User talk:Kowelenzer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kowelenzer!


Hallo Kowelenzer,
schön dass du zu uns gestossen bist. Allerdings ist anderen und nun auch mir aufgefallen, dass du eine Reihe neuer Kategorien auf deutsch angelegt hast. Unserer Richtlinien gemäß müssen Kategorienamen, mit Ausnahme von Eigennamen, auf englisch sein. Dadurch dass du die Kat. auf deutsch angelegt hast, gibt es sie nun vermutlich doppelt, weil die englischsprachige vermutlich längst existiert. Bevor du weitere Kat. anlegst, empfehle ich dir Commons:Categories zu studieren. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So wie ich das verstehe, ist die englische Sprache nicht zwingend notwendig, da es Leute geben soll die kein Englisch können! Auch für die muß ein Weg offen sein! Kowelenzer (talk) 06:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, nein. Es gibt keine Parallelstrukturen! Du bist frei ein eigenes Commons aufzumachen, wenn dir das nicht gefällt. --Túrelio (talk) 06:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für Deinen zynischen Ratschlag Kowelenzer (talk) 06:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mag sein, dass du das als zynisch auffasst. Das ist auf Wikis nunmal die Standardempfehlung an diejenigen, das mal eben vorbeikommen und meinen, nun müsste aber alles anders werden, weil sie es eben so wollen. --Túrelio (talk) 06:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Und bzgl. der Sprache kannst du hier Category:Construction trailers sehen, wie man das löst. Man setzt einfach die entsprechenden deutschen (und sonstigsprachlichen) Begriffe auf die Kategorieseite und setzt darüber hinaus interwikis (Links auf den entsprechenden Begriff in anderen Wikimedia-Projekten; also z.B. zur de-Wikipedia). Das Besondere an Commons ist ja gerade, dass es ein multinationales Projekt ist. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo-Tipps[edit]

Die beiden Gebäude, die du hier File:Ko jun10 064.jpg und File:Ko jun10 050.jpg aufgenommen hast, sind eigentlich schön; du könntest beim Photographieren aber etwas sorgfältiger sein. In beiden Fällen hast du die Gebäudespitze abgeschnitten. Im Fall der Kapelle wäre das einfach zu vermeiden gewesen, wenn du weniger von dem uninteressanten Vordergrund aufs Bild genommen, also die Kamera etwas höher gerichtet hättest. Im 2. Fall hättest du einfach etwas größeren Abstand nehmen müssen, sofern das möglich ist. Vielleicht kommst du da ja nochmal vorbei ... File:Ko jun10 056.jpg ist sichtbar unscharf/verwackelt, was bei 1/15 sec auch kein Wunder ist; nächstes Mal den Blitz zuschalten. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Kowelenzer!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karneval Ko 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

L' empereur Charles (talk) 16:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karneval Ko 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

L' empereur Charles (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karneval Ko3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

L' empereur Charles (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:RoW KomW.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

L' empereur Charles (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC) [reply]