User talk:Livioandronico2013/Archive/2016

Happy New Year!

Classical, but still... thank you for your work on Commons! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

The traditional greeting

	Dear friend
	Happy New Year and best wishes!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chandelier of the nineteenth century in the Museo di Capodimonte (Napoli).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chandelier of the nineteenth century in the Museo di Capodimonte (Napoli).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling of Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funerary altar of Elpis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of a man on a herm (Known as Socrates).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of Chrysippus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica dei Santi Apostoli (Roma) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica dei Santi Apostoli (Roma) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 16:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica dei Santi Apostoli (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of a man on a herm (Known as Aratus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome) - Abside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling of Santa Maria Maddalena (Rome) HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Santa Maria Maddalena (Rome) HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling of San Carlo al Corso (Rome).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of San Carlo al Corso (Rome).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Center of Church Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria della Vittoria in Rome - Dome HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria della Vittoria in Rome - Dome HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Second left chapel ceiling in Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Third left chapel ceiling in Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! First left chapel ceiling in Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome) - Cappella Paolina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 09:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! First right chapel ceiling in Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michelangelo's Moses (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 15:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michelangelo's Moses 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling in San Peter in Vincula (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Martino ai Monti (Rome) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! --Ermell 09:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling in Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Third right chapel ceiling in Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Second right chapel ceiling in Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dome of San Rocco all'Augusteo (Rome) HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of San Rocco all'Augusteo (Rome) HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Madonna of the Magnificat.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madonna of the Magnificat.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo di Città di Castello - Intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Forced perspective gallery by Francesco Borromini.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Forced perspective gallery by Francesco Borromini.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:San Rocco all'Augusteo (Rome) - Interior HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Rocco all'Augusteo (Rome) - Interior HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Duomo di Città di Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 21:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval staircase in Citta di Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abside of Duomo di Citta di Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome) - Intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pietro in Vincoli (Rome) - Interior 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria in Campitelli (Rome) - Interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria in Campitelli (Rome) - Interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Globe fresco in the Palace of Caserta, edit.jpg

Hi, I would support a FPC if you can make a version a bit like this. Of course, you would probably get a better result doing it against from the RAW. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes thanks,i want work it when i have more time --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg

Thanks for your comment. First I didn´t know how to do that, but now I´ve added the EXIF-data. Greetings --Milseburg (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling of the "Assumption of Mary" in Santa Maria Immacolata a via Veneto (Roma).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of the "Assumption of Mary" in Santa Maria Immacolata a via Veneto (Roma).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria in Traspontina (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria in Traspontina (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Because your contributions to commons with a Hight Quality standards, I give you this barnstar. Thanks Livioandroinico2013, I hope see more nice pictures from you The Photographer (talk) 21:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria in Traspontina (Rome) - Ceiling of the sagresty.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria in Traspontina (Rome) - Ceiling of the sagresty.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria in Traspontina (Rome) - Dome and ceiling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria in Traspontina (Rome) - Dome and ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Ivo alla Sapienza (Rome) - Dome.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Ivo alla Sapienza (Rome) , Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Request for help

Hi, Could you do me a favor and post this information, translated to your native language, on the Wikipedia Facebook fanpage in your country?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2016/03#Crowdfunding_for_User:Jacek_Halicki
I would like this information to reach as many people as possible.
So it looks on polish Wikipedia fanpage
https://www.facebook.com/polska.wikipedia/posts/10154099524278189
Bye

Hi Jacek happy to help you but i don't find a Wikipedia Facebook fanpage in italian,sorry --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santi Andrea e Claudio dei Borgognoni (Rome) - Interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santi Andrea e Claudio dei Borgognoni (Rome) - Interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Andrea delle Fratte - Dome HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The exposure control of the windows is not really the best, but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 21:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Andrea delle Fratte - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angel with the inscription by Giovanni Lorenzo Bernini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angel with the Crown of Thorns by Gianlorenzo Bernini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice capture! --Michael Barera 18:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Girolamo dei Croati (Rome) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Andrea delle Fratte - interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dome of Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Girolamo dei Croati (Roma) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crucifixion of Christ by Pietro Perugino.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crucifixion of Christ by Pietro Perugino.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ss. Pietro e Paolo (Galatina) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling Painted Dome Cupola Angels Fighting Demons in Vatican Museums.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling Painted Dome Cupola Angels Fighting Demons in Vatican Museums.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santissimo Sacramento (Rome) - Dome.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santissimo Sacramento (Rome) - Dome.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ss. Pietro e Paolo (Galatina) - St. Peter fresco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Caterina d'Alessandria (Galatina) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basilica dei Santi Apostoli (Roma) - Interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica dei Santi Apostoli (Roma) - Interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basilica dei Santi Apostoli (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica dei Santi Apostoli (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallard duke (female) in Desenzano del Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Looks nice. --Peulle 22:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giorgio in Braida (Verona) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon in Piazza Brà (Verona) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Verona with the church of San Giorgio in Braida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of left chapel in Duomo (Verona).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral (Parma) - Assumption by Correggio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busts of William Shakespeare in Tomba di Giulietta (Verona).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaques in Tomba di Giulietta (Verona).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliefs of the lion of Saint Mark in Tomba di Giuletta (Verona).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turdus merula in Verona (Italia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Auguri. --Johann Jaritz 16:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of right chapel in Duomo (Verona).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo (Mantua) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the overexposed window is acceptable for me. --Hubertl 08:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo (Mantua) - Left chapel ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Andrea (Mantua) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulips in Desenzano del Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo (Mantua) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --Alchemist-hp 20:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon in Piazza Brà (Verona) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Borderline exposure, but it looks pretty good at full screen on an 4k monitor. Ram-Man 16:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon in Piazza Brà (Verona).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Borderline exposure, but it looks pretty good at full screen on an 4k monitor. Ram-Man 16:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Lens: Might be that one, or Sigma 17-50 f/2.8. You need better wide open, and starts at 17mm. --Mile (talk) 14:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Annunciation (Leonardo).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annunciation (Leonardo).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling of Santa Maria ai Monti (Rome).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Santa Maria ai Monti (Rome).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Athena punishes Daedalus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Athena punishes Daedalus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral (Parma) - Ceiling of left chapel and dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral (Parma) - Ceiling of right chapel and dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cristina (Parma) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giovanni Evangelista (Parma) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome) - Interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria dell'Orto (Rome) - Interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

I see quylity is much better, see lines, good. Now see which focals are good. I think f/9 isnt, more f/8 ... so try between f/7.1-/8...even f/9 looks OK. For this shot, put yellow some down also. Good lens. --Mile (talk) 07:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

p.S. Too bad you didt have it before.

Thanks Mile,i try others today --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of Henry I of Cyprus in Galatina (Lecce).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 12:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II at sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's tilted anticlockwise --A.Savin 01:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC) Better? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 07:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC) Yes, OK for me now. --A.Savin 00:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Braschi (Rome) - Staircase ceiling 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Braschi (Rome) - Staircase ceiling 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stefano Tofanelli Family.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of Gerolama Santacroce in Conti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling in Palazzo Braschi (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling with the Apollo on the chariot in Palazzo Braschi (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santissima Trinità dei Pellegrini (Rome) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Braschi (Rome) - Staircase ceiling 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo ai Catinari ,Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling with the Judgement of Paris in Palazzo Braschi (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling in San Peter in Vincula (Rome).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling in San Peter in Vincula (Rome).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Stanislao dei Polacchi (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Duomo di Città di Castello - Intern.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duomo di Città di Castello - Intern.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of the Tiber with the broken bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is obviously not a photo, but a reproduction of a painting. Any info on source, artist? --A.Savin 15:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC) I do not know if it's a compliment, however, is a picture, you can find the original here and here is an artist unknown, thanks --Livioandronico2013 19:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment I think what he means is that you need to edit the description and categories of this media file, to more accurately describe what it is we're seeing. --Peulle 10:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)*  Comment It is a work in the style of Caspar van Wittel --Hubertl 08:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC) All relevant infos are meanwhile added, OK for me --A.Savin 01:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sant'Andrea delle Fratte - Dome HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Andrea delle Fratte - Dome HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dome of Duomo di Città di Castello.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Duomo di Città di Castello.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

An advice

Livio my friend,

maybe you should break (for a moment) your series of ceiling paintings and try another subject for FPC. At first, when you began with this thema, you gained a lot of a unanimous promotions, but now, reviewers are tending to be more severe, surely due to a feeling of dullness. It is probably unfair, but read carefuly the "oppose" comments..."again and again a ceiling of a roman church by Livio...". That is what they mean.

That's just an advice, but a cinque stelle advice, IMO .

Don't take it in a wrong part, it's strategy !--Jebulon (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay Jebulon, too many tourists. However you're probably right, but the i think that it don't change my life, I propose, if you do not like .... peace. Besides, each one has their own photos of shells, birds, cars, landscapes etc .... you have to see the whole thing of the nomination, thank you and good afternoon. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, you are right too. It was just the humble poor opinion of an old "regular". That's why I change and change my themas. Next time: probably another American Civil War restoration. I hope you will like it (hard work !) Have fun in taking your excellent pictures !--Jebulon (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cathedral (Parma) - Assumption by Correggio.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral (Parma) - Assumption by Correggio.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Antonio da Padova all'Esquilino - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Hi Livio, I hope you and your family and friends are happy and healthy. File:Duomo(Mantua) - Dome.jpg and File:Athena punishes Daedalus.jpg are two of my absolute favorites here at Commons. I always look forward to seeing your next creation! Ciao! INeverCry 00:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks INeverCry,I'm glad someone appreciates--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 15:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

With 92 featured pictures, I know there's plenty of people here who appreciate your work besides me. You would be my hero if you ever got an FP of Cristina Scabbia BTW... INeverCry 16:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Domnica - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

My comments

I want ask you sorry for my strong negative comments about your pictures. The places where you are taking theses pictures are amazing. I think that a combination of less exposition in a enviroment with vibration and maybe use tripod could improve the quality of your pictures. --The Photographer (talk) 02:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks The Photographer but in your opinion I work without tripod? Second you i have the camera 3,4 or 10 seconds in my hands? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

I usually do this, holding my breath --The Photographer (talk) 22:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Is impossibile stay 5 (o more) seconds be perfectly still --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

I thought only snipers and surgeons had hands that steady... INeverCry 00:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II at sunset.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II at sunset.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di Sant'Anastasia al Palatino (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di Sant'Anastasia al Palatino (Rome) - Intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Duomo(Mantua) - Dome.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duomo(Mantua) - Dome.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Cosmedin (Rome) - Ciborium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore (Roma) - Cappella Paolina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Hercules (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cecilia (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sant'Andrea (Mantua) - Dome.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Andrea (Mantua) - Dome.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giorgio in Velabro (Rome) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. A geo tag would be nice though. W.carter 08:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)  Done thanks --Livioandronico2013 10:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not

Sorry, I do not recognize the flower.
It seems exotic. A plant that does not occur in nature in the Netherlands.

Sincerely,
Dominicus Bergsma (Famberhorst).

File:Santa Maria in Cosmedin (Rome) - Ciborium.jpg

Hallo Livio, it seems as would your File Santa Maria in Cosmedin (Rome) - Ciborium.jpg lean a little bit to the left. Can you correct it? Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 20:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 Done buddy,thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeolian Islands at sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Hibiscus in Palermo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes sp. in Palermo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Cecilia (Rome) - Ceiling alt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Cecilia (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel hill yellow in Palermo (Lantana Yellow).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Martorana (Palermo) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:11, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giuseppe dei Teatini (Palermo) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferry boat "Riace" in the Strait of Messina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola cultivars.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pink rose and red.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for a single shot --Hubertl 21:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange hibiscus,lateral view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange hibiscus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 6 months

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 6 months for the following reason: Intimidation/harassment: repeated trolling on COM:FPC, it seems the user just doesn't get it. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Someday it's enough, Livioandronico2013! Your repeated uncivility on COM:FPC especially on your "own" nominations and regarding people who vote in oppose (which is their right to do, as I think), deserves a longer break from Commons. This discussion was the last straw. Please think about it. --A.Savin 14:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

• I've brought this up at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Unfair block by A.Savin. INeverCry 01:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "unfair block, have not been notified as usual by A.Savin and I have not threatened or insulted nobody. Provided that a person appears to Simon Cowell is not insulting. moreover already blocking me unjustly for one week and continues without asking nobody. You can see all on this discussion opened by INeverCry thanks. LivioAndronico (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)" Decline reason: "Although that discussion is ongoing, there is clearly consensus that your edits have been disruptive. Generally, comments there focus on the potential to shorten the block (implicitly supportive of the block, just not necessarily the duration) but with the caveat that you acknowledge and refrain from the behaviour that caused the block. Discussion has now centered on alternative remedies such as a topic ban. This unblock request is at the very least premature, as a remedy--be it lifting (with or without a topic ban), shortening or not changing the block--will come from that discussion. That this unblock request denies the existence of an issue, especially when there is clear indication that you have been disruptive, suggests the block should stand for the time being. COM:BLOCK, for example, requires "a credible promise that the behaviour that led to the block will not be repeated." (emphasis original) Эlcobbola talk 18:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks Эlcobbola talk, but i can't promise that i can't do. Regards --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

Hi Livio. You're going to have to make some concessions and promises to get unblocked. It's the best I could do at AN... La vita è difficile, caro mio! If you're banned from FPC or QIC, I can do the nominations for you. I just don't want to see you stay blocked for a long period. INeverCry 20:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks INeverCry,you are a real kind person,I want thank also Jee because he understood the situation.

I honestly did not expect the stabs by Daniel Case and Jebulon (although even expecting that they would protect me!)...trust is good but don't trust is better. Not to mention the cowardly way of Code and The Photographer (i'm not happy if you get block, but if you do thank you!!!). And more the blocks by A.Savin with no reason and without warning and for periods that only he decides not caring community (we are more than 100 users of FP but just a couple complain to block without asking anything to anyone!).--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

I've had some fights here and on the English Wikipedia. I lost my administrator rights at Wikipedia in a very upsetting way. I think you and I have a lot in Common. In this situation, you're going to have to "eat crow" as we say in the USA. This means that in order to get unblocked, you'll have to promise not to interact with or talk about Code, The Photographer, or Benh, and you'll have to agree to a ban of up to 6 months from FPC/VIC/QIC. Sometimes you've got to do things you may not like or even agree with to get yourself clear of trouble. I say put these things behind you, get unblocked, and move on from there. If you'll make the promises I mention above, and accept the temporary ban from FPC/VIV/QIC, I think we can get you unblocked pretty quickly. INeverCry 22:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes INeverCry, I promise not to interact with or talk about Code, The Photographer, or Benh --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Are you OK with not being able to directly participate at FPC/VIC/QIC? Will you agree to avoid commenting about or talking to A.Savin in future also? INeverCry 23:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes,is fine...but even vote? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, the ban would be complete, probably 6 months, but I and others would still be able to nominate images that you upload. INeverCry 23:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Ok,I do...thanks--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

I've made the case for an unblock at AN/U. Give me some time to handle this. Maybe we can get you unblocked later today or tomorrow at latest. I'll certainly do my best for you. INeverCry 23:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for all --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

(ec) This is just an offensive and disrespectful comment and in no way helpful to resolve the issue. By now, I was preparing to lift your block soon for a topic ban as announced on ANU, so that you can at least submit uploads and do other non-controversial stuff. But honestly I'm no longer willing to do anything here. And the sentence "i can't promise that i can't do" actually speaks for itself. --A.Savin 22:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

the way you do speaks for itself A.Savin --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of left chapel in Cathedral (Monreale) - Mosaic of Christ Pantocrator,large view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of left chapel in Cathedral (Monreale) - Mosaic of Christ Pantocrator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santissima Trinità dei Pellegrini (Rome) - Dome.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santissima Trinità dei Pellegrini (Rome) - Dome.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

• I've added Category:Featured pictures by Livioandronico2013 to this FP, and Category:Quality images by Livioandronico2013 to the QIs above. INeverCry 20:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Unblock

Per Blocking policy Blocks based on disruptive behaviour should be lifted if there is reason to believe that the disruptive behaviour will not resume. So I've unblocked you. If A.Savin wants to wheel-war and put the block back in place, he and I will have to take it to COM:ANB or COM:BN. You have to be very careful with what you do and say now Livio. If you don't they'll re-block you, and I won't be able to fight another block. So please be relaxed and positive, and no more trouble. INeverCry 07:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: The ban from FPC/VIC/QIC should last till March 8 2017. After that you'll have to be mellow. In the meantime you can ask me to do VIC, QIC, and FPC noms, or anyone else you trust to do so. INeverCry 07:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks INeverCry,don't worry --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

I've had to re-apply the block. The community has made it clear that my removal of the block was inappropriate because I'm so involved and that it has to be put back in place until the community comes to a consensus on what to do. I'll keep working toward a solution, but I have to work with the community. Be patient and don't attack anyone, and we'll see what solution the community can come up with together. INeverCry 18:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for everything INeverCry, but do not worry. I am 38 years old, two daughters, I'm a football referee (and recently began the season), I have 20 apartments for students and tourists in Rome, in fact I'm not bored for sure. If I'll come back in six months or more is not a problem. Do not get so many enemies as I do here. If you want you can write me at the email that I have here. A hug.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

I hope your family are all happy and healthy. It certainly sounds like you're busy. I'm 48 and disabled, so I don't leave my house often. I live with one of my brothers and his wife and one of my sisters who is also not in good health (I have 5 sisters and 4 brothers), so my brother gets my groceries and takes me to get medication and see my doctors. That's why I'm at Commons so much.

We'll keep trying to find the right solution for you and everyone else involved in this issue. I don't want to see you go away like so many people have in the almost 8 years I've been here on Commons. Take care my friend. INeverCry 19:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi INeverCry,solutions? thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

I would suggest that you post another unblock request here. You'll have to apologize for your former behavior and promise that it won't be repeated. Post a good unblock request and let's see what happens. Hopefully the community will give you another chance. INeverCry 20:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Ok buddy, see you in march o later. Thanks for all --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

I'll be 49 years old the next time I see you on here. That's a shame. But that's life I guess. You should check out http://www.deviantart.com. Your photography would get plenty of attention there. INeverCry 21:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Ok buddy I upload this,let me know if you like --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Very nice as usual. Great colors. You might also want to look into the featured picture programs at wikis, especially en.wiki: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. There's a little more focus on the educational value, but photos of domes and frescoes can be added to church/cathedral articles. You'll see many of the Commons FPC people at the en.wiki FPC. It's a bit unfortunate that the Italian Wikipedia doesn't seem to have an FPC program. INeverCry 20:14, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes INeverCry, but how I can upload a picture? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:35, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

With this. You can also tag your uploads with this and just say that you're blocked on Commons and transferring your image here could be seen as block evasion. Then you try and find an article the image can be used in. I could help with that. After that you go here. There is the risk that people there will look at your uploading to Wikipedia as a form of block evasion. You may run into the same problems there.

I still say put up an unblock request here and promise to stay calm and cool if you're allowed to be unblocked. I don't see how anyone here can expect you to do anything more than end the behavior you were blocked for and edit constructively and politely. INeverCry 09:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

RE:FPC/VIC/QIC

Do not worry. Thank you. They are only pictures. I know of your support. Greetings--Lmbuga (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, friend =

Español: Gracias, amigo

.

Galego: Grazas, amigo

--Lmbuga (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocco

Livio, sono Sergio, un amministratore in lingua italiana su Commons, vengo da Roma anch'io. Puoi spiegarmi sinteticamente il punto che ha portato al tuo blocco? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Ciao Sergio,sinteticamente c'è gente che non si limita a votare negativamente (la cosa sinceramente poco mi importa) le mie foto ma insulta o prende in giro o scrive cose tipo "Terribile". A queste persone naturalmente rispondo nello stesso tono ma se lo faccio io sono maleducato,se lo fanno loro è tutto ok! Per esempio. Comunque lo stesso amministratore mi ha già bloccato ,anche in quel caso senza avvisarmi ed è passato da un blocco di una settimana a sei mesi(!). Comunque non ho minacciato nessuno ho semplicemente detto che non mi interessava l'opinione di chi si crede il nuovo Simon Crowell....questo è tutto. Grazie per l'interesse. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Ciao Sergio,era solo per curiosità? Grazie --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Block

But some admin,George Chernilevsky, Christian Ferrer, Blackcat can not see this absurd situation? I was blocked,always and always by the same admin, without being notified and from period of one week to 6 months! Only for a joke. Two months have passed. To me it does not seem normal ..... thanks. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#User:Livioandronico2013. I'm trying to help. But any comment from your side which has a negative tone may not be helpful. So be prepared to accept that this is about your behavior in COM:FPC and many people already stated that your behavior is not acceptable. Who blocked you is not very relevant here. So please stop making such arguments. Jee 03:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Livio. Good to see you over here. I would suggest two things if you get unblocked. First, avoid problems with anybody voting at FPC, and let the past be the past; it's not worth the drama. My second suggestion would be to respond to questions and comments in Italian. People have translation gadgets, and this would help to avoid any misunderstandings. Anyways, I've posted my support for your unblock, and I hope you're able to come back. Two months is long enough! I only had to do a one month block [1]... Ciao! lNeverCry 04:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks lNeverCry,but probably ,if I were to be unlocked, and I had to participate in FP/QI, probably will not answer their,thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

That would also be an effective way to avoid problems. Nobody should be forced to participate in a proscribed way. How do people at FPC know what you have and haven't learned from criticism? They don't. You should be free to nominate your images and have them passed or failed according to their merit. You've got nearly 100 FPs, so it's not like you're trolling FPC with a bunch of junk. But all I can do is wish you good luck, and see how it goes. lNeverCry 08:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Jee,but I have never said to be a saint, just does not seem right to be blocked without being advise, always the same admin and go from one week to six months. Then if you want my behavior and other people we can talk all you want.Thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Livio, se serve scrivi in italiano, posso anche tradurre. Magari la barriera del linguaggio non aiuta. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 09:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Excuse me Jee, SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)}, we are after 11 days in 5 support my unblock and 2 not. Only for know,how time need to make a decision? thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Unblocked

I've removed your block. Blocking someone and then just letting their appeals die on the noticeboards is unacceptable. I can no longer sit by while this block just goes on until half a year is done. You deserved maybe a month block. If you can't be a part of this community, then neither can I. I feel like a coward just sitting by while you're appeals get archived. No more. If we have to fight, then we can fight. If we want to be fair and let you have your 2nd chance, then we can do that. What Livio has been under for 3 months is basically a super block. The regular avenues of appeal have ignored Livio, and that's not how my Commons treats people. We have no superblock here. lNeverCry 01:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks lNeverCry,you're a friend, but I believe them get paid --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Candelabrum of Salon de Mars du Château de Versailles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 18:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Louis XIV in place d'armes of Versailles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 18:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of Salon de Vénus du Château de Versailles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Amazing and maybe FP --The Photographer 18:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of Salon de Mars du Château de Versailles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 18:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of Hall of Mirrors (Palace of Versailles).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 11:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of a Young Man by Sandro Botticelli - Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prise de la ville et de la citadelle de Gand en six jours - Hall of Mirrors (Palace of Versailles).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Portrait of young man by Sandro Botticelli - Louvre.jpg

Hey man !

Have a look to the file page: this is an artwork caption !

Have fun !

--Jebulon (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes Jebulon,you have right.....but i was very busy! Sorry --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Be happy ! But I like very much building good captions, I find this interesting and that's why I did that for your Botticelli (very lovely, even if the dark looks too dark for me). I'll try to go to the Louvre next week...--Jebulon (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The triumph of french painting The apotheosis of Poussin,Le Sueur and Le Brune - Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La belle ferronnière,Leonardo da Vinci - Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of young man by Sandro Botticelli - Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De La Fosse's allegories on the dome over the Napoleone's tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glory of Florentine Saints on the dome in San Lorenzo (Florence).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Lorenzo (Turin) - Dome interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore (Florence).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of Grand cabinet de le reine - Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 21:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgin and Child Flanked by Sts Benedict and Quentin by Francesco Marmitta - Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Palace (Turin)- Ceiling royal staircase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegory Treaty of the Pyrenees Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Auxerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning photograph. Maybe a candidate for FP? -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Paris from the Pont de l'Archevêché by Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre d'Auxerre - interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 23:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:De La Fosse's allegories on the dome over the Napoleone's tomb.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:De La Fosse's allegories on the dome over the Napoleone's tomb.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Painted ceiling of the Palais du Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Halavar 22:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)