User talk:Lutz Fehling

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lutz Fehling!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please experiment in the sandbox

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  Frysk  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−
float 
An edit you made seemed to be a test, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Feel free to visit the community portal if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thank you!

Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker OverlegCA 07:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not advertise on Commons

Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  हिन्दी  日本語  العربية  +/−


Wikimedia Commons has an educational purpose, and is not the place to post promotional links or to advertise. Creating articles, userpages, templates, etc. with promotional text is not permitted, nor is the posting of links anywhere on the Commons in an attempt to advertise a website, product, company, person, or organization. Uploading of company logos, press images, and the like in order to advertise or use them only in promotional material on other wikis is also prohibited, and such images will be deleted if they are found to violate our policies. Recreation of deleted content or continuing to post links or promotional text or files after this warning may result in a block. Thank you for understanding.

Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker OverlegCA 07:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Dear Lutz Fehling,

can you just explain me why you have removed template {{Speedy}}? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker OverlegCA 07:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With this edit you did it again. Could you have a reason why you have removed {{Speedy}}? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker OverlegCA 07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not for Wikipedia articles

Deutsch  English  español  italiano  македонски  português  svenska  +/−


Hello! I noticed that you tried to create a Wikipedia article on Commons. Please note that Commons is not Wikipedia, and does not host encyclopedia content - Commons only hosts media (photographs, videos, etc).

To create a Wikipedia article, please go to Wikipedia's article wizard. You might also find Wikipedia's new contributors' help page useful.

If you have any questions about contributing media to Commons, please see Commons' Help Index, and if necessary ask for help at Commons:Upload help. Thanks.

--Achim (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tok Pisin  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


float 
You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Lutz Fehling, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Dies ist nicht Wikipedia. Hier gibt es keine Artkelseiten. Artikel gehören auf die Wikipedias, z. B. die deutschsprachige oder die englischsprachige. --Achim (talk) 11:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This text violates COM:CSD#G1, COM:CSD#G3, and COM:CSD#G10. When used in userspace, it violates COM:CSD#U3. When used in mainspace, it violates COM:CSD#GA1 and COM:CSD#GA2. It is not acceptable on Wikipedia, either.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me put it this way:

You are other than normal.


Or: (personal attack removed by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker at 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)).

Lutz Fehling Lutz Fehling (talk) 15:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


You have been indefinitely blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Commons for the following reason: vandalism-only account.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

-- Wutsje 17:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wutsje: Thanks, you might also want to look into autoblock due to the user's previous activity as 89.15.238.242, especially the filter log and this German Wikipedia block log.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jeff G, I've now blocked this talk page for this user too and the ip-address for a week. Thanks for notifying me and regards, Wutsje 00:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wutsje: Ter informatie: 89.15.236.92 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log liet gisteren filters afgaan, en ik heb een vermoede dat dit ook dezelfde gebruiker is omdat zowel Lutz Fehling zelf als het eerder genoemde IP-adres door Jeff G. en de door mij genoemde IP zo'n gallerij wouden aanmaken met Lutz Fehling in paginatitel. En daarnaast, het door mij genoemde IP-adres ondertekent ook met Lutz Fehling, terwijl Lutz Fehling zelf ook met zijn eigen naam ondertekent dat ook zichtbaar te zien is in o.a. deze en deze diffs. Tijd om 89.15.236.92 ook eens de bewerkingsrechten voor een week te ontnemen c.f mijn duck test? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker OverlegCA 07:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker, op zichzelf wellicht wel, maar er zijn verder geen bewerkingen meer vandaan gekomen en het lijkt bovendien een dynamische range te zijn (link), dus dan zou het om een symbolisch blok gaan. Het lijkt me niet zo belangrijk. Wutsje 14:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above

Lutz Fehling Lutz Fehling (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "please unblock Lutz Fehling 180.190.91.11 05:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "1) This request was added by an IP; requests need to be made whilst logged in to ensure they are indeed coming from the blocked user and 2) as per below, our policy requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. This request does neither. Further, the unblock template advises "Please note that trolling or otherwise abusing your ability to edit your talk page will result in that ability being revoked." If such vacuous, unresponsive requests continue, or if Lutz Fehling continues to believe "You are other than normal. Or: Shit-bombardement is what you do" to be acceptable comments whilst blocked, that ability will indeed be removed. Эlcobbola talk 17:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Blocking policy reads:

Blocked users are informed that they may request unblocking. They may do this by adding {{unblock|reason for the request}} to their own user talk page. Alternatively, they may request unblocking with an appropriate reason via e-mail to the blocking administrator or another administrator.

An appropriate reason will almost always include one of the following:

* An acknowledgement that the block was appropriate and a credible promise that the behaviour that led to the block will not be repeated
* An explanation of why the block is not appropriate based on this and other relevant policies and guidelines or is likely to be a mistake or an unintended side effect

--Achim (talk) 07:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "username"
Decline reason: "Refer to previous decline. Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

{{LutzFehling}} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 180.190.91.230 (talk) 08:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]