User talk:Llez/Archives/2022 (2)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oliva concavospira (Head Concave Olive), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 29 - Left statue main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oliva australis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gastrana fragilis (Fragile Tellin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 30 - Right statue main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaton decussatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaton decussatus (Decussate Murex), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oliva australis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Untergrombach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Untergrombach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Myurella amoena 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 05:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuculana claviformis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea amalthei, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 02 - View from southwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 01 - View from southwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terebra acuminata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myurella amoena, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Terebra acuminata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 03 - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. HDR template would be nice. --Ermell 13:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoernesia socialis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aequipecten priscus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 04 - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Love the leading lines --Dimitrijemat 06:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conasprella viminea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 05 - Main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morum watanabei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, interior, view to the organ loft.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hoernesia socialis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, interior, view to the altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conasprella viminea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 06 - Miraculous image.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morum watanabei, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, miraculous image.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palaeonucula hammeri, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 08 - Left side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palaeonucula hammeri, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 09 - Right side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gyrineum lacunatum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gorgeous and a good FP candidate. -- Ikan Kekek 08:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 06 - Miraculous image.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 06 - Miraculous image.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gyrineum roseum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucina plana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, left side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gyrineum lacunatum, shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 11 - Sanctuary lamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astartellopsis nuda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 10 - Crucifixion group.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 12 - Pulpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astartellopsis nuda, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gyrineum lacunatum, shell, red form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 13 - Pulpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitromorpha columbellaria, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exogyra conica, shells.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 15 - Sacristy bell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entolium lunare, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 16 - World War I memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pholadomya murchisoni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anarithma maesi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mangelia brusinae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosbronn-Althof - Forest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parainoceramya dubia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pholadomya murchisoni, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernbach - Box stand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parainoceramya dubia, shell of a clay layer specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modiolus modiolus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 14 - Sacred Heart of Jesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 05:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --MB-one 21:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxychilus draparnaudi (Draparnaud's glass snail), shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemilienardia ocellata, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mytilus galloprovincialis dilatatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Modiolus modiolus (Northern Horsemussel), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lienardia nigrotincta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mytilus galloprovincialis dilatatus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arca zebra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arca zebra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Altschlossfelsen 39.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altschlossfelsen 39.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lienardia purpurata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lienardia falsaria, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clavus bilineatus, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petricolaria pholadiformis (False angelwing), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petricolaria pholadiformis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petricolaria pholadiformis (False angelwing), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcinella arcinella 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Scabricola bicolor 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scabricola bicolor 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcinella arcinella 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arcinella arcinella (Caribbean Spiny Jewelbox Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arcinella arcinella (Caribbean Spiny Jewelbox Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duplicaria dussumierii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudochama subspinosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxymeris senegalensis (Faval Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudochama subspinosa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duplicaria dussumierii (Dussumier's Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Septa marerubrum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudochama subspinosa, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudochama subspinosa, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Set Promoted to FP[edit]

This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Arcinella arcinella valves, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Arcinella arcinella valves has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Septa marerubrum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chama macerophylla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daphnella gemmulifera, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chama macerophylla 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Cepaea vindobonensis - Banding variation.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chama macerophylla (Leafy jewel box clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chama macerophylla (Leafy jewel box clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moseltalbrücke A 61 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moseltalbrücke A 61 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitromorpha fischeri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutraria lutraria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dieblich an der Mosel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moseltalbrücke A 61 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raphitoma philberti, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutraria lutraria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenktafel Moseltalbrücke A 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papaver rhoeas - Winningen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutraria lutraria (Otter shell), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsterwald - Box stand 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsterwald - Box stand 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Azulejo - The Ritz - Funchal 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Azulejo - The Ritz - Funchal 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutraria lutraria (Otter shell), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 8–10 - Monschau - Rotes Haus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsterwald - Box stand 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circomphalus foliaceolamellosus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 8–10 - Monschau - Rotes Haus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Circomphalus foliaceolamellosus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulla striata var. adansoni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruine Haller - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rurstraße 10 - Monschau - Wasserrad Schmitzenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulla occidentalis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 8–10 - Monschau - Rotes Haus 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 8–10 - Monschau - Rotes Haus - Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Circomphalus foliaceolamellosus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eopseuma phyllotrapezium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschbachstraße - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenbach - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulla occidentalis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulla striata var. adansoni, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eopseuma phyllotrapezium 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stehlings - Eschbachstraße - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stehlings - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Septa marerubrum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Septa marerubrum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eopseuma phyllotrapezium, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschbachstraße - Monschau 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschbachstraße - Monschau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulla punctulata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschbachstraße - Monschau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschbachstraße - Monschau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 09:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulla occidentalis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carinapex minutissima, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulla punctulata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eopseuma phyllotrapezium, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbatia amygdalumtostum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 06:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbatia amygdalumtostum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, of course, and a beautiful shell. -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtstraße - Monschau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtstraße - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelische Stadtkirche - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia amygdalumtostum (Burnt-almond Ark), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbo castanea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker - Stadtstraße - Monschau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtstraße - Monschau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia amygdalumtostum (Burnt-almond Ark), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo castanea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamarcka ventricosa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgau 1 - Monschau - Cafe Thelen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auf den Planken 11 - Monschau - Villa Bellesief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. WB may be a touch too warm. Please have a look. --XRay 05:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks --Llez 10:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Caldera de las Cañadas 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caldera de las Cañadas 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argopecten gibbus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtstraße - Monschau 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchstraße 32 - Monschau - Spinnen - Hubert Kruft.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamarcka ventricosa (Ventricose Ark), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lithopoma americanum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtstraße - Monschau 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks rather like a door instead of a building (I'm asking for an additional cat) --Poco a poco 07:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Transferred to the Category "Doors in Monschau" --Llez 07:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support. Good quality -- Spurzem 07:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtstraße - Monschau 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Same here --Poco a poco 07:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Idem --Llez 07:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heteropurpura polymorpha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 7 - Monschau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße - Holzmarkt - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lithopoma americanum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Argopecten gibbus (Atlantic calico scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polititapes durus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polititapes durus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 06:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 18 - Monschau - Haus Troistorff - Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 18 - Monschau - Haus Troistorff 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heteropurpura polymorpha, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polititapes durus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Favartia salmonea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 05:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Im Städtchen - Monschau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 09:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 24 - Monschau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 09:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polititapes durus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naria poraria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal 2. Hannoversches Infanterie-Regiment Nr. 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spondylus occidens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge WC-51 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge WC-51 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Favartia salmonea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spondylus occidens 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 08:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M24 Chaffee - Spicheren 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality although I'm not sure about the WB, if feels a bit too warm --Poco a poco 11:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks --Llez 14:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge WC-51 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial of the 2. Hannoversches Infanterie-Regiment Nr. 77, Main cemetery Saarbrücken.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Naria poraria (Purple-based cowry), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nucleolaria nucleus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and more interesting than the current FPCs --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M24 Chaffee - Spicheren 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M24 Chaffee - Spicheren 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus occidens, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Latirus hesterae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04305200 Aachen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The colors seem a bit oversaturated, but the picture is still beautiful and technically correct. -- Spurzem 07:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04305200 Aachen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality like the other -- Spurzem 07:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Set Promoted to FP[edit]

This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Barbatia amygdalumtostum valves, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Barbatia amygdalumtostum valves has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nucleolaria nucleus (Wrinkled cowry), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus occidens, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micronaias granadensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04305200 Aachen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04305200 Aachen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micronaias granadensis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04304950 Stella Maris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:03, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laufenstraße 18 - Monschau - Haus Troistorff 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The house on the left should be cut off. --Steindy 15:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done thanks --Llez 05:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latirus hesterae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peristernia ustulata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04811990 Seensucht 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04811990 Seensucht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calibanus furvus aegrotus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04813140 St. Nikolaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04813140 St. Nikolaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Micronaias granadensis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Micronaias granadensis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dosinia exoleta var. interrupta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04305200 Aachen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peristernia ustulata var. luchuana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dosinia exoleta var. interrupta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rursee 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rursee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 06:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04813140 St. Nikolaus - ENI 04811990 Seensucht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENI 04304950 Stella Maris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus furvus var. aegrotus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Africonus crotchii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationalpark-Ranger - Rurberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absperrventil - Rurberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia exoleta var. interrupta (Rayed Artemis), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia exoleta var. interrupta ( Rayed Artemis), Right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunella granulata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gloripallium pallium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lunella granulata (Granulated Moon Turban), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus crotchii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I'd apply perspective correct, there is also a bit of CA --Poco a poco 08:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks --Llez 18:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]