User talk:Lantus/Archiv/2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diese Datei enthält archivierte Diskussionsbeiträge. Bitte nicht bearbeiten.
This file is containing older threads. Please do not edit.


File:Atif Bashir Photo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rapsar (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Lantus/Archiv,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Lantus/Archiv,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Magst Du bei Bildnachbearbeitung helfen?[edit]

Hi Lantus! Also für die "Ankunft" ist es hoffentlich noch nicht die steile Abfahrt für immer, danke nochmal für Deinen Beitrag... Eben habe ich zwei wenig kategorisierte Bilder entdeckt, die ziemliches Potential haben. Dachte erst, die wären gemalt. Magst Du sie nachbearbeiten? File:Civita di Bagnoregio - La Città che muore.jpg könnte beschnitten werden: Links das Haus erhalten, evtl kürzen, unten weg bis kurz unterhalb des Verkehrsschildes (sollte drauf wegen des Gegenwartsbezugs, sonst wäre es fast Mittelalter – oder mach 2 Versionen!), also ohne die Autos und die zu reichliche Strasse, wenn die Mauer auch in die Bildmitte leitet. Möglichst viel vom Himmel erhalten, das Dorf schwimmt regelrecht im Wolkenmeer! Interessant sind auch Ausschnitte von der Bildmitte (Burgtor), sowie von den Erosionsstrukturen im rechten Bildteil, die wie mit Weichzeichner wirken, was vielleicht sanft verstärkt werden kann (WikiLovesEarth?). Die Wolken sind auch ein Thema an sich – was hatte der Fotograf für ein supi Fotowetter! Das siehst Du auch am zweiten Bild, das leider nicht so gut ist: Wurden die Ränder "abgewedelt" – so hätte ich das früher im Labor gemacht? Ist jedenfalls zu dunkel, vielleicht waren ja auch die Lichtverhältnisse so extrem; unten und rechts kann jedenfalls etwas vom Bildrand weg. Das Bildzentrum ist mir zu dunkel, der Schatten an der linken Hügelflanke stört, Kontrast und Farbe könnte auch höher sein, gerade weil das Gegenlicht in den Bäumen relativ romantisch wirkt. Interessant sind freilich die hellen Wolken links und die etwas kleinere rechts, sowie für einen Ausschnitt vom Festungstor das Gegenlicht in den Hausdächern – also ohne die beiden Touristengruppen auf dem Steg und der vielen Gegend rundrum. Kann dieses düstere Licht stärker? Na ja vielleicht machst Du ja was draus. Etwas prominenter verlinken, wenn's gut wird. Wird sicher besser als diese Postkarte mit Postkartenwetter, bei der auch das "C" mal hinterfragt werden sollte. Netten virtuellen Spaziergang wünsch ich Dir. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 08:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deinen Wunsch will ich gern erfüllen! Allerdings wird das erst Freitag oder Samstag was werden, da ich bis dahin komplett unterwegs und nicht im Büro bin. Technisch habe ich mit beiden Bildern meine Schwierigkeiten, sie scheinen schon stark digital bearbeitet worden zu sein, ausserdem gefällt mir die Qualität des Objektives nicht (das siehst Du beim ersten Bild bei den Autoscheiben, wo, etwas nach links versetzt, die Kontur noch einmal zu sehen ist und beim zweiten Bild an den Schornsteinen der Häuser oben auf dem Berg. Beim zweiten Bild wurde massiver digital getrickst, was Du an den rötlichen Kleidern der Leute erkennen kannst. Die Vignettierung des zweiten Bildes wird man kaum ganz entfernen können. Mir scheint es, als ob sie absichtlich nachträglich hineingebraucht wurde … warum auch immer. Ich melde mich an dieser Stelle, sobald ich fertig bin. Gruss aus Luxemburg, Lantus (talk) 15:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, doch lass Dir Zeit dabei, der Ort ist schon über 2000 Jahre alt, die Frühlingssonne sollte vorrangig auch mal Beachtung finden, auch wenn Bagnoregio nicht zu den entschleunigten Cittàslow zählt! "Objektiv" ist bei den Bearbeitungen mit Photoshop schon ein berechtigter Einwand, was mich nach längerer Betrachtung dazu geführt hat, die Bild-Beschreibung erst mal sachte wenigstens für das erste Bild zu ergänzen – als Hinweis an künftige Betrachter. Schade nur, dass der Photograph gerade für das zweite Bild – wo er es etwas mit dem "mach-Himmel-blau-und-alles-furchtbar-bunt-Programm" und der Himmelverdunkelung übertrieben hat, nicht die Originalaufnahmen in Commons eingestellt hat, was die Transparenz erhöhen und den Grad der Realitätsnähe offen legen würde. Andererseits sind gerade diese interpretativen Bearbeitungen im Vergleich zu vielen anderen Aufnahmen sehr reizvoll wie ich finde – bitte also nicht alles wegkorrigieren. Die malerische Bearbeitung von David Guerrini ("sterbende Stadt" ... ach hätte er nicht soviel abgeschattet) könnte vielleicht sogar vertieft werden: Weichzeichner? Auf "Fraktal"-Ebene eventuelle Farbkorrekturen mit kleinen Gedichten in verschiedenen Sprachen vornehmen (farbige, verschieden grosse Buchstaben wie bei googlemapwasserzeichen)? "italienische Bäume – sich düster in das Wolkenmeer bei Bagnorea streckend" (blau-schwarz, senkrecht zur Verstärkung der Bäume, als Korrektur für die blauen Linien am Hang),
"rote Baurutsche
im Spielplatz für Erwachsene" (vertikale rote Linie in Bagnoregio-Mitte)

mit dem
G E L B E N
K O N T R A
Punkt
(= gelber Punkt eines roten Ausrufezeichens als Highlight), was eine vielleicht ein wenig arg kreative Version wäre.

Schon ein interessantes Örtchen – wer dort schon alles vorbeikam: Garibaldians, diverse Kardinäle, der Ex-Pabst ...).

"Anmerkungen" im Bild ("Add a note") wären später mal eine Verlinkungsmöglichkeit, gerade die Calanchi, sowie die dort im Artikel verlinkten einzelnen Gebiete sowie Entwicklung und Naturschutz (u.a.) hätten eine Übersetzung ins Deutsche verdient, doch mein Italienisch ist dazu nicht gut genug. Die nächste WP/Commons-Generation muss ja noch grössere Aufgabenbereiche vorfinden. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 19:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
hmmm, ehrlich gesagt komme ich mit etwas klarer formulierten Aufgaben/Wünschen besser zurecht. :-/ Ich weiss jetzt nicht so recht, was ich für Dich machen soll. Lantus (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Konkreter, enger Fokus: 3 x Bilder ausschneiden vom Bild wie ganz oben beschrieben, mit Link zum Originalbild:
  • "Postkartenansicht" von Civita di Bagnoregio (evtl. für Die schönsten Dörfer Italiens)
  • Nahaufnahme, also ein Ausschnitt der Bildmitte von der linken Hügelflanke bis zur rechten Flanke mit dem dann gut sichtbaren Burgtor (für Seite Civita di Bagnoregio und Artikel in WP's)
  • "Calanchi", beginnend etwa ab Ende des Mäuerchens im Vordergrund bis hoch knapp über dem Horizont, also mit Baum und etwas gelbem Gebüsch, Steinhäusern und einem Teil der rechten Hügelflanke (für eine Commons-Seite Badlands und it:Calanchi)
Der kreative Panoramablick war wohl etwas zu philosophisch. Ich mache Dir nur unnötige Arbeit mit Konkreter Poesie, die sozusagen in mehreren Stufen irgendwann aus den beiden Bildern entstehen könnte: Erst fast unsichtbar im Foto, am Ende ein mehrsprachiges Gedicht für Category:Typographic art, dann fast ohne reales Dorf. Doch es gibt in der Tat wichtigeres, geniess lieber die Frühlingsluft im potentiellen Nationalpark Hunsrück, wo noch Fotos von Pflanzen, Tieren, Bächen in den Naturschutzgebieten fehlen, wenn Du mal hinkommst, vielleicht auch für Wiki Loves Earth geeignet. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 03:26, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Atif Bashir Photo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rapsar (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Lantus/Archiv,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Lantus/Archiv,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
File:Atif Bashir Photo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rapsar (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Scheme Gold Reef City.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Lantus/Archiv,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Lantus/Archiv,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo