User talk:LeoRomero

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Jarekt, re your note below, if you would just please click on the link that I had entered into the Permission field when I uploaded the file, you will see that the owner published the image with a CC BY-NC 2.0 license. That page also includes a link to that license, but here it is anyway, for your ready reference. It may help you to know that with images on flickr, all you have to do is scroll down: licensing information is normally on the lower-righthand corner of each image page. - Thanks; LeoRomero (talk) 03:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Social Enterprise.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Social Enterprise.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anne Curzan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anne Curzan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BabelStone (talk) 19:05, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BabelStone: Just forwarded the authorization to permissions-commons. - Thanks; LeoRomero (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing that. BabelStone (talk) 19:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fastily: I emailed permissions on 2/24 but got no reply. Uploaded another photo instead. - Thanks; LeoRomero (talk) 00:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anne_Curzan_-_Anatol_Rodgers_Lecture.jpg[edit]

Hi Fastily - Let me know please why you deleted the file. I used the upload wizard and provided all the required information. I did not get a notice that it was flagged for deletion. So I don't know what I did wrong. - Thanks LeoRomero (talk) 01:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you personally take this photograph? If not, then do you have permission from the person who did to publish the file under a Commons-compatible license (if so, email COM:OTRS to get the file restored)? -FASTILY 05:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks User:Fastily. When I uploaded the photo with the owner's permission, I indicated the name of the copyright holder and the photographer, so no, I am not the photographer. Why does that even matter? The photographer is not the copyright holder. Nonetheless, as you requested, I have forwarded the email I received from the copyright holder to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. My question is why was this photo deleted without notice? - LeoRomero (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]