User talk:Llez/Archives/2023 (3)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megapitaria squalida (Squalid Callista), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Argopecten gibbus (Atlantic calico scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buccinulum littorinoides 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venus verrucosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsteine - Lug 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsteine - Lug 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Scharfenberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venus verrucosa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality. --ReneeWrites 05:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buccinulum littorinoides, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venus verrucosa ssp. verrucosa (Warty Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cookia sulcata (Cook's turban), shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venus verrucosa ssp. verrucosa (Warty Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diloma zelandicum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Relativity 05:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nerita melanotragus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winden - Hauptstraße 18-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türmel - Oberhausen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diloma zelandicum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venus verrucosa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinenstadt - Auwald 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venus verrucosa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsteine - Lug 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsteine - Lug 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsteine - Lug 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Runder Hut - Wernersberg 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Runder Hut - Wernersberg 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinenstadt - Rhein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita melanotragus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunella smaragda 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinenstadt - Rhein 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinenstadt - Rhein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verbascum nigrum - Steinenstadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venus verrucosa ssp. simulans (Warty Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venus verrucosa ssp. simulans (Warty Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinenstadt - Baggersee 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinenstadt - Baggersee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinenstadt - Box stand 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lunella smaragda (Emerald Moon Turban), juvenile shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leukoma staminea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 10:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 06:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 10:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amblyacrum gougeroti, juvenile shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leukoma staminea 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Terragio67 05:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Terragio67 05:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Terragio67 05:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality and beautiful.--Famberhorst 06:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leukoma staminea (Pacific Littleneck Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leukoma staminea (Pacific Littleneck Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gallus gallus domesticus - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leptoptilos crumenifer - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - Vogelpark Steinen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asthenotoma microcheila, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 05:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gallus gallus domesticus - Vogelpark Steinen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 05:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gallus gallus domesticus - Vogelpark Steinen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gallus gallus domesticus - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Varicospira crispata 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Varicospira crispata 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium protractum, juvenile shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium (Saddle Oyster), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melopsittacus undulatus - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A strange dark background but what a shot... Good quality. --Terragio67 08:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Platycercus eximius - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium (Saddle Oyster), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmorana serpentina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 20:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia abdimii - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panopea liasina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia abdimii - Vogelpark Steinen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia abdimii - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marmorana serpentina, subadult shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxyacrum obliteratum, juvenile shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensis leei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grus virgo - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - Vogelpark Steinen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - Vogelpark Steinen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pflug - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trigonoceps occipitalis - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dacelo novaeguineae - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panopea liasina, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fissurella fascicularis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Necrosyrtes monachus - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Necrosyrtes monachus - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raphitoma costellata ssp. subattenuata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donax trunculus 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 09:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 09:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fissurella fascicularis (Wobbly Keyhole Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donax trunculus 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 08:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 16:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 10:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments @Llez: Good image with good quality. I would give it a promotion when the stitching errors that I marked in two notes on the image are fixed --D-Kuru 09:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Stitching errors removed. Thanks for the review --Llez 13:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know my fair share of problems with fixing stitching errors: They usually just get moved to a different location. The grass should be an easy fix. Not so sure about the door and the rain pipe --D-Kuru 14:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Sharp eye! All erros you noted removed --Llez 13:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stitching errors removed, good quality! --D-Kuru 18:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus var. subplanus (Truncate Donax), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus var. subplanus (Truncate Donax), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:06, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rangia cuneata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Delete dark blue spot in the sky, please. --Mike1979 Russia 09:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 13:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 13:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Gallus gallus domesticus - Vogelpark Steinen 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gallus gallus domesticus - Vogelpark Steinen 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crassispira acuminiensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulgarica vetusta ssp. festiva, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rangia cuneata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melopsittacus undulatus - Vogelpark Steinen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Famberhorst 06:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melopsittacus undulatus - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canarium mutabile 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lordenois 11:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lordenois 11:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lordenois 11:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasticardium subrugosum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --WikiEuropian 13:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Delete CA, please. --Mike1979 Russia 09:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 16:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Аныл Озташ 16:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malteserschloss Heitersheim 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canarium mutabile (Variable Stromb), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasticardium subrugosum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:22, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eopleurotoma longicauda, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fissurella obscura 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vasticardium subrugosum (Subrugose Cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Myurellopsis columellaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römermuseum Heitersheim 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vasticardium subrugosum (Subrugose Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Codakia tigerina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 03 - Citroen U 23 R4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 20:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fissurella obscura, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Codakia tigerina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 04 - Kramer KL 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Codakia tigerina (Pacific Tiger Lucina), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxymeris suffusa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 12 - Hansi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neoterebra dislocata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Melopsittacus undulatus - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melopsittacus undulatus - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Codakia tigerina (Pacific Tiger Lucina), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kramer KL 17.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensis minor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very beautiful, like the others ! --Sebring12Hrs 07:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxymeris suffusa (Hawaiian Cat Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schloss Lichtenstein (Württemberg) - Eugenien-Bastion - Ritterbau - Fürstenbau - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Lichtenstein (Württemberg) - Eugenien-Bastion - Ritterbau - Fürstenbau - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensis minor 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:34, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ensis minor (Jackknife Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ensis minor (Jackknife Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austroginella muscaria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 22:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austroginella muscaria (Fly Marginella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensis ensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Liridon 12:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensis ensis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pectinodonta maxima, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Terebra babylonia 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Terebra babylonia 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancilla sarda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice subject, but very distorted, basically too dark and disturbing flash reflection. With a lot of post-processing, you might be able to get a good picture out of it. -- Spurzem 09:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I corrected the lightning and made a further perspective correction (please check the verticals). As the room was only 3X4 m I had to use a wide angle lens which unavoidable leads to some distorsions which are not all correctable in retrospect --Llez 13:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Difficult interior shot. Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 13:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ensis ensis (Sword Razor), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ensis ensis (Sword Razor), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ellobium stagnale 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 10 - Forge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support I don't think it is possible to do a better picture of this interior house. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dacelo novaeguineae - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dacelo novaeguineae - Vogelpark Steinen 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
What kind of flowers are these? --Ermell 08:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Pelargonium × hortorum, a widespread ornamental plant. --Llez 10:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think that should appear in the categories. --Ermell 08:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Category added and also to the description of the file page --Llez 11:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --多多123 16:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Écomusée d’Alsace[edit]

Fachwerkhaus aus Joncherey – wow, sogar mit Storch!

Hallo Llez,

mit Freuden habe ich Dein Foto aus dem Écomusée d’Alsace auf der FPC-Seite gesehen und mich noch mehr gefreut, als ich entdeckt habe, dass Du noch viele andere Fotos aus dem Museum hochgeladen hast! Ich bin ein großer Freund historischer „Alltags“-Architektur, also von gut erhaltenen Bauern- und Handwerkerhäuser usw., mag daher entsprechende Freilichtmuseen sehr und habe auch allerhand Fotos dort gemacht. Leider liegen nur die Museen bei Schwäbisch Hall, Beuren und Walldürn in meiner Reichweite. Daher bin ich umso glücklicher, wenn ich sehe, dass andere Fotografen sich um die anderen Freilichtmuseen kümmern – Kollege Ermell macht das ja in Franken und es ist toll, dass Du die Museen im Schwarzwald und im Elsass fotografierst!

Das Écomusée d’Alsace ist außerdem sicher eines der spektakulärsten Museen dieser Art – es hat wirklich tolle Gebäude. Ist das auf dem Fachwerkhaus aus Joncherey sogar ein lebendiger Storch, oder ist das eine Attrappe? ;–) Egal wie, ein Storch ist gerade für das Elsass natürlich eine perfekte Krönung eines solchen Fotos!

Herzlichen Dank und liebe Grüße von Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 10:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Aristeas,
es freut mich, wenn Dir die Fotos gefallen. Ich habe einen ganzen Tag dort verbracht und hatte auch wettermäßig ungeheures Glück. Ich habe noch eine ganze Reihe weiterer Fotos aus dem Écomusée, die ich sukzessive hochladen werde, allerdings erst wieder in knapp 2 Wochen, da ich ab morgen in Urlaub bin. In dem Museum gibt es eine ganze Storchenkolonie und auf vielen der Häuser befinden sich ein bis mehrere Nester. Es sind also alles lebendige Störche, keine Atrappen.
Viele Grüße Herbert --Llez (talk) 11:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancilla sarda, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellobium stagnale, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensis magnus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Famberhorst 06:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Famberhorst 06:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, despite the crop at left. --Sebring12Hrs 08:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ensis magnus (Razor shell), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nerita polita 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Afrolittorina africana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can the noise still be reduced somewhat ? --Ermell 13:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reduced the noise, thanks for the review --Llez 14:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better. Thank you. --Ermell 15:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ensis magnus (Razor shell), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita polita (Polished Nerite), shell, white form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spisula subtruncata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spisula subtruncata 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula subtruncata (Cut Through Shell), brown form, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Afrolittorina africana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensis magnus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Écomusée d’Alsace 06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Écomusée d’Alsace 06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula subtruncata (Cut Through Shell), brown form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Echinolittorina penicillata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spisula subtruncata 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampasopsis thomae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 04:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spisula subtruncata 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Conasprella viminea 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Conasprella viminea 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula subtruncata (Cut Through Shell), grey form, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 04:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 04:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 04:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula subtruncata (Cut Through Shell), grey form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crepipatella dilatata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A CAT or description of the animals would be useful. --Tagooty 05:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lampasopsis thomae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argopecten irradians 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argopecten irradians 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --1municipio 08:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:33, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crepipatella dilatata (Dilated Slipper Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Argopecten irradians (Atlantic Bay Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Argopecten irradians (Atlantic Bay Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucina aurantia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bela powisiana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucina aurantia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucina aurantia, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Larryasou 18:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slight tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 07:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint--Llez 07:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits Rodolphe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 19:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucina aurantia, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corbicula fluminea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits Rodolphe 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits Rodolphe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asthenotoma festiva, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]