User talk:Krupski Oleg/QI-2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Messing.jpg[edit]

File:Messing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShinePhantom (talk) 08:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:W. Messing.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

File:G. Rogozin.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:G. Rogozin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:46, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:G.G.R..jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

File:G.G.R..jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:G.G.R..jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 23:31, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Стр.3.jpg[edit]

File:Стр.3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not scan all pages texts book! Only name and Index, table of Contents (name items). Find a person who knows the Russian language, that he analyzes. You are not logical. This book has 700 pages... Do you understand? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 10:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krupski Mikoaj.jpg[edit]

File:Krupski Mikoaj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Paul Krupski.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Krupski.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paul Krupski.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

File:Стр.6-7.jpg[edit]

File:Стр.6-7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not scan all pages texts book! Only name and Index, table of Contents (name items). Find a person who knows the Russian language, that he analyzes. You are not logical. This book has 700 pages... Do you understand? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 10:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Александр Крупский в 1984.jpg[edit]

File:Александр Крупский в 1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's means - scanner copy. Yes. You can change the license. But leave this picture. I trust you. I personally have been corresponding with this man! His surname is Krupski and my surname Krupski. I'm writing a story about our family. Do you understand? Krupski Oleg --Krupski Oleg (talk) 10:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Второй становится первым.jpg[edit]

File:Второй становится первым.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's means - scanner copy. Yes. You can change the license. But leave this picture. I trust you. I personally have been corresponding with this man! His surname is Krupski and my surname Krupski. I'm writing a story about our family. Do you understand? Krupski Oleg --Krupski Oleg (talk) 10:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:А. К. Крупский.jpg[edit]

File:А. К. Крупский.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have a prejudice against me! You break the rules of Wikipedia! You compel me write to Stewards about you! My argument - you are all my files to put on the destruction! - These files are made ​​by me with the publication of the book in 1840 years, there was no of modern of copyright laws in 1840 year! I did this on my home scanner. In my scanner, I would put copy (paper copy of this old book printed 1840). This xerocopy I did in the research library of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Russia. About this I have the documents and reader subscription libraries and historical archives (I've been doing research since 1995)! This is the Polish language! You used to take my files with the Russian language. You do not know the Polish language and do not know the Russian language for analyzing this files! - Painted portrait hangs in the University in the museum on the wall (portrait this man was 100 years ago) - then the camera on a mobile phone, then my computer. It's easy. - You threaten to delete the files created from me. You are privatized Wikipedia??? Krupski Oleg (talk) 20:34, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Крупский А. К..jpg[edit]

File:Крупский А. К..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have a prejudice against me! You break the rules of Wikipedia! You compel me write to Stewards about you! My argument - you are all my files to put on the destruction! - These files are made ​​by me with the publication of the book in 1840 years, there was no of modern of copyright laws in 1840 year! I did this on my home scanner. In my scanner, I would put copy (paper copy of this old book printed 1840). This xerocopy I did in the research library of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Russia. About this I have the documents and reader subscription libraries and historical archives (I've been doing research since 1995)! This is the Polish language! You used to take my files with the Russian language. You do not know the Polish language and do not know the Russian language for analyzing this files! - Painted portrait hangs in the University in the museum on the wall (portrait this man was 100 years ago) - then the camera on a mobile phone, then my computer. It's easy. - You threaten to delete the files created from me. You are privatized Wikipedia??? Krupski Oleg (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Str. 729 t. IV.jpg[edit]

File:Str. 729 t. IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have a prejudice against me! You break the rules of Wikipedia! You compel me write to Stewards about you! My argument - you are all my files to put on the destruction! - These files are made ​​by me with the publication of the book in 1840 years, there was no of modern of copyright laws in 1840 year! I did this on my home scanner. In my scanner, I would put copy (paper copy of this old book printed 1840). This xerocopy I did in the research library of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Russia. About this I have the documents and reader subscription libraries and historical archives (I've been doing research since 1995)! This is the Polish language! You used to take my files with the Russian language. You do not know the Polish language and do not know the Russian language for analyzing this files! - Painted portrait hangs in the University in the museum on the wall (portrait this man was 100 years ago) - then the camera on a mobile phone, then my computer. It's easy. - You threaten to delete the files created from me. You are privatized Wikipedia??? Krupski Oleg (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Str.223 t.5.jpg[edit]

File:Str.223 t.5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have a prejudice against me! You break the rules of Wikipedia! You compel me write to Stewards about you! My argument - you are all my files to put on the destruction! - These files are made ​​by me with the publication of the book in 1840 years, there was no of modern of copyright laws in 1840 year! I did this on my home scanner. In my scanner, I would put copy (paper copy of this old book printed 1840). This xerocopy I did in the research library of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Russia. About this I have the documents and reader subscription libraries and historical archives (I've been doing research since 1995)! This is the Polish language! You used to take my files with the Russian language. You do not know the Polish language and do not know the Russian language for analyzing this files! - Painted portrait hangs in the University in the museum on the wall (portrait this man was 100 years ago) - then the camera on a mobile phone, then my computer. It's easy. - You threaten to delete the files created from me. You are privatized Wikipedia??? Krupski Oleg (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Str.226-227 t.5.jpg[edit]

File:Str.226-227 t.5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have a prejudice against me! You break the rules of Wikipedia! You compel me write to Stewards about you! My argument - you are all my files to put on the destruction! - These files are made ​​by me with the publication of the book in 1840 years, there was no of modern of copyright laws in 1840 year! I did this on my home scanner. In my scanner, I would put copy (paper copy of this old book printed 1840). This xerocopy I did in the research library of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Russia. About this I have the documents and reader subscription libraries and historical archives (I've been doing research since 1995)! This is the Polish language! You used to take my files with the Russian language. You do not know the Polish language and do not know the Russian language for analyzing this files! - Painted portrait hangs in the University in the museum on the wall (portrait this man was 100 years ago) - then the camera on a mobile phone, then my computer. It's easy. - You threaten to delete the files created from me. You are privatized Wikipedia??? Krupski Oleg (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Str.224-225 t.5.jpg[edit]

File:Str.224-225 t.5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have a prejudice against me! You break the rules of Wikipedia! You compel me write to Stewards about you! My argument - you are all my files to put on the destruction! - These files are made ​​by me with the publication of the book in 1840 years, there was no of modern of copyright laws in 1840 year! I did this on my home scanner. In my scanner, I would put copy (paper copy of this old book printed 1840). This xerocopy I did in the research library of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Russia. About this I have the documents and reader subscription libraries and historical archives (I've been doing research since 1995)! This is the Polish language! You used to take my files with the Russian language. You do not know the Polish language and do not know the Russian language for analyzing this files! - Painted portrait hangs in the University in the museum on the wall (portrait this man was 100 years ago) - then the camera on a mobile phone, then my computer. It's easy. - You threaten to delete the files created from me. You are privatized Wikipedia??? Krupski Oleg (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do not upload scans of book with the option "its my own work". You reproduced something, thats not your own work. And now correct it!
Correct this now. --Martin H. (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have no particular prejudice against you, but I certainly have a problem with you. Any Administrator who finds a user who has uploaded several copyright violations is probably going to check all of that user's work, as I have done for the past year. This is simply common sense -- where there is one problem, there are probably more.
Almost all of the files you have uploaded in the last year are either
  • copyright violations
  • violations of the rights of a sculptor
  • violations of the rights of an architect, or
  • are described as "own work" when they are not.
The last group can be fixed, but you must do so. All of the rest will probably be deleted when their Deletion Requests have been open for a week. In addition, I have speedy deleted a number of files that were blatant copyright violations -- taken from web sites with explicit copyright notices. We take copyright seriously here and you must learn and understand its rules. If you continue to upload problem files, you will probably be blocked from editing on Commons.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC04474.JPG[edit]

File:DSC04474.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture "File:Wick harbor scotland.jpg" end etc (User:Jameslwoodward) analogically has a similar license ("self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL"), as it is in my photos (analogically). I own a digital camera for photographs in city ru:Аркадак (Arkadak), where the rest every year with my family. You love your pictures more than my files photos? You have nothing to do? Why do you want all of my photos to destroy? Are you a drug addict or an alcoholic, what are you doing on Wikipedia, why are you harassing my work??? My files are numbered automatically installed with a digital camera "DSC04474", "DSC04471", "DSC04472" and etc. My digital camera "Sony Cyber-shot (8.1 Megapixels)". Wikipedia this is free encyclopedia, they do not pay fees, but these are my files. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC04471.JPG[edit]

File:DSC04471.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture "File:Wick harbor scotland.jpg" end etc (User:Jameslwoodward) analogically has a similar license ("self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL"), as it is in my photos (analogically). I own a digital camera for photographs in city ru:Аркадак (Arkadak), where the rest every year with my family. You love your pictures more than my files photos? You have nothing to do? Why do you want all of my photos to destroy? Are you a drug addict or an alcoholic, what are you doing on Wikipedia, why are you harassing my work??? My files are numbered automatically installed with a digital camera "DSC04474", "DSC04471", "DSC04472" and etc. My digital camera "Sony Cyber-shot (8.1 Megapixels)". Wikipedia this is free encyclopedia, they do not pay fees, but these are my files. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC04472.JPG[edit]

File:DSC04472.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture "File:Wick harbor scotland.jpg" end etc (User:Jameslwoodward) analogically has a similar license ("self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL"), as it is in my photos (analogically). I own a digital camera for photographs in city ru:Аркадак (Arkadak), where the rest every year with my family. You love your pictures more than my files photos? You have nothing to do? Why do you want all of my photos to destroy? Are you a drug addict or an alcoholic, what are you doing on Wikipedia, why are you harassing my work??? My files are numbered automatically installed with a digital camera "DSC04474", "DSC04471", "DSC04472" and etc. My digital camera "Sony Cyber-shot (8.1 Megapixels)". Wikipedia this is free encyclopedia, they do not pay fees, but these are my files. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the explanation on the Deletion Requests. In all countries, if you take a photograph of a copyrighted work -- a painting, a sculpture, a building, a literary text, among other things -- then you have infringed on the copyright. If you do it for your own personal use, there is no problem. In some countries, but not Russia, there is an exception to the law which allows such photos to be kept here. We call this exception Freedom of Panorama but, again, it does not apply in Russia, so we cannot keep images of Russian sculpture or buildings unless the sculptor or architect has been dead for 70 years.
My image of Wick is not a problem for two reasons. First that there is nothing copyrighted -- no sculpture, no building -- that is visible in it. Second, Great Britain has FOP for buildings and sculpture.
I am not deliberately harassing you, but, as I said above, almost all of your uploads in the last year has been a problem for one reason or another. As I said, once I found several problems, I simply went back through your contributions one by one and marked almost all of them for deletion or correction.
You must:
  • stop uploading copyright violations,
  • stop claiming "own work" on material for which you did not actually take the picture or write the text,
  • stop making attack posts at unrelated pages such as you did at File talk:Wick harbor scotland.jpg,
  • stop making threats and
  • stop making personal insults.
If you do not change your behavior, you will be blocked from editing on Commons.
     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:47, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll take off a record "own work". You threaten to destroy my files, but I'm not threatened destroy your files!!! You do help me, but you not do persecute my work. You are required to clarify and ask questions. But you do impose the laws of a foreign country to me! I was born in the USSR, and I'm go in different countries (Commonwealth of Independent States), my photos of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Poland. You did not analyze the text my files on the Russian and Polish, you're not analyzing links my picture for Russian Wikipedia (city Arkadak). You suddenly filed a claim to me (your rigorism). You have to understand it - what it is like Your behavior for another person (on the part of another person from another country, with other laws). I wrote "own work", because it's made with my camera and my scanner in Russia and in Ukraine! --Krupski Oleg (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Commons rules require that all files be free in the USA as well as in the country of origin, so I am required to impose the rules of the USA on you and everyone else. However, there is no place in your files where the USA is a problem. Russia's lack of Freedom of Panorama is a problem for your pictures of buildings and sculpture, but the USA rule is easier, not harder. So the problem is always with Russian law (Ukraine is the same). On the other copyright matters, such as copying from books that still have a copyright, the rule is the same for every country.
But, again, I do not persecute. When I see when mistake, I look for more. When I see more mistakes, I keep looking. That is not presecution.
As for the old documents which you claimed as "old work", I think those have been properly closed out after chaning the author and source.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I have looked at all of your files that I tagged with {{Delete}}.
  • Some of them are copies from very old books which you claimed "own work". Those have now been corrected and the deletion requests have been closed as kept. Thank you for correcting your mistakes.
  • Some, such as File:Krupski Mikoaj.jpg, File:Крупский А. К..jpg, and File:А. К. Крупский.jpg, appear to be copyright violations, but more information about when and where the images were first published might allow them to be kept on Commons.
  • Some, such as File:Стр.3.jpg, are scans from recent books and appear to be clear copyright violations. They cannot be kept without permission from the publisher.
  • [:File:Александр Крупский в 1984.jpg]] and File:Второй становится первым.jpg are scans of recent (1980s) publications that are still under copyright. They cannot be kept without permission from the owner of the copyright.
  • File:DSC04474.JPG, File:DSC04471.JPG, and File:DSC04472.JPG, infringe the copyright of the sculptor or architect and cannot be kept on Commons without permission from those people.
  • I have just tagged File:Family Krupski M. A..jpg. The description suggests that this image has never been published before its publication here. If that is true, then it will have a US copyright until 2064 (120 years after creation in 1944). That copyright belongs to the heirs of the unknown photographer, so there is no one from whom we can get permission.
Therefore, the answer to your question is that no one is allowed to remove the {{Delete}} tags from your files until the Deletion Requests are closed after one week. I expect that most, perhaps all of them, will be deleted, although, as I said above, more information might help with a few.
Please take the time to understand the laws and rules under which you and I both must work. You seem to think that you can upload almost anything without worrying about other people's rights -- photographers, publishers, sculptors, and architects.
     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Family Krupski M. A..jpg[edit]

File:Family Krupski M. A..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your "unlikely" - is in your head. And the reality is a ... I to confess to you, so you do not delete my photos. Because he received the title (Rear Admiral in 1944), a new form after 1943 in the USSR! His son (pictured) - this is his grandfather (his grandson gave me this photo.) His grandson - a Russian citizen. I was born in the Soviet Union (I am in Ukraine), and we ourselves have done pictures, all the people in USSR make (own hands - no professional photographer) their photos (black and white) and put into own paper album. Years passed ... I use it for Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia. I can prove, even in court - I have this picture in my email, from his great-grandson of Russia do give me it (his address too with text, and genealogy). I wrote an article about his great-grandfather in Wikipedia. Do you understand me? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I was young - there was no digital photocamera. And I'll did the same photos at home without a license. And they just did too! And I can tell you write technology it. I'm tired of explaining to you - the obvious thing for the former Soviet Union. No license, I bring into the public domain, because I wrote an article about this man, I found his descendants received from them this picture (voluntarily). If you do not understand this, then find someone who is understand on Russian (in WikiMedia Commons) - instead of you, to communicate with me. Because you can not make a fair analysis my files photos from the USSR. This and other photos - please, you of leave, remove the template "delete". Tell me what template to put in to leave a photo for illustration my article in Wikipedia, because this him. You are well understood, I can prove the transfer of photos to me from his great-grandson (pictured old - it was his great-grandfather, a young man - it was his grandfather, a woman - it is his grandmother.) When your had great-grandparents lived (period your great-grandparents too) - you do think. He gave me his family tree (family relationship), to prove. So have. No copyright infringements. I've hung templates (on my personal page) - I'm from Kiev, and so on. I'm not in the U.S.. Source of pictures - Soviet Union (now Russia and Ukraine). Your arguments spread on the military USA (in the military uniform of the U.S.) from USA 1940-1950s, photographs from the U.S., made by U.S. citizens! They and I - are not U.S. citizens (and picture taken outside the U.S.)!!! How do you understand that? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 07:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Please do not add top level general categories such as

to images. These general categories are not intended to be used for images, but only as parents of more specific categories.

In addition, Biographies is a subcat of Books, so you must not ever use both on one file.

You might, instead use categories such as:

and similar categories where appropriate.

Please remove all of the general cats you have recently added.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for for three days.. The reason for the block is for removing {{Delete}} tags from files a second time after being warned. (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

The files affected are:

File:Абрамович-УАПЦ.jpg[edit]

File:Абрамович-УАПЦ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Рогачёвский уезд.jpg[edit]

File:Рогачёвский уезд.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:11, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep  Comment This is a fragment map in 1865 years: Russian empire, Mogilev province - fragment from map Mogilev Governorate "Rogachev district". Fragment of the map, I do copy, I did painted, I did touch-up (because this the map is very old). It is located in the scientific and historical library (inventory # 40594) - I took it personally. Written on the map Old Russian language. - I appealed to all administrators who know the Russian language. For you personally told - I do not wish your administration. So is why you are not able to analyze my files: you do not know the Russian language, you do not know Russian history and Soviet history. My file is linked to this story. You have a lot to explain. What not to do Russian administrators here. You did not fair ID Lock 99664. You aggressively impose their services and your attention (en:Wikipedia:WikiVampire). You make an absurd (en:Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point). You are doing the vandalism against my files (en:Wikipedia:Vandalism). You do discriminate to my files, because I analyzed the relation the files of the U.S., etc.

 Comment Там источником не была ваша работа. Источником была научная библиотека, причём вы не указали, КАКАЯ именно библиотека и ГДЕ, КОГДА опубликована эта карта. Может оказаться, что вы присвоили чужие права и ненароком совершаете подлог.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ответ[edit]

  • Отвечаю вам на своём обсуждении.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • A propos: не обвиняйте Jameslwoodward в вандализме, вы пока не очень чётко разобрались в сути свободного лицензирования и в том, у кого какие права. Don't claim Jameslwoodward as a vandalism maker: you just don't clearly catch the idea of free licenses, and you don't see who has the author's rights, and how.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Я согласен с вами. Но прошу вашей помощи мне в подборе лицензий к загружаемым мною файлам, а не в вашем скоропостижном удалении моих фотографий и сканер-копий. Так как я уважаю авторские права, я НЕ занимаюсь коммерцией используя файлы, я НЕ получаю гонораров за мою роботу в Википедии и Викимедиа-коммон. Предубеждений к Jameslwoodward у меня НЕТ, просто объясните ему то, что понимаете вы в технологии домашнего изготовления чёрнобелых фотографий периода СССР (и периода Российской империи), что я в научной библиотеке брал старинные книги на русском и польском языке и карты для сканирования дома (это не нарушает авторские права), что мои файлы с моего цифрового фотоаппарата - это "ru:Доска почёта" в ru:Аркадак, а не "ru:Панорама" (который он удалил и не правильно трактовал и блокировал мой ай-пи адрес за мою критику его поведения "идентификатор блокировки 99664"). И так далее. Он должен понимать, что он бывает НЕ прав. Так как я видел файлы Jameslwoodward на его личной странице фотографии с его цифрового фотоаппарата с аналогичными же лицензиями (как и мои)...но к моим он имел претензии! Мне известно про политику "сдерживания" загрузки файлов на ваш сервер вне США...я наблюдал то обилие файлового мусора (порой откровенно изображающую моральное уродство в Америке), который грузят не из СНГ. А я занимаюсь историческим исследованием для публикации и развития Википедии. И они мои файлы ценят меньше, чем изображения их морально незрелых глупостей. Где справедливость по-вашему? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 07:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Подробности по пунктам[edit]

  • 1) Викисклад — это не для меня, не для вас. Это место для всех. Поэтому каждое действие на Викискладе делается с расчётом на всех.
  • 2) Среди жителей мира есть коммерсанты, которые приходят на Викисклад за свободными изображениями. Если вы не обеспечили свободного изображения, значит, ваш поступок не подходит для Викисклада. Он годится для другого сайта, а здесь он просто будет неуместным.
  • 3) Вы пишете, что фотография сделана в домашних условиях. Откуда вы это узнали, кто вам это сообщил? Будьте добры предоставить доказательство своей правоты. Без такого доказательства другие участники Викисклада не могут однозначно и твёрдо поверить вашим словам. Если вы заняты историческим исследованием, прошу вас, помните о чужих авторских правах. Вы можете разрешить ВСЕМ использовать картинки СВОБОДНО, только если у вас есть право давать такие разрешения. А такое право вы должны получить у автора картинок. Именно об этом вас и просят участники Викисклада.
  • 4) Вы удивлены, что «ваши файлы» ценят не так сильно, хотя они полезны. Ошибка тут очень серьёзная. Дело в том, что это... не ваши файлы. Они принадлежат не вам, а фотографам, которые создали исходные фотографии. Чтобы говорить про «ваши файлы», вы должны получить у этих фотографов право на такие фотографии. Сейчас, пока это файлы других фотографов (возможно, покойных) и их наследников, ваши слова вызывают недоверие и подозрения.
  • 5) Старинные книги — это отличное решение. Каждый раз, когда вы так делаете, будьте добры, пожалуйста, укажите точную ссылку: автор, название книги, издательство, место издания, год, номер страницы. Тогда любой человек сможет проверить, как оно там на самом деле. И тогда любой человек твёрдо знает, что изображение действительно можно использовать как угодно, и этот любой станет вам очень благодарен.
  • РЕЗЮМЕ. Старайтесь обеспечить людям уверенность.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krupski_Oleg/QI-2012&oldid=84967916"