer mir noch einige andere Benutzer, die ich als durchaus versiert einschätze, etliche Fotos zunächst positiv beurteilt haben, die erst später von anderen Usern abqualifiziert wurden. Schönen Sonntag und lG--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

P.S.: Könnt ihr Euch bitte die 4 Fotos von heute ansehen, die Peulle innerhalb von 1 Minute (!!) mit “Decline” beurteilt hat. Und was fange ich mit der Aufforderung an, keine Fotos mehr zu nominieren? Immerhin habe ich bis dato weit über 900 QI's.

Bei drei der vier Bilder ist das fragliche Streifenmuster schnell zu erkennen, bei einem dauert es etwas länger. Und da mittlerweile wohl jeder darauf achtet, wird es sicher immer gefunden, wenn es vorhanden ist. In diesen vier Fällen ist es wohl OK, wenn die Nominierung abgelehnt wird. Ich interpretiere Peulle ganz einfach so, dass er Dich bittet, keine Bilder mehr zu nominieren, bei denen der Fehler wahrscheinlich vorhanden sein wird. Ich würde an Deiner Stelle jetzt erstmal keine Bilder bei QI nominieren, die neue Software nutzen und sehen, wie die Ergebnisse werden. Ich würde dabei damit anfangen, die problematischen Bilder vom Original an neu zu bearbeiten und davon neue Versionen hochzuladen. Für die kannst Du dann ja vor der Nominierung bei QI den einen oder anderen "Nutzer deines Vertrauens" bitten, die mal zu überprüfen. Wenn dann jemand wie z.B. Ralf Roletschek, Smial, Tsungam o.ä. den Fehler nicht mehr findet, dann würde ich die Bilder nominieren. Mit allem anderen verärgerst Du wahrscheinlich nur Leute und schädigst Deinen Ruf. Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Dirtsc, ich habe soeben auf der DS von Peulle einen Kommentar hinterlassen. Ich möchte unbedingt wissen, warum bis vor einiger Zeit nahezu alle Nominierungen positiv erledigt werden konnten und erst vor einigen Wochen Probleme aufgetaucht sind, die - wie nun festgestellt wurde - nicht mit dem Sensor und allgemein mit der Kamera in Zusammenhang stehen. Auch die Nachbearbeitungssoftware (Photoumpact XL) verwende ich seit Jahren. Wie soll ich da draufkommen, wenn ich mir bei den beanstandeten Fotos die Aufnahmedaten der Kamera nicht ansehen und mit jenen der qualifizierten Fotos vergleichen kann? Vielen Dank für Deine Bemühungen und freundliche Grüße von einem etwas irritierten und frustrierten--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Um den Fehler vielleicht mal wirklich einzugrenzen, könntest Du mir auch von den vier gerade abgelehnten Bildern die RAWs zur Verfügung stellen und ich bearbeite die mal mit meiner Software. Dann könnte man sehen, ob eine andere Software bei gleichem Ausgangsmaterial vielleicht keine Fehler erzeugt und wäre ein gutes Stück weiter. Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Dirtsc, ich habe meine früheren Fotos leider noch nicht mit dem NEF-Format von Nikon (entspricht dem RAW) aufgenommen, weil ich damals noch keine Software zur Nachbearbeitung von NEF's hatte und bis jetzt mit “Photoimpact XL” gearbeitet habe. Mein erstes Foto wurde am 6. Mai 2012 als QI qualifiziert und in den seither vergangenen über 7 Jahren sind es exakt 929 geworden. Das Problem mit den Streifen ist erstmals vor etwa 2 Jahren aufgetreten und hat sich seither langsam, aber kontinuierlich vergroßert. Waren es zu Beginn nur einzelne Fotos, die beanstandet wurden, so geht heute fast keines mehr als QI durch. Da ich das Problem auf meinem Monitor nicht erkennen kann (und einige andere User auch nicht, die meine Fotos zunächst als QI gewertet haben, ehe sie einer “Nachbeurteilung” durch andere zum Opfer gefallen sind), konnte mittlerweile ausgeschlossen werden, daß es ein Kamera- bzw. Sensorproblem ist. Auch “Photoimpact XL” kann es wohl nicht sein, denn wie sollte sich eine Software plötzlich verändern? In Zukunft werde ich das NEF-Format und zur Nachbearbeitung die Software “Capture NX-D” von Nikon verwenden. Bleiben zunächst 2 Fragen offen:

1. Wo könnte die Ursache für das Problem liegen, das erstmals vor 2 Jahren aufgetreten und sich seither offenbar stetig vergrößert hat und
2. Was mache ich mit den noch vorhandenen und für eine Nominierung vorgesehenen Fotos?

Ich bin Dir jedenfalls sehr dankbar dafür, daß Du Dich mit meinem Problem beschäftigst anstatt mich - wie es manch andere bei den QI-Nominierungen durch die Blume zum Ausdruck bringen - als fotografischen Volltrottel anzusehen. Ich fotografiere immerhin seit meinem 15. Lebensjahr und habe mich stundenlang in der Dunkelkammer aufgehalten, weil ich alle meine Fotos vor Einführung der Farbfotografie selbst ausgearbeitet habe.

Einen schönen Wochenbeginn und freundliche Grüße--M@nfred ([[User talk:Manfred Kuzel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 16 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted} Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Template:Section resolved

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted}

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 217.149.171.95 16:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 217.149.171.95 16:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, BASEPAGENAME! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Template:Section resolved