User talk:Madelgarius/archives 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Copyright status: File:Acte de décès d'Adrien Canelle - 1874 - actes de décès, Amsterdam.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Acte de décès d'Adrien Canelle - 1874 - actes de décès, Amsterdam.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Acte de décès d'Adrien Canelle - 1874 - actes de décès, Amsterdam.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014) (Remini enhanced).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014) (Remini enhanced).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014) (Remini enhanced).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 06:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014) (Remini enhanced).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014) (Remini enhanced).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Auteur inconnu. Rien ne précise que c'est un photomaton. Copyvio manifeste (source ː simple site web n'exposant aucune autorisation)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Benoît (d) 06:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 06:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Auteur inconnu. Rien ne précise que c'est un photomaton. Copyvio manifeste (source ː simple site web n'exposant aucune autorisation)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Benoît (d) 06:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 06:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Simone Bartel (1922-2014).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Auteur inconnu. Rien ne précise que c'est un photomaton. Copyvio manifeste (source ː simple site web n'exposant aucune autorisation)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Benoît (d) 06:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Camille Bourgault ca1953-(Remini and human enhanced).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Camille Bourgault ca1953-(Remini and human enhanced).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Camille Bourgault ca1953-(Remini and human enhanced).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 06:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Camille Bourgault ca1953-(Remini and human enhanced).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Camille Bourgault ca1953-(Remini and human enhanced).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Camille Bourgault ca1953-(Remini and human enhanced).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 06:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Raissa Bloch (1898-1943).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Raissa Bloch (1898-1943).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Raissa Bloch (1898-1943).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 06:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Benita von Falkenhayn (1900-1935) (original).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Benita von Falkenhayn (1900-1935) (original).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Benita von Falkenhayn (1900-1935) (original).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 06:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benita von Falkenhayn (1900-1935) (original).jpg[edit]

File:Benita von Falkenhayn (1900-1935) (original).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franse-chansonkunstenaars-in-scheveningen-0f3882-640.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Madelgarius,

Je jetais un œil sur tes contributions car je cherchais le bandeau que tu avais créé pour les retouches avec l'IA car je pense créer un modèle basé dessus.

Une remarque concernant ton dernier import : l'upscaling avec l'IA n'était pas nécessaire sur ce fichier, les photos de la collection de l'Nationaal Archief sont toutes disponibles en haute résolution sur leur site nationaalarchief.nl, j'ai dû cependant ruser, en tapent « Katharina Renn » ou « Simone Bartel » je ne trouvais rien, mais en tapant le lieu « Scheveningen » et en filtrant par photographe, j'ai fini par la trouver. C'est cependant une exception, normalement on arrive à les trouver facilement.

Aussi je remarque que le bandeau n'était pas présent, un oubli ?

Cordialement. Thibaut (talk) 13:18, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thibaut Ce serait vraiment super pour le modèle. Tu trouveras des exemples de ces bandeaux dans la catégorie de maintenance Category:Remini.ai retouched pictures. Pour celle-ci, ce n'est pas vraiment un oubli, c'est de la désinvolture tant j'ai été meurtri ces derniers temps tant sur WD que WP ou Commons (je suis un retour de banni, on propose à la suppression mes illustrations en mesure de rétorsion par rapport à tout autre chose, on m'accuse de harcèlement...) bref. Je dois me zénifier par rapport à tout cela. Si tu crées le modèle, peux-tu me laisser un lien ici pour que je sois informé ? bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 13:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anecdote aujourd'hui[edit]

Madel

Bonsoir, pourrais tu me dire, s'il te plait, s'il y a d'autres photos de Nicole Girard-Mangin, et si l'on peut dater la photo de France Tv plus précisément (moi je la verrais avant sa mobilisation) Amicalement, Mike Coppolano (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Mike, voir la catégorie: Category:Nicole Girard-Mangin pour les autres photos. C'est laquelle celle de France TV ? bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai trouvé la photographie dont tu parles. Selon moi, puisqu'elle est en uniforme, ce portrait a été fait entre 1914 et 1918. S'il s'agit d'un uniforme anglais modifié ce serait plutôt vers 1914, s'il est bien français, cela nous rapprocherait plutôt 1918. Mais ce pourrait aussi bien être 1919, lorsqu'elle faisait des conférence sur le rôle des femmes dans la guerre... Mais certainement pas avant son enrôlement en tout cas. bien à toi, --Madelgarius (talk) 06:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pour l'anecdote voici celle où on la voit sauver des vies File:Nicole-Girard-Mangin-premiere-femme-medecin-sur-le-front.jpg], son métier de médecin et ces braves infirmières. Bonne journée à toi. Mike Coppolano (talk) 06:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC) En fait cette photo est mal légendé par Commons cf En 1917, les autorités la promeuvent médecin-capitaine et lui proposent la direction de l’hôpital-école Édith-Cavell (Paris). Désormais en charge de la formation des infirmières auxiliaires, elle continue son travail de médecin-chirurgien. Dès lors, Nicole assiste aux réunions de la Croix-Rouge américaine pour la lutte anti-tuberculose, milite à l’Union des femmes françaises et participe à la création de la ligue contre le cancer. À l’Armistice, elle ne reçoit pourtant ni décoration, ni honneurs. Pourrais tu légender s'il te plait la photo, où on la voit en uniforme ? A plus Madel Mike Coppolano (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anecdote René Maran[edit]

Bonjour Madel
Pourrais tu s'il te plaît télécharger cet image ? c'est pour l'article de Réné Maran. Bonne journée Mike Coppolano (talk) 03:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Mike, elle est déjà sur commons : File:René Maran-1923.jpg. A+ --Madelgarius (talk) 05:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike voici une version retouchée par une IA : A+ --Madelgarius (talk) 06:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci ami,
Ahem, c'est de ma faute. Je n'ai pas assez détaillé : La coupure de presse où l'on voit son portrait à l'occasion de la réception de son Goncourt. Bonne journée, Mike Coppolano (talk) 06:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cela n'arrange rien le traitement par IA (Il a un oeil de blanchi et sa peau) Personnellement, je sais qu'il y a un bonze (dont j'ai oublié le nom) très côté aux USA qui organise des sessions dans son monastères et qui attire les gens de la Silicone Valley, pour que l'IA soit contrôlé. Mais si ce truc l'IA met un jour la main sur les ogives nucléaires, on est foutus. J'observe Bard et je ne le trouve pas intelligent. Il se plante parmi les questions Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Grrr Clin. Cette photographie dont tu parles ne sera versée au domaine public qu'en 2034. Elle a été prise par Albert Harlingue qui est mort en 1964. Son fond a été repris par l'agence Roger-Viollet... du coup... --Madelgarius (talk) 07:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oui je comprends tes réserves par rapport aux IA n'empêche, voici un avant après des deux photographies... Et il n'y a pas photo pour déterminer celle qui présente la meilleure qualité (puis je suis également intervenu pour régler les blancs et les noirs) --Madelgarius (talk) 07:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je viens de faire un tour sur la Toile : Une personne atteinte de la maladie de Charcot retrouve l'usage de la parole grâce à l'IA ok, totalement pour !!! De même que les scanners sont de plus en plus rapides (5 minutes et hop) 2/ Pour la photo, je suis plus dubitatif, si ces retouches IA altèrent la perception même ... (René Maran sur la photo retouchée louche terriblement) Pourrais-tu me montrer qqs exemples ? avant /après Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike, voir ici, dans la section qui traite des retouches par IA puis tu peux regarder cette catégorie Commons en cliquant sur l'une d'entre elle tu auras le lien vers la photographie initiale. A+ --Madelgarius (talk) 07:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Madel, C'est pas la panacée en sciences humaines. Bonne journée Mike Coppolano (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

é

cher Madel technicien de L'IA[edit]

L'anecdote sur Nicole Girard-Mangin est accepté. Pourrais-tu coloriser Nicole avec l'IA ? Il y a une très belle photo colorisée d'elle assise à son bureau Bonne journée, Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Mike, Quand parait l'anecdote ? Suis dans un train j'trouve pas comment signer. Bètchoux 2A02:A020:4D:8468:1:0:4B31:D196 09:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike :
  • version colorisée à la main
    version colorisée à la main
  • crop et retouche par une IA
    crop et retouche par une IA

--Madelgarius (talk) 08:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

L'uniforme est bleu (bleu garance) ici. Si tu peux coloriser la photo où elle pose et regarde l'objectif. La première dont nous avons parlé celle là Ce qu'il fait chaud dans l'Aube] ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Salut Mike Non, certainement pas bleu (navy) mais celui d'officier de l'armée de terre qui, après recherche n'était pas kaki tirant vers le vert mais kaki tirant vers le brun. Je ne parviens pas à trouver l'image dont tu me parles, google tourne, tourne mais l'illustration n'apparait pas, tu peux me mettre un lien commons ? a+ --Madelgarius (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
px=200
La photo entière https://archives.defense.gouv.fr/actualites/articles/verdun-2016-nicole-girard-mangin-medecin-de-guerre-malgre-eux.html#:~:text=%C3%80%2041%20ans%2C%20en%201919,de%20soigner%20chez%20les%20autres. Mike Coppolano (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike,
px=200
--Madelgarius (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tu es doué Madel. Merci Mike Coppolano (talk) 03:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

La photo de l'infobox[edit]

Rebonjour Madel,

Il faudrait cette photo en infobox là Madel comme sur la wiki espagnole (infobox) où l'on voit ses belles mains qui ont sauvés tant de vies photo ici Bonne soirée Mike Coppolano (talk) 16:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oui, je suis également le téléverseur de cette "photographie", je mets les guillemets parce que c'est à l'origine un dessin fait d'après cette photographie et je ne retrouve plus la trace du dessin originel que j'avais déjà passablement modifié, du coup, cette image est probablement la moins représentative de Nicole Girard-Mangin mais je vais regarder à ce que je pourrais faire... --Madelgarius (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Madel, bonjour et la couleur des uniformes sur cette photo de groupe (le flash) Mike Coppolano (talk) 03:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC) pas représentative : si c'est très bien dessiné, enfin tu vois ... Mais on voit ses mains[reply]
Salut Mike Peux-tu me donner l'hyperlien pour "la couleur des uniformes sur cette photo de groupe (le flash)" ? --Madelgarius (talk) 08:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je présumai qu'il y avait eu un flash lors de la prise de la photo. Mike Coppolano (talk) 04:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery[edit]

@Mike

  • nouvel upload de l'original avec une meilleure résolution
    nouvel upload de l'original avec une meilleure résolution
  • Original amélioré par Remini.ai
    Original amélioré par Remini.ai
  • Original colorisé à la main
    Original colorisé à la main
  • Original amélioré par Remini.ai et colorisée à la main
    Original amélioré par Remini.ai et colorisée à la main

Excellent travail, mais ce ?! Mike Coppolano (talk) 03:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Il y a changement de couleur d'uniforme Mike Coppolano (talk) 04:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bleu horizon

Ce n'est qu'en >>> "Début 1917, le gouvernement français découvre que l'armée allemande avait développé des moyens de repérages optiques permettant de faire ressortir le bleu horizon lors de ses observations. Afin de remédier à cet inconvénient, un nouveau drap de laine dit « Gris Canon » fut mis en essai à partir de 1917 jusqu'en 1921. Il était destiné à remplacer le bleu horizon (reconnu trop visible). Ce projet bénéficiait du soutient actif de Georges Clemenceau, alors ministre de la Guerre et président du Conseil." Mike Coppolano (talk) 04:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Mike, Nicole Girard Mangin, de son propre aveu, n'a jamais porté, toute la guerre durant, l'uniforme français (ni le garance, ni le bleu horizon). La raison est simple, il n'y avait tout simplement pas d'uniforme pour les femmes. En revanche les britanniques en disposait. Voici à quoi ressemblait les uniformes des Tommies. Je comprends que d'aucuns aient pu penser que puisqu'elle était une militaire française de la WWI, il fallait la coloriser en bleu... Mais c'est aller trop vite en besogne. bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 07:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Et si c'est de la toile qui confectionne un uniforme certes de coupe britannique, mais non coloré. Puis affectée à Nicole, puis coloré en bleu. Je ne suis plus sur de rien. Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC) note = Pourquoi lui aurait-on mis un uniforme proche de la couleur des uniformes allemands ?[reply]
Oh Mike, tu l'as rêvée très fort en bleu garance, elle n'en porta jamais, les troupes britanniques avaient des uniformes dans les tons que je t'ai montré ce qui lui fit dire : [...] «j’aurai un sourire amusé pour mon accoutrement singulier». Singuliers, ils l'étaient par leur coupe anglaise, par leur couleur et par les écussons qu'ils portaient et qui, eux, étaient bien français. on lui mettrait pas une belle grosse moustache de poilu aussi ? --Madelgarius (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Puis elle portait la casquette plate des officier britannique, sur un uniforme garance s'eut été du plus bel effet ! --Madelgarius (talk) 08:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
sur cette photographie que je t'ai déjà montrée, même en niveau de gris, on voit bien la différence entre le garance des officiers et son uniforme. Or le dessin qui nous occupe est tiré de cette photographie-là. --Madelgarius (talk) 08:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 11:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aérostat Giffard[edit]

Bonjour Madel, Si tu pouvais enregistrer ces deux mots Aérostat Giffard et les mettre dans l'article (ce petit haut-parleur avec écrit écouter) ? moi même j'ai tendance à le prononcer Guiffard. Si tu as le temps. Merci mille fois pour les revues sur Kalinine. Bonne journée Mike Coppolano (talk) 06:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Mike, j'ignore totalement comment faire cela. --Madelgarius (talk) 06:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai bien vu la page Albert Einstein, mais ils ne sont pas français de langue maternelle Mike Coppolano (talk) 06:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
pour le Wiktionnaire et concernant les injecteurs, il faut dire Giffard ( \ʒi.faʁ\ ). --Madelgarius (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)--Madelgarius (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Madel pour les infos, tu pourrais m'écrire en écriture phonétique Aérostat Giffard en entier et aussi Henri Giffard Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Voici :
Aérostat Giffard, \a.e.ʁɔs.ta ʒi.faʁ\
Henri Giffard, \ɑ̃.ʁi ʒi.faʁ\
A+ --Madelgarius (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci ajouté dans les articles (Je m'occupe de Kalinine, enfin) Mike Coppolano (talk) 05:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je reviens, je n'ai que la première page de la lettre ordonnant l'éxécution. Mike Coppolano (talk) 05:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Mike après vérification, la source ne propose que cet extrait, A+ --Madelgarius (talk) 08:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci à toi. Bonne journée. Amitiés, Mike Coppolano (talk) 05:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irène de Trébert[edit]

Bonjour Madel, Si tu pouvais importer des photos de Irène de Trébert (si on la voyait danser ...) Amitiés, je file Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Mike après quelques recherches, je n'en ai trouvé aucune qui serait libre de droit. Si tu as une piste je veux bien y regarder à nouveau mais elle est décédée en 1996, ce qui nous amène à 2064+les cinq années de guerre, 2069 pour que l'ensemble de son œuvre soit placée dans le PD. Pour ce qui est de photographies, ce sont des studios tels qu'Harcourt ou d'autres dont le copyright est toujours en vigueur. Bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci d'avoir regardé. Bonsoir Madel, Mike Coppolano (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

De Gaulle / On change pas d'époque[edit]

Pourrais tu m'envoyer cet article cher Madel ? Bonne journée à toi. Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

T'as vu cet article ? Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mike Oh, merci du partage, c'est un aspect de lui dont j'ignorais tout ! Je t'ai envoyé le chapitre en question, bon WE --Madelgarius (talk) 08:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
En fait, je voudrais faire une anecdote comme quoi, il est allé à la messe à Moscou en 1944, puis il y est retourné lors d'une autre visite en 1966 (si tu as des idées) Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike, genre :

De Gaulle, ses principes, ses exceptions...[edit]

Le Président de Gaulle qui avait installé une petite chapelle privée à l'Elysée n'a jamais communié publiquement en France par respect pour la laïcité de l'Etat. En Russie, en revanche, il lui est arrivé de le faire en vertu de la liberté de culte (ou exerçant par là sa liberté de culte).

bon, peut-être un peu long... Bon dimanche ! --Madelgarius (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Madel ! Bon dimanche également Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ben, tu pourrais créer Chapelle de l'Elysée ?! Mike Coppolano (talk) 05:36, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
C'est faisable ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike je regarde à ça Clin--Madelgarius (talk) 08:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Palais de l'Elysée § Chapelle --Madelgarius (talk) 08:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vas y, je ne peux pas rester assis longtemps, je suis sous opium Mike Coppolano (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Michel Langevin et autres martyrs[edit]

Au secours, tu pourrais aggrandir cet acte de baptême, que l'on puisse le lire. S'il y a retouché par une IA ce serait smart. C'est pour l'article Jean-Michel Langevin. Quand à moi, je vais d'examens et de toubibs en toubibs. Amitiés Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike T'aurais pas oublié un hyperlien ou le lieu et la date de naissance pour que je puisse consulter l'archive source ? bàt --Madelgarius (talk) 13:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse, dans cet article Mike Coppolano (talk) 13:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike voici, meilleure résolution, légère rotation et suppression de certaines ecritures parasites en périphérie ou provenant du verso. Je n'ai pas pu écraser le document d'H2O du coup j'ai du en uploder un autre. bàt. Tu me changes les idées du bistro... Prends soin de toi. --Madelgarius (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup ! Bon ap ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pour cet article, pourrais tu trouver des images du séminaire Saint-Firmin ? Bonne journée, Mike Coppolano (talk) 05:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Mike, il y a celle-ci : --Madelgarius (talk) 07:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC) et @Mike la seconde, une photographie de 1910 :[reply]
Ancien séminaire Saint-Firmin, rue des écoles, 2 à Paris photographié en février 1910.

Je suis sous opium, c'est te dire si je souffre Mike Coppolano (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike, oh merde Mike si tu le souhaites on peut échanger par mail. N'hésite pas, bien à toi, --Madelgarius (talk) 17:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je souffre un peu moins, mais je suis toujours sous opium. Pourrais-tu me dire toi et l'IA qui sont ces deux religieuses ?

. Merci Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Mike, il s'agit de Marie-Anne Vaillot et Odile-Baumgarten, martyrs d'Angers. Bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 08:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Autre chose et bon dimanche à toi ! :-) Pourrais tu me dire quel est le séminaire Saint-Firmin (car les deux photographies sont assez dissemblables. A plus Madel ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike, C'est pourtant le même bâtiment, le croquis est peut-être approximatif, ou les façades ont été reprises au XIXe siècle... Bàt et bon dimanche également, --Madelgarius (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci à toi. Bonne semaine Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosaparks (Remini enhanced).jpg[edit]

File:Rosaparks (Remini enhanced).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Belbury (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marie-Anne Vaillot et Odile Baumgarten[edit]

Je suis hyper embêté, je ne retrouve plus dans mes pages de brouillon, l'article consacré à ces religieuses. Si tu pouvais faire qqchose (la douleur !) Salut Madel Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Martyrs d'Angers ? Tu es allé chez un ostéopathe ? Il y a deux ans, j'avais deux nerfs coincés entre des vertèbres et plus aucune mobilité au niveau des cervicales, je souffrais le martyr (d'Angers). Après une séance, j'étais décoincé, la deuxième, retour complet à la normale. Bon, c'est pas super agréable comme manip mais ça soulage ! bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pas la page sur les Martyrs d'Angers mais dans mon espace personnel, dans mes brouillons. Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike j'ai consulté l'ensemble de tes sous-pages, pas l'ombre d'une trace... --Madelgarius (talk) 08:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai bien écrit un brouillon intitulé Marie-Anne Vailot et Odile Baumgarten Mike Coppolano (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Pas sur WP en tout cas, sur aucune de tes sous-pages... --Madelgarius (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moi, j'ai pas rêvé. De retour de blocage, j'ai travaillé cet article sur une de mes sous-pages Mike Coppolano (talk) 15:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike je n'en disconviens pas, peut-être t'es-tu fait sucrer pour copyvio ? j'sé pas moi Mike... --Madelgarius (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je savais qu'il y avait des copyvios DANS mon brouillon, je ne l'aurais jamais mis en ligne ainsi ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ouf, retrouvé grâce à un super JohnNewton8, l'admin sympa Lire ici Mike Coppolano (talk) 16:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Rhoo, c'est à cause de l'espace avant le slash qu'il n'apparait pas dans tes sous pages... (bon à retenir) Template:Diable --Madelgarius (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonne journée ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Re un ch'ti coup de main, il s'agit de légender du nom de leur auteur Jean-Claude Pertuzé (aka Morburre) les dessins ici Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cela serait lui rendre justice après la claque qu'il s'est pris pour le dessin de Kurt Gerstein. Souvent, je me dis que Wikipédia est une machine qui broie des vies Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC) note : dessin de Kurt Gertein présent sur la Wikipédia en hébreu + https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KGerstein.jpg?uselang=fr[reply]
Aide moi à légender les dessins de Morburre (trop mal + opium) Mike Coppolano (talk) 13:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pas sûr de comprendre ta demande, j'ai ajouté avecle modèle "extrait" un préambule établissant le lien avec Jean-Claude Pertuzé, tu as vu ? Que faudrait-il ajouter comme légende aux images ? A+ --Madelgarius (talk) 13:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vois mes contributions sur Wikipédia Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Madel, au secours ! Vois sur cet article https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie-Anne_Vaillot_et_Odile_Baumgarten Je n'arrive pas à agrandir l'image Mike Coppolano (talk) 06:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Si tu pouvais m'en télécharger une image de meilleure qualité

Merci Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

up right n'a rien changé Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike ben si, c'est que tu as modifié tes paramètres d'affichage des illustrations quelque part dans tes prefs... --Madelgarius (talk) 09:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tu crois ? Faut aller où dans Préférences, pour remettre ça droit ? Bonne journée à toi Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike peut-être préférences>apparence>taille maximale des images dans les articles, A+ --Madelgarius (talk) 08:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
J'y suis pas arrivé. Au fait t'as essayé de changer le format de l'image avec des px ? Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Si tu pouvais m'avoir qqs photos Mike Coppolano (talk) 19:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Allo, y'a quelqu'un ? (ça va, Madel ?) Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Salut Mike, oui, ça va. Pas trop le temps de contribuer ces temps-ci. J'aimerais mettre en ligne un article pour le 24 (79e anniversaire - massacre de Bande). Et ton épaule, une petit progrès ? Bàt, --Madelgarius (talk) 07:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Salut Madel ! Oui, j'avais vu que tu étais moins présent. Oui, ça va juste un peu mieux. Amitiés, Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonne journée et Noel, Madel ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Joyeux Noël Mike, que cette bonne étoile continue à guider nos pas encore longtemps, Yala ! --Madelgarius (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gardons la bonne étoile
Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonne année ! ça va ? Amitiés Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Salut, @Mike, oui tout va bien, quelques jours à la mer pour la Saint-Sylvestre... Clin --Madelgarius (talk) 10:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Si tu veux bien faire le nécessaire sur Stephen Hawking je croule sous les comprimés d'opium Mike Coppolano (talk) 12:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Madelgarius/archives_2023&oldid=859646907"