User talk:Pinigin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:MaksimPinigin)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pinigin.

This is the user talk page of Pinigin, where you can send messages and comments to Pinigin.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pinigin!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Upload test123.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hi MaksimPinigin, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:MaksimPinigin/userinfo.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 6 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 58 character 86: ['query'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_userid + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["userid"] + "<br>");
  2. ISSUE: line 58 character 95: ['users'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_userid + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["userid"] + "<br>");
  3. ISSUE: line 58 character 107: ['userid'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_userid + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["userid"] + "<br>");
  4. ISSUE: line 59 character 89: ['query'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_globalid + "</b> " + gdata["query"]["globalallusers"][0]["id"] + "<br>");
  5. ISSUE: line 59 character 98: ['globalallusers'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_globalid + "</b> " + gdata["query"]["globalallusers"][0]["id"] + "<br>");
  6. ISSUE: line 59 character 119: ['id'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_globalid + "</b> " + gdata["query"]["globalallusers"][0]["id"] + "<br>");
  7. ISSUE: line 61 character 90: ['query'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_editscount + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["editcount"] + "<br>");
  8. ISSUE: line 61 character 99: ['users'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_editscount + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["editcount"] + "<br>");
  9. ISSUE: line 61 character 111: ['editcount'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_editscount + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["editcount"] + "<br>");
  10. ISSUE: line 62 character 87: ['query'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_regdate + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["registration"] + "<br>");
  11. ISSUE: line 62 character 96: ['users'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_regdate + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["registration"] + "<br>");
  12. ISSUE: line 62 character 108: ['registration'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_regdate + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["registration"] + "<br>");
  13. ISSUE: line 63 character 86: ['query'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_gender + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["gender"] + "<br>");
  14. ISSUE: line 63 character 95: ['users'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_gender + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["gender"] + "<br>");
  15. ISSUE: line 63 character 107: ['gender'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_gender + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["gender"] + "<br>");
  16. ISSUE: line 64 character 90: ['query'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_usergroups + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["groups"].toString() + "<br>");
  17. ISSUE: line 64 character 99: ['users'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_usergroups + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["groups"].toString() + "<br>");
  18. ISSUE: line 64 character 111: ['groups'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_usergroups + "</b> " + data["query"]["users"][0]["groups"].toString() + "<br>");
  19. ISSUE: line 65 character 93: ['query'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_globalgroups + "</b> " + gdata["query"]["globalallusers"][0]["groups"].toString() + "<br>");
  20. ISSUE: line 65 character 102: ['globalallusers'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_globalgroups + "</b> " + gdata["query"]["globalallusers"][0]["groups"].toString() + "<br>");
  21. ISSUE: line 65 character 123: ['groups'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: $("#userinfobody").append("<b>" + pui_globalgroups + "</b> " + gdata["query"]["globalallusers"][0]["groups"].toString() + "<br>");

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:05, 26 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

editToken[edit]

Hello MaksimPinigin. I just wanted to let you know that editToken is deprecated, and you still use it in one or more of your userspace scripts. If you want your user script(s) to work properly, please replace editToken with csrfToken in source code of the scripts. You'll need to change the following script(s):

Regards, Ahmadtalk 21:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]