User talk:L' empereur Charles/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"replaced by more precise"

I don't know how you work -- or exactly why there are so many of these -- but if possible, it would be a lot faster for the Admins if you gathered a day's work -- or even two or three day's work -- into one DR. Since they are all non-controversial -- almost qualifying for {{Speedy}} -- I'd just create one and then list all the rest in it without hanging {{t|delete)) tags and notifying on each one. I can delete a file with one keystroke, but it takes three more to close each DR. That may seem silly, but we have only enough Admin time to delete around 1,000 files a day and we should be doing 2,000 - 3,000, and are falling way behind. Every little bit helps. Thanks, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi! What do you think about File:Monconseil inf 1723.png? Do you want to present that file for deletion? Taivo (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:FhjPzTrp.png

File:FhjPzTrp.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bungert55 (talk) 07:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

K.u K. Kriegsmarine ranks

Why are you replacing rank insignia with that of low resolution and unwanted description below. I already reverted all changes you made in Polish-Wikipedia, and - if you do not restore previous images I am going to remove all section from the article. Your action is an unwanted pirating and won't be tolerated in the future. belissarius (talk) 15:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Because the ranks of the k.u.k. Kriegsmarine do not, I repeat do not have any NATO-Code classification. If you want wrong informations in your wp so that is you thing! To give you right informations is pirating? Oh Lord - poor Poland -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Emotions are not really helpful – oh Lord. However, I try to give a file description not to you as the explicit expert of k.u.k rank files. For normal people, not so familiar with the correct level of historical rank insignias, it might be interesting to have an orientation. I receive grateful response from newcomers. Only with that background I introduced the appropriate NATO equivalent. And by the way, the OR pell-mell in English speaking armed forces rank level is more than confusing. V.r. --HHubi (talk) 08:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh good Lord - that means that all the Ranks of a long gone Instition must be uplistet in the NATZO code? What Nato Rank code has per example an roman centurion? 0R-10? (hmpf!!!) -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Fotos von Südtiroler Denkmälern

Hallo L' empereur Charles, ich habe gerade gesehen daß du Fotos von Südtiroler Baudenkmälern hochgeladen hast. Wenn du das direkt über die Listen machst (neben dem Denkmal ist eine Ikone eines Fotoapparats), werden sie halbautomatisch kategorisiert. MfG --ManfredK (talk) 11:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die Info - allerdings gibt es mit den Liste Probleme schau mal auf die wp disk von sachme Servus, -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:L%27_empereur_Charles/Archive_1&oldid=536634538"