User talk:Llez/Archives/2024 (1)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corculum cardissa (Heart Cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scalptia obliquata (Oblique Nutmeg), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitra mitra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corculum cardissa (Heart Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bursa bufonia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitra mitra (Episcopal Miter), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dosinia lupinus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bursa bufonia (Warty Frog Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunst-Raststätte Illertal-Ost 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Sorry[reply]
 Comment Please sign the vote --Llez 06:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopfensee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dosinia lupinus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - Pfarrhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia lupinus ssp. incta, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia lupinus ssp. lincta, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Typhis tubifer, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuttallia obscurata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Olivancillaria vesica 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olivancillaria vesica 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia bocholtensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuttallia obscurata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuttallia obscurata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good but please fix the invalid category. --Plozessor 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Oops, sorry --Llez 08:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crassispira cerithina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drillia angolensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crassispira cerithina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuttallia obscurata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I think this should be slightly rotated, otherwise it's really good. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrea gregarea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dallocardia muricata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drillia angolensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea gregarea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perrona spirata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scalptia crenifera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perrona spirata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberbergen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyards - Oberbergen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyards - Oberbergen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudamussium peslutrae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scalptia crenifera, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudamussium peslutrae 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin 'Sweet Dumpling' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit grainy, do you think you could apply a bit more NR while retaining sharpness? --Plozessor 10:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 14:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx! Good quality. --Plozessor 14:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emichsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emichsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left side is slightly leaning outward. --Plozessor 06:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calabash 'Indian Mix' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace - Fountain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is tilted ccw. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 07:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Favartia rosamiae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mancinella armigera (Belligerent Rock Snail), shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meiocardia vulgaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake on an identification ?[edit]

Maybe i'm wrong but your file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Larus_argentatus_-_Bremerhaven_01.jpg show a yellow-legged bird. But the Larus Argentatus got pinkish leggs so maybe it can be a Larus fuscus or other ? 2A01:CB1C:41D:3000:A73F:5E18:CD97:D4D6 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I submitted this great photo to an expert ornithologist, Stanislas Wroza. He thinks this bird is a Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Figure and story related categories should be added --Ermell 06:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 11:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meiocardia vulgaris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meiocardia vulgaris, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meiocardia vulgaris, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ocenebra hybrida, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unio terminalis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austrolittorina antipodum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chlamys textoria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Set Promoted to FP[edit]

This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chlamys textoria, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hiatula diphos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]