User talk:Loopy30/Archive 2020

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Loopy30!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading iNaturalist images to Wikimedia Commons![edit]

Hello Loopy, thank you for uploading iNaturalist images to Wikimedia Commons. I noticed you uploaded the medium quality version of File:Alfaroa_mexicana.jpg. I added the full resolution version (you can find this one by hitting the 'original' button on iNaturalist), assuming you meant to upload the highest quality version available.

If there are arguments for uploading the medium version instead, just let me know! Deelthx (talk) 13:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Addyme ferrorubella.jpg[edit]

Hi Loopy30, are you sure this is Addyme ferrorubella? It looks different from other pictures I find online (different position of the antemedian line, different postmedian line). Best regards --LamBoet (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LamBoet, as I was not the original observer of this insect, then I am not sure of any visual-only identification without the accompanying DNA sequencing results. However, this image was identified by two biology professors as being Addyme ferrorubella. Other images used for comparison in determining this identification can be found here and here. In these images appear a range of variations of the morphology of the antemedian and postmedian lines. Is there a different species name that you could suggest as an alternative identification for the moth in this image? 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 12:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Loopy30, many thanks for your answer! I don't have documentation to suggest an alternative species, but I trust your sources and your second link is convincing indeed. I just created the species category. Have a nice weekend --LamBoet (talk) 19:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LicenseReview[edit]

Would you consider to add {{LicenseReview}} to your uploads from iNaturalist? It gives a second check of its license, see also Commons:License review. Lymantria (talk) 07:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lymantria, as all 545 images that I have uploaded since the start of the year have been sourced from iNaturalist, could the inclusion of this tag be now added to each file by a bot? For future uploads, could adding this template not be embedded as a feature within the Upload Wizard? And is a "License Review" carried out by an "Image Reviewer" for each file newly uploaded by those users who have not yet been granted the "Autopatrolled" user right? Loopy30 (talk) 11:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My bot is running. Image review is only for images from external sources, and most uploads aren't. It is meant just to ensure they are indeed licensed under a free license. Auto-patrol has nothing to do with it. I do many uploads from external sources myself, and my images are reviewed as well. It would be a pity if they would have to be deleted in a couple of years, because the source is gone and check is not possible. Lymantria (talk) 13:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I can add the template to new uploads (is this correct?). When you say that your bot is running, does that mean that it is now retroactively adding the template to the 545 files that I previously uploaded, or "reviewing their license", or doing something else? My comment on auto patrol was meant to ask if images uploaded by a user without autopatrol would be automatically reviewed for their license applicability without the addition of the LicenseReview template to the file. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 14:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My bot has added {{LicenseReview}} to your previous uploads from inaturalist. Your adding of the template is okay, I would prefer placement directly following the license template. There is no automatic review for non autopatrol users. Best regards, Lymantria (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ctenosaura oaxacana - body 01.jpg[edit]

File:Ctenosaura oaxacana - body 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-nd-4.0

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 16:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anolis concolor head and throat detail.jpg[edit]

File:Anolis concolor head and throat detail.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using arr

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 04:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lepidoblepharis festae.jpg[edit]

File:Lepidoblepharis festae.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using arr

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lepidoblepharis sanctaemartae.jpg[edit]

File:Lepidoblepharis sanctaemartae.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using arr

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lygophis lineatus.jpg[edit]

File:Lygophis lineatus.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using arr

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metriophasma diocles.jpg[edit]

File:Metriophasma diocles.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using arr

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 05:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Osteocephalus planiceps.jpg[edit]

File:Osteocephalus planiceps.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using arr

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nemastylis tenuis cropped.jpg[edit]

File:Nemastylis tenuis cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-sa-4.0

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 21:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/48809590 --MGA73 (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

INaturalist[edit]

Hi! As you know there are many files from INaturalist that is not yet reviewed. If you have time you can help by uploading the original image and requesting a new INaturalistreview. Once the file is reviewed you can revert to the cropped version. --MGA73 (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MGA73, which image are you referring to? Loopy30 (talk) 00:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Oh lol.... I thought you could read my mind ;-) I'm talking about the images in Category:iNaturalist images needing human review. Example File:Anolis mariarum.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 06:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! For files like File:Balaustium leanderi.jpg perhaps you could upload the original file, wait for the bot to review the file and then crop the file? That would save us a lot of time because then we do not have to check the files manually. --MGA73 (talk) 10:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding files from English Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, for moving files originally hosted on English Wikipedia, please refer to Commons:Moving files to Commons, and also consider using one of the tools listed on that page (CommonsHelper can be useful for normal users). This enhances standardization among files. Should you have further questions, please feel free to ask me, thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes files should not be moved manually. But I think FileImporter (also called FileExporter) is better. It's a great way to move files. It will move the file history.

You can use it by adding it from en:Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures on the wiki you wanna move files from. And you can read more about it at mw:Help:Extension:FileImporter. --MGA73 (talk) 10:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 廣九直通車, I didn't know I was moving any files from English Wikipedia to Wikimedia Commons at all. Is this something I am unaware of? Loopy30 (talk) 00:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

identity[edit]

Hi Loopy - unfortunately, File:Juniperus pingii.jpg is not Juniperus pingii as claimed at inaturalist, but most likely a juvenile-foliage cultivar of J. chinensis, or possibly J. squamata; the leaf structure does not match J. pingii. The location (South Korea) is also well away from the native range of J. pingii (SW China). I am not on inaturalist so can't add an ID comment there; if you are, would you like to add an ID correction there, please? It should also be removed from the wikipedia pages where it is used. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 15:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addenum: I see from the 2nd image at the source, it is a cultivated plant with a label "Juniperus pingii var. wilsonii"; this taxon is now confirmed genetically (Gymnosperm Database) as a variant of J. squamata - MPF (talk) 15:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MPF, I will suggest a new identification on iNaturalist to change it there. Loopy30 (talk) 15:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MPF, I have removed the image from the all the Wikipedia pages where it was in use, and added the caveat that it was cultivated (and not wild) to the observation on iNat. However, the identification given on iNat was not a case of mistaken identity, but instead just follows a differing taxonomic classification system, by treating Juniperus squamata var. wilsonii as a synonym for Juniperus pingii var. wilsonii - as does POWO. Loopy30 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Let's hope POWO and inat follow up on the genetic studies by Adams (cited on the Gymnosperm Database page) - MPF (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Boana nympha cropped.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Boana nympha cropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Boana nympha cropped.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MGA73 (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MGA73, I have sent a message on iNaturalist to the original author to ask if they would change the license back to CC-BY, but have not yet received any reply. Additionally, the following images from the same author are also affected:

Osteocephalus planiceps.jpg
Lepidoblepharis sanctaemartae.jpg (already deleted)
Lepidoblepharis festae.jpg (already deleted)
Metriophasma diocles.jpg
Lygophis lineatus.jpg (already deleted)
Anolis concolor (already deleted)
Osteocephalus planiceps

If the original author does not reply, then these images will have to be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Loopy30 (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Hope for a good response soon. --MGA73 (talk) 16:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MGA73, nothing heard from the original author and they were last active on iNat on 20 Aug. Delete away! Loopy30 (talk) 00:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sinclairia glabra glabra.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sinclairia glabra glabra.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 11:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source fixed. Loopy30 (talk) 12:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

iNaturalist[edit]

Hi! When you upload files from iNaturalist it would be a big help if you would upload the original file and request a licensereview. The bot should review the file within a few minutes. After that you can upload the cropped file. That way we do not have to review the files manually. --MGA73 (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MGA73, the iNaturalist image review bot certainly does good work in reviewing the image licenses! - However, when dealing with those exceptions where an original image has been cropped, a manual review by visual comparison will still have to made by a human reviewer. This is because most (if not all) of these altered images would be considered as "radical/substantial crops" or "major re-compositions" of the original images and which should then be re-labeled with new filenames as per COM:CROP. These new files would still have to be (manually) reviewed and would also end up duplicating all the ancillary information from the original image file page. This would not be either an effective workflow or a desired outcome. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Loopy30! The problem is that we lack active reviewers. If you count the files in Category:License review needed and subcategories you may end up with 30k files. So it can take years before someone review the file. So you risk that the file will be long gone or the license is changed before someone check the file.

It is correct that uploading a new file on top of a reviewed file could need a review. But if someone upload a different photo on top of an file that is reviewed then they can just revert it or nominate it for deletion. Once the original is reviewed then it is always possible to verify the crop.

I know that we often want to keep original images. But i think we can use Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Secondary_images here. As an alternative you can upload the original and have the bot review that. Then you can make a derivative work and link to the original. That way we have secured the license. --MGA73 (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Loopy30/Archive 2020

Contents

Welcome![edit]

Thank you for uploading iNaturalist images to Wikimedia Commons![edit]

File:Addyme ferrorubella.jpg[edit]

Autopatrol given[edit]

LicenseReview[edit]

File:Ctenosaura oaxacana - body 01.jpg[edit]

File:Anolis concolor head and throat detail.jpg[edit]

File:Lepidoblepharis festae.jpg[edit]

File:Lepidoblepharis sanctaemartae.jpg[edit]

File:Lygophis lineatus.jpg[edit]

File:Metriophasma diocles.jpg[edit]

File:Osteocephalus planiceps.jpg[edit]

File:Nemastylis tenuis cropped.jpg[edit]

INaturalist[edit]

Regarding files from English Wikipedia[edit]

identity[edit]

File tagging File:Boana nympha cropped.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sinclairia glabra glabra.jpg[edit]

iNaturalist[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:Loopy30/Archive 2020

Welcome![edit]

Thank you for uploading iNaturalist images to Wikimedia Commons![edit]

File:Addyme ferrorubella.jpg[edit]

Autopatrol given[edit]

LicenseReview[edit]

File:Ctenosaura oaxacana - body 01.jpg[edit]

File:Anolis concolor head and throat detail.jpg[edit]

File:Lepidoblepharis festae.jpg[edit]

File:Lepidoblepharis sanctaemartae.jpg[edit]

File:Lygophis lineatus.jpg[edit]

File:Metriophasma diocles.jpg[edit]

File:Osteocephalus planiceps.jpg[edit]

File:Nemastylis tenuis cropped.jpg[edit]

INaturalist[edit]

Regarding files from English Wikipedia[edit]

identity[edit]

File tagging File:Boana nympha cropped.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sinclairia glabra glabra.jpg[edit]

iNaturalist[edit]

Navigation menu

Search